On the internal structures of mercury and venus

Recent radar measures of the radius and mass of Mercury imply a composition for the planet containing about 60% iron. One or other of two conclusions seems inescapable: either that Mercury is a highly exceptional object among terrestrial planets, or that all measures to date of the planet involve substantial systematic error. In either case the situation is such that independent checking of the radius and mass of Mercury by some entirely different means has become of the greatest importance to planetary physics and cosmogony.The recent radar and other determinations of the solid radius of Venus imply an internal structure similar to that of the Earth, namely a liquid core surrounded by a solid mantle and outer-shell zone. The theory also implies that the temperatures within Venus should be slightly higher than at the corresponding parts of the Earth. The proportion of mass in the core of Venus (about 25% of the whole) is entirely consistent with the phase-change hypothesis as to its nature, as of course is also the absence of any liquid or iron core in both Mars and the Moon. On the older iron-core hypothesis, Venus with considerably less iron content by mass than the Earth, and Mars and the Moon with none, would all present problems in different degrees to account for the differences of composition.If Venus began as an all-solid planet, the initial radius would have been about 6300 km, and the total amount of surface reduction to date owing to contraction of the planet would have been almost 40 million km², and as a proportion of the total area only slightly less than the contraction of the Earth. The theory thus predicts the existence of folded and thrusted mountain-systems of terrestrial type at the surface of Venus.     

Relation of a contracting earth to the apparent accelerations of the sun and moon

The tidal theory of the evolution of the lunar orbit has remained inconsistent with the observational values of the apparent secular accelerations of the Sun and Moon since it was first developed by Jeffreys in 1920. Allowance for a changing moment of inertia of the Earth enables the discrepancy to be completely removed if a decrease is occurring at a rate of just about the amount already required by the phase-change theory of the nature of the terrestrial core. The agreement of the resulting theory with the latest determinations of the lunar acceleration increases confidence in the phase-change hypothesis. On the other hand the theory renders it most unlikely that a changing constant of gravitation will prove necessary to account for the observations. On the present theory of itself the Moon would have been extremely close to the Earth only about 10⁹ yr ago which suggests that some additional process may at times have influenced the lunar orbit.     

Developments in geophysics

Recent claim by Jeffreys that thermal contraction is the only mechanism yielding a real reduction of the Earth remotely near sufficient for mountain-formation is demonstrably incorrect, since the phase-change hypothesis has been shown to lead inescapably to more than ten times the maximum amount possible on his theory. In any event, the absence of folded and thrusted systems on Mars proves that thermal contraction cannot be a relevant process, while the fact that the terrestrial planets began as ccol all-solid bodies completely rules out thermal contraction a priori as a possibility. Apart from the purely verbal claims associated with plate-tectonice, the phase-change theory remains the sole contender resulting in geologically adequate contraction.     

Planetary core size: A seismological approach

A key parameter for understanding the geodynamics of a terrestrial planet is the size of its core. Numerical evaluation of 28 different interior structure models of Mercury, Venus, Earth, the Moon, and Mars suggests that there is an almost linear relationship between the core radius and the extent of the seismic P-wave core shadow. A scaling law is derived from a simple mantle density and velocity model that permits the interpretation of respective seismic measurements on terrestrial planetary bodies.     

The ramsey phase-change hypothesis

The series of papers by the late W. H. Ramsey developing on a mathematical and physical basis the phase-change theory of the terrestrial core are summarised, and the numerous remarkable successes of the theory in accounting for hitherto unexplained properties of the interior of the Earth are emphasised. Subsequent attack on the problem by a different approach, based on established seismic data, confirmed independently the correctness of the general Ramsey-theory, and enabled it to be developed in numerical detail to demonstrate the precise nature of the evolution of the Earth. This treatment shows that through radioactive heating the Earth, starting in all-solid form, develops conditions at its centre suitable for the change of phase to take place, and there then occurs the sudden Ramsey-collapse involving formation within a matter of minutes of a metallic liquid core of large radius (in fact of 2042 km radius and just over 6% of the mass of the Earth). With further increase of temperature at the core-mantle boundary, evolution proceeds continuously along a stable series of configurations of increasing core-mass and core-radius, anddecreasing overall surface-radius. A steadily decreasing moment-of-inertia accompanies the general contraction of the planet and at a rate in close agreement with that required by the intrinsic accelerative component of the angular velocity of the Earth revealed by the ancient-eclipse data. The total decrease of surface-radius since the initial sudden collapse has been by about 300 km, which involves a reduction of surface-area by some 50×10⁶ km², and a redistribution by means of folding and thrusting of about 160×10⁹ km³ of outerlayers material, values quite adequate to account for some twenty separate periods of mountain-building during the age of the Earth. The iron-core hypothesis has nothing to offer by way of solution of any of these problems, and must be assigned negligible weight in comparison with the phase-change hypothesis.Paper dedicated to Professor Hannes Alfvén on the occasion of his 70th birthday, 30 May, 1978.That the density was between 5 and 6 times that of water was estimated by Newton from the relative masses of the planets, but he made no identification with iron.Principia, Book III, Propns VIII & X.     

Does the Moon Have a Metallic Core?: Constraints from Giant Impact Modeling and Siderophile Elements

The issue of whether the Moon has a small metallic core is reexamined in light of new information: improved dynamical modeling, new constraints on core size, and high temperature and pressure metal-silicate partition coefficients. Addressed specifically is the question of whether the Moon's siderophile element budget can be explained by derivation of the Moon from a differentiated impactor or proto-Earth (stage 1), followed by formation of a small metallic core within the Moon (stage 2). If the Moon is made of mantle material from either a “hot” impactor or a “warm” impactor or proto-Earth, a small metallic core (0.7 to 2 mass%) is predicted. If the Moon is made from mantle material from a “hot” proto-Earth, the lunar mantle would be more depleted in W or Re than is observed. Scenarios in which the Moon is made from impactor or proto-Earth mantle material that has equilibrated with metal at low pressures and temperatures (“cold” scenarios) would yield a much larger metallic core than observed. Finally, the greater depletions of Ni, Mo, and Re in the Moon (relative to the Earth) can be explained by low PT and reduced metal-silicate equilibrium in an impactor without later core formation in the Moon (i.e., no stage 2), but depletions of Co, Ga, and W cannot. Altogether, geochemically unlikely or geophysically inadequate non-metallic core alternatives, substantial geophysical evidence for a metallic core, and the successful models presented here for siderophile element depletions all favor the presence of a small lunar metallic core. Previous geochemical objections to an impactor origin of the Moon are eliminated because siderophile element concentrations in the lunar mantle are consistent with separation of a small core from a bulk Moon derived from impactor mantle material.     

The origin of the Moon: Theories involving joint formation with the Earth

A planet the size of the Earth or the Moon is much like a blast furnace; it produces slag-like rock floating on a mass of liquid metal. In the Earth, the mantle and crust are the slag, and the core is the liquid iron.In the Moon, there is clear chemical evidence that liquid iron was separated from the mass, but the Moon has no detectable iron core. This points to some kind of joint origin, which put the metallic iron in the Earth's core. For instance, the Moon might have been a detached part of the rocky matter of the Earth, as suggested by G. H. Darwin in the 1880's. But is is also clear, as Ringwood has pointed out, the there has been an enormous loss of volatiles from both Earth and Moon, but especially from the Moon. It may be that the Moon formed from a sediment-ring of small bodies detached somehow from the outer parts of the Earth, as Öpik has suggested.If tektites come from the Moon, then Darwin's suggestion is probably right; if they come from the Earth, then the Öpik-Ringwood sediment ring may be the origin.Paper presented at the AAAS Symposium on the Early History of the Earth and Moon in Philadelphia on 28 December 1971.     

Giant impacts and the initiation of plate tectonics on terrestrial planets

Earth is the only terrestrial planet with present-day lithosphere recycling through plate tectonics. However, theoretical models of mantle convection based on general considerations find that all the terrestrial planets should be operating in the stagnant lid regime, in which the planets are one-plated and there is no lithosphere recycling. The stagnant lid regime is a consequence of the strong viscosity contrast across the convective layer, and therefore the upper lid (roughly equivalent to the lithosphere) must be sufficiently weakened in order to be mobilized. Here I propose that giant impacts could have provided the upper layer weakening required for surface recycling, and hence for plate tectonics, to initiate on the early Earth. Additionally, giant impacts originated lithosphere thickness and density differences, which might contribute to the initiation of subduction. Impacts are more energetic for Earth than for Mars, which could explain the likely early existence of plate tectonics on the Earth whereas Mars never had lithosphere recycling. On the other hand, convection on Mercury and the Moon might be sluggish or even inexistent, implying a reduced influence of giant impacts on their internal dynamics, whereas there is no record of the earliest geological history of Venus, which obscures any discussion on the influence of giant impacts on their internal dynamics.     

Properties of the solar nebula and the origin of the moon

The basic geochemical model of the structure of the Moon proposed by Anderson, in which the Moon is formed by differentiation of the calcium, aluminium, titanium-rich inclusions in the Allende meteorite, is accepted, and the conditions for formation of this Moon within the solar nebula models of Cameron and Pine are discussed. The basic material condenses while iron remains in the gaseous phase, which places the formation of the Moon slightly inside the orbit of Mercury. Some condensed metallic iron is likely to enter the Moon in this position, and since the Moon is assembled at a very high temperature, it is likely to have been fully molten, so that the iron can remove the iridium from the silicate material and carry it down to form a small core. Interactions between the Moon and Mercury lead to the present rather eccentric Mercury orbit and to a much more eccentric orbit for the Moon, reaching past the orbit of the Earth, establishing conditions which are necessary for capture of the Moon by the Earth. In this orbit the Moon, no longer fully molten, will sweep up additional material containing iron oxide. This history accounts in principle for the two major ways in which the bulk composition of the Moon differs from that of the Allende inclusions.Paper dedicated to Professor Harold C. Urey on the occasion of his 80th birthday on 29 April 1973.     

Chemical composition of the Earth after the giant impact

The giant impact hypothesis for the origin of the Moon has been widely accepted. One of the most important features of this hypothesis is that the impactor's metallic core was incorporated in the Earth after impact. If the mass of the impactor is 0.82 × 10²⁷ g, the mass of the impactor core was estimated to be 0.19 × 10²⁷ g, which is about 1/10 of present Earth's core. Liu (1982) derived the bulk composition of the Earth from CI chondrites, and concluded that the Fe content of his model appears to be low in comparison with the present Earth, which, however, can be rationalized by the addition of impactor core into the proto-Earth developed by Liu (1982). If the impactor's mantle contains 14 wt% FeO as suggested, the mass ratio of impactor/proto-Earth should not exceed 0.22. The same ratio is not likely to exceed 0.30, if a giant blowoff did not occur during impact.     

In Situ Biological Contamination Studies of the Moon: Implications for Planetary Protection and Life Detection Missions

NASA and ESA have outlined visions for solar system exploration that will include a series of lunar robotic precursor missions to prepare for, and support a human return to the Moon, and future human exploration of Mars and other destinations, including possibly asteroids. One of the guiding principles for exploration is to pursue compelling scientific questions about the origin and evolution of life. The search for life on objects such as Mars will require careful operations, and that all systems be sufficiently cleaned and sterilized prior to launch to ensure that the scientific integrity of extraterrestrial samples is not jeopardized by terrestrial organic contamination. Under the Committee on Space Research’s (COSPAR’s) current planetary protection policy for the Moon, no sterilization procedures are required for outbound lunar spacecraft, nor is there a different planetary protection category for human missions, although preliminary COSPAR policy guidelines for human missions to Mars have been developed. Future in situ investigations of a variety of locations on the Moon by highly sensitive instruments designed to search for biologically derived organic compounds would help assess the contamination of the Moon by lunar spacecraft. These studies could also provide valuable “ground truth” data for Mars sample return missions and help define planetary protection requirements for future Mars bound spacecraft carrying life detection experiments. In addition, studies of the impact of terrestrial contamination of the lunar surface by the Apollo astronauts could provide valuable data to help refine future Mars surface exploration plans for a human mission to Mars.     

Differential melt scaling for oblique impacts on terrestrial planets

Analytical estimates of melt volumes produced by a given projectile and contained in a given impact crater are derived as a function of impact velocity, impact angle, planetary gravity, target and projectile densities, and specific internal energy of melting. Applications to impact events and impact craters on the Earth, Moon, and Mars are demonstrated and discussed. The most probable oblique impact (45°) produces ～1.6 times less melt volume than a vertical impact, and ～1.6 and 3.7 times more melt volume than impacts with 30° and 15° trajectories, respectively. The melt volume for a particular crater diameter increases with planetary gravity, so a crater on Earth should have more melt than similar-size craters on Mars and the Moon. The melt volume for a particular projectile diameter does not depend on gravity, but has a strong dependence on impact velocity, so the melt generated by a given projectile on the Moon is significantly larger than on Mars. Higher surface temperatures and geothermal gradients increase melt production, as do lower energies of melting. Collectively, the results imply thinner central melt sheets and a smaller proportion of melt particles in impact breccias on the Moon and Mars than on Earth. These effects are illustrated in a comparison of the Chicxulub crater on Earth, linked to the Cretaceous–Tertiary mass extinction, Gusev crater on Mars, where the Mars Exploration Rover Spirit landed, and Tsiolkovsky crater on the Moon. The results are comparable to those obtained from field and spacecraft observations, other analytical expressions, and hydrocode simulations.     

On the thermal evolution of the terrestrial planets

Physical and chemical constraints for such different planetary objects as the Earth, the Moon and meteorite parent bodies can best be satisfied by thermal history models having high initial temperatures. On the basis of thermal calculations it is suggested that the evolution of the other terrestrial planets (Mars, Venus and Mercury) was also characterized by high initial temperatures. Under these conditions, melting and, consequently, fractionation would set in at an early stage. Because of the resulting redistribution of the long-lived radioactive heat sources and the concentration of these elements in the surface layers, large-scale differentiation could be achieved by partial melting.Paper presented at the Lunar Science Institute Conference on Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration of the Moon and Planets, January 10–12, 1973.     

The Martian Nonhydrostatic Components of Moment-of-Inertia

The author puts forward the proposal in this paper that all the terrestrial planets (Venus, the Earth, and Mars) as well as the Moon deviate from hydrostatic equilibrium to some degree. The Earth's level of deviation of these four celestial bodies is minimum, and that of Mars is maximum. Moreover, the author estimates Martian nonhydrostatic components of the principal moments-of-inertia using five models for the interior of Mars. Comparison with other terrestrial planets shows that setting the range of mean moment-of-inertia ratio, I/MR², in 0.345 ~ 0.355for Mars is reasonable. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The EURONEAR Lightcurve Survey of Near Earth Asteroids 2017–2020

Earth, Moon, and Planets - The Perseverance rover (Mars 2020) mission, the first step in NASA’s Mars Sample Return (MSR) program, will select samples for caching based on their potential to...     

Thermal evolutions of the terrestrial planets

The thermal evolution of the Moon, Mercury, Mars, Venus and hypothetical minor planets is calculated theoretically, taking into account conduction, solid-state convection, and differentiation. An assortment of geological, geochemical, and geophysical data is used to constrain both the present day temperatures and thermal histories of the planets' interiors. Such data imply that the planets were heated during or shortly after formation and that all the terrestrial planets started their differentiations early in their history. Initial temperatures and core formation play the most important roles in the early differentiation. The size of the planet is the primary factor in determining its present day thermal state. A planetary body with radius less than 1000 km is unlikely to reach melting given heat source concentrations similar to terrestrial values and in the absence of intensive early heating such as short half-life radioactive heating and inductive heating.Studies of individual planets are constrained by varying amounts of data. Most data exist for the Earth and Moon. The Moon is a differentiated body with a crust, a thick solid mantle and an interior region which may be partially molten. It is presently cooling rapidly and is relatively inactive tectonically.Mercury most likely has a large core. Thermal calculations indicate it may have a 500 km thick solid lithosphere, and the core may be partially molten if it contains some heat sources. If this is not the case, the planet's interior temperatures are everywhere below the melting curve for iron. The thermal evolution is dominated by core separation and the high conductivity of iron which makes up the bulk of Mercury.Mars, intermediate in size among the terrestrial planets, is assumed to have differentiated an Fe–FeS core. Differentiation and formation of an early crust is evident from Mariner and Viking observations. Theoretical models suggest that melting and differentiation of the mantle silicates has occurred at least up until 1 billion years ago. Present day temperature profiles indicate a relatively thick (250 km) lithosphere with a possible asthenosphere below. The core is molten.Venus is characterized as a planet similar to the Earth in many respects. Core formation probably occurred during the first billion years after the formation. Present day temperatures indicate a partially molten upper mantle overlain by a 100 km thick lithosphere and a molten Fe–Ni core. If temperature models are good indicators, we can expect that today, Venus has tectonic processes similar to the Earth's.Paper dedicated to Professor Hannes Alfvén on the occasion of his 70th birthday, 30 May 1978.     

Accretion of the terrestrial planets. II

Some aspects and consequences of the theory of gravitational accretion of the terrestrial planets are examined. The concept of a “closed feeding zone” is somewhat unrealistic, but provides a lower bound on the accretion time. Safronov's relative velocity relation for planetesimals is not entirely consistent with the feeding zone model. A velocity relation which includes an initial velocity component is suggested. The orbital parameters of the planetesimals and the dimensions of the feeding zone are related to their relative velocities. The assumption of an initial velocity does not seriously change the accretion time.Mercury, Venus, and the Earth have accretion times on the order of 10⁸yr. Mars requires well over 10⁹yr to accrete by the same assumptions. Currently available data do not rule out a late formation of Mars, but the lunar cratering history makes it unlikely. If Mars is as old as the Earth, nongravitational forces or a violation of the feeding zone concept is required. One such possibility is the removal of matter from the zone of Mars by Jupiter's influence. The final sweeping up by Mars after this event would result in the scattering of a considerable mass among the other terrestrial planets. The late postaccretional bombardments infrerred for the Moon and Mercury may have had this source.     

Nonuniform cratering of the terrestrial planets

We estimate the impact flux and cratering rate as a function of latitude on the terrestrial planets using a model distribution of planet crossing asteroids and comets [Bottke, W.F., Morbidelli, A., Jedicke, R., Petit, J.-M., Levison, H.F., Michel, P., Metcalfe, T.S., 2002. Icarus 156, 399-433]. After determining the planetary impact probabilities as a function of the relative encounter velocity and encounter inclination, the impact positions are calculated analytically, assuming the projectiles follow hyperbolic paths during the encounter phase. As the source of projectiles is not isotropic, latitudinal variations of the impact flux are predicted: the calculated ratio between the pole and equator is 1.05 for Mercury, 1.00 for Venus, 0.96 for the Earth, 0.90 for the Moon, and 1.14 for Mars over its long-term obliquity variation history. By taking into account the latitudinal dependence of the impact velocity and impact angle, and by using a crater scaling law that depends on the vertical component of the impact velocity, the latitudinal variations of the cratering rate (the number of craters with a given size formed per unit time and unit area) is in general enhanced. With respect to the equator, the polar cratering rate is about 30% larger on Mars and 10% on Mercury, whereas it is 10% less on the Earth and 20% less on the Moon. The cratering rate is found to be uniform on Venus. The relative global impact fluxes on Mercury, Venus, the Earth and Mars are calculated with respect to the Moon, and we find values of 1.9, 1.8, 1.6, and 2.8, respectively. Our results show that the relative shape of the crater size-frequency distribution does not noticeably depend upon latitude for any of the terrestrial bodies in this study. Nevertheless, by neglecting the expected latitudinal variations of the cratering rate, systematic errors of 20-30% in the age of planetary surfaces could exist between equatorial and polar regions when using the crater chronology method.     

On the chronology of lunar origin and evolution

An origin of the Moon by a Giant Impact is presently the most widely accepted theory of lunar origin. It is consistent with the major lunar observations: its exceptionally large size relative to the host planet, the high angular momentum of the Earth–Moon system, the extreme depletion of volatile elements, and the delayed accretion, quickly followed by the formation of a global crust and mantle.According to this theory, an impact on Earth of a Mars-sized body set the initial conditions for the formation and evolution of the Moon. The impact produced a protolunar cloud. Fast accretion of the Moon from the dense cloud ensured an effective transformation of gravitational energy into heat and widespread melting. A “Magma Ocean” of global dimensions formed, and upon cooling, an anorthositic crust and a mafic mantle were created by gravitational separation.Several 100 million years after lunar accretion, long-lived isotopes of K, U and Th had produced enough additional heat for inducing partial melting in the mantle; lava extruded into large basins and solidified as titanium-rich mare basalt. This delayed era of extrusive rock formation began about 3.9 Ga ago and may have lasted nearly 3 Ga.A relative crater count timescale was established and calibrated by radiometric dating (i.e., dating by use of radioactive decay) of rocks returned from six Apollo landing regions and three Luna landing spots. Fairly well calibrated are the periods ≈4 Ga to ≈3 Ga BP (before present) and ≈0.8 Ga BP to the present. Crater counting and orbital chemistry (derived from remote sensing in spectral domains ranging from γ- and x-rays to the infrared) have identified mare basalt surfaces in the Oceanus Procellarum that appear to be nearly as young as 1 Ga. Samples returned from this area are needed for narrowing the gap of 2 Ga in the calibrated timescale. The lunar timescale is not only used for reconstructing lunar evolution, but it serves also as a standard for chronologies of the terrestrial planets, including Mars and possibly early Earth.The Moon holds a historic record of Galactic cosmic-ray intensity, solar wind composition and fluxes and composition of solids of any size in the region of the terrestrial planets. Some of this record has been deciphered. Secular mixing of the Sun was constrained by determining ³He/⁴He of solar wind helium stored in lunar fines and ancient breccias. For checking the presumed constancy of the impact rate over the past ≈3.1 Ga, samples of the youngest mare basalts would be needed for determining their radiometric ages.Radiometric dating and stratigraphy has revealed that many of the large basins on the near side of the Moon were created by impacts about 4.1 to 3.8 Ga ago. The apparent clustering of ages called “Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB)” is thought to result from migration of planets several 100 million years after their accretion.The bombardment, unexpectedly late in solar system history, must have had a devastating effect on the atmosphere, hydrosphere and habitability on Earth during and following this epoch, but direct traces of this bombardment have been eradicated on our planet by plate tectonics. Indirect evidence about the course of bombardment during this epoch on Earth must therefore come from the lunar record, especially from additional data on the terminal phase of the LHB. For this purpose, documented samples are required for measuring precise radiometric ages of the Orientale Basin and the Nectaris and/or Fecunditatis Basins in order to compare these ages with the time of the earliest traces of life on Earth.A crater count chronology is presently being built up for planet Mars and its surface features. The chronology is based on the established lunar chronology whereby differences between the impact rates for Moon and Mars are derived from local fluxes and impact energies of projectiles. Direct calibration of the Martian chronology will have to come from radiometric ages and cosmic-ray exposure ages measured in samples returned from the planet.     

Volatiles on Earth and Mars: A comparison

Based on our new and previous determinations of halogens in SNC meteorites, the bulk concentrations of halogens in the SPB, which is thought to be Mars, are estimated. The two-component model for the formation of terrestrial planets as proposed byA. E. Ringwood (Geochem. J. 11, 111–135 (1977) andOn the Origin of the Earth and Moon, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979) andH. Wa¨nke (Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A 303, 287–302 (1981) is further substantiated. It is argued that almost all of the H₂O added to Mars during its homogeneous accretion was converted on reaction with metallic Fe to H₂, which escaped. By comparing the solubilities of H₂O and HCl in molten silicates, the amount of H₂O left in the mantle of Mars at the end of accretion can be related to the abundance of Cl. In this way an H₂O content in the Martian mantle of 36 ppm is obtained, corresponding to an ocean covering the whole planet to a depth of about 130 m.The huge quantities of H₂ produced by the reaction of H₂O with metallic iron should also have removed other volatile species by hydrodynamic escape. Thus it is postulated that the present atmospheres of Venus, Earth, and Mars were formed by degassing the interiors of the planets, after the production of H₂ had ceased, i.e., after metallic iron was no longer available. It is also postulated that the large differences in the amounts of primordial rare gases in the atmospheres of Venus, Earth, and Mars are due mainly to different loss factors.Except for gaseous species, Mars is found to be richer in volatile (halogens) and moderately volatile elements than the Earth. The resulting low release factor of⁴⁰Ar for Mars is attributed to a low degree of fractionation, leading to a relatively small crustal enrichment of even the most incompatible elements like K.