利用唐山近场强震记录对如何分析场地反应进行研究,分析比较了多种方法:线性反演法、传统的谱比法以及接收函数法.通过比较研究,发现各种方法都能给出土层场地的卓越周期,但每种方法给出的场地反应不完全相同.其中,传统的谱比法与线性反演法的结果较为接近,而接收函数法的结果则同其它两种方法的结果相差较大.在线性反演法中,给出了S波的品质因子QS,QS 在0.5~32Hz范围内与频率有关:QS(f)=67 f 1.1. 相似文献
During the excavations for the foundations of a three storey building on the limestone tuffs of Condeixa, Central Portugal,
a large dissolution fissure and smaller dissolution voids were found. Since the area has never been the subject of engineering
geology investigation, it was decided to evaluate the risk associated with the construction of the building. These limestone
tuffs were formed in a continental environment by the precipitation of calcite carried by the water coming from the large
limestone body in the east. The precipitated calcite mixed with the terrigenous materials and around trunks and leaves of
plants, originating a very heterogeneous and porous ground, which is characteristic of limestone tuffs. The study started
with a detailed geological survey followed by a large number of destructive drillings, located essentially under the pad foundations.
The results revealed several karstic cavities with serious problems for the building foundations and the structure, and many
smaller dissolution cavities, often filled with clayey soils. The ground treatment solutions used included, dental cleaning,
filling with concrete or granular material the dissolution structures accessible at the level of the foundation, reinforcement
of the footing and the structure of the building and adding a continuous foundation beam to hold the foundations together.
The cost of the engineering geology study, site investigation, ground treatment, and the reinforcement of the foundation and
building, increased the total construction cost from 2%, at the design stage, to 4.8%. 相似文献