Neuere Veröffentlichungen

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Physiologie des Phenolabbaus bei Rhodococcus spec. P1. Teil 2: Untersuchungen zur Regulation des Phenolabbaus

The phenol-degrading system which can be induced in Rhodococcus spec. P 1 brings about the metabolization of phenol via the β-ketoadipate path (ortho-cleavage of catechol). For the more precise characterization of the degradation performance investigations were made into the influences of different carbon sources: glucose, galactose, ribose, arabinose, xylose, acetate, citricacid, mandelic acid, protocatechoic acid, glycerol, tryptophane, phenylalanine and the complex substrate of nutrient broth as well as succinate, catechol and benzoate. Only the three last-named substances show an influence: succinate inhibits only the synthesis of phenol hydroxylase, catechol and benzoate inhibit the synthesis and activity of phenol hydroxylase. As a comparison of the results with literature shows, even at the same path of degradation there are different regulating mechanismus in the different microorganisms.     

Normalized 87Sr86Sr by multiple collection and comparison to a standard

A system for precisely determining normalized ${}^{87}\text{Sr}{}^{86}\text{Sr}$ by comparing unknown to standard in a solid-source quadruple-collector mass spectrometer is outlined. This is made possible by a mathematical approximation in the data-reduction process.     

Profile measurements in the atmospheric near-surface layer and the use of suitable universal functions for the determination of the turbulent energy exchange

The authors summarize their recent published studies on profile measurements including new universal functions and an error analysis with a particular view to parameterisation above soil and water. Verification of the theoretical results is given using new data of the MESP-81 Tsimlyansk experiment.     

Expert judgment and climate forecasting: A methodological critique of “climate change to the year 2000”

The National Defense University's study of climate change to the year 2000 was based largely on the judgments of the members of two expert panels. Although the study has been widely distributed and apparently read by policy makers in the U.S. and abroad, the method of eliciting and analyzing expert judgment has not been critically reviewed. This paper uses the literature on judgment and subjective probability to evaluate the expert judgment methods used in the study.The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.