基坑土钉支护设计的简单算法研究

土钉支护技术在深基坑开挖和支护中已得到了广泛的应用,但对其工作机制和计算方法的研究尚不完善。目前数值模拟算法较多,但其本构模型准确地选择及相关参数的确定需要进行大量的三轴试验或真三轴试验。基于此,提出3个假设,建立简单的计算模型,并对土钉的工作机制深入研究,得到土钉拉力的“二半支抛物线”分布规律,推导出土钉支护设计的解析算法相关公式。以徐州彭城地下广场深基坑土钉支护工程为例,进行土钉拉力现场测试,对基坑水平位移、沉降进行观测,所测数据验证了文中公式的可靠性,为类似基坑工程的设计和施工提供参考。     

CFG桩复合地基褥垫层三维弹塑性分析

在CFG桩复合地基中, 褥垫层的设置厚度和模量对于复合地基的承载及变形特性有较大的影响。本文建立了CFG桩复合地基的三维弹塑性数值分析模型,研究了当采用不同厚度和模量的褥垫层时,复合地基沉降、桩端沉降、褥垫层压缩量和桩土应力等参数的变化规律。结果表明复合地基沉降和褥垫层压缩量随着垫层厚度的增加而增大,而随着垫层模量的增大而减小;垫层厚度和模量的变化对于桩端沉降的影响较小,从工程角度可认为桩端沉降不随垫层厚度与垫层模量的变化而变化;桩土应力比随垫层厚度的增大而减小,随垫层模量的增大而增大。本文建立的分析模型还可进一步对CFG桩复合地基的其他参数进行相应的分析计算,分析结果可以为复合地基的设计和施工提供相应的理论依据。     

考虑侧填荷载的分离式基础涵洞地基承载力新算法和试验

为了研究涵侧填土对采用分离式基础涵洞地基承载力的提高效应,先结合基底土体的受力特点,进行受力分析,建立计算模型,构建求解分离式基础地基极限承载力的算法,给出承载力表达式。然后在相似理论的指导下,设计了5组模型,试验模拟粉质黏土地基受荷变形直到破坏的全过程,绘出荷载-沉降曲线,测得涵侧填土高度为0、4、8、12、16 m时的地基极限承载力。试验发现:随着侧填土高度的增加,承载力显著提高,当填土为12 m时已达到885 kPa;但提高幅度表现出非线性特性,先从18.42%增加到36.11%,然后减小到3.39%;当填土达到16 m时承载力达到915 kPa且不再增加;同时发现使用本文算法与试验实测值的误差小于10%,可以考虑用此算法计算分离式基础涵洞的地基极限承载力。继而得出结论:当涵洞地基沉降满足设计要求时,涵侧填土显著提高了地基承载力,节约工程造价,且提高的幅度先增加后减少,当达到16 m时地基承载力便逐渐趋于915 kPa。     

确定堤坝工程地基渗透系数的敏感分析法

堤坝工程中地基渗透系数的选取具较大随机性, 为了解决这个问题, 采用敏感性分析理论建立了求解渗透系数敏感性因子的数学模型, 该模型在河南省燕山水库水利工程中的应用表明: 覆盖层渗透系数的敏感性最大(> 10-2), 设计应取试验值的大值; 其他部分渗透系数的敏感性相对较小(10-6~10-3), 设计中可取试验值的均值; 对于防渗设施, 只要达到一定密实度, 再降低其渗透系数, 防渗效果不会再有明显改善      

钻孔瞬变电磁方法探测越界开采采空区的应用

煤矿井下越界开采扰乱煤炭资源开发秩序,同时存在巨大的安全隐患,准确探测越界开采采空区及其边界对安全采掘极为重要。常规的矿井瞬变电磁探测方法容易受到巷道中的金属和电磁信号干扰,探测精度有限,难以满足采空区边界精准解释的需求。为了解决这一问题,提出一种钻孔中收发信号的钻孔瞬变电磁方法和施工工艺,利用其远离巷道和靠近异常体的特点,提高异常信号在实测数据中的占比;并研究可行域约束的OCCAM反演算法,进一步减小体积效应影响,实现了对越界开采采空区的电阻率精细成像。结合山西某煤矿的工程实践,对该方法精准探测邻矿越界开采采空区规模、性质的实用性和有效性进行了检验。结果表明,钻孔瞬变电磁方法是矿井地球物理技术与钻探工艺技术的高效结合和有益补充,基于可行域约束的OCCAM反演算法能够有效应用于越界开采采空区的边界精确成像解释。      

基坑开挖中渗流-应力耦合模拟

根据基坑工程施工实际情况,基于地下水渗流的基本规律以及岩土体受力的本构模型,建立了在应力场和渗流场耦合作用下基坑受力的力学模型,通过有限元方法模拟了基坑开挖过程中周围应力场及渗流场的变化规律。计算结果表明：在设置挡土墙并及时排水情况下,随着开挖的进行,基坑周围的土体变形增大,挡土墙前的土体发生沉降,墙体最终发生变形,基坑底部土体向上隆起,在基坑角落处水头梯度较大,发生应力集中,容易导致工程事故,必须谨慎处理。另外,基坑在降水时内外水头差过大将会引起墙体承受过大压力,基坑周围沉降会更大,这样不利于墙体和周围建筑安全。     

高真空击密法在软地基处理中的应用

姑合工程实践,介绍快速“高真空击密法”软地基处理方法的施工原理、施工工艺及质量控制等,并简单阐述“高真空击密法”在进行软地基处理中的优点。     

Experimental study on wide-shallow composite bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine under cyclic loading

As an appropriate type of foundation for offshore wind turbines (OWTs), wide-shallow composite bucket foundation (WSCBF) is cost-competitive, and it has a unique and special substructure that comprises seven internal rooms arranged in a honeycomb-like structure. In this study, the cyclic behavior of WSCBF for OWTs embedded in saturated clay was investigated using a large-scale model subjected to lateral cyclic loading. The responses of foundation under constant- and various-amplitude cyclic loadings were recorded in terms of displacements, rotations, and bending moments. The variations in stiffness and damping were obtained, and a collaborative bearing mechanical model between the bucket and soil was considered, which was beneficial for improving the stiffness of the whole structure. Accumulative deformation was found to have little effect on the bearing capacity of the foundation. Dynamic analysis in frequency domain was further performed on both moment and rotation data, and the complex, frequency-dependent impedance was also studied.     

Effects of long-term cyclic horizontal loading on bucket foundations in saturated loose sand

A 1-g model experimental study was conducted to investigate the accumulated rotations and unloading stiffness of bucket foundations in saturated loose sand. One-way horizontal cyclic loading was applied to model bucket foundations with embedment ratios 0.5 and 1.0. Up to 10⁴ cycles of loading were applied at a frequency of 0.2 Hz varying load amplitudes. The accumulated rotation of the bucket foundations increased with the number of cycles and the load amplitudes. Empirical equations were proposed to describe the accumulated rotation of the foundations. The unloading stiffness of foundations increased with the number of cycles but decreased with an increase in load amplitude. The initial unloading stiffness of L/D = 1.0 (L is skirt length; D is foundation diameter) was approximately twice that of L/D = 0.5. Excess pore water pressure difference of 50% was observed between L/D = 0.5 and 1.0. The suction and static capacity of the bucket increased with increase of bucket embedment ratio with a difference of 69.5% and 73.6% respectively between L/D = 0.5 and 1.0.