新限制禁止用地项目目录发布实施

12月12日。国土资源部、国家发改委联合印发《关于发布实施〈限制用地项目目录（2006年本）〉和〈禁止用地项目目录（2006年本）〉的通知》，两目录自《通知》发出之日起实行。同时，国土资源部、原国家经贸委1999年发布的《国土资源部国家经贸委关于发布和实施〈限制供地项目目录〉〈禁止供地项目目录〉（第一批）的通知》废止。在《限制用地项目目录》中，与1999年的目录相比，在其他项目一类中．变化最大的是。机动车交易市场、家具城、建材城等大型商业设施项目，大型游乐设施、主题公园（影视城）、仿古城项目，低密度、大套型住宅项目（指住宅小区建筑容积率低于1．0、单套住房建筑面积超过144平方米的住宅项目），赛车场项目，公墓项目，机动车训练场项目等六类项目不仅被列入限制用地项目，而且禁止占用耕地，亦不得通过先行办理城市分批次农用地转用等形式变相占用耕地。[第一段]     

A taxonomic study on the families Lepadellidae and Trichocercidae （Rotifera： Monogononta） of Turkey

Thirteen rotifer species belonging to the families Lepadellidae and Trichocercidae were studied taxonomically from nine water bodies in Turkey. Lepadella biloba is a new entry to the Turkish rotifer fauna. All species were drawn under a light microscope using a camera lucida.     

用地申请被否决之后……——修武县周庄国土资源所服务新农村建设纪事

"新农村建设是大事,改善群众的物质文化生活,给广大村民提供休闲、娱乐、健身的良好环境是好事,我们积极支持,但占用耕地建游园坚决不行,这是原则问题".修武县周庄国土资源所所长薛晨生这番话一出口,来递用地申请的五里堡村村委李主任满面春风的笑容不见了,铁青着脸甩手离开了国土所办公室,这是前不久发生在修武县周庄国土资源所的一幕.     

建设新农村节地230亩——西华县安营村社会主义新农村试点走笔

在西华县城东关3公里处,有一个漂亮的村庄,一座座红白相间的两层小楼整齐统一,村内道路横竖一条线,排水沟、绿化带、路灯等公用设施应有尽有……这就是省社会主义新农村试点--西华县皮营乡安营村. 皮营乡安营村共有131户,545口人,共有耕地630亩,人均耕地1.6亩,原村庄面积340.6亩,户均宅基地2.6亩.历届村委没有实行村庄规划,每户宅基地面积大小不等,多则2～3亩,少则0.3～0.5亩,村内道路狭窄弯曲,地势低洼,晴天一身土,雨天一身泥.村里部分"能人"纷纷迁往县城居住,造成村内空宅多,安营村成了名副其实的"空心村",在一定程度上影响了经济发展,极大影响了群众的生产生活.     

失地农民有了“保险箱”——安阳开发区妥善安置失地农民

村里的土地被征用，而失地农民的生活水平不仅没有降低，反而比以前过得更好。“我们村光出租标准厂房每年就能收入300多万元，村里不论是大人还是小孩，就是什么都不干，每人每年也能分到4000块钱。”安阳开发区许吴村村委会主任申平安满怀自豪地说。     

粘土矿与生活

粘土矿是由自然界的岩石和矿物,经过长期风化形成的比较微细的颗粒组成。若含铝质成分较高时,可叫铝质粘土矿,含镁较高时叫镁质粘土矿,含铁锰质较高时就叫红土矿。其用途依它的成分不同而异,粘土矿是其总称,属于非金属矿范畴。它虽然不像黑色金属、有色金属和贵金属矿那样受人重视,但它与人们的生活却有着甚为密切的关系。如盖房子用的砖瓦,是用粘土煅烧而成;吃饭用的碗碟,喝水用的茶壶、茶杯是由瓷土(高岭土)烧制而成;     

旧村改造中的若干土地问题分析

近两年来,根据省委、省政府的部署,我市开始实施了"千村整治、百村示范"工程,各地积极地开展了旧村改造.旧村改造是改善城乡环境质量,提高人民生活质量,加快新农村建设,推进城市化进程,实现城乡一体化战略的基本途径之一.旧村改造虽说是一件惠及千家万户的好事,但由于该项工作事关村民很具体的种种利益分配和要求,在旧村改造时应当充分考虑村民的生活、生产、就业等各方面利益.     

宁波市大力推进城中村改造工作

为了落实"五个统筹"、"六大联动"和"平安宁波"建设,进一步改善全市人民群众的居住条件和生活环境,提高城市品位,促进城乡协调发展.宁波市人民政府决定,从今年起用三年时间对市老三区内的城中村进行大规模改造.     

"困难走(周)"--记第四地质队退休职工周兴泉

“万水千山总是低,只凭脚上量天尺”这是新中国成立五十多年来老地质队员为地质工作而发出的豪迈的心声.当他们把自己的青春、激情挥洒在祖国山川的时候,就已经许下了付出汗水和热血,甚至是生命的承诺.地质队员,就像自己随身携带的小铁锤一般,坚毅如铁,四海为家.     

Changes in Agricultural Biodiversity： Implications for Sustainable Livelihood in the Himalaya

Himalayan mountain system is distinguished globally for a rich biodiversity and for its role in regulating the climate of the South Asia.Traditional crop-livestock mixed farming in the Himalaya is highly dependent on forests for fodder and manure prepared from forest leaf litter and livestock excreta. Apart from sustaining farm production, forests provide a variety of other tangible and intangible benefits, which are critical for sustainable livelihood of not only 115 million mountain people, but also many more people living in the adjoining plains. Extension of agricultural landuse coupled with replacement of traditional staple food crops by cash crops and of multipurpose agroforestry trees by fruit trees are widespread changes. Cultivation of Fagopyrum esculentum,Fagopyrum tataricum, Panicum miliaceum, Setaria italica and Pisum arvense has been almost abandoned. Increasing stress on cash crops is driven by a socio-cultural change from subsistence to market economy facilitated by improvement in accessibility and supply of staple food grains at subsidized price by the government. Farmers have gained substantial economic benefits from cash crops. However, loss of agrobiodiversity implies more risks to local livelihood in the events of downfall in market price/demand of cash crops, termination of supply of staple food grains at subsidized price, pest outbreaks in a cash crop dominated homogeneous landscape and abnormal climate years. Indigenous innovations enabling improvement in farm economy by conserving and/enhancing agrobiodiversity do exist, but are highly localized. The changes in agrobiodiversity are such that soil loss and run-off from the croplands have dramatically increased together with increase in local pressure on forests. As farm productivity is maintained with forest-based inputs, continued depletion of forest resources will result in poor economic returns from agriculture to local people,apart from loss of global benefits from Himalayan forests. Interventions including improvement in traditional manure and management of on-farm trees,participatory development of agroforestry in degraded forest lands and policies favoring economic benefits to local people from non-timber forest products could reduce the risks of decline in agricultural biodiversity and associated threats to livelihoods and Himalayan ecosystems.