The Berriasian-Valanginian Springhill Formation of the Austral Basin of southern South America comprises fluvial to marine deposits. In order to interpret depositional systems and unravel the stratigraphic architecture of this unit in the southern region of the basin (Tierra del Fuego Province, Argentina), 500 m of cores combined with well-log data from 41 wells were studied. Facies associations corresponding to fluvial (A1-A6), estuarine (B1-B5) and open-marine (C1-C4) depositional environments were identified. These facies associations succeed each other vertically across the entire study area (6800 km2) forming a ∼120-m-thick transgressive succession. This unit filled a north-south-oriented valley system, developed in the underlying Jurassic volcanic complex.Lowstand fluvial deposits of the first stage of the valley-system fill occur in downdip segments of the system above a sequence boundary (SB). These fluvial deposits are overlain by coastal-plain and tide-dominated estuarine strata across an initial transgressive surface (ITS). In the northern sector the earliest valley infill is characterized by a transgressive fluvial succession, overlying a merged SB/ITS that is probably time-equivalent of marginal-marine deposits of the southern sector. The fluvial strata in the north are overlain by wave-dominated estuarine deposits. A drastic change to open-marine conditions is marked by a marine flooding surface, with local evidence of marine erosion (FS-RS). Open-marine strata are thin (<10 m) and dominated by lower-shoreface and offshore-transition deposits. They are capped by a younger flooding surface (FS), which represents the onset to offshore conditions across the study area due to a continuous long-term transgression that persisted until the Barremian.Although the interpreted depositional systems and stratigraphic architecture of the Springhill Formation resemble transgressive incised-valley-fill successions, the greater thickness and larger size of the Springhill valleys suggest inherited rift topography rather than valley development during a relative sea-level fall. 相似文献
为了评估不同聚类算法对雷暴系统的识别效果,进一步提高雷电临近预报能力,本文采用地闪定位数据和雷达反射率数据,利用基于密度的空间聚类(Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Application with Noise,DBSCAN)、快速搜索和查找密度峰聚类(Clustering by Fast Search and Find of Density Peaks,CFSFDP)以及改进的快速搜索和查找密度峰聚类(Extended Clustering by Fast Search and Find of Density Peaks,E_CFSFDP)三种聚类算法,对2018年9月21日19∶15—20∶57(北京时)发生在(114°—117°E、27°—30°N)区域的一次雷暴过程进行了聚类识别计算,探讨了三类聚类算法在雷暴系统识别中的差异。结果表明:(1) DBSCAN算法在地闪数据分布清晰且不同数据簇之间有显著距离间隔时,分类识别的准确率较高;当各个闪电数据簇的簇间距离或密度相差很大时,分类识别的准确率较低;(2) 地闪数据“无密度峰值”分布时CFSFDP算法会分裂出错误类,每个闪电数据簇仅具备唯一的密度峰值点是CFSFDP算法识别准确的前提条件;(3) E_CFSFDP算法解决了CFSFDP算法的“无密度峰值”问题,受地闪数据分布影响较小,因此基于E_CFSFDP算法的雷暴系统识别准确率明显高于DBSCAN和CFSFDP算法。