观测时间对基线解算质量和GPS网精度的影响分析

在不同的观测时段,卫星的几何分布情况及其运动轨迹并不一样,这直接导致各时段内所获得的基线解算质量和GPS定位精度也有区别。采用LGO软件进行基线向量解算和网平差,并通过复测基线长度较差、异步环闭合差、点位中误差、GPS基线向量残差4项指标来比较不同观测时间长度下的基线解算质量和定位精度。结果表明,观测时间在1h左右就可以获得较高的精度。在选择较好的观测时段后,在满足测量精度的前提下,适当缩短观测时间是可行的．这对于在工程测量中提高工作效率具有一定的指导意义。     

具有抵偿面的GPS基线向量网任意带高斯投影模型研究

通过GPS技术获取的空间基线向量和坐标信息是建立在WGS-84坐标系下的,无法直接应用于工程实际。因此使用GPS基线向量网必须将其从WGS-84坐标系转换到测区的平面坐标系统中,这就需要构造一个具有抵偿面的任意带高斯投影模型,来控制和减小边长投影变形。     

��ͬģ���º������ɶԸ߾���GPS������Ӱ��

???й?????????IGS????,??????FES2004????????NAO99b?????????????????????????????????λ?????????????????????????????????λ????????cm??????????????U????????????????????????3~4????????????????????????????????mm????????????????????????С????????????????GPS????????????????10^-8??????????????????????????????????С??mm?????????????????????????????1 cm??     

单基准线向量解算法在GPS变形监测中的应用

GPS测量目前在三峡库区变形监测应用较为广泛,但常规数据处理中,网平差这一步骤导致了因某点测量误差偏大而导致的整个监测网中其他监测点测量误差偏大,为解决这一问题,介绍了单基线向量解算法,并利用该方法对长屋滑坡2005年3月-2007年3月的监测点数据进行解算,提出了该方法能减少测量误差和内业工作量,并能运用于实际工程。     

三级GPS大地控制网观测数据质量检测

介绍了观测数据质量检测在三级GPS大地控制网施测中的重要作用以及观测数据质量检测方法.在此基础上,给出了观测数据质量检测的各种不同指标的定义,并讨论了相互关系;利用TEQC(Translate Edit Quality Check)软件对三级GPS大地控制网青海测区48个测点实测数据进行了质量检测,并结合基线解算结果进行了统计分析.     

独立分量分析改进的图像去噪方法

针对传统去噪算法在复杂噪声污染图像处理中能力较弱的问题,该文基于信号高阶统计量的独立分量分析,通过其自适应变换,分离出源信号中的统计独立的分量,在分析对比传统图像去噪方法的基础上,讨论了独立分量分析的基本模型及原理;提出了一种结合中值滤波与wiener滤波的最大似然估计的图像去噪改进方法。仿真实验表明改进的独立分量分析去噪方法具有较大的优越性。     

执行2009版《全球定位系统(GPS)测量规范》若干问题的研究

结合技术人员在执行《全球定位系统(GPS)测量规范》(GB/T18314—2009)时的不同理解和认识,通过对基线测量中误差、环闭合差、相邻点基线分量中误差和GPS网平差技术指标等的计算与实现,进行了理论分析和实践探讨,得出规范可以得到较好执行的结论。     

不同分布模式电离层对星载InSAR测高精度的影响及校正

电离层总电子含量(TEC)会使合成孔径雷达干涉测量(In SAR)信号产生相位延迟,进而影响生成DEM的精度,特别是对L和P等长波段信号的影响不可忽略。因此,针对不同TEC分布模式的电离层开展研究,构建了电离层对星载In SAR测高精度的影响模型,提出了相应的校正方法,并进行了仿真实验。实验表明对于特定波长的In SAR信号,不同TEC分布模式对In SAR测高精度的影响不同:TEC均匀分布的电离层模型对In SAR测高精度的影响较小,并可通过相位解缠、基线估计等环节进行很好的补偿;而TEC不均匀分布的电离层模型对In SAR精度的影响较大,仅靠相位解缠等过程不能较好地消除,必须通过向干涉图中加入电离层影响模型予以纠正。     

基于SBAS时序分析的大同地面沉降与地下水活动研究

大同盆地是汾渭盆地北端一个地面沉降较严重的区域,地下水开采是该区域地面沉降发生的一个重要原因。然而地下水活动与地面沉降在空间和时间的相关性却鲜有研究。为了掌握该地区地下水活动与地面沉降的内在联系,该文基于Envisat ASAR数据,利用短基线集(small baseline subset,SBAS)-In SAR技术对大同盆地地面沉降形变特征进行监测;同时利用地下水位监测数据,研究地面沉降中心与地下水位漏斗在空间和时间上的对应关系,定量分析2处地下水位波动与地表形变的关系。研究表明,地下水开采是大同盆地水源地地面沉降的主要原因,但并非所有的地下水位漏斗都存在地面沉降。该研究成果对指导该地区地下水开采及控制地面沉降有一定参考价值。     

Standardization of baseline and additionality determination under the CDM

Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project developers have long complained about the complexities of project-specific baseline setting and the vagaries of additionality determination. In response to this, the CDM Executive Board took bold steps towards the standardization of CDM methodologies, culminating in the approval of guidelines for the establishment of performance standards in November 2011. The guidelines specify a performance standard stringency level for both baseline and additionality of 80% for several priority sectors and 90% for all other sectors. However, an analysis of 14 large-scale CDM methodologies that use performance standard approaches challenges this top-down approach to the performance standard design. An appropriate performance standard stringency level strongly depends on sector and technology characteristics. A single stringency level for baseline and additionality determination is appropriate only for greenfield projects, but not for retrofit ones. Overly simple, highly aggregated performance standards are unlikely to ensure high environmental integrity, and difficult questions regarding stringency and updating frequency will eventually have to be addressed on a rather disaggregated level. A careful balance between data requirements and the practicability of performance standards is essential because the heavy data requirements of the existing performance standard methodologies have been the key barrier to their actual implementation.

Policy relevance

CDM regulators have been pushed by many stakeholders to standardize baseline setting and eliminate project-specific additionality determination. At first glance, performance standards seem to provide the perfect solution for both tasks. However, a one-size-fits-all political decision – e.g. the average of the top 20% performers as enshrined in the Marrakech Accords – is inappropriate. Substantial disaggregation of performance standards is required both technologically and geographically in order to limit over- and under-crediting and close loopholes for non-additional projects. As a lack of reliable and complete data has been and will be a key bottleneck for the development of performance standards, international support for data collection will be indispensable, but costly, and time-consuming. Empirically driven, techno-economic assessments of performance standard stringency levels must be the central task of the future work on standardized methodologies, and should not be sidelined by perceived needs of policy makers to take bold decisions under time pressures.