Strike-slip faulting, rotation, and along-strike elongation in the Kopeh Dagh mountains, NE Iran

The Kopeh Dagh is a linear mountain range separating the shortening in Iran from the stable, flat Turkmenistan platform. In its central part is an array of active right-lateral strike-slip faults that obliquely cut the range and produce offsets of several kilometres in the geomorphology and geological structure. They are responsible for major destructive earthquakes in the 19th and 20th centuries and represent an important seismic hazard for this now-populous region of NE Iran. These strike-slip faults all end in thrusts, revealed by the uplift and incision of Late Quaternary river terraces, and do not continue beyond the Atrak river valley, which forms the southern margin of the Kopeh Dagh. The cumulative offset on these strike-slip faults, and their associated rotation about vertical axes, can account for ∼60 km of N–S shortening. This value is similar to estimates of the Late Quaternary N–S right-lateral shear between central Iran and Afghanistan, which must be accommodated in NE Iran. The strike-slip faults also require ∼30 km of along-strike extension of the Kopeh Dagh, which is taken up by the westward component of motion between the South Caspian Basin and both Eurasia and Central Iran. It is probable that these motions occurred over the last ∼10 Ma.     

Lunar shape does not record a past eccentric orbit

The Moon has long been known to have an overall shape not consistent with expected past tidal forces. It has recently been suggested (Garrick-Bethell, I., Wisdom, J., Zuber, M.T. [2006]. Science 313, 652-655) that the present lunar moments of inertia indicate a past high-eccentricity orbit and, possibly, a past non-synchronous spin-orbit resonance. Here I show that the match between the lunar shape and the proposed orbital and spin states is much less conclusive than initially proposed. Garrick-Bethell et al. (Garrick-Bethell, I., Wisdom, J., Zuber, M.T. [2006]. Science 313, 652-655) spin and shape evolution scenarios also completely ignore the physics of the capture into such resonances, which require prior permanent deformation, as well as tidal despinning to the relevant resonance. If the early lunar orbit was eccentric, the Moon would have been rotating at an equilibrium non-synchronous rate determined by it eccentricity. This equilibrium supersynchronous rotation would be much too fast to allow a synchronous spin-orbit lock at e = 0.49, while the capture into the 3:2 resonance is possible only for a very constrained lunar eccentricity history and assuming some early permanent lunar tri-axiality. Here I show that large impacts in the early history of the Moon would have frequently disrupted this putative resonant rotation, making the rotation and eccentricity solutions of Garrick-Bethell et al. (Garrick-Bethell, I., Wisdom, J., Zuber, M.T. [2006]. Science 313, 652-655) unstable. I conclude that the present lunar shape cannot be used to support the hypothesis of an early eccentric lunar orbit.     

A possible YORP effect on C and S Main Belt Asteroids

A rotating frequency analysis in a previous paper, showed that two samples of C and S-type asteroids belonging to the Main Belt, but not to any families, present two different values for the transition diameter to a Maxwellian distribution of the rotation frequency, respectively 48 and 33 km. In this paper, after a more detailed statistical analysis, aiming to verify that the result is physically relevant, we found a better estimate for the transition diameter, respectively D_C = 44 ± 2 km and D_S = 30 ± 1 km. The ratio between these estimated transition diameters, D_C/D_S = 1.5 ± 0.1, can be supported with the help of the YORP (Yarkovsky-O’Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack) effect, although other physical causes cannot be completely ruled out.In this paper we have derived a simple scaling law for YORP which, taking into account the different average heliocentric distance, the bulk density, the albedo and the asteroid “asymmetry surface factor”, has enabled us to reasonably justify the ratio between the diameters transition of C-type and S-type asteroids. The same scaling law can be used to estimate a new ratio between the bulk densities of S and C asteroids samples (giving ρ_S/ρ_C ≈ 2.9 ± 0.3), and can explain why the asteroids near the transition diameter have about the same absolute magnitude. For C-type asteroids, using the found density ratio and other estimates of S-type density, it is also possible to estimate an average bulk density equal to 0.9 ± 0.1 g cm⁻³, a value compatible with icy composition. The suggested explanation for the difference of the transition diameters is a plausible hypothesis, consistent with the data, but it needs to be studied more in depth with further observations.     

Rotational dynamics and internal structure of Titan

Estimates of the moments of inertia of Titan, as separately deduced from its gravitational field and spin pole orientation, are quite different. This discrepancy can be resolved if Titan is either not precessing as a rigid body (e.g. if the shell is decoupled from the interior by an ocean), or if the spin pole is not fully damped (e.g. due to atmospheric excitation). By the end of the Cassini mission, continued monitoring of the changing spin pole orientation, by Cassini radar observations, will determine which effect dominates.     

Combined effect of YORP and collisions on the rotation rate of small Main Belt asteroids

The rotation rate distribution of small Main Belt asteroids is dominated by YORP and collisions. These mechanism act differently depending on the size of the bodies and give rise to non-linear effects when they both operate. Using a Monte Carlo method we model the formation of a steady state population of small asteroids under the influence of both mechanisms and the rotation rate distribution is compared to the observed one as derived from Pravec et al. (Pravec, P. et al. [2008]. Icarus 197, 497-504). A better match to observations is obtained with respect to the case in which only YORP is considered. In particular, an excess of slow rotators is produced in the model with both collisions and YORP because bodies driven to slow rotation by YORP have a random walk-like evolution of the spin induced by repeated collisions with small projectiles. This is a dynamical evolution different from tumbling and it lasts until a large impact takes the body to a faster rotation rate. According to our model, the rotational fission of small asteroids is a very frequent event and might explain objects like P/2010 A2 and its associated tail of millimeter-sized dust particles. The mass loss during fission of small asteroids might significantly influence the overall collisional evolution of the belt. Fission can in fact be considered as an additional erosion mechanism, besides cratering and fragmentation, acting only at small diameters.