丰城三溪峡——东乡石马岭推覆构造是扬子板块与华南板块的直接分界线

扬子板块与华南板以丰城三溪峡－东乡石马岭推覆构造分野。该推覆构造发育在萍乡－广丰深断裂与遂川－德兴深断裂的复合部位，具有可行－逆冲推覆性质。原地系统为扬子地层分区中元古界牛头岭组、高桥组和将军岭组，外来系统是华南地层分区新元古界源里组，分别相当于蓟县系修水组和青白口系上施组同期沉积。根据推覆变形形式、构造岩特征和变形程度，可将推覆体划分为包括糜棱岩亚带、糜棱岩化亚带在内的变形主带和劈理化带。韧性剪切变形与推覆变形同期产生，但影响范围更广泛。     

Oligocene–Miocene thrusting in central Aegean: insights from the Cycladic island of Amorgos

In the central Aegean, the Cycladic island of Amorgos consists of two high‐pressure (HP) units, the marble‐rich Amorgos unit, which is correlated to the Mesozoic ‘cover’ sequence of the Menderes Massif, and the Cycladic Blueschist unit. New structural data show that the deformation history of the Amorgos HP‐rocks was principally governed by early Oligocene (or late Eocene)–early Miocene ductile to brittle thrusting (D₁–D₃) followed by middle–late Miocene oblique contractional movements (D₄–D₅). The D₁ phase caused syn‐blueschist‐facies ductile thrusting of the Cycladic Blueschist unit over the Amorgos unit, with ambiguous kinematics. Progressive deformation under continuous NW–SE compression produced a sequence of imbricate NW‐directed thrusts (D_2/3) characterized by a stratification of fault‐related rocks, with mylonitic zones (D₂) giving way downwards to cataclastic zones (D₃). Ductile D₂ thrusting synchronous to greenschist‐facies retrogression, was accompanied by mega‐sheath folding during constrictional and general shear deformation. Brittle D₃ thrusting was associated with NW‐verging F₃ folds trending at a high‐angle to the transport direction. Orthogonal contraction gave way to transpression during which the compression orientation changed from NW–SE (D₄) to NE–SW (D₅). Back‐arc related NW–SE pure extension (D₆) seems to have been established in post‐late Miocene times and related high‐angle normal faulting affected HP‐rocks only after they had already reached the uppermost crustal levels. Oligocene–early Miocene deformation history is interpreted to indicate syn‐compressional exhumation of HP‐rocks possibly in an extrusion wedge. In this case, Amorgos HP‐rocks should have occupied the base of the extrusion wedge. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

湖北省随枣地区推覆构造格局的研究

研究区构造格局的基本特征是上地壳多层次自北而南的逆冲—拆离，柳林、洪清、大洪山３条逆掩断层与深部拆离面一起组成了尖端指向南的楔形薄皮构造。逆冲系统以背驮式扩展演化。多层次推覆构造格局因后期高角度断裂的切割破坏而复杂化，构造格局定型时代为燕山期     

鄂尔多斯盆地西缘中段构造特征与油气勘探前景

鄂尔多斯盆地西缘中段是西缘构造带的重要组成部分,关于该区的地下构造模式由于受地下构造复杂与地震资料品质差的影响长期以来缺乏清晰的认识。通过地表地质、大量地震资料的综合研究,纵向上以下古生界类复理石浊积岩系、上古生界煤系区域性滑脱层为界,将该区划分为上部的逆冲推覆构造系统和下部的原地系统。前者断裂、褶皱发育,由6个逆冲席组成,横向分带性特征明显,自西向东划分为逆冲推覆构造主体、前缘过渡带、前缘带三个带;后者构造变形较弱,总体为西倾单斜,局部地区发育完整背斜圈闭。前缘过渡带、前缘带及原地系统勘探目的层众多,油气成藏地质条件好,勘探前景较好;逆冲推覆构造主体目的层已裸露,油气生成与保存条件较差,勘探潜力欠佳。     

Northward younging zircon fission‐track ages from 13 to 2 Ma in the eastern extension of the Kathmandu nappe and underlying Lesser Himalayan sediments distributed to the south of Mt. Everest

This study is concerned with the tectono‐thermal history of the Kathmandu nappe and the underlying Lesser Himalayan sediments (LHS) that are distributed in eastern Nepal. We carried out zircon fission‐track(ZFT) dating and obtained 16 ZFT ages from the eastern extension of the Kathmandu nappe, the Higher Himalayan Crystalline, Kuncha nappe, and the Main Central Thrust (MCT) zone. The ZFT ages of the frontal part of the Kathmandu nappe range from 13.0 ±0.8 Ma to 10.7 ±0.7 Ma and exhibit a northward‐younging tendency. These Middle Miocene ZFT ages indicate that the frontal part of the Kathmandu nappe remained at a temperature above 240 °C until the termination of its southward emplacement at 12–11 Ma. The ZFT ages of the LHS range from 11.1 ±0.9 Ma in the southern part of the Okhaldhunga Window to 2.4 ±0.3 Ma of the augen gneiss in the northern margin and also exhibit a northward‐younging age distribution. The ZFT ages show the northward‐younging linear distribution pattern (?0.16 Ma/km) along the across‐strikesection from the frontal part of the Kathmandu nappe to the root zone, without a significant age gap. This distribution pattern indicates that the Kathmandu nappe, the underlying MCT zone, and the Kuncha nappe cooled from the frontal zone to the root zone as a thermally united geologic body at a temperature below 240 °C. An older ZFT age (456.3 ±24.3 Ma), which was partially reset at the axial part of the Midland anticlinorium in the central part of the Okhaldhunga Window, was explained by downward heating from the “hot” Kathmandu nappe. The above evidence supported a model that southward emplacement of the hot Kathmandu nappe resulted in a thermal imprint on the upper part of the LHS; however, the lower part did not reach 240 °C.     

大别山商城石门冲一带中生代逆冲推覆构造

笔者运用1∶5万双柳树幅、白雀园幅区域地质调查成果,阐述商城石门冲一带发育的逆冲推覆构造。大别山商城石门冲一带中生代逆冲推覆作用,使本区发育的中—新元古界龟山岩组、下古生界石门冲岩组、上古生界石炭系及中生界朱集组等,不同程度卷入NE向逆冲推覆系统中,形成一系列构造窗、飞来峰和叠瓦状逆冲断层带。逆冲推覆距离最小约为6 km,形成时代约为中侏罗世—晚侏罗世之间,最晚不超过早白垩世。     

大青山逆冲推覆体系含义及地质特征

大青山逆冲推覆体系是三叠纪中后期至白垩纪漫长的脉动式的造山过程形成的一套完整的逆冲推覆体系，是由一系列由南向北逆冲推覆构造岩片相互叠置构成。它涉及了前寒武纪变质杂岩，古生代沉积地层和中生代陆相沉积地层，并伴随有印支期岩浆活动。在变形旋回上表现为多期和多阶段的脉动式，印支期表现为南向北逆冲推覆和强烈的岩浆活动，燕山期表现为南南东向北北西推覆，形成了褶皱系统和劈理系统。     

成都平原的形成与演化

成都平原是位于青藏高原东南侧前缘的第四纪压陷盆地，东西两侧分别被龙泉山和龙门山所限。研究表明，成都平原的第四纪断陷作用从大邑－彭县－绵竹隐伏断裂和浦江－新津－成都－德阳断裂所夹的北东向断块的为民陷开始，然后向东西两侧扩展。不同断裂在不同时代的逆冲运动对成都平原的形成和演化起重要的制约作用。     

福建省推覆构造研究及其意义

本文主要是根据“闽西南地区推覆构造与隐伏煤田预测研究”的主要成果来写的。在概述两次研究课题取得主要成果的同时，对福建省重大基础地质有关的问题提出了新的认识。文中重点是总结了福建省推覆构造发育的特征，将推覆构造划分为两大类（逆冲推覆构造，拆离构造）和五种类型（中深层次逆冲推覆构造、浅层次逆冲推覆构造、褶皱逆冲推覆构造和拆离（滑脱）构造、褶皱拆离构造），对各类型的主要特征、分布规律、组合特征和推覆构造的发生和发展进行系统的总结，明确指出了燕山早期中深层次边冲推覆构造是福建省规模最大、对今后寻找隐伏矿产关系最密切和最重要的推覆构造，对研究我省的推覆构造具有重要意义。并结合福建省的实际，从基础地质和找矿两方面进行论述。