河北西北部熔积岩特征及其地质意义

熔积岩是火山碎屑岩的一种特殊类型，由熔浆和未固结的湿沉积物两种组分掺杂混合而成。熔积岩的形成主要受炽热熔浆与未固结的湿沉积物接触时引起的淬碎或蒸汽爆炸作用以及寄主沉积物流体化作用控制，通常分布于熔岩流底部或前缘，也可分布于超浅成侵人体周围。据熔浆碎屑物的结构特征，冀西北熔积岩可分为流状和块状两种类型。流状熔积岩多是熔浆与细粒沉积物混合的结果，块状熔积岩大多与粗粒沉积物相关。正确鉴别熔积岩对确定沉积作用与岩浆作用的时序、研究盆地发展演化历史具有重要意义。     

内蒙古黄岗梁锡铁多金属矿床层状夕卡岩的喷流沉积成因

内蒙古自治区黄岗梁矿床是大兴安岭中南段的一个大型Sn-Fe多金属矿床,燕山期火山侵入岩广泛出露,通过对矿床地球化学特征的系统研究,并结合矿床地质特征,得出的主要研究成果为:①与含微细浸染胶状锡的磁铁矿层共生的层状夕卡岩与海底火山活动关系密切,是一种很具特色的喷流岩;②REE地球化学特征表明,该矿床层状夕卡岩与典型岩浆热液接触交代夕卡岩存在较大差异,而与现代海底热流体和喷流型矿床及其共生的热水沉积岩有较大的相似性,应属热水喷流成因;③层状夕卡岩的碳、氧同位素组成关系可与许多沉积喷流型块状硫化物矿石及其共生的喷流岩相对比,暗示了两者具有相似的形成机理。     

金伯利岩中“熔离小球”的特征及其成因

在金伯利岩人工重砂中发现的“熔离小球”,直径多数<1 mm,除个别出现微晶外,均为非晶质,属于熔体淬火冷却产物。提供了29个小球的主元素分析和3件微量元素分析结果。“熔离小球”按成分可分为3种类型:(1)高铁钛小球;(2)硫铁镍小球;(3)浅色硅铝质小球。其中高铁小球w(FeO)高达99.39%,高钛小球w(TiO2)达45.90%,它们含MnO也偏高,最高达23.75%。Fe、Mn、Ti都属于高负电性元素,在熔体中与氧结合的键强度大,容易发生熔离。硫铁镍小球的w(SO3)变化于38.27%~51.95%,w(FeO)为0.31%~23.10%,w(NiO)为25.24%~61.05%。浅色小球w(SiO2)变化范围为24.01%~52.64%,Al2O3、CaO含量高但变化范围大,总体成分接近基性—超基性硅酸盐熔浆。主元素、微量元素特征以及硫铁镍小球中发现了高镁(Fo=0.95)橄榄石捕虏晶表明,小球形成于金伯利岩岩浆的介质环境。此外高铁及硅铝质两种成分呈交生结构的两相小球的发现,暗示二者为熔离作用成因。小球的熔离作用可以应用SiO2-FeS-FeO的液态不混溶相图做出解释。认为小球形成于岩浆结晶的晚期阶段,相对富含CO2、SO3、FeO、MnO、TiO,在岩浆快速上升、快速降温、降压、熔体中出现了多种局部有序区的条件下发生的。     

郭家岭岩体矿物包裹体研究

通过对胶东金成矿区郭家岭岩体中熔融包裹体、含石盐子晶包裹体、ＣＯ２三相包裹体和Ｈ２Ｏ两相包裹体的显微测温,结果表明,该岩体在岩浆结晶晚期发生过高盐度流体与硅酸盐熔体的不混熔过程。根据熔融包裹体均一温度与均一过程的时间,利用相应公式,计算出郭家岭岩体包裹体熔体的粘度和含水量,认为该岩体是从一种高温高粘度的岩浆中结晶成岩的。     

岩浆侵位机制研究综述

岩浆侵位机制是研究地球动力作用的重要依据,综合国内外资料,对岩浆侵位机制提出了按侵位深度,岩浆迁移距离,岩浆结晶程度的分类方案及其联合侵位类型。分别对各类侵位机制 岩浆侵位过程,特点,研究现状进行了综述,并讨论了岩浆定位空间问题和影响岩浆定位的因素。     

The magma evolution of Tianchi volcano, Changbaishan

The Changbaishan Tianchi volcano is composed of the basaltic rocks at the shield-forming stage, the trachyte and pantellerite at the cone-forming stage and modern eruption. Studies on their REE, incompatible elements and Sr, Nd, Pb isotopes suggest that rocks at different stages have a common magma genesis and close evolution relationship with differentiation crystallization playing the key role. The co-eruption of basaltic trachyandesite magma and pantellerite magma indicates that there exist both crustal magma chamber and mantle magma reservoir beneath the Tianchi volcano. Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 49672109).     

腾冲火山活动监测,预测与对策研究中的若干重要问题

《膳冲火山活动监测、预测与对策研究》项目是一项集火山活动监测研究、防灾及资源综合开发与利用为一体的系统工程。需要火山地质、地震、地球化学、地球物理、地壳形变及地热等诸多相关学科的合理配置和联合攻关。在过去的３０年,众多学和研究实体对腾冲火山进行 大量的观察和研究获得一批与火山活动的相关的基础研究成果。其中也不乏说明腾冲火山存在在喷发危险性的证据。为了保证本重大项目能在有限时间内及有限的人力、财务     

腾冲火山区水平形变初探

介绍了采用精密大地测量的方法,对腾冲火山区域的水平形变情况进行了探索。通过两期相距３８年的实测数据,对火山“休眠期”中岩浆活动与地壳局部变形的相关性进行研究,并提供了部分计算结果。作者认为,采用精密大地测量的方法对火山区域地壳变形进行研究是可行的;火山区域水平形变与构造形变的区别是存在的;腾冲火山区内近几十年内岩浆的动也是明显的,但目前总体为间歇性收缩期;从水平形变测量的结果来看,显示了南面活跃的迹象;且认为可能是岩浆囊的存在才会引起此大范围的地壳活动。     

Intrusion–Related Vein Gold Deposits: Types, Tectono-Magmatic Settings and Difficulties of Distinction from Orogenic Gold Deposits

Abstract: A spectrum of intrusion-related vein gold deposits is recognized. Representative examples are described of the following geochemical associations: Au-Fe oxide–Cu, Au–Cu–Mo–Zn, Au–As–Pb–Zn–Cu, Au–Te–Pb–Zn–Cu and Au–As–Bi–Sb. The associated intrusions range from small outcropping stocks to complex batholiths. The different vein associations are believed to reflect the compositions of related intrusions, which themselves characterize distinct tectonic settings. The Au-Fe oxide–Cu and Au–Cu–Mo–Zn associations belong to two broad groups of deposits, Fe oxide–Cu–Au and porphyry Cu–Au, both of which are related to highly oxidized calc-alkaline intrusions emplaced in sub–duction–related arcs. The Au–As–Pb–Zn–Cu association seems to be linked to somewhat less oxidized intrusions emplaced in a similar setting. The Au–Te–Pb–Zn–Cu association, which possesses well-known epithermal counterparts, is also found with highly oxidized intrusions, but of alkaline composition and back-arc location. In contrast, the Au–As–Bi–Sb association, part of a newly recognized class of intrusion-hosted Au–Bi–W–As deposits, is related to relatively reduced intrusions, spanning the boundary between the magnetite– and ilmenite–series. Such intrusions, which may host major bulk-mineable gold deposits, were emplaced along the landward sides of arcs, possibly during lulls in subduction, as well as in continental collision settings. Therefore, a variety of geological environments is prospective for vein and, by extrapolation, other styles of gold mineralization, not all of them fully appreciated in the past. Several features of vein gold deposits, including imprecise relationships to individual intrusive phases, poorly developed mineral and metal zoning, apparent time gaps between intrusion and mineralization and presence of low–salinity, CO₂–rich fluid inclusions, are commonly taken to indicate a non-igneous origin and to be more typical of orogenic (mesothermal) gold deposits generated during accretionary tectonic events. However, several or all of these features apply equally to some intrusion– related vein gold deposits and, therefore, do not constitute distinguishing criteria. The currently popular assignment of most gold-rich veins to the orogenic category requires caution, because of the geological convergence that they show with some intrusion-related deposits. A proper distinction between intrusion-related and orogenic gold deposits is crucial for exploration planning.