The case for an Imbrium origin of the Apollo thorium-rich impact-melt breccias

Abstract— Mafic, Th-rich impact-melt breccias, most of which are identified with the composition known as low-K Fra Mauro (LKFM), are the most common rock type in the nonmare regoliths of the Apollo lunar landing sites. The origin of mafic impact-melt breccias bears on many lunar problems: the nature of the late meteoroid bombardment (cataclysm); the spatial distribution of KREEP, both near the surface and at depth; the ages of the major basins; and the composition of the early crust of the nearside lunar highlands. Thus, it is crucial that the origin of mafic impact-melt breccias be accurately understood. Because of both intra- and intersite differences in compositions of mafic impact-melt breccia samples, apparent differences in crystallization age, and differences in siderophile-element ratios, previous studies have argued that either (1) most mafic impact-melt breccias are the products of several large craters local to the site at which they were found but that some are of basin origin or that (2) they are all from the Imbrium (Apollos 14 and 15), Nectaris (Apollo 16), and Serenitatis (Apollo 17) basins. Here, we reconsider the hypothesis that virtually all of the Th-rich, mafic impact-melt breccias from the Apollo missions are products of the Imbrium impact. Ejecta deposit modeling based on modern crater scaling indicates that the Imbrium event produced ejecta deposits that average hundreds of meters thick or more at all Apollo highland sites, which is thicker than some previous estimates. Substantial amounts of Imbrium ejecta should have been sampled at every Apollo highland site. We suggest that the mafic impact-melt breccias may be the principal form of those ejecta. The Imbrium projectile impacted into Th-rich material that we regard as part of a unique, mafic, lunar geochemical province we call the High-Th Oval Region. Based on the surface distribution of Th, only basins within the High-Th Oval Region excavated Th-rich material; the Th concentrations of the highlands as observed by the Apollo orbiting γ-ray experiments are consistent with the estimates from ejecta modeling. Of the younger basin-forming impacts, only Imbrium was large enough to produce the copious amount of melt required by the ubiquitous presence of mafic impact-melt breccias in the Apollo-sampled regolith. The High-Th Oval Region still may have been molten or hot at shallow depths ～4 Ga ago when the Imbrium projectile struck. We reason that compositional heterogeneity of ejected melt breccia is to be expected under these circumstances. We argue that siderophile-element “fingerprints” of mafic impact-melt breccias are not inconsistent with production of all common types by a single projectile. We suggest that the narrow range of ages of 3.7–4.0 Ga for all successfully dated mafic impact-melt breccias may reflect a single event whose age is difficult to measure precisely, rather than a number of discrete impact events closely spaced in time, such that reported age variations among mafic impact-melt breccias reflect the ability to measure ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar ages with greater precision than the accuracy with which measured portions of mafic impact-melt breccias have recorded the time of their formation.     

Chronology of dimict breccias and the age of South Ray crater at the Apollo 16 site

Abstract— We report the noble gas isotopic abundances of five dimict breccias and one cataclastic anorthosite that were collected at the Apollo 16 landing site. Orbital and surface photographs indicate that rays from South Ray crater, an almost 1 km wide young crater in the Cayley plains, extend several kilometers from their source into the area that was sampled by the Apollo 16 mission. Previous studies have shown that South Ray crater formed 2 Ma ago and that a large number of rocks might originate from this cratering event. On the basis of cosmic-ray produced nuclei, we find that the six rocks investigated in this work yield the same lunar surface exposure age. Using literature data, we recalculate the exposure ages of additional 16 rocks with suspected South Ray crater origin and obtain an average exposure age of 2.01 ± 0.10 Ma. In particular, all nine dimict breccias (a type of rock essentially restricted to the Apollo 16 area consisting of anorthosite and breccia phases) dated until now yield an average ejection age of 2.06 ± 0.17 Ma. We conclude that they must originate from the Cayley formation or from bedrock underlying the Cayley plain. We determined the gas retention ages for the dimict breccias based on the ⁴⁰K-⁴⁰Ar and U,Th-¹³⁶Xe dating methods: rock 64425 yields a ⁴⁰K-⁴⁰Ar age of 3.96 Ga and rock 61016 a U,Th-¹³⁶Xe age of 3.97 Ga. These results, together with ³⁹Ar-⁴⁰Ar ages obtained by other workers for rocks 64535 (3.98 Ga) and 64536 (3.97 Ga), show that the dimict breccias formed 3.97 Ga ago.     

Orientale multi-ringed basin interior and implications for the petrogenesis of lunar highland samples

The lunar Orientale basin and its associated facies formed as a result of impact into lunar highland crustal rocks. The crater rim is shown to be closely represented by the position of the outer Rook Mountain ring, approximately 620 km in diam. The inner Rook Mountains form a central peak ring within the crater. The 900 km diam Cordillera ring is a fault scarp which formed in the terminal stages of the cratering event as a large portion of the crust collapsed inward toward the recently excavated crater, forming a mega-terrace. This collapse pushed the wall of the Orientale crater inward, distorting it and slightly decreasing its radius.A domical facies is almost exclusively developed between the Cordillera and outer Rook rings. The domical facies is interpreted to be radially textured ejecta which was disrupted and modified to a jumbled domical texture by seismic shaking associated with the formation of the mega-terrace. The plains and corrugated facies pre-date the mare fill and lie within the Orientale crater. These facies are interpreted to have been deposited contemporaneously with the cratering event as partial and total impact melts which collected on the floor of the crater during the terminal stages of the event. The plains facies, with an estimated thickness of 1 km and a volume of 75000 km³, represent the most thoroughly impact melted materials which collected and ponded in the central portion of the crater floor. The corrugated facies, with an estimated thickness of 1 km and a volume of 180000 km³, represent impact partial melts mixed with debris. A relatively small volume of mare material was subsequently deposited in the basin (probably less than 25000 km³ in Mare Orientale).There is little evidence that the basin has undergone major structural modifications subsequent to the terminal stages of the cratering event. The striking implication for the Orientale gravity anomaly is that mascon formation may be primarily related to crustal excavation and upwarping of a moho plug, rather than attributable to post-impact mare filling.The plains units on the floor of Orientale are similar to Cayley-like plains in other multi-ringed basins and on smaller crater floors. Impact melt deposits may therefore be a significant source of Cayley-like plains units.The volumes of impact melt associated with the Orientale basin and their mode of deposition have important implications for petrogenetic models. Multi-ringed basin formation provides a mechanism for instantaneously melting large volumes of shallow to intermediate depth lunar crustal material which is emplaced such that the differentiation and crystallization of a variety of igneous rock types and textures may occur.     

Serenitatis multi-ringed basin: Regional geology and basin ring interpretation

New topographic data allow a reassessment of the ring structure of the Serenitatis basin and correlation with the younger Orientale basin. The northern Serenitatis basin is smaller and less well preserved than the southern Serenitatis basin. Three major rings of the main (southern) Serenitatis basin are mapped: ring 1, Linné ring, outlined by mare ridges, average diameter 420 km; ring 2, Haemus ring, outlined by basin-facing scarps and massifs with crenulated borders, 610 km; ring 3, Vitruvius ring, outlined by basin-facing linear scarps and massifs, 880 km. Ring 1 corresponds to the inner Rook Mountain ring of Orientale, ring 2 with the outer Rook ring, and ring 3 with the Cordillera Mountain ring. These ring identifications and assignments indicate that the Serenitatis basin is essentially the same size as the Orientale basin, rather than much larger, as previously proposed. The Apollo 17 site lies near the second ring, which is interpreted as the rim of the transient cavity. Apollo 15 lies at the junction of the Serenitatis and Imbrium third rings; Serenitatis ejecta should be present in significant amounts at the Apollo 15 site. The new reconstruction indicates that portions of the Serenitatis basin are better preserved than previously thought, consistent with recent stratigraphic and sample studies that suggest an age for Serenitatis which is older than, but close to, the time of formation of the Imbrium basin.     

Stratigraphy of the Caloris basin,Mercury

The 1300-km-diameter Caloris impact basin is surrounded by well-defined ejecta units that can be recognized from more than 1000 km, radially outward from the basin edge. A formal rock stratigraphic nomenclature is proposed for the Caloris ejecta units, which are collectively called the Caloris Group. Each of the individual formations within the Group are described and compared to similar rock units associated with the lunar Imbrium and Orientale basins. A crater degradation chronology, linked the the Caloris event, is also proposed to assist in stratigraphic correlation on a Mercury-wide basis.     

Petrography and geochemistry of five new Apollo 16 mare basalts and evidence for post‐basin deposition of basaltic material at the site

Abstract— We present the petrography and geochemistry of five 2–4 mm basalt fragments from the Apollo 16 regolith. These fragments are 1) a high‐Ti vitrophyric basalt compositionally similar to Apollo 17 high‐Ti mare basalts, 2) a very high‐Ti vitrophyric basalt compositionally similar to Apollos 12 and 14 red‐black pyroclastic glass, 3) a coarsely crystalline high‐Al basalt compositionally similar to group 5 Apollo 14 high‐Al mare basalts, 4) a very low‐Ti (VLT) crystalline basalt compositionally similar to Luna 24 VLT basalts, and 5) a VLT basaltic glass fragment compositionally similar to Apollo 17 VLT basalts. High‐Ti basalt has been reported previously at the Apollo 16 site; the other basalt types have not been reported previously. As there are no known cryptomaria or pyroclastic deposits in the highlands near the Apollo 16 site (ruling out a local origin), and scant evidence for basaltic material in the Apollo 16 ancient regolith breccias or Apollo 16 soils collected near North Ray Crater (ruling out a basin ejecta origin), we infer that the basaltic material in the Apollo 16 regolith originated in maria near the Apollo 16 site and was transported laterally to the site by small‐ to medium‐sized post‐basin impacts. On the basis of TiO₂ concentrations derived from the Clementine UVVIS data, Mare Tranquillitatis (?300 km north) is the most likely source for the high‐Ti basaltic material at the Apollo 16 site (craters Ross, Arago, Dionysius, Maskelyne, Moltke, Sosigenes, Schmidt), Mare Nectaris/Sinus Asperitatis (?220 km east) is the most likely source for the low‐Ti and VLT basaltic material (craters Theophilus, Madler, Torricelli), and a large regional pyroclastic deposit near Mare Vaporum (?600 km northwest) is the most likely source region for pyroclastic material (although no source craters are apparent in the region).     

On the relative and absolute ages of seven lunar front face basins: II. From the Crater Counts

From counts of postbasin craters larger than 30 km in diameter, lying within or near to seven giant front face lunar basins, relative ages for the basins may be obtained. These relative ages correlate well with absolute basin ages found from viscosity arguments in R. B. Baldwin (1987, Icarus 70, □□□-□□□). From crater counts the basins are in the following sequence of increasing relative age: Orientale, Imbrium, Crisium, Serenitatis, Nectaris, Humorum, and the unnamed basin lying between Werner and the Altai ring. The absolute ages from Baldwin (1987) range from 3.80 to 4.30 × 10⁹ years while a correlation with the relative ages of this paper yields a range of 3.79 to 4.27 × 10⁹ years. The discrepancy is largely due to Serenitatis where the debris from Imbrium has presumably buried some post-Serenitatis craters. From both sets of data there is no evidence that a “Terminal Lunar Cataclysm” ever occured.     

Impact history of the Apollo 17 landing site revealed by U‐Pb SIMS ages

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) U‐Pb ages of Ca‐phosphates from four texturally distinct breccia samples (72255, 76055, 76015, 76215) collected at the Apollo 17 landing site were obtained in an attempt to identify whether they represent a single or several impact event(s). The determined ages, combined with inferences from petrologic relationships, may indicate two or possibly three different impact events at 3920 ± 3 Ma, 3922 ± 5 Ma, and 3930 ± 5 Ma (all errors 2σ). Searching for possible sources of the breccias by calculating the continuous ejecta radii of impact basins and large craters as well as their expected ejecta thicknesses, we conclude that Nectaris, Crisium, Serenitatis, and Imbrium are likely candidates. If the previous interpretation that the micropoikilitic breccias collected at the North Massif represent Serenitatis ejecta is correct, then the average ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb age of 3930 ± 5 Ma (2σ) dates the formation of the Serenitatis basin. The occurrence of zircon in the breccias sampled at the South Massif, which contain Ca‐phosphates yielding an age of 3922 ± 5 Ma (2σ), may indicate that the breccia originated from within the Procellarum KREEP terrane (PKT) and the Imbrium basin appears to be the only basin that could have sourced them. However, this interpretation implies that all basins suggested to fall stratigraphically between Serenitatis and Imbrium formed within a short (<11 Ma) time interval, highlighting serious contradictions between global stratigraphic constraints, sample interpretation, and chronological data. Alternatively, the slightly older age of the two micropoikilitic breccias may be a result of incomplete resetting of the U‐Pb system preserved in some phosphate grains. Based on the currently available data set this possibility cannot be excluded.     

Origin and transportation history of lunar breccia 14311

In this paper, we compare the U‐Pb zircon age distribution pattern of sample 14311 from the Apollo 14 landing site with those from other breccias collected at the same landing site. Zircons in breccia 14311 show major age peaks at 4340 and 4240 Ma and small peaks at 4110, 4030, and 3960 Ma. The zircon age patterns of breccia 14311 and other Apollo 14 breccias are statistically different suggesting a separate provenance and transportation history for these breccias. This interpretation is supported by different U‐Pb Ca‐phosphate and exposure ages for breccia 14311 (Ca‐phosphate age: 3938 ± 4 Ma, exposure age: ~550–660 Ma) from the other Apollo 14 breccias (Ca‐phosphate age: 3927 ± 2 Ma, compatible with the Imbrium impact, exposure age: ~25–30 Ma). Based on these observations, we consider two hypotheses for the origin and transportation history of sample 14311. (1) Breccia 14311 was formed in the Procellarum KREEP terrane by a 3938 Ma‐old impact and deposited near the future site of the Imbrium basin. The breccia was integrated into the Fra Mauro Formation during the deposition of the Imbrium impact ejecta at 3927 Ma. The zircons were annealed by mare basalt flooding at 3400 Ma at Apollo 14 landing site. Eventually, at approximately 660 Ma, a small and local impact event excavated this sample and it has been at the surface of the Moon since this time. (2) Breccia 14311 was formed by a 3938 Ma‐old impact. The location of the sample is not known at that time but at 3400 Ma, it was located nearby or buried by hot basaltic flows. It was transported from where it was deposited to the Apollo 14 landing site by an impact at approximately 660 Ma, possibly related to the formation of the Copernicus crater and has remained at the surface of the Moon since this event. This latter hypothesis is the simplest scenario for the formation and transportation history of the 14311 breccia.     

On estimating contributions of basin ejecta to regolith deposits at lunar sites

Abstract— We have developed a quantitative model for predicting characteristics of ejecta deposits that result from basin‐sized cratering events. This model is based on impact crater scaling equations (Housen, Schmitt, and Holsapple 1983; Holsapple 1993) and the concept of ballistic sedimentation (Oberbeck 1975), and takes into account the size distribution of the individual fragments ejected from the primary crater. Using the model, we can estimate, for an area centered at the chosen location of interest, the average distribution of thicknesses of basin ejecta deposits within the area and the fraction of primary ejecta contained within the deposits. Model estimates of ejecta deposit thicknesses are calibrated using those of the Orientale Basin (Moore, Hodges, and Scott 1974) and of the Ries Basin (Hörz, Ostertag, and Rainey 1983). Observed densities of secondary craters surrounding the Imbrium and Orientale Basins are much lower than the modeled densities. Similarly, crater counts for part of the northern half of the Copernicus secondary cratering field are much lower than the model predicts, and variation in crater densities with distance from Copernicus is less than expected. These results suggest that mutual obliteration erases essentially all secondary craters associated with the debris surge that arises from the impacting primary fragments during ballistic sedimentation; if so, a process other than ballistic sedimentation is needed to produce observable secondary craters. Regardless, our ejecta deposit model can be useful for suggesting provenances of sampled lunar materials, providing information complementary to photogeological and remote sensing interpretations, and as a tool for planning rover traverses (e.g., Haskin et al. 1995, 2002).     

An integrated approach to understanding Apollo 16 impact glasses: Chemistry,isotopes, and shape

Abstract The major‐ and minor‐element abundances were determined by electron microprobe in 1039 glasses from regoliths and regolith breccias to define the compositional topology of lunar glasses at the Apollo 16 landing site in the central highlands of the Moon. While impact glasses with chemical compositions similar to local materials (i.e., Apollo 16 rocks and regoliths) are abundant, glasses with exotic compositions (i.e., transported from other areas of the Moon) account for up to ?30% of the population. A higher proportion of compositionally exotic, angular glass fragments exists when compared to compositionally exotic glass spherules. Ratios of non‐volatile lithophile elements (i.e., Al, Ti, Mg) have been used to constrain the original source materials of the impact glasses. This approach is immune to the effects of open‐system losses of volatile elements (e.g., Si, Na, K). Four impact glasses from one compositionally exotic group (low‐Mg high‐K Fra Mauro; lmHKFM) were selected for ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹ Ar dating. The individual fragments of lmHKFM glass all yielded ages of ?3750 ± 50 Ma for the time of the impact event. Based on the petrography of these individual glasses, we conclude that the likely age of the impact event that formed these 4 glasses, as well as the possible time of their ballistic arrival at the Apollo 16 site from a large and distant cratering event (perhaps in the Procellarum KREEP terrain) (Zeigler et al. 2004), is 3730 ± 40 Ma, close to the accepted age for Imbrium.     

The evolution of the lunar Nectaris multiring basin

Nectaris is an 820-km-diameter, multiring impact basin located on the near side of the Moon. The transient cavity is estimated to have been less than 90 km in depth and materials were excavated from a depth of less than 30 km. About 2 km thickness of impact melt is believed to line the cavity center. The impact event probably took place at about 3.98 ± 0.03 × 10⁹ years ago. Nectaris ejecta forms a substantial proportion of the surface materials at the Apollo 16 site. Inter-ring plains deposits were deposited after the formation of the Nectaris basin. The most persuasive origin for the smooth plains is one of extrusives overlain by a thin veneer of ejecta. Basaltic fragments within Apollo 16 samples are believed to have been largely derived from Nectaris. A titanium-rich Apollo 16 mare basalt fragment has an age of 3.79 ± 0.05 × 10⁹ years but, although some relatively titanium-enriched basalts occur in southern Nectaris, titanium-rich basalts are nowhere seen at the surface of the mare. The earliest recognized eruptives appear to be low-titanium (perhaps VLT) basalts found as pyroclastic materials on Daguerre and in the Gaudibert region. The majority of the surface basalts are of intermediate composition (possibly similar to Apollo 12 basalts) and have an age of approximately 3.6 × 10⁹ years. The basalt fill is estimated to have a minimum thickness of 3 km. Flood-style eruptions appear to have been the main form of extrusion. Mare ridges exhibit a strong north-south preferential alignment and appear to postdate basalt emplacement. The lack of basin-related graben in Nectaris is consistent with a thick lithosphere. The basin ring structure is best preserved in the southwest and least preserved in the northeast. This is believed to result from horizontal variations in the crust and lithosphere thicknesses and from the influence of the preexisting Fecunditatis and Tranquillitatis basins; the ring structure is best preserved where the lithosphere was thickest. Floor-fractured craters within Nectaris are intimately associated with the basalt fill both in terms of age and location. Theophilus ejecta, small craters, and Tycho rays, combined with subsidence and mare ridge development, were the only modifying influences on Nectaris since the termination of basalt eruptions.     

Some things we can infer about the Moon from the composition of the Apollo 16 regolith

Abstract— Characteristics of the regolith of Cayley plains as sampled at the Apollo 16 lunar landing site are reviewed and new compositional data are presented for samples of <1 mm fines (“soils”) and 1–2 mm regolith particles. As a means of determining which of the many primary (igneous) and secondary (crystalline breccias) lithologic components that have been identified in the soil are volumetrically important and providing an estimate of their relative abundances, more than 3 × 10⁶ combinations of components representing nearly every lithology that has been observed in the Apollo 16 regolith were systematically tested to determine which combinations best account for the composition of the soils. Conclusions drawn from the modeling include the following. At the site, mature soil from the Cayley plains consists of 64.5% ± 2.7% components representing “prebasin” materials: anorthosites, feldspathic breccias, and a small amount (2.6% ± 1.5% of total soil) of nonmare, mafic plutonic rocks, mostly gabbronorites. On average, these components are highly feldspathic, with average concentrations of 31–32% Al₂O₃ and 2–3% FeO and a molar Mg/(Mg + Fe) ratio of 0.68. The remaining 36% of the regolith is syn- and postbasin material: 28.8% ± 2.4% mafic impact-melt breccias (MIMBs, i.e., “LKFM” and “VHA basalts”) created at the time of basin formation, 6.0% ± 1.4% mare-derived material (impact and volcanic glass, crystalline basalt) with an average TiO₂ concentration of 2.4%, and 1% postbasin meteoritic material. The MIMBs are the principal (80–90%) carrier of incompatible trace elements (rare earths, Th, etc.) and the carrier of about one-half of the siderophile elements and elements associated with mafic mineral phases (Fe, Mg, Mn, Cr, Sc). Most (71%) of the Fe in the present regolith derives from syn- and postbasin sources (MIMBs, mare-derived material, and meteorites). Thus, although the bulk composition of the Apollo 16 regolith is nominally that of noritic anorthosite, the noritic part (the MIMBs) and the anorthositic part (the prebasin components) are largely unrelated. There is compositional evidence that 3–4% of the soil is Th-rich material such as that occurring at the Apollo 14 site, and one fragment of this type was found among the small regolith particles studied here. If regolith such as that represented by the Apollo 16 ancient regolith breccias was a protolith of the present regolith, such regolith cannot exceed ～71% of the present regolith; the rest must be material added or redistributed since closure of the ancient regolith breccias. The postclosure material includes the mare-derived material and the Apollo-14-like component. Compositions of all mature surface soils from Apollo 16, even those collected 4 km apart on the Cayley plains, are very similar, which is in stark contrast to the wide compositional range of the lithologies of which the soil is composed. This uniformity indicates that the ratio of MIMBs to feldspathic prebasin components is not highly variable in the megaregolith over distances of a few kilometers, that there are no large, subsurface concentrations of “pure” mafic impact-melt breccia, and that the intimate mixing is inherent to the Cayley plains at a gross scale. Thus, the mixing of mafic impact-melt breccias and feldspathic prebasin components must have occurred during formation and deposition of the Cayley plains; such uniformity could not have been achieved by small postdeposition impacts into a stratified megaregolith. Using this conclusion as one constraint, and the known distribution of Th on the lunar surface as another, and the assumption that the Imbrium impact is primarily responsible for formation of the Cayley plains, arguments are presented that the Apollo 16 MIMBs derive from the Imbrium region, and, consequently, that one-fourth of the Apollo 16 regolith is primary Imbrium ejecta in the form of mafic impact-melt breccias.     

Geologic setting of Boulder 1, Station 2, Apollo 17 landing site

Boulder 1 at Station 2 is one of three boulders sampled by Apollo 17 at the base of the South Massif, which rises 2.3 km above the floor of a linear valley interpreted as a graben formed by deformation related to the southern Serenitatis impact. The boulders probably rolled from the upper part of the massif after emplacement of the light mantle. Orbital gravity data and photogeologic reinterpretation suggest that the Apollo 17 area is located approximately on the third ring of the southern Serenitatis basin, approximately 1.25 times larger than the analogous but fresher Orientale basin structure. The massif exposures are interpreted to represent the upper part of thick ejecta deposited by the southern Serenitatis impact near the rim of the transient cavity. Basin ring structure and the radial grabens that give the massifs definition were imposed on this ejecta at a slightly later stage in the basin-forming process. There is no clear-cut compositional, textural, or photogeologic evidence that Imbrium ejecta was collected at the Apollo 17 site.     

Morphology and structure of the taurus-littrow highlands (Apollo 17): evidence for their origin and evolution

The Taurus-Littrow region (Apollo 17 landing area) is located in the northeastern quadrant of the Moon in the mountainous area on the southeastern rim of the Serenitatis basin. The highlands in the Taurus-Littrow region can be divided into three broad terrain types. (1)Littrow massifs - massive, 10-20 km diam, steep-sloped (20°–30°), highland blocks often bordered by linear graben-like valleys. (2)Littrow sculptured hills - a series of closely spaced 1-5 km diam domical hills occupying broad highland plateaus which have been cratered and block faulted. Sculptured hill units stretch along the eastern edge of Serenitatis from the Apollo 17 area north to Posidonius. (3)Vitruvius front and plateau - a long irregular but generally north-trending scarp (occasionally rising over 2 km above the surrounding terrain) and its associated uplifted plateau to the east. This terrain is composed of hills ranging from 2-7 km diam, whose morphology is intermediate between the sculptured hills and the massifs. It is concluded that the highland units in the Taurus-Littrow region are primarily related to the origin of the Serenitatis basin because of their marked similarity to more well-preserved basin-related deposits in the younger Imbrium and Orientale basins: (1) the massifs and sculptured terra are morphologically similar to the Imbrium basin-related Montes Alpes and Alpes Formation, (2) the relative geographic position of the Taurus-Littrow highlands and Montes Alpes/Alpes Formation is the same, forming the second ring and spreading distally, and (3) the structures are similar in orientation and development (e.g., massifs are related to radial and concentric structure; Alpes Formation/sculptured terra are not). Interpretation of the massifs and sculptured hills as Serenitatis impact-related deposits lessens the possible role of highland volcanism in the origin and evolution of the Taurus-Littrow terrain, although extensive pre-Serenitatis volcanism cannot be ruled out. The preserved morphology of the sculptured hills suggests that the thickness of post-Serenitatis large basin ejecta (from Imbrium, for instance) is small, compared to the total highland section. This implies that the primary contributions to the highland stratigraphy are from Serenitatis and pre-Serenitatis events. The highland surface, however, may be dominated by ejecta from the latest nearby large event (formation of the Imbrium basin). Structural elements mapped in the Taurus-Littrow area include lineaments, the Vitruvius structural front, two types of grabens, and scarps. The majority of lineaments, as well as some grabens, appear to be related to a dominant NW trend and subordinate N and NE trends. These trends are interpreted to be related to a more regional lunar grid pattern which formed in the area prior to the origin of the Serenitatis basin, causing distinct structural inhomogeneities in the highland terrain. The Serenitatis event produced radial and concentric structures predominantly influenced by this pre-existing trend. Younger grabens are generally circumferential to the Serenitatis basin and appear to be related to readjustment of Serenitatis-produced structures; those that are oblique to Serenitatis follow the pre-Serenitatis structural grain. No obvious structural elements can be correlated with the post-Serenitatis, Nectaris and Crisium basins. It is believed that the origin and hence the geographic concentration of the Littrow massifs is related to the fact that Serenitatis radials in the massif area coincide with lines of pre-existing structural weakness along a general lunar grid direction (NW). Pre-existing structurally weak lunar grid trends seem to have been structurally reactivated by Serenitatis radials, causing preferential uplift of large blocks in this area. Elsewhere in the region radials would be oblique to this direction. Since Serenitatis and Imbrium radials coincide in the massif area, the post-Serenitatis Imbrium event may have reactivated Serenitatis radial fractures, possibly rejuvenating the massif terrain. The geologic and tectonic history of the Taurus-Littrow highlands began prior to the origin of Serenitatis in Tectonic Interval I. The strong NW trending structural elements are believed to have formed as part of a global stress pattern (possibly shear) sometime during this period of probable crustal formation and fragmentation. Tectonic Interval II was initiated by the origin of the Serenitatis basin. The basic topography and morphology of the region and most large grabens resulted from this event and their orientations show that they were controlled at least in part by the pre-existing grid. No other large basins forming during this interval appear to have had a major effect on the area. Tectonic Interval III is dominated by the formation of narrow grabens following structural patterns circumferential to the Serenitatis basin and tangential to it where they coincide with pre-existing grid directions. Serenitatis isostatic rebound or early mare fill may have produced this stress system. The scarp in the vicinity of the Apollo 17 landing site is the youngest obvious structural element.     

Remote sensing and geological studies of the Hadley‐Apennine region of the Moon

Abstract— We have used data from the Clementine and Lunar Prospector spacecraft in conjunction with reflectance spectra collected with Earth‐based telescopes to study the geology of the Hadley‐Apennine portion of the lunar Imbrium basin. The Apennine Mountains and the Imbrium backslope are composed of Imbrium basin ejecta with a noritic or anorthositic norite composition. We find that the two major facies of Imbrium ejecta, the Apenninus material and the Alpes Formation, differ in iron and titanium content. “Pure” anorthosite has tentatively been identified in the ejecta of the crater Conon, based on low‐iron content. A difference in Th and rare earth element (REE) abundance between the northeast Apennine Mountains (lower) and the southwest Apennines (higher) is noted. Pyroclastic deposits are common in the region and are dominated by mare basalt material, probably plug rock ejected in vulcanian eruptions. The Apennine Bench Formation, which is likely to be a deposit of non‐mare volcanic material, has an Fe, Ti and Th composition consistent with that of Apollo 15 KREEP basalt samples thought to be fragments of the Bench. Aristillus crater is a Th and REE hot spot, and the stratigraphy of the impact target site has been reconstructed from knowledge of the composition of the crater interior and exterior deposits. We infer that the target consisted of highland basement, KREEP plutonics and volcanics, and both high‐ and low‐Ti mare basalt.     

Compositional evidence regarding the influx of interplanetary materials onto the lunar surface

Siderophilic element/Ir ratios are higher in mature lunar soils from highlands sites than in those from mare sites. We infer that the population of materials responsible for the early intense bombardment of the Moon had high ratios, and that the population responsible for the essentially constant flux has low ratios. No group of chondrites has siderophile/Ir ratios identical to those in the mare or highlands soils; CM chondrites are the most similar, and CM-like materials may account for a major fraction of Earth-crossing materials during the past 3.7 b.y.Siderophile/Ir ratios may be used to determine the amount of highlands regolith in soils or breccias from the mare-highlands interface areas (Apollo 15 and 17), and to infer the time of formation of highlands breccias whose sideropbiles originated in mature soils. Arguments are summarized against the viewpoint that the siderophiles in most highlands breccias originated in basin-forming projectiles. Differences in mature soil siderophile concentrations at Apollo 14 and 16 indicate a substantially greater concentration at the latter site immediately following the Imbrium event.Siderophile concentrations are used to estimate mean regolith depths at the landing sites; as relative values these are more precise than estimates based on seismic or crater observations. The longlived flux is calculated to be 2.9 g cm^–2 b.y.^–1 averaged over the past 3.7 b.y. A consideration of the relationship between mass fluence and time indicates that the mass flux decreased with a half-life of about 40 m.y. immediately following the Imbrium event.     

Origin of lunar fragmental matrix breccias—Highly siderophile element constraints

Ejecta at North Ray crater (Apollo 16) sampled a unique section of the lunar highlands not accessible at most other landing sites and provide important constraints on the composition of late accreted materials. New data on multiple aliquots of four fragmental matrix breccias and a fragment‐laden melt breccia from this site display a variety of highly siderophile element patterns which may represent the signatures of volatile element‐depleted carbonaceous chondrite‐like material, primitive achondrite, differentiated metal, and an impactor component that cannot be related to known meteoritic material. The latter component is prevalent in these rocks besides characterized by depletions in Re and Os compared to Ir, Ru and Pt, chondritic Re/Os, and a gradual depletion of Pd and Au. The observed characteristics are more consistent with fractionations by nebular processes, like incomplete condensation or evaporation, than with lunar crustal processes, like partial melting or volatilization. The impactor signature preserved in these breccias may stem from primitive meteorites with a refractory element composition moderately different from known chondrites. The presence of distinct impactor components within the North Ray crater breccias together with observed correlations of characteristic element ratios (e.g., Re/Os, Ru/Pt, Pd/Ir) in different impact lithologies of four Apollo landing sites constrains physical mixing processes ranging from the scale of gram‐sized samples to the area covered by the Apollo missions.     

High resolution U‐Pb ages of Ca‐phosphates in Apollo 14 breccias: Implications for the age of the Imbrium impact

Previous age estimates of the Imbrium impact range from 3770 to 3920 Ma, with the latter being the most commonly accepted age of this basin‐forming event. The occurrence of Ca‐phosphates in Apollo 14 breccias, interpreted to represent ejecta formed by this impact, provides a new opportunity to date the Imbrium event as well as refining the impact history of the Moon. We present new precise U‐Pb analyses of Ca‐phosphates from impact breccia sample 14311 that are concordant and give a reliable weighted average age of 3938 ± 4 Ma (2σ). Comparison with previously published U‐Pb data on phosphate from Apollo 14 samples indicate that all ages are statistically similar and suggest phosphates could have been formed by the same impact at 3934 Ma ± 3 Ma (2σ). However, this age is older than the 3770 to 3920 Ma range determined for other samples and also interpreted as formed during the Imbrium impact. This suggests that several impacts occurred during a 20–30 Ma period around 3900 Ma and formed breccias sampled by the Apollo missions.     

Evidence for the sedimentary origin of imbrium sculpture and lunar basin radial texture

The Imbrium sculpture texture, a distinctive ridged and furrowed pattern radial to the Imbrium basin and seen in other basins, has long been debated as to its origin (internal, formed by basin-related fractures; external, related to ejecta patterns). To test for the presence of deep radial fractures on the moon, the azimuth and length of linear rim segments of twenty-four post-Imbrium-basin craters were measured. Linear segments of crater rims parallel preexisting fracture patterns in terrestrial craters floored in an indurated substrate. Craters forming in a terrain containing pervasive fractures radial to Imbrium should show evidence of this tectonic influence by forming rim crest segments (terrace scarps) preferentially along these directions. No systematic relation of these segments with Imbrium radial structure was found. This suggests that the surface radial grooves may not extend to depth. The relatively young Orientale basin shows two types of radial structures: (1) pervasive subparallel ridges and furrows formed by a spectrum of sizes of secondary crater chains emanating from the main crater, and from flowage of material during secondary cratering; (2) parallel, generally radial ridges which appear to have formed on top of outward flows of debris. These types of radial textures (both depositional and erosional) appear unrelated to major faults or fractures. Therefore, these two lines of evidence suggest that much of the Imbrium-type sculpture surrounding major lunar basins is sedimentary, rather than tectonic, in origin.