WebService与地理信息数据共享的研究

WebService作为互联网数据共享的技术,为解决地理信息数据共享的问题提供了有效的手段。本文提出了利用WebService技术实现地理信息数据共享的解决方案。     

全球气候变化研究与科学数据简

By illustrating the relationship between the climate system and the scientific data, a requirement of scientific data for the earth system research has been proposed to be paid more attention to climate change studies. The research progresses of global climate change in China for the recent 10 years have been reviewed and the important role of observation datasets and assimilated production in the global climate change has been pointed out. Furthermore, the meteorological data sharing situation     

EPC模式下业主对项目合同模式的选择研究

工程总承包EPC模式下,合同模式的选择事关项目成败、承包商持续努力工作的激励和项目执行成本的大小。本文通过剖析以支付方式分类的现有合同模式特征,就业主要求稳定性、项目建设规模、自然因素的不确定性、承包商努力程度等对工程项目成本的影响因素进行了分析,并结合实例,就业主在合同模式选择中需要关注的策略及合同绩效指标的激励方案作了探讨。     

共享住宿价格的多尺度空间特征及影响因素

以江苏省苏南地区为案例地,获取Airbnb网站房源数据,运用泰尔指数、DBSCAN聚类算法等分析方法,从多尺度视角对共享住宿价格的空间分异进行探讨,采用OLS回归模型和分位数回归模型从房源内部和房源外部相结合的角度对比分析共享住宿价格的影响因素。结果表明：（1）从苏南整体和各地市来看,共享住宿房源价格在城市内部和区县内部的差异较为明显,在城市之间和区县之间的差异较小;（2）不同价格水平共享住宿的空间聚类中心存在显著差异,高、中、低档次共享住宿对于水域的依赖逐渐降低,整体上,空间聚类中心呈现“东多西少,南多北少”分布;（3）共享住宿房源价格是内部属性和外部属性共同耦合驱动作用的结果,对比来看,房源价格受到内部属性如房源卫生间个数等指标的影响较大,受到外部属性的影响较小,同时不同影响因素对于同等价格水平共享住宿房源的作用方向和影响程度存在明显差异性和分层性。     

Breaking the impasse: towards a new regime for international climate governance

The reality of the current international order makes it imperative that a just and effective climate regime should balance the historical responsibility of developed countries with the increasing absolute emissions from many developing nations. The key pillars are briefly proposed for a new international climate architecture that envisions replacing the current annex system with two new annexes: Annex α, for countries with high current emissions and historically high emissions, and Annex β, for countries with high current emissions and historically low emissions. Countries in both annexes would implement legally binding targets under this framework. Additionally, this proposal includes alterations and revisions to funding and technology transfer mechanisms to correct for weaknesses and inequities under the current Kyoto architecture. The proposed framework stems from a belief that a top-down, international approach to climate policy remains the most effective for ensuring environmental integrity. Given the slow rate of institutional learning, the reform and improvement of the current system is held as a more efficient course of action than abandoning the progress already achieved. It is argued that the proposed framework could effectively accommodate key equity, environmental integrity, and political feasibility concerns.     

The Regensburg Model: reference values for the (I)NDCs based on converging per capita emissions†

A core question still remains after the Paris Agreement: who receives how much of the remaining CO₂ budget (resource/burden/effort sharing), so that the increase in the global average temperature is kept to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels? If converging per capita emissions serve as a possible answer to this question, the discussion focuses primarily on the approach ‘Contraction and Convergence’ (C&C). The Regensburg Model now offers a further option for the mathematical implementation of converging per capita emissions. The authors identify features common to C&C and differences from C&C. They show that, of the convergence models they examined, the Regensburg Model is the most favourable option for industrialized countries.

Policy relevance

In politics, the concept of converging per capita emissions is often accepted at the abstract level. Civil society in particular can then take politicians at their word wherever they take values calculated using the Regensburg Model as points of reference; then prosperous developed countries in particular whose nationally determined contributions do not come up even to these reference values will find it difficult to justify their contributions.     

Agreement,significance, and understandings of historical responsibility in climate change negotiations

For over 20 years, Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change have struggled with the normative significance of history for the differentiation of responsibilities. Negotiations on ‘historical responsibility’ have been marked by considerable conflict between developed and developing countries. However, in 2010, the Parties acknowledged the concept in a consensus decision. This article analyses UN Climate Change Conference delegates' agreement with the decision, whether it reconciled conflict between interpretations of historical responsibility, and the significance that delegates ascribe to the decision for future agreements. The decision has not eliminated conflict between different interpretations. Delegates who understand historical responsibility as linking countries' historical contributions to climate change to their responsibilities to act agree more with the decision and foresee it having a stronger influence on future agreements than do those viewing the concept in more conceptual terms. The decision marks the start of negotiations concerning how rather than whether historical responsibility should guide operative text. This article demonstrates that (1) the divergent interpretations pose clear challenges for a necessary but demanding agreement on operationalization, and (2) focusing on an ambiguous version of proportionality between contribution to change and responsibility can become a first step for convergence between divergent positions.     

Differentiating (historic) responsibilities for climate change

Following the conclusion of the official work of the Ad Hoc Group for the Modelling and Assessment of Contributions to Climate Change (MATCH), this article considers the politically more sensitive aspect of the Brazilian proposal, namely the issue of differentiating (historic) responsibility for, and not merely (causal) contribution to climate change. Its aim is (1) to highlight the fact that, while related, the two issues (‘contribution to’ and ‘responsibility for’) are fundamentally different and should not be confused, and (2) to propose a methodology for calculating shares of responsibility as opposed to the shares in causal contribution arrived at through the MATCH results. Two conceptions of responsibility (‘strict’ or ‘limited’) are applied in order to operationalize the notion of ‘respective capabilities’ given in Article 3.1 of the UNFCCC. The key message resulting from the calculations is that causal contribution—while an important indicator of (environmental) relevance to the problem—must not be confused with the moral responsibility for it. The rather large difference between the responsibilities at the two extremes of the scale under both conceptions gives pause for thought as to what sorts of burdens can justly be demanded in any application of the UNFCCC principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, whether in the context of the Brazilian proposal or beyond.     

新疆测震台网历史数据共享平台的设计与实现

分析新疆测震台网历史数据的现状,以及研究和开发新疆测震台网历史数据共享平台的重要意义。介绍平台设计的技术思路,通过系统分析,明确平台各模块的主要功能。对数据库概念结构设计和数据库逻辑结构设计这两个重要环节进行了详细阐述。在数据库设计的基础上,对平台系统设计及实现的关键技术做了重点介绍。通过本平台的设计和开发,实现了数据信息的提取及入库;并且实现了在局域网内通过浏览器的方式对测震历史数据的检索及下载功能,为本局科研工作者提供了便捷的数据服务。