胶东半岛乳山地区低角度韧性剪切带几何学、运动学特征:对中国东部岩石圈减薄作用的启示

大规模伸展构造是华北克拉通东部岩石圈减薄的重要表现形式。部分低角度韧性剪切带是地壳伸展变形后所展现的构造形式。本文研究了王格庄韧性剪切带的岩石学、几何学、运动学等特征显示:韧性剪切带走向近南北向,剪切带断层面倾向多变(倾向西、西南、西北方向)。大部分区域面理低角度倾向西,矿物拉伸线理近东西向,不对称旋转碎斑及S-C组构指示顶端指向西的剪切特征。结合研究区西侧与伸展构造相匹配的半地堑伸展盆地证据:本研究认为伸展构造的形成可能与西太平洋板块的后撤相关,即大规模伸展构造作用引发了华北克拉通东部的地壳减薄作用。     

准噶尔盆地车排子凸起春光区块沙湾组沉积特征新认识

准噶尔盆地车排子凸起沙湾组沉积环境存在较大争议,主流观点认为辫状河三角洲或者滩坝砂沉积。通过对研究区内钻井、古生物、地球物理资料分析认为,车排子凸起沙湾组并非水下环境,而是处于陆上暴露环境,发育冲积扇和河流沉积体系,其中研究区北部发育冲积扇体系,而中南部则发育河流体系,且不同沉积时期沉积体系类型发生变化:沙一段发育冲积扇-辫状河沉积,沙二段发育冲积扇-曲流河沉积,沙三段则缺少典型的河流沉积,以冲积扇体系及洪泛平原沉积为主。总体而言,春光区块沙湾组沉积期具有多物源、多沉积体系发育的特征,垂向上构成了两类冲积扇-河流体系沉积模式。     

基于LS-DYNA的贯通式潜孔锤反循环钻头强度的优化分析

通体花键式贯通式潜孔锤反循环钻头在实际施工中尾部较易损坏,影响反循环钻头的使用寿命。为提高反循环钻头的使用寿命,对反循环钻头尾部结构进行了优化设计,并采用非线性动力学仿真软件LS-DYNA对改进前后的反循环钻头进行了仿真分析。分析结果表明：由于在冲锤的高频冲击作用下,反循环钻头尾部易出现较大的局部应力集中,导致钻头体出现疲劳破坏;通过对钻头尾部结构设计优化后,与通体花键式反循环钻头相比,新结构钻头在无泄风槽情况下,应力集中值减小44%,在有泄风槽的情况下,应力集中值减小19%。数值模拟分析表明,优化后能大幅度提高钻头寿命。     

高模数水玻璃钾基抑制冲洗液在蠕变坍塌地层中的应用

在青海埃坑南矿区钻遇含角砾石的断层泥地层,孔壁坍塌、掉块,卡钻事故时有发生,几乎无法继续钻进,使用水玻璃与相关钻井液处理剂配合使用制备水玻璃钾基抑制冲洗液,用来平衡地层压力保护孔壁,并且加大金刚石钻头及扩孔器外径,解决了钻孔坍塌、缩径以及卡钻等问题,使施工顺利进行,为后续施工提供了参考方法。     

PDC钻头切削齿布齿设计的新思路

切削齿布齿设计是PDC钻头设计的关键。为提高PDC钻头的钻进效率,综合考虑PDC钻头切削齿的设计特点和切削先后顺序等因素,并且通过对PDC钻头单切削齿实验结果进行分析,提出了以冠部轮廓法线为基准的切削齿布齿设计方法。     

渤海海域W油田新近系明化镇组河流相砂体结构特征

利用野外露头、现代沉积和大量岩心以及钻测井资料,以高分辨率层序地层学原理为指导,结合地震和探地雷达,分析了W油田新近系明化镇组明下段河流相层序格架和砂体结构的沉积特征,总结了砂体的发育规模特征,建立了河流相砂体的沉积模式,为海上油田开发及后期调整提供依据和指导。研究表明,渤海海域明化镇组河流相砂体结构划分为堆叠型、侧叠型和孤立型3种类型共7种样式,其中侧叠型又分为紧密型、疏散型和离散型;孤立型又分为下切侵蚀型、孤立河道和决口扇;河道砂体厚度为2.1~15m,平均6.75m;宽度为200~1 225m,平均宽度519m。决口扇砂体厚约2~3m,宽度为150~450m,平均宽度300m。河流相砂体结构受控于湖平面的变化。不同的湖平面变化下发生堆叠型、侧叠型和孤立型规律性的砂体结构变化。     

煤田地质超深孔钻探工艺

在对深部煤田地质钻孔钻进工艺研究的基础上,有针对性选择使用聚合物泥浆,解决了基浆配制用水及泥浆抗地表水水质污染问题。通过改变双管钻具长度和改换取心钻头的切削具,满足软硬互层对钻头钻进效率的影响。在煤系地层钻进中,除采用常规的单管钻具钻进外,在见煤预告下过后,采用加长双管取心钻具,既可保证了回次进尺,又可保证岩心的采取。多项措施落实,不仅解决了生产中的一些难题,收到了较好的效果,而且创造了河北省煤田地质局煤田地质单孔钻探深度2 009.12m的新纪录,为今后深部钻孔的施工积累了经验。     

Periglacial and Fluvial Factors Controlling the Sedimentation of Pleistocene Breccia in NW Poland

Breccias were investigated on the terrace of the Toruń‐Eberswalde ice‐marginal valley at Rozwarzyn (NW Poland). Breccia layers include soft‐sediment clasts with diameters between 2 and 256 mm and soft‐sediment megaclasts with diameters from 256 mm to 7 m. The shape of the soft‐sediment clasts and megaclasts (derived from frozen sediments) in the breccia is diverse: from angular and irregular in the case of debris‐flow breccias to slightly rounded and tabular in fluvial breccias. These two types of breccias were developed during the Late Weichselian when the periglacial climate favored extensive lateral erosion by currents of frozen braided channels in the ice‐marginal valley. The dual presence of breccias of fluvial and debris‐flow origin in channel deposits is unique for Quaternary sediments. Zones of breccias existed in the channels where scours and obstacle marks related to megaclasts developed. The study of breccias shed new light on the fluvial processes in ice‐marginal valleys during the Pleistocene and can be considered as diagnostic for fluvio‐periglacial conditions.     

Tectonic control of accommodation space and sediment supply within the Mata Amarilla Formation (lower Upper Cretaceous) Patagonia,Argentina

The Mata Amarilla Formation dates from the early Upper Cretaceous and was deposited during a transition in tectonic regime from the extensional Rocas Verdes Basin to the Austral Foreland Basin. Detailed sedimentological logs and architectural parameters were used to define 13 facies associations. The distribution of facies associations and associated variations in fluvial architecture have enabled large‐scale changes in accommodation space/sediment supply ratios (A/S ratio) to be defined for the three component sections of the Mata Amarilla Formation. The lower and upper sections are characterized by a high A/S ratio, whereas the middle section corresponds to a low A/S ratio. In the western part of the study area, small‐scale variations in the A/S ratio were recognized in the middle section. The strong west to east trend in evolution of the fluvial systems coincides with the direction of propagation of the Patagonian fold and thrust belt, which is located to the west of the study area. Intervals of high A/S ratio (i.e. lower and upper sections) are interpreted to have developed during periods of increased loading by the fold and thrust belt caused by tectonic uplift. In contrast, intervals of low A/S ratio (i.e. middle section) were developed during periods of tectonic quiescence. This article suggests that the large‐scale variations in A/S ratios are related to different rates of migration and growth of the Patagonian fold and thrust belt, whereas the small‐scale variation occurred in response to specific periods of thrusting and folding in the Patagonian fold and thrust belt (i.e. local loads). This field example of the effects of different scales of variation in A/S ratios across the Austral Foreland Basin could be used to recognize similar tectonically forced variations in stratigraphic architecture in other foreland basins throughout the world, as well as to understand the response of fluvial systems to such changes.