The distribution and abundance of pelagic gammarid amphipods on Georges Bank and Nantucket Shoals

In this study, long-term, broad-scale zooplankton survey data were used to estimate the temporal and spatial distribution and abundance of gammarid amphipods present in the water column on Georges Bank. Delta-mean abundances computed from 10 years of data showed that gammarid amphipod abundances peaked in summer and again in fall. The amphipods were also most numerous in water less than 50 m deep. The statistical tests employed revealed no conclusive evidence for diurnal vertical migration. Interannual delta-mean abundances fluctuated approximately 5-fold between 1977 and 1986, ranging from 217 to 1181 amphipods 100 m⁻³. Peak amphipod biomass occurred in July and was estimated to be 2.8 kcal m⁻². Using production-to-biomass ratios from the literature, mean annual production of amphipods in these samples was estimated to be between 1.6 and 9.8 kcal m⁻². Production in shallow areas was especially high, 22 kcal m⁻² year⁻¹.     

Application of superposition with nonlinear head-dependent fluxes

While superposition is commonly used to address linear ground water problems, it can also be used to address certain nonlinear problems. In particular, it can be used to address problems with nonlinear head-dependent fluxes, where the problem can be separated conveniently into steady-state and transient-state components. Superposition can be used to simulate the transient-state head changes independently from the steady-state heads. The problems addressable by superposition include phreatophyte discharges, stream-aquifer interactions, spring discharges, and drain discharges. Each of these represents a nonlinear head-dependent flux, where the flux depends on the elevation of the land surface or some other feature. Superposition is applied by referencing elevations to the local steady-state water table and by imposing the negative of the steady-state flux on the transient-state problem.     

Standing stock and estimated production rates of phytoplankton and zooplankton in Narragansett Bay,Rhode Island

Seasonal changes in phytoplankton biomass and production, total zooplankton biomass, and biomass and potential production rates of the two dominant copepods, Acartia hudsonica (formerly called Acartia clausi) and Acartia tonsa are described for several stations in Narragansett Bay, R.I. Plankton in the bay behaved as a single population with simultaneous changes occurring at the upper bay (Station 5) and the lower bay (Station 1). Phytoplankton biomass was higher in the upper bay ( \(\bar x\) =16.95 mg chl a·m^?3) than in the lower bay ( \(\bar x\) =6.37 mg chl a·m^?3) and these 0269 0101 V differences in biomass were reflected in the phytoplankton production rates. The zooplankton, which was dominated by A. hudsonica in the spring and early summer and A. tonsa during summer and fall, showed no such consistent differences between the stations. Mean A. hudsonica biomass (St 1, \(\bar x\) ;=82.7 mg dry wt·m^?3; St 5, _ \(\bar x\) ;=95.2 mg dry wt·m^?3) exceeded that of A. tonsa (St 1, \(\bar x\) ;=56.7 mg dry wt·m^?3; St 5, \(\bar x\) ;=60.0 mg dry wt·m^?3). Potential production rates of the two Acartia 0269 0101 V spp. were strongly temperature dependent. Despite the higher biomass levels of A. hudsonica, low temperatures resulted in lower potential production rates ( \(\bar x\) ; St 1=7.25 mg C·m^?3 day^?1; \(\bar x\) ; St 5=10.77mg C·m^?3 day^?1) and biomass doubling times of up to 9.6 days. Potential production rates of A. tonsa at summer temperatures were high ( \(\bar x\) ; St 1=19.0 mg C·m^?3 day^?1; \(\bar x\) ; St 5=22.9 mg C·m^?3 day^?1) and biomass doubling times were generally less than one day.