Denitrification potential of marsh soils in two natural saline-alkaline wetlands

Little information is available on denitrification potential of marsh soils in natural saline-alkaline wetlands. The denitrification potentials of an open wetland in the floodplain(Erbaifangzi wetland) and a closed wetland(Fulaowenpao wetland) in backwater areas in Jilin Province of Northeast China were monitored by an anaerobic incubation at 30℃ for 25 days. Our results showed that the relative denitrification index(RDI) increased gradually with incubation time, and showed a rapid increase in the first 5 days of incubation. The RDI values declined quickly from surface soils to subsurface soils and then kept a small change in deeper soils along soil profiles over the incubation time. Denitrification proceeded much faster in the top 20 cm soils of open wetland than in the closed wetland, whereas no significant differences in RDI values were observed in deeper soils between both wetlands. The RDIs were significantly negatively correlated with bulk density and sand content, while a significantly positive correlation with clay content, soil organic matter, total nitrogen and phosphorous. The maximum net NO–3-N loss through denitrification in 1 m depth were higher in the open wetland than the closed wetland with higher soil pH values. Future research should be focused on understanding the influencing mechanisms of soil alkalinity.     

Land use effects on soil organic carbon,microbial biomass and microbial activity in Changbai Mountains of Northeast China

Land use changes are known to alter soil organic carbon （SOC） and microbial properties, however, information about how conversion of natural forest to agricultural land use as well as plantations affects SOC and microbial properties in the Changbai Moun- tains of Northeast China is meager. Soil carbon content, microbial biomass carbon （MBC）, basal respiration and soil carbon mineraliza- tion were studied in five selected types of land use： natural old-growth broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest （NF）; spruce plantation （SP） established following clear-cutting of NF; cropland （CL）; ginseng farmland （GF） previously under NF; and a five-year Mongolian oak young forest （YF） reforested on an abandoned GF, in the Changbai Mountains of Northeast China in 2011. Results showed that SOC content was significantly lower in SP, CL, GF, and YF than in NF. MBC ranged from 304.4 mg/kg in CL to 1350.3 mg/kg in NF, which was significantly higher in the soil of NF than any soil of the other four land use types. The SOC and MBC contents were higher in SP soil than in CL, GF, and YF soils, yielding a significant difference between SP and CL. The value of basal respiration was also higher in NF than in SP, CL, GF, and YF. Simultaneously, higher values of the metabolic quotient were detected in CL, GF, and YF soils, indicat- ing low substrate utilization of the soil microbial community compared with that in NF and SP soil. The values of cumulative mineral- ized carbon and potentially mineralized carbon （Co） in NF were significantly higher than those in CL and GF, while no significant dif- ference was observed between NF and SP. In addition, YF had higher values of Co and C mineralization rate compared with GF. The results indicate that conversion from NF into agricultural land （CL and GF） uses and plantation may lead to a reduction in soil nutrients （SOC and MBC） and substrate utilization efficiency of the microbial community. By contrast, soils below SP were more conducive to the preservation of soil organic matter, which was reflected in the comparison of microbial indicators among CL, GF, and YF land uses. This study can provide data for evaluating soils nutrients under different land use types, and serve as references for the rational land use of natural forest in the study area.     

�˼�Э�����Ӱ���GPS�߳���Ϸ����о�

???????-????????????????????????е??г??????,????????????????????????;???,??????????????????????????С???????÷??????????Э???????????????????о??????????????????????仯???????????????????????????????y?????????????????????????Э?????????С???????÷???????????????????????Ч??????????     

�����ݶ�����ģ�⼰���ڹ��Ե����е�Ӧ��

?о???????EGM??DTM???????????????????????????????????????EGM2008??SRTM3???????????????????????????????????????????????????T^_zz???????????????????μ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????λ???????????????仯??????λ???????ж??????????????????????????????????????????     

PS-InSAR��������̫ԭ�е�������α����

????2008??8??~2010??9???浵??20??ENVISAT ASAR?????????PS??InSAR???????????е?????????????????????λ?????????????2008~2010??????α?????????α???????У??????????????????к??????????     

������ֱ�ݶȷ����Ա仯�о�

???????????????????????????????????????????????????80 cm??130 cm??????????????????????仯??????0.02×10^-8 ms^-2/cm??????????仯????仯??????????????????????FG5??A10???????????????????????????????????????????????????仯????????     

������С��������Ԥ��ȫ�������ܵ��Ӻ���

??????????????????(VTEC)??????????????????????????????????4?????????????????????Э????????????????С???????÷????????????????????????г????????????????????????????????????????????????????????(CODE)????????????????????????0.812???????????ο???в???4 TECu????????????????????????????????????????????γ20°?????????????????????????????????????1??7 TECu?????????????????2.4 TECu?????CODE????????20.14%????????????????3.5 TECu?????CODE???????????????????3.0 TECu?????CODE????????8.25%??     

����ICESat�����ϼ����DZ���̱߳仯

????2004??2008???ICESat???????????????GLA12???????????????????????????????????????仯????????????????????????????????????仯??????????????????????????????3 m??????????????????????仯?????????????????????????????????     

BDS�������ԭ�����ȷ���

??????????????(BDS)???????????????????????????и???????????????????????????????????????????????t??????????????????????????????????BDS??????????????????????????????????????????t??????????????????????cm/s?????????????λ???????????????????????????mm/s???????????????У????????????????????????豸????????????????cm/s??????????????????????????????豸????????????????dm/s????????????????????????????????????????     

���͹���������ǵ�����

?????????????????????????????????????????????μ?????????????????????????????????????????????????0.05 mm????????0.02 mm?????????????????????????????????÷???????