为了评估不同聚类算法对雷暴系统的识别效果,进一步提高雷电临近预报能力,本文采用地闪定位数据和雷达反射率数据,利用基于密度的空间聚类(Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Application with Noise,DBSCAN)、快速搜索和查找密度峰聚类(Clustering by Fast Search and Find of Density Peaks,CFSFDP)以及改进的快速搜索和查找密度峰聚类(Extended Clustering by Fast Search and Find of Density Peaks,E_CFSFDP)三种聚类算法,对2018年9月21日19∶15—20∶57(北京时)发生在(114°—117°E、27°—30°N)区域的一次雷暴过程进行了聚类识别计算,探讨了三类聚类算法在雷暴系统识别中的差异。结果表明:(1) DBSCAN算法在地闪数据分布清晰且不同数据簇之间有显著距离间隔时,分类识别的准确率较高;当各个闪电数据簇的簇间距离或密度相差很大时,分类识别的准确率较低;(2) 地闪数据“无密度峰值”分布时CFSFDP算法会分裂出错误类,每个闪电数据簇仅具备唯一的密度峰值点是CFSFDP算法识别准确的前提条件;(3) E_CFSFDP算法解决了CFSFDP算法的“无密度峰值”问题,受地闪数据分布影响较小,因此基于E_CFSFDP算法的雷暴系统识别准确率明显高于DBSCAN和CFSFDP算法。
At present, lightning is one of the 10 natural disasters, and it is also the top environmental factor of power interruption. It often causes huge losses to the electric system. The Wuhan High Voltage Institute of the State Grid Corporation of China and Huazhong University of Science and Technology have been researching and developing lightning location systems (LLSs) since the late 1980s. In the mid-1990s, a lightning detection network was created in 29 provinces and cities in China. It is primarily applied to rapidly find lightning accidents, which greatly reduces power interruption. Also, it ensures high efficiency and safe operation of the electricity system. Remarkable benefit is achieved. China's LLS went through an "orientation positioning - time difference positioning - integrated positioning" development process. The positioning precision, detection efficiency, degree of automation, practicability and applied range are improved. Also, a lightning information system plan of the national network has been implemented, which services the whole society. 相似文献
Based on the CINRAD Doppler radar data in Guangzhou and the lightning data in 2004 by power suppliers of Guangdong, statistical study is done by overlaying lightning’s position on radar’s echo. The result shows the followings. The concentrated period in which more negative lightning occurred at the middle levels (2 – 14 km), where radar echo was moderate (12 – 45 dBz), rather than at the low levels with the weakest echoes or at high levels with the strongest echoes. At levels 3 – 11 km, where the radar echo was between 10 dBz and 35 dBz, the area of negative lightning was much larger in central Guangdong than in the rest of the province. At levels 0.5 – 7 km where the radar echoes were between 44 dBz and 51 dBz, the probability for a point to have negative lightning varies from 0.4 to 0.7. 相似文献