中国东部城市旅游效率的空间特征——以沿海城市群为例(英文)

The traditional data envelopment analysis(DEA), bootstrap-DEA and Malmquist models are employed to measure different tourism efficiencies and their spatial characteristics of 61 cities in six coastal urban agglomerations in eastern China. The following conclusions are drawn.(1) The comprehensive efficiency(CE) of urban tourism using the bootstrap-DEA model is lower than the CE level using the DEA-CRS model, which confirms the significant tendency of the DEA-CRS model to overestimate results.(2) The geometric CE averages of urban tourism in the Yangtze River Delta(YRD) and the Pearl River Delta(PRD) have changed from ineffective to effective since 2000, the averages in the Beijing-TianjinHebei(BTH) and the Shandong Peninsula(SDP) have changed from ineffective to moderately effective since 2000, and those in the Central and Southern Liaoning(CSL) and the West Bank of Taiwan Strait(WBTS) have been ineffective since 2000.(3) The CE values of urban tourism in the PRD, the YRD, the BTH and the SDP have been slightly affected by the pure technical efficiency(PTE), whereas the CE values in the CSL and the WBTS have been slightly affected by the scale efficiency(SE) since 2000.(4) Spatially, the range of geometric averages of the total factor productivity(TFP) for the PRD, the YRD, the BTH, the SDP, the WBTS and the CSL has decreased sequentially, while the one for most cities in six urban agglomerations has exhibited a downward trend since 2000.(5) Collectively, the natural conditions, the economic policies and the tourism capital drive the SE change of urban tourism of the CSL and the WBTS. The tourism enterprises for increasing returns to scale and imitating innovative technology have an effect on the CE change of urban tourism in the BTH and the SDP. The tourism market competition drives the PTE change of urban tourism in the PRD and the YRD. Although the PTE and the SE of urban tourism in six coastal urban agglomerations suffer from uncertain events, the CE maintained overall sound momentum since 2000.     

中国城市群多中心网络的拓扑结构

在既有理论基础上扩展了城市群多中心网络的度量工具,考察中国12个城市群总部—分支机构的企业关联网络,比较梳理了地级城市空间联系的拓扑结构。实证研究发现：①包括长三角、珠三角和京津冀三大典型城市群在内,中国城市群内部网络系统的拓扑结构依然发育不完善,在联系数据方面均呈现出一定的稀疏矩阵特征,空间组合关系均为树状结构。②总部区位(出度)的层级性差异均高于分支机构区位(入度)的层级性差异,显示出城市群内部空间“流”的不对称性。③针对12个城市群内部网络的拓扑结构聚类分析表明：长三角、珠三角、京津冀、山东半岛、海峡西岸地区的城市群内部网络联系较为紧密,呈现出一定程度的一体化网络特征;其中三大典型城市群存在明显的企业总部集聚核心,其余城市群内部的网络联系松散,跨城企业联系比重较低,在拓扑结构上大多呈现出以省会或副省级城市为指向的向心式联系。     

知识密集型服务业集聚对城市群旅游创新影响的空间效应

知识密集型服务业作为国家创新体系的重要组成部分,已经成为促进区域旅游创新发展的关键因素.以中国长三角、珠三角和京津冀城市群为例,运用区位商、数据包络分析法、探索性空间数据分析法和空间计量模型等方法,对知识密集型服务业集聚和旅游创新的时空演变特征与两者之间的空间关联性深入分析.结果 表明:①三大城市群知识密集型服务业集聚...     

技术转移视角下中国三大城市群区域一体化发展研究

基于城际间的专利转让数据,从技术转移体系一体化的视角阐释中国三大城市群的区域一体化进程,得出以下结论：①在总体层面和技术供给链层面,长三角、珠三角和京津冀这三大城市群的区域一体化皆未实现,其中长三角城市群正朝着一体化方向发展,大部分城市的技术获取依赖于区内技术转移网络,珠三角城市群一体化程度次之,但朝着一体化相反方向发展,京津冀城市群一体化程度最低,大部分城市的技术获取愈发依赖于外部技术转移网络;②在技术销售链层面,仅长三角城市群实现了区域一体化,以上海为核心的一体化技术转移体系正加速形成,珠三角城市群大部分城市的技术销售愈发依赖于城市群外部,而京津冀城市群则愈发依赖于城市群内部;③三大城市群的技术流动越来越多地跨越边界,区域内技术转移网络越来越无法满足城市群的技术发展需求。     

环渤海地区城市旅游业发展效率时空特征及其演化阶段——以三大城市群为例

以环渤海地区京津冀、山东半岛和辽东半岛三大城市群地级以上城市为单元,采用数据包络分析和全要素生产率指数模型测算和分析三大城市群城市旅游业发展效率及其时空特征分解效率差异及其影响因素的演化阶段。结果表明：①2000 年以来京津冀和山东半岛城市群城市旅游业平均投入资源利用综合水平呈无效向中等转变,而辽东半岛城市群始终处于无效状态,各城市群主要直辖市、省会城市和核心城市旅游业投入资源利用综合水平呈无效向中等转变;②2000 年以来京津冀和山东半岛城市群城市旅游业综合效率受纯技术效率的影响和制约程度略强于规模效率,而辽东半岛城市群则反之;③2000 年以来环渤海地区三大城市群城市旅游业平均全要素生产率变化呈依次下降态势,且大多数城市提高幅度大但趋于下降,京津冀和山东半岛城市群主要直辖市、省会城市和核心城市全要素生产率变化提高幅度明显高于辽东半岛城市群。④环渤海地区三大城市群城市旅游业发展效率分别受旅游投资、旅游技术和旅游市场因素、旅游产品和旅游技术因素、旅游资源、旅游政策和旅游项目（产品）因素的影响,各自处于技术创新阶段、技术学习阶段和规模主导阶段。     

城市群创新联系网络结构与创新效率研究

引入修正引力模型、社会网络分析方法、DEA模型以及Tobit模型,探讨2001—2015年京津冀、长三角、珠三角三大城市群的创新联系网络结构对创新效率的影响。研究表明：① 创新联系格局方面,京津冀城市群呈现以“京津”为核心的放射状发展特征,长三角城市群呈现以“Z”字形为主轴的类钻石型空间格局,珠三角城市群形成了以珠江口两侧城市为核心、其他城市为重要节点的空间格局;② 在创新联系网络结构特征方面,京津冀城市群呈极核式发展,群内创新联系高度依赖于核心城市,长三角和珠三角城市群由单中心驱动转变为多中心驱动,呈均衡发展特征,京津冀和珠三角城市群创新联系网络具有“小世界”网络特征;③ Tobit模型回归结果显示,三大城市群中,城市节点在城市群创新联系网络中的中心位置、中介地位、对结构洞的运用能力和集聚程度对其创新效率的影响存在差异。     

2000年以来中国东部四大沿海城市群城市旅游业发展效率的综合测度与时空特征

以城市群地级以上城市为生产单元,采用传统DEA、Bootstrap-DEA纠偏和Malmquist指数模型测算和分析中国东部4 大沿海城市群城市旅游业发展效率与时空特征。结果表明：①由传统DEA模型测度的城市群城市旅游业综合效率及其分解效率值均要高于Bootstrap-DEA纠偏模型测度后的效率值,表明了传统模型测度存在明显高估倾向的问题。② 2000 年以来4 大城市群主要直辖市、省会城市和核心城市旅游业投入资源利用综合水平呈持续良好态势;同时,长三角和珠三角城市旅游业平均投入资源利用综合水平呈无效向良好转变,京津冀和山东半岛城市旅游业则呈无效向中等转变。③ 2000 年以来珠三角和长三角城市旅游业综合效率受纯技术效率的影响程度略强于规模效率,而京津冀和山东半岛城市旅游业则反之。④ 2000年以来4 大城市群大多数城市提高幅度大但趋于下降,珠三角和长三角主要直辖市、省会城市和核心城市全要素生产率变化提高幅度略高于京津冀和山东半岛;同时,珠三角、长三角、京津冀和山东半岛城市旅游业平均全要素生产率提高幅度呈依次下降态势。     

中国五大城市群人口流入的空间模式及变动趋势

城市群在中国城镇化格局中占有重要地位,也是快速城市化时期的主要人口流入地。本文关注京津冀、长三角、珠三角、长江中游和成渝五大城市群,利用人口普查和流动人口动态监测调查数据,从流入人口分布格局、流动范围和来源地等多维度剖析城市群人口流入的空间模式,并从居留和落户意愿空间差异的视角探讨空间模式的发展趋势及其对流入地和流出地的影响。研究发现,各城市群流入人口向中心城市持续集中,等级和空间分布格局总体稳定;流动范围有所扩大,省内流动增速普遍高于省际;沿海城市群人口吸引范围大但仍服从距离衰减律,不同来源地流入人口的城市群偏好存在差异。在流入地,沿海城市群中心城市面临流动人口管理服务的持续挑战,内陆城市群中心城市和一般城市吸引力并存;在流出地,平等开放的高质量公共服务供给是吸引人口回流的重要途径,少数地区的人口流失可能成为较长期的现象。     

特大城市群生态空间及其生态承载状态的时空分异

快速城镇化导致中国城市群地区生态空间被大量挤占,生态承载压力加剧,已成为制约城市群健康发展的重要因素。本文界定并分析了京津冀、长三角、粤港澳大湾区、成渝、长江中游5个特大城市群三生空间结构分布特征,解析了1990—2020年生态空间时空分异及其变化的影响因素,进一步通过水资源供给、水质调节、空气质量调节、休闲游憩探讨了近30年生态空间综合承载状态及其时空分异特征。研究结果表明：① 不同形成发育阶段的城市群呈现差异性的三生空间面积结构比、以多中心组合为主的生活空间拓展演变模式,以及屏障式、紧密、离散、全包围式的生态空间结构。② 1990—2020年城市群生活空间面积持续大幅度增加而生产空间呈现相反趋势,除粤港澳大湾区以外,生态空间均表现出增加态势尤其近10年增势明显。三生空间面积结构及其时空变化特征,说明特大城市群生产、生态空间的主要功能从供给转向调节和文化,并反映了中国从快速城镇化到新型可持续城镇化的转变。③ 5个城市群分别有78.6%、73.1%、54.5%、56.3%和25.8%市域呈现严重超载的综合生态承载状态,其中水资源供给、水质调节是制约城市群生态承载水平的要因,未来需要重视城市群生态空间保留量及其合理布局以减缓生态承载压力。本文可为城市群绿色可持续发展、三生空间结构优化和配置提供科学依据。     

中国城市群技术知识单中心与多中心探究

城市空间组织的多中心、网络化特征受到区域经济研究关注。但由于发展阶段、空间尺度、研究视角的差异,城市区域多中心格局有待商榷,知识经济时代解读知识流作用下的城市空间组织应成为经济地理学重点破解的命题。基于中国知识产权局2014年申请和联合申请发明专利数据,运用社会网络分析法和基尼系数,从知识生产和知识网络层面,对京津冀、长三角、珠三角、长江中游、成渝五大城市群技术知识形态多中心和多尺度功能多中心进行测度。研究发现：① 城市群技术知识创新呈现网络化模式,但在形态和功能上多呈现单中心格局,与已有研究基于城市间基础设施联系、企业联系、科学知识联系广泛认同城市群呈现多中心格局的观点不同;② 城市群技术知识网络结构具有空间异质性,国家尺度技术知识流强度的空间不均衡性更加显著,强联系由少数核心城市控制;③ 形态和功能多中心程度存在区域差异,同城市群创新基础、经济实力、协同发展水平有关;④ 功能多中心程度具有尺度敏感性,区域尺度功能多中心程度高于国家尺度。研究结论有助于引发对城市空间组织理论的再思考。     

不透水地表盖度视角下中美城市群空间结构对比——以“京津冀”与“波士华”为例

将城市不透水地表盖度产品应用于城市群空间结构研究具有重要价值。本文基于多源遥感数据提取了“京津冀”与“波士华”城市群近40年（1972-2011年）亚像元级不透水地表专题信息,构建了城市群空间结构对比分析数据集;并引入引力模型和景观格局理论,利用引力指数、景观格局指数以及空间结构参数等,采用地理信息系统空间分析方法,从城市群与城市两个尺度对城市群空间结构进行了对比研究。结果表明：① “京津冀”城市群不透水地表快速增长,而“波士华”城市群较为稳定;② “京津冀”城市群空间结构经历了城市孤立发展阶段、双核心城市群阶段、城市群组阶段以及城市群网络化阶段,“波士华”城市群空间结构较为稳定,空间结构呈现出“点—轴”带状分布;③ 中国城市不透水地表盖度“高—高”聚集区呈现出典型团块状“摊大饼”形态,而美国城市呈现出一种“多中心集聚、分散成组”的态势;④ “京津冀”城市群生态、生产与生活用地不透水地表面积占比均高于“波士华”城市群。最后,基于两国城市群空间结构的对比结果,从空间布局优化角度对“京津冀”城市群的发展提出了初步建议。     

中国城市群旅游网络化社会资本分异研究

借助社会网络分析,对中国城市群旅游网络化社会资本分异特征进行探讨。结果显示:①在关系上,各城市群的规模、发展程度、地理地形以及资源环境的不同,导致各城市群旅游关系最强值差别明显。②在网络结构上,整体中心势偏高的地区为西部与北部;全国城市群的整体网密度普遍不高,有较大的提升空间;核心-边缘空间结构模式广泛存在于中国城市群内。③在制度上,无论从正式制度方面还是从非正式制度方面,长江中游、长江三角洲及中原城市群表现均较为突出,旅游网络化发展态势良好。强化政府协调功能、加强异质旅游资源开发、重视边缘区旅游产业建设以及完善城市群旅游网络化发展机制等是优化与积累社会资本及促进中国城市群旅游网络化发展的重要途径。     

Comparison of spatial structures of urban agglomerations between the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Boswash based on the subpixel-level impervious surface coverage product

Under the background of China’s rapid urbanization, study on comparative analysis of the spatial structure of urban agglomerations between China and the US can provide the policy proposals of space optimization for the Chinese government. Taking the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) and Boswash as study area, we mapped the subpixel-level impervious surface coverage of the BTH and Boswash, respectively, from 1972 to 2011. Further, landscape metrics, gravitational model and spatial analysis were used to analyze the differences of the spatial structures between the BTH and Boswash. The results showed that (1) the area of the impervious surface increased rapidly in the BTH, while those remained stable in the Boswash. (2) The spatial structure of the BTH experienced different periods including isolated cities stage, dual-core cities stage, group cities stage and network-style cities stage, while those of the Boswash was more stable, and its spatial pattern showed a “point-axis” structure. (3) The spatial pattern of high-high assembling regions of the impervious surface exhibited a “standing pancake” feature in the BTH, while those showed a “multi-center, local aggregation and global discrete” feature in the Boswash. (4) All the percentages of the impervious surface of ecological, living, and production land of the BTH were higher than those of the Boswash. At last, from the perspective of space optimization of urban agglomeration, the development proposals for the BTH were proposed.     

城市群水污染物排放的驱动因素及尺度效应

揭示水污染物排放的驱动因素及尺度效应是研究城市群演化环境效应的重要议题,也是实现城市群水污染物协同减排和水环境协同治理的重要前提。以长三角城市群的305个县域为例,选取化学需氧量（COD）和氨氮（NH₃-N）两项特征污染物指标,在2011—2016年水污染物排放时空格局分析基础上,采用空间滞后模型（SLM）和空间误差模型（SEM）评估城市群水污染物排放的驱动因素,构建多尺度地理加权回归（MGWR）模型诊断驱动力的尺度效应及空间异质性。结果显示：常住人口规模、城镇化水平和经济发展水平对水污染物排放呈现全域层面的正向驱动,而工业化水平、社会固定资产投资、外商直接投资、地方财政分权程度以局部的微观作用为主;固定资产投资在杭嘉湖及沿海地区对COD和NH₃-N排放均呈较强正向驱动,工业化水平在太湖流域及浙江全域对COD排放呈正向驱动;外商直接投资对NH₃-N排放呈局部抑制作用,外资投入的“污染光环”效应在苏北、皖北、浙南等城市群边缘区较为突出;地方财政分权在城市群中心区对COD排放具有明显抑制作用,反映出地方环保意识提升和多层级环境规制强约束的积极影响。建议引导绿色生产生活方式以降低水污染物排放基数,在工业生产、资本投入和财政收支等领域嵌入环境倒逼机制,系统构建与水环境承载力相适应的城市群高质量发展格局。     

Spatiotemporal evolution of PM2.5 concentrations in urban agglomerations of China

As the main form of new urbanization in China,urban agglomerations are an im-portant platform to support national economic growth,promote coordinated regional devel-opment,and participate in international competition and cooperation.However,they have become core areas for air pollution.This study used PM2.5 data from NASA atmospheric re-mote sensing image inversion from 2000 to 2015 and spatial analysis including a spatial Durbin model to reveal the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and main factors con-trolling PM2.5 in China's urban agglomerations.The main conclusions are as follows:(1)From 2000 to 2015,the PM2.5 concentrations of China's urban agglomerations showed a growing trend with some volatility.In 2007,there was an inflection point.The number of low-concentration cities decreased,while the number of high-concentration cities increased.(2)The concentrations of PM2.5 in urban agglomerations were high in the west and low in the east,with the"Hu Line"as the boundary.The spatial differences were significant and in-creasing.The concentration of PM2.5 grew faster in urban agglomerations in the eastern and northeastern regions.(3)The urban agglomeration of PM2.5 had significant spatial concentra-tions.The hot spots were concentrated to the east of the Hu Line,and the number of hot-spot cities continued to rise.The cold spots were concentrated to the west of the Hu Line,and the number of cold-spot cities continued to decline.(4)There was a significant spatial spillover effect of PM2.5 pollution among cities within urban agglomerations.The main factors control-ling PM2.5 pollution in different urban agglomerations had significant differences.Industriali-zation and energy consumption had a significant positive impact on PM2.5 pollution.Foreign direct investment had a significant negative impact on PM2.5 pollution in the southeast coastal and border urban agglomerations.Population density had a significant positive impact on PM2.5 pollution in a particular region,but this had the opposite effect in neighboring areas.Urbanization rate had a negative impact on PM2.5 pollution in national-level urban agglomer-ations,but this had the opposite effect in regional and local urban agglomerations.A high degree of industrial structure had a significant negative impact on PM2.5 pollution in a region,but this had an opposite effect in neighboring regions.Technical support level had a signifi-cant impact on PM2.5 pollution,but there were lag effects and rebound effects.     

中国城市群地区PM2.5时空演变格局及其影响因素

城市群作为中国新型城镇化主体形态,是支撑全国经济增长、促进区域协调发展、参与国际分工合作的重要平台,也是空气污染的核心区域。本文选取2000-2015年NASA大气遥感影像反演PM_2.5数据,运用GIS空间分析和空间面板杜宾模型,揭示了中国城市群PM_2.5的时空演变特征与主控因素。结果显示：① 2000-2015年中国城市群PM_2.5浓度呈现波动增长趋势,2007年出现拐点,低浓度城市减少,高浓度城市增多。② 城市群PM_2.5浓度以胡焕庸线为界呈现东高西低的格局,城市群间空间差异性显著且不断扩大,东部、东北地区浓度提升更快。③ 城市群PM_2.5年均浓度空间集聚性显著,以胡焕庸线为界,热点区域集中东部,范围持续增加,冷点集中在西部,范围持续缩小。④ 城市群内各城市间PM_2.5浓度存在空间溢出效应。不同城市群影响要素差异显著,工业化和能源消耗对PM_2.5污染有正向影响;外商投资在东南沿海和边境城市群对PM_2.5污染具有负向影响;人口密度对本地区PM_2.5污染主要具有正向影响,对邻近地区则相反;城市化水平在国家级城市群对PM_2.5污染有负向影响,在区域性和地方性城市群则相反;产业结构高级度对本地区PM_2.5污染有负向影响,对邻近地区则相反;技术扶持度对PM_2.5污染的影响显著,但存在滞后性和回弹效应。     

中国城市群城市用地扩张时空动态特征

认识城市群城市用地扩张特征、扩张质量及景观生态效应等综合信息将有助于城市群空间高质量发展规划与决策。选取10个不同发育等级的城市群作为研究对象,综合运用城市用地扩张强度指数、城市用地扩张强度差异指数、景观扩张指数、景观格局指数,分析1990—2015年期间城市群城市用地扩张时空特征及景观生态效应,并构建人口、经济与城市用地协同发展指数,据此分析城市用地扩张中“人—地”关系协同程度。结果表明：① 1990—2015年,各个城市群城市用地面积持续增加,建成区的范围不断扩大,扩张强度呈现“上升—下降”的趋势;在2010年之前成熟型城市群的扩张强度最高,2010年之后培育型城市群成为扩张强度最高的类型。② 城市群城市用地扩张总体上呈现不均衡布局的趋势,高速扩张区域主要分布在沿海地区。从全国视角来看,东部高于中、西、东北部,整体城市群快速扩张的中心由东向西移动。③ 城市群城市用地空间扩张模式表现出边缘式和飞地式两种空间扩张模式并存,不同发育等级之间具有明显差异性,成熟型城市群的空间结构较为稳定,其他两种类型的城市群空间结构初具雏形或尚未形成。④ 城市群城市用地扩张“吞没”了郊区和农村地区,破碎化程度、形状的复杂程度较高,景观格局表现出不稳定。⑤ 城市群“人口—土地”协同程度逐步增强,“经济—土地”协同程度整体较高,整体上表现出城市用地扩张质量有所提升。新时期城市群城市用地应严格控制扩张规模,加快中小城市的发展,促进城市群城市用地扩张均衡发展,为城市群国土空间高质量发展提供重要参考。     

Drivers of water pollutant discharge in urban agglomerations and their scale effects: Empirical analysis of 305 counties in the Yangtze River Delta

Revealing the drivers and scale effects of water pollutant discharges is an important issue in the study of the environmental consequences during urban agglomeration evolution. It is also a prerequisite for realizing collaborative water pollutant reduction and environmental governance in urban agglomerations. This paper takes 305 counties in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) as an example and selects chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonia nitrogen (NH₃-N) as two distinctive pollutant indicators, using the Spatial Lag Model (SLM) and Spatial Error Model (SEM) to estimate the drivers of water pollutant discharges in 2011 and 2016. Then the Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model is constructed to diagnose the scale effect and spatial heterogeneity of the drivers. The findings show that the size of population, the level of urbanization, and the economic development level show global-level increase impacts on water pollutant discharges, while the level of industrialization, social fixed assets investment, foreign direct investment, and local fiscal decentralization are local-level impacts. The spatial heterogeneity of local drivers presents the following characteristics: Social fixed assets investment has a strong promoting effect on both COD and NH₃-N discharges in the Hangzhou-Jiaxing-Huzhou region and the coastal area of the YRD; industrialization has a promoting effect on COD discharges in the Taihu Lake basin and Zhejiang province; foreign direct investment has a local inhibitory effect on NH₃-N discharge, and the pollution halo effect is more prominent in the marginal areas of the YRD such as northern Jiangsu, northern Anhui, and southern Zhejiang; local fiscal decentralization has a noticeable inhibitory effect on COD discharge in the central areas of the YRD, reflecting the positive impacts on improved local environmental awareness and stronger constraints of multilevel environmental regulations in the urban agglomeration. Therefore, it is recommended to guide greener development to reduce the water pollutant discharge; to embed an environmental push-back mechanism in the fields of industrial production, capital investment, and financial income and expenditure; and to establish a high-quality development pattern of urban agglomerations systematically compatible with the carrying capacity of the water environment.     

Important progress and future direction of studies on China’s urban agglomerations

Urban agglomerations are an inevitable outcome of China’s new national industrialization and urbanization reaching relatively advanced stages of development over the past 30 years. In the early 2000s, urban agglomerations became new geographical units for participating in global competition and the international division of labor, and China has spent the past decade promoting them as the main spaces for pushing forward its new form of urbanization. The convening of the first Central Work Conference on Urbanization and the National New-type Urbanization Plan (2014-2020) further defined the status of urban agglomerations as the main players in promoting China’s new type of national urbanization. Nevertheless, urban agglomerations remain a weak link in Chinese academia and are in urgent need of study. Only 19 articles on the theme of urban agglomerations were published in the journal Acta Geographica Sinica between 1934 and 2013, accounting for only 0.55% of all articles written during that period. Not only are there very few, they have also all been published within a relatively short period of time, with the first having been published only 10 years ago. The studies are also concentrated among only a few authors and institutions, and research is aimed at national requirements but is rather divergent. Even so, some studies on urban agglomerations have played a leading role and made important contributions to dictating the overall formation of urban agglomerations nationwide. Specifically, a proposed spatial pattern for urban agglomerations formed the basic framework for the spatial structure of China’s urban agglomerations and guided the government to make urban agglomerations the main urban pattern when promoting the new type of urbanization; proposed standards and technologies for identifying the spatial dimensions of urban agglomerations played an important role in defining the scope of national urban agglomerations; a series of studies in the area of urban agglomerations spurred more in-depth and practical studies in the field; and studies on issues related to the formation and growth of urban agglomerations provided warnings on the future selection and development of urban agglomerations. Taking the progress and results of these studies as a foundation, the foci of selecting and developing urban agglomerations in China are as follows: to be problem-oriented and profoundly reflect on and review new problems exposed in the selection and development of urban agglomerations; to concentrate on urban agglomerations and lay importance on the formation of a new “5+9+6” spatial structure for China’s urban agglomerations; to rely on urban agglomerations and promote the formation of a new pattern of national urbanization along the main axes highlighted by urban agglomerations; to be guided by national strategic demand and continue to deepen understanding of major scientific issues in the course of the formation and development of urban agglomerations, including studying the resource and environmental effects of high-density urban agglomerations, scientifically examining resource and environmental carrying capacities of high-density urban agglomerations, creating new management systems and government coordination mechanisms for the formation and development of urban agglomerations, studying the establishment of public finance systems and public finance reserve mechanisms for urban agglomerations, and studying and formulating technical specifications for urban agglomeration planning and standards for delineating urban agglomeration boundaries.     

中国东部沿海5大城市群旅游流网络结构空间分布特征研究

基于大数据挖掘的旅游流网络结构研究,是旅游流深化研究的主要方向之一.论文基于网络爬虫技术抓取携程旅行网上的中国东部沿海5大城市群旅游线路相关数据,构建城市群旅游流网络,进一步利用社会网络分析法从网络密度、节点结构特征、网络凝聚子群、核心—边缘特征、结构洞等方面揭示旅游流网络结构特征.主要结论有:中国东部沿海5大城市群旅...