Influence of mineral weathering reactions on the chemical composition of soil water,Springs, and ground water,Catoctin Mountains,Maryland

During 1983 and 1984, wet precipitation was primarily a solution of dilute sulphuric acid, whereas calcium and bicarbonate were the major ions in springs and ground water in two small watersheds with a deciduous forest cover in central Maryland. Dominant ions in soil water were calcium, magnesium, and sulphate. The relative importance of mineral weathering reactions on the chemical composition of these subsurface waters was compared to the contribution from wet precipitation, biological processes, and road deicing salts. Mineral reaction models, developed from geochemical mass-balance relationships, involved reactions of primary and secondary minerals in metabasalt and metarhyolite with hydrogen ion. Geochemical weathering reactions account for the majority of total ion equivalents in soil water (46 per cent), springs (51 per cent), and ground water (68 to 77 per cent). The net contribution of total ion equivalents from biological processes was 20 and 16 per cent for soil water and springs, respectively, but less than 10 per cent for ground water. The contribution of total ion equivalents from deicing salts (10 to 20 per cent) was related to proximity to roads. Strong acids in precipitation contributed 44 per cent of the total amount of hydrogen ions involved in mineral-weathering reactions for ground water in contact with metarhyolite compared to 25 per cent for ground water in contact with metabasalt, a less resistant rock type to weathering.     

The tectonics of Precambrian craton—mobile belts: progressive deformation of polygonal miniplates

The Archaean—Proterozoic crust of many Precambrian terrains consists of two contrasting tectonic units: Archaean cratonic blocks made up of granite—greenstone terrains and Archaean—Proterozoic mobile zones, fold belts and orogens which separate and tend to surround and flow around the cratons. The cratons are relatively rigid blocks, but have a history of ductile and brittle deformations. The surrounding mobile belts are either high-strain, high-grade metamorphic belts or folded basins. Thus, the relatively rigid cratons are surrounded by more ductile zones of mobility. It is speculated that the Archaean cratons are originally separate, although neighbouring ensialic, polygonal miniplate blocks of a single continent which have moved relative to one another according to the mantle controls and the prevailing Eulerian poles, and this mutual jostling has progressively deformed their common boundaries. The deformed boundaries are now the sites of the surrounding ductile and higher strain mobile belts, which are persistent crustal defects, while the cratons represent the more rigid and lower strain cores and relicts, which have stabilized after the Archaean. The mega-scale relationships between the cratons and mobile belts (e.g., East Africa) are compared to the smaller scale micro—meso-scale porphyroclast-matrix structures found in augen gneisses and mylonites. These structural relationships are of vastly different magnitudes (10⁸), but as there exists a continuum on all the intermediate scales they may all be related. Their geometric similarities are interpreted as having a common mechanical—rheological origin.     

Note on the layered anorthosite complex of the Harts Range ruby deposit in the Arunta Block,central Australia

A preliminary study of the host rock at the Harts Range ruby mine in the Arunta Block, central Australia, suggests that it is a layered anorthosite complex in contradiction of the metasedimentary, limestone‐terra rossa hypothesis of McColl & Warren (1979). The mineralogical, textural and structural evidence points to a meta‐igneous origin, and this compares well with other ruby‐bearing, Archaean, layered anorthosite complexes described from Greenland, India and elsewhere. This is the first report of a layered anorthosite in a high‐grade metamorphic terrain in the Australian Precambrian.     

The dolomitization of CaCO3: an experimental study at 252–295°C

The results of experiments on the hydrothermal dolomitization of calcite (between 252 and 295°C) and aragonite (at 252°C) by a 2 M CaCl₂-MgCl₂ aqueous solution are reported and discussed. Dolomitization of calcite proceeds via an intermediate high (ca. 35 mole %) magnesian calcite, whereas that of aragonite is carried out through the conversion of the reactant into a low (5.6 mole %) magnesian calcite which in turn transforms into a high (39.6 mole %) magnesian calcite. Both the intermediate phases and dolomite crystallize through a dissolution-precipitation reaction. The intermediate phases form under local equilibrium within a reaction zone surrounding the dissolving reactant grains. The volume of the reaction zone solution can be estimated from Sr²⁺ and Mg²⁺ partitioning equations. In the case of low magnesian calcite growing at the expense of aragonite at 252°C, the total volume of these zones is in the range of 2 × 10^?5 to 2 × 10^?4 1., out of 5 × 10^?3 1., the volume of the bulk solution.The apparent activation energies for the initial crystallization of high magnesian calcite and dolomite are 48 and 49 kcal/mole, respectively.Calcite transforms completely into dolomite within 100 hr at 252°C. The overall reaction time is reduced to approximately 4 hr at 295°C. The transformation of aragonite to dolomite at 252°C occurs within 24 hr. The nature of the reactant dictates the relative rates of crystallization of the intermediate phases and dolomite. With calcite as reactant, dolomite growth is faster than that of magnesian calcite; this situation is reversed when aragonite is dolomitized.Coprecipitation of Sr²⁺ with dolomite is independent of temperature (within analytical error) between 252 and 295°C. Its partitioning, with respect to calcium, between dolomite and solution results in distribution coefficients in the range of 2.31 × 10^?2 to 2.78 × 10^?2.