Collisional Pumping of H $${}_{2}$$ O and СH $${}_{3}$$ OH Masers in C-Type Shock Waves

Astronomy Letters - The collisional pumping of H $${}_{2}$$ O and СH $${}_{3}$$ OH masers in magnetohydrodynamic nondissociative C-type shocks is considered. A grid of C-type shock models...     

Transformation of the Extended Gamma Function Γ>_{0,2}^{2,0} [(b,x)] with Applications to Astrophysical Thermonuclear Functions dos Campos, Brazil, 10–14 November 1997.

Two representations of the extended gamma functions [(b,x)] are proved. These representations are exploited to find a transformation relation between two Fox's H-functions. These results are used to solve Fox's H-function in terms of Meijer's G-function for certain values of the parameters. A closed form representation of the kernel of the Bessel type integral transform is also proved.     

高红移类星体光谱中的L_α森林

在类星体光谱证认史上,“L_α森林”假说的提出与证实是继“发射红移”、“吸收红移、“多重红移”之后的又一座里程碑。L_α森林的概念形成于六、七十年代之交,八十年代初对它的研究逐渐进入高潮。研究L_α森林是了解星系际物质分布及其演化的重要途径,其潜在的宇宙学意义将是很深刻的.本文是继Sargent和Boksenberg之后有关L_α森林的第二篇专题评述,全文的要点是:L_α森林概念的形成和证实(第二、三节),吸收线密度的统计研究(第五节)、静止等值宽度(第六节)、吸收云的成团性(第七节)、吸收云的尺度(第八节)和其他物理参数(第九节)。其他有关论题可参阅文献[5]和另外几篇综述类星体吸收线的文章(参考文献[6,7,8]),以及为它们所引用的文献.     

九个类星体的氢L_α吸收线的统计研究

本文研究了九个类星体,即B2 1225+31.7,PKS 2126—158,Q 0002—422,Q 0453—423,PHL 957,PKS 0528—250,PKS 0805+046,PKS 1448—232和PKS 1442+101的高分辨率光谱中L_a吸收线的性质.发射线红移的范围是2.20≤Z_(em)≤3.54;L_a吸收线的红移范围是1.70≤Z_(abs)<3.54,总数为350条. 统计分析的结果支持了如下结论:(1)L_a吸收线的数密度在不同类星体之间没有显著差异;(2)L_a吸收线的数密度随红移没有显著变化;(3)L_a吸收线的静止等值宽度谱随红移没有显著变化;(4)L_a吸收线的性质在L_a发射线翼同连续区没有差别;(5)L_a吸收线的两点相关函数在分辨率极限内是平坦的,与星系相关函数的行为不同. 这些结果表明,高红移类星体中的L_a吸收线,很可能是均匀分布于宇宙空间的星系际氢云产生的.     

类星体L_α森林吸收线密度与发射红移的相关性

本文对16个高红移类星体的L_α森林吸收线密度N(z_(abs))统计分析的结果,表明它明显地依赖于类星体自身的发射红移z_(em)。这不仅表现在z(em)越大的类星体其全部L_α吸收线的平均数密度N(z_(abs))也越大;更重要的是,对于相同的吸收红移值z_(abs),而言,N(z_(abs))在统计意义上明显地随着类星体z_(em)的增大而增大。另一方面,本文也在“吸收体源自类星体抛射”的框架下作了统计,结果仍表明z_(em)对L_α森林吸收线密度有显著影响,但抛射速度却对被抛射体的数目无显著影响。最后,对所得的结果以及可能影响N(z_(abs))的若干因素作了讨论。     

地月系L_2点中继星激光测距成功率的估算

为了模拟位于地月系L2点的中继星"鹊桥"与月球的位置关系,进而估算中继星激光测距的成功率,按照轨道周期约为14天的要求对中继星所在的晕轨道进行计算,建立了一个综合考虑望远镜抖动、大气抖动和预报轨道横向偏离的模型。从数值上给出了一条轨道周期为14. 78天,X方向(地月连线方向)振幅为12 493 km,Y方向为34 596 km,Z方向(垂直于地月轨道平面方向)为11 916 km的周期轨道。由于晕轨道的最小振幅远大于月球遮挡的临界振幅4 000 km,因此月球对中继星不存在遮挡问题。基于建立的测距成功率模型,根据昆明站(国际编号:7820)的激光测距系统对运行在该轨道上的中继星进行测距成功率分析,结果表明:测距成功率随着中继星横向轨道标准差的增大呈快速降低的趋势。对于中继星到测站的平均距离而言,当中继星没有横向偏离时,探测器产生的光电子数为0. 151,成功率为14. 07%;横向偏离2 km时,光电子数降为0. 035,成功率降为3. 46%。对比最近距离与最远距离的情况,无横向偏离的情况下,探测器产生的光电子数从0. 174降为0. 139,成功率从16. 01%降为13. 02%。该计算结果可为云南天文台1. 2 m望远镜实现中继星激光测距提供参考。     

A closed-form solution to the minimum $${\Delta V_{\rm tot}^2}$$ Lambert’s problem

A closed form solution to the minimum DV_tot²{\Delta V_{\rm tot}^2} Lambert problem between two assigned positions in two distinct orbits is presented. Motivation comes from the need of computing optimal orbit transfer matrices to solve re-configuration problems of satellite constellations and the complexity associated in facing these problems with the minimization of DV_tot{\Delta V_{\rm tot}}. Extensive numerical tests show that the difference in fuel consumption between the solutions obtained by minimizing DV_tot²{\Delta V_{\rm tot}^2} and DV_tot{\Delta V_{\rm tot}} does not exceed 17%. The DV_tot²{\Delta V_{\rm tot}^2} solution can be adopted as starting point to find the minimum DV_tot{\Delta V_{\rm tot}}. The solving equation for minimum DV_tot²{\Delta V_{\rm tot}^2} Lambert problem is a quartic polynomial in term of the angular momentum modulus of the optimal transfer orbit. The root selection is discussed and the singular case, occurring when the initial and final radii are parallel, is analytically solved. A numerical example for the general case (orbit transfer “pork-chop” between two non-coplanar elliptical orbits) and two examples for the singular case (Hohmann and GTO transfers) are provided.     

Equivalence principle (EP) and solar system constraints on $R(1\pm\epsilon\ln({R \over R_{c}}))$ model of gravity

Experiments on the violation of equivalence principle (EP) and solar system give a number of constraints in which any modified gravity model must satisfy them. We study these constraints on a kind of f(R) gravity as f(R) = R(1±eln([(R)/(R_c)]))f(R) = R(1\pm\epsilon\ln({R \over R_{c}})). For this investigation we use of chameleon mechanism and show that a spherically body has thin-shell in this model. So that we obtain an effective coupling of the fifth force which is suppressed through a chameleon mechanism. Also, we obtain γ _PPN =1±1.13×10⁻⁵ which is agreement with experiment results. At last, we show that for R _c ≈ρ _c this model is consistent with EP, thin shell condition and fifth force of chameleon mechanism for ε⋍10⁻¹⁴.     

L_(syn)-E_(syn,p)-δ relation in active galactic nucleus jets and implication for the physical origin of the L_p-E_(p,z)-Γ_0 relation of gamma-ray bursts

High energy photon radiations of gamma-ray bursts(GRBs) and active galactic nuclei(AGNs)are dominated by their jet radiations.We examine whether the synchrotron radiations of jets in BL Lacs,flat spectrum radio quasars(FSRQs),and Narrow Line Seyfert 1 galaxies(NLS1s) follow the relation between the prompt gamma-ray emission and the initial Lorentz factor(Γ_0) of GRBs.It is shown that the AGN sample does not agree with the L_p-E_(p,z)-Γ_0 relation of GRBs.In addition,we obtain a tight relation of ■ for FSRQs and NLS1 galaxies,where L_(syn) is the luminosity at peak photon energy E_(syn,p) of the synchrotron radiations.This relation is different from the L_p-E_(p,z)-Γ_0 relation of GRB s.The dependence of L_(syn) to δ is consistent with the expectation of the Doppler boosting effect for the FSRQs and NLS1 galaxies,but it is not for GRBs.We argue that Γ_0 may be a representative of the kinetic power of the radiating region and the tight L_p-E_(p,z)-Γ_0 relation is shaped by the radiation physics and the jet power together.     

Catalogue of ${>}\,55$ MeV Wide-longitude Solar Proton Events Observed by SOHO,ACE, and the STEREOs at ≈1${\approx}\,1$ AU During 2009 – 2016

Based on energetic particle observations made at \({\approx}\,1\) AU, we present a catalogue of 46 wide-longitude (\({>}\,45^{\circ}\)) solar energetic particle (SEP) events detected at multiple locations during 2009?–?2016. The particle kinetic energies of interest were chosen as \({>}\,55\) MeV for protons and 0.18?–?0.31 MeV for electrons. We make use of proton data from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Energetic and Relativistic Nuclei and Electron Experiment (SOHO/ERNE) and the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory/High Energy Telescopes (STEREO/HET), together with electron data from the Advanced Composition Explorer/Electron, Proton, and Alpha Monitor (ACE/EPAM) and the STEREO/Solar Electron and Proton Telescopes (SEPT). We consider soft X-ray data from the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) and coronal mass ejection (CME) observations made with the SOHO/Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) and STEREO/Coronagraphs 1 and 2 (COR1, COR2) to establish the probable associations between SEP events and the related solar phenomena. Event onset times and peak intensities are determined; velocity dispersion analysis (VDA) and time-shifting analysis (TSA) are performed for protons; TSA is performed for electrons. In our event sample, there is a tendency for the highest peak intensities to occur when the observer is magnetically connected to solar regions west of the flare. Our estimates for the mean event width, derived as the standard deviation of a Gaussian curve modelling the SEP intensities (protons \({\approx}\,44^{\circ}\), electrons \({\approx}\,50^{\circ}\)), largely agree with previous results for lower-energy SEPs. SEP release times with respect to event flares, as well as the event rise times, show no simple dependence on the observer’s connection angle, suggesting that the source region extent and dominant particle acceleration and transport mechanisms are important in defining these characteristics of an event. There is no marked difference between the speed distributions of the CMEs related to wide events and the CMEs related to all near-Earth SEP events of similar energy range from the same time period.