Thermal evolution of the Tertiary Shimanto Belt, Muroto Peninsula, Shikoku, Japan

Abstract The Shimanto accretionary complex on the Muroto Peninsula of Shikoku comprises two major units of Tertiary strata: the Murotohanto Sub-belt (Eocene-Oligocene) and the Nabae Sub-belt (Oligocene-Miocene). Both sub-belts have been affected by thermal overprints following the peak of accretion-related deformation. Palaeotemperatures for the entire Tertiary section range from ～ 140 to 315°C, based upon mean vitrinite reflectance values of 0.9–5.0%R_m. Values of illite crystallinity index are consistent with conditions of advanced diagenesis and anchimetamorphism. Illite/mica b₀ lattice dimensions indicate that burial pressures were probably no greater than 2.5kbar. In general, levels of thermal maturity are higher for the Murotohanto Sub-belt than for the Nabae Sub-belt. The Eocene-Oligocene strata also display a spatial decrease in thermal maturity from south to north and this pattern probably was caused by regional-scale differential uplift following peak heating. Conversely, the palaeothermal structure within the Nabae Sub-belt is fairly uniform, except for the local effects of mafic intrusions at the tip of Cape Muroto. There is a paleotemperature difference of ～ 90°C across the boundary between the Murotohanto and Nabae Sub-belts (Shiina-Narashi fault), and this contrast is consistent with approximately 1200 m of post-metamorphic vertical offset. Subduction prior to Middle Miocene probably involved the Kula or fused Kula-Pacific plate and the background geothermal gradient during the Eocene-Oligocene phase of accretion was ～ 30–35°C/km. Rapid heating of the Shimanto Belt evidently occurred immediately after a Middle Miocene reorganization of the subduction boundary. Hot oceanic lithosphere from the Shikoku Basin first entered the subduction zone at ～ 15 Ma; this event also coincided with the opening of the Sea of Japan and the rapid clockwise rotation of southwest Japan. The background geothermal gradient at that time was ～ 70°C/km. Whether or not all portions of the inherited (Eocene-Oligocene) palaeothermal structure were overprinted during the Middle Miocene remains controversial.     

Reporting negative results to stimulate experimental hydrology: discussion of “The role of experimental work in hydrological sciences – insights from a community survey”*

ABSTRACT

Experimental work in hydrology is in decline. Based on a community survey, Blume et al. showed that the hydrological community associates experimental work with greater risks. One of the main issues with experimental work is the higher chance of negative results (defined here as when the expected or wanted result was not observed despite careful experimental design, planning and execution), resulting in a longer and more difficult publishing process. Reporting on negative results would avoid putting time and resources into repeating experiments that lead to negative results, and give experimental hydrologists the scientific recognition they deserve. With this commentary, we propose four potential solutions to encourage reporting on negative results, which might contribute to a stimulation of experimental hydrology.     

MJO对2018年华北夏季降水的影响

本文基于华北夏季降水资料和热带大气季节内振荡（Madden–Julian Oscillation，简称MJO）指数、NCEP/NCAR（美国国家环境预报中心/美国国家大气研究中心）再分析环流资料，采用多种统计方法分析MJO与2018年华北夏季降水的关系及影响机制。结果表明:（1）MJO与华北夏季降水有密切的联系。虽然MJO不能移到较高纬度直接影响华北夏季降水，但MJO对流区的气旋会在其北侧激发出反气旋环流，这对“气旋—反气旋对”在缓慢东移过程中，处于较高纬度的反气旋会直接影响华北夏季降水。即MJO会间接影响华北夏季降水，表现为当夏季MJO进入5、6位相时，华北地区夏季会出现明显降水过程，但降水强弱与MJO振幅大小有关。（2）影响机制方面。在850 hPa，伴随MJO的“气旋—反气旋对”的东移，它会造成华北夏季偏南风水汽输送加强（对应RMM1）或东南风水汽输送加强（对应RMM2），从而有利于降水过程发生。在500 hPa层，MJO通过中层扰动向中高纬的传播，诱导副热带高压移到朝鲜半岛附近并加强，对西来高空槽形成阻挡作用，有利于华北地区产生上升运动，从而有利于华北夏季降水过程发生。（3）可以用MJO制作华北夏季延伸期降水过程预报。     

Electrodynamic heating and movement of the thermosphere

The theory of dissipation of ionospheric electric currents is extended to include viscosity. In a steady state (i.e. usually above about 140 km altitude) the joule plus viscous heating may be calculated by μ∇²v. E × B/B². At lower altitudes where viscosity may, in some circumstances, be relatively unimportant the joule dissipation is calculated by the usual formula j. (E + v × B). In a prevalent model of the auroral electrojets it is found that the joule heating can be much more intense outside auroral forms than within them. Heating due to auroral electrojets cause a semi-annual variation in the thermosphere. Movement caused by auroral electric fields make a contribution to the super-rotation of the midlatitude upper atmosphere. Random electric fields lead to an eddy ‘viscosity’ or ‘exchange coefficientrs in the upper thermosphere of magnitude ρE_R²/B³t_R²|∇E|. where t_R is the correlation time of the random component of electric fields E_R and ρ is air density. Theoretical conditions for significant heating by field-aligned currents are derived.     

Distances from auroral zones to the magnetic and geographic equators

Distance from auroral zone is a fundamental parameter in studies of disturbances produced in the thermosphere and ionosphere through the action of the solar wind. Calculations showing the great variation of the distances of the auroral “zones” from the magnetic equator and geographic equator are presented in diagrams. An auroral zone proximity index is proposed for use in correlative studies of upper atmosphere and of ionospheric disturbances.     

Activity–composition relations for phases in petrological calculations: an asymmetric multicomponent formulation

For petrological calculations, including geothermobarometry and the calculation of phase diagrams (for example, P–T petrogenetic grids and pseudosections), it is necessary to be able to express the activity–composition (a–x) relations of minerals, melt and fluid in multicomponent systems. Although the symmetric formalism—a macroscopic regular model approach to a–x relations—is an easy-to-formulate, general way of doing this, the energetic relationships are a symmetric function of composition. We allow asymmetric energetics to be accommodated via a simple extension to the symmetric formalism which turns it into a macroscopic van Laar formulation. We term this the asymmetric formalism (ASF). In the symmetric formalism, the a–x relations are specified by an interaction energy for each of the constituent binaries amongst the independent set of end members used to represent the phase. In the asymmetric formalism, there is additionally a "size parameter" for each of the end members in the independent set, with size parameter differences between end members accounting for asymmetry. In the case of fluid mixtures, for example, H₂O–CO₂, the volumes of the end members as a function of pressure and temperature serve as the size parameters, providing an excellent fit to the a–x relations. In the case of minerals and silicate liquid, the size parameters are empirical parameters to be determined along with the interaction energies as part of the calibration of the a–x relations. In this way, we determine the a–x relations for feldspars in the systems KAlSi₃O₈–NaAlSi₃O₈ and KAlSi₃O₈–NaAlSi₃O₈–CaAl₂Si₂O₈, for carbonates in the system CaCO₃–MgCO₃, for melt in the melting relationships involving forsterite, protoenstatite and cristobalite in the system Mg₂SiO₄–SiO₂, as well as for fluids in the system H₂O–CO₂. In each case the a–x relations allow the corresponding, experimentally determined phase diagrams to be reproduced faithfully. The asymmetric formalism provides a powerful and flexible way of handling a–x relations of complex phases in multicomponent systems for petrological calculations.