川东北地区陆相两类砾岩岩石与储层特征

川东北地区发育上三叠统须家河组须四段和下侏罗统自流井组珍珠冲段两套陆相砾岩储层。根据对岩心、测井、岩石薄片、物性等多种资料的深入研究,认为两类砾岩分别发育于高位冲积扇和低位扇三角洲体系中,西部须家河组以钙质砾岩为主,胶结作用为方解石胶结,发育裂缝型储层; 东部须家河组和整个珍珠冲段以石英质砾为主,硅质砾及火山岩砾次之,主要为粘土矿物胶结和硅质胶结,发育孔隙-裂缝型储层,两类砾岩邻近烃源岩,具备良好的生储盖条件,是有利的勘探目标。     

The most primitive lower tetrapod fauna in China

A comprehensive analysis of the fauna indicates that three vertebrate assemblage zones existed in the Upper Permian of China. Among them the Dashankou lower tetrapod fauna consisting mainly of therapsids is the most primitive and abundant one. It is more closely related to Zone II of Russia than to theEodicynodon Assemblage Zone of South Africa. Zone II of Russia in the Late Permian played a role of bridge for the dispersal of tetrapods from North America to South Africa and China at that time     

兰新线玉门段防护体系经济效益分析

兰新线玉门段防护体系的主要组成部分是阻（固）沙带和防风带。调查计算了体系中各措施的防护周期、截沙量、林带对风速的影响及成本投资,从防护效果和成本两方面进行经济价值分析,为建造经济型铁路防护体系提供科学依据。     

论砾岩层控型半宽金矿的地质特征和成因

半宽金矿产于崤山地体铁铜沟组与下代岩层的不整合面或铁铜沟组底砾岩中，赋矿层金丰度明显高于其它岩石，属典型的层控矿床，称之砾岩层控型。矿物包裹体、同位素、微量元素等研究表明，矿床形成经历了Ⅰ期高温变质热液蚀变矿化、Ⅱ期中温变质－雨水混合热液蚀变矿化、Ⅲ期低温雨水热液蚀变矿化。Ⅲ期对矿床形成的贡献较小。成矿物质来源复杂，以深源为主。矿床形成于中生代沿马超营断裂向北的陆内俯冲作用，结晶基底与上覆地层的不整合面及上覆地层的底部是寻找半宽式金矿的有利位置。     

2002年玉门5.9级地震序列精确定位和发震构造研究

用“双差法”对2002年12月14日甘肃玉门5．9级地震的主震和余震序列进行了重新精确定位,在此基础上讨论了本次地震的发震断层和发震机制。结果表明,在汇合处玉门断裂向深部延伸和旱峡一大黄沟断裂汇合在汇合处的断层面上发生逆推错动,造成这次主震和余震的能量释放。     

2002年12月14日甘肃玉门5.9级强震余震记录

介绍了2002年12月14日21时27分甘肃玉门Ms 5.9破坏性地震后,在流动观测中所获取的强余震记录资料,并对其进行了地震波动力学特性的初步分析.     

甘肃康县一带碧口岩群砾岩成因类型及其构造意义

在甘肃康县南部出露的碧口岩群中夹有3种不同类型的砾岩,这3种砾岩在空间分布上具有一定的范围,反映不同的成因环境和构造环境。特别是构造砾岩与韧性剪切带中糜棱岩相伴生,在区域上研究划分剪切带具有一定的意义。     

2002年12月14日玉门5.9级地震活动及序列特征

根据玉门地区区域构造环境和中强震基本活动特征,分析了2002年12月14日玉门5．9级地震前地震活动性时空异常特征和地震序列类型,结果表明,地震前存在地震空区、条带、低频度、低b值、缺震、高η值、小震调制比和GL值高值等中短期异常现象;地震序列类型为前震—主震—余震型;其发震构造为一组挤压逆冲推覆断裂。     

Reply to Molina-Garza et al. (2019) “Discussion of: Ortega-Flores et al. (2018) provenance analysis of Oligocene sandstone from the Cerro Pelón area,southern Gulf of Mexico”

ABSTRACT

The origin of the Oligocene turbidites from the Cerro Pelón area in south Gulf Mexico proposed by Ortega-Flores et al. (2018) is in disagree with the interpretations made by Molina-Garza et al. (2019), which main criticism is based on U-Pb ages of detrital zircons from the matrix of a conglomerate unit, which they refer to as ‘Nanchital Conglomerate’, as well as on the presence of limestone, gabbros, and mafic protolith-derived clasts. Molina-Garza et al. (2019) basically interpret the Nanchital Conglomerate as Miocene in age, which was sourced mainly from metamorphic complexes including their sedimentary covers located to the west and south of the Cerro Pelón area. For some reason, Molina-Garza et al. (2019) suppose that the Nanchital Conglomerate should have the same provenance sources that the Oligocene turbidites from Cerro Pelón area, reported by Ortega-Flores et al. (2018). Based on the foregoing, we strongly disagree with Molina-Garza et al. (2019) considering that, from the beginning, they intend to compare two units of different age. Additionally, the scarce data reported from both the matrix and the clasts of the Nanchital Conglomerate are not determinant for interpreting the provenance of this conglomeratic unit and subsequently, to consider the same rock sources from the Oligocene through Miocene time.