地球参考框架ITRF2014结果分析

ITRF2014是地球参考系的最新实现。该框架利用正弦函数估计负荷对台站位置的季节性效应,与ITRF2008相比,可以得到更稳定、精确的速度场;另外,ITRF2014引入了震后形变模型,可以更好地分析测站的非线性运动。本文通过分析发现:ITRF2014其原点相较于ITRF2008,其符合精度为3.5 mm;两种技术(VLBI和SLR)在2010.0历元确定的尺度因子不符值为1.18 ppb;同时,局部测量解与空间大地测量解解算的本地连接向量仍存在较大不符。     

ITRF2014-GPS解数据质量分析

现搜集了最新的ITRF2014-GPS解数据,并利用移动回归模型与快速傅里叶变换进行了数据处理,将处理结果与ITRF2008-GPS解处理结果进行比较发现,ITRF2014-GPS解数据质量比ITRF2008有明显提高,其中主要非线性周期规律已经较好地被模型化改正,主要包含周年规律和半周年规律.     

我国大陆地区ITRF坐标系统转换研究

在研究ITRF坐标系统转换理论和方法的基础上,提出了一种实际可行的框架、历元转换方法,并应用于实际工程快速获得了CGCS2000坐标。结果表明,不同框架坐标在相同历元下坐标差异较小,ITRF2014与ITRF2008、ITRF2005在2021.00历元下的坐标偏差小于5 mm;不同地区地壳构造程度差异导致坐标历元间差别很大。提出了两套中国大陆地区3°×3°速度格网（CGCS2000和ITRF14）,可用于快速获取测站速度和历元坐标转换,精度可达厘米级,能在工程中广泛应用。     

陆态网络基准网数据处理策略分析

从基准网测站分区和整网平差策略方面对基准网数据处理进行了详细分析,并进行了强约束法和相似变换法的比较实验。结果表明,强约束法对框架精度要求较高,约束点精度对结果有直接影响;而相似变换法保留了区域框架的本质,避免了网形结构的扭曲。由于CGCS2000框架是基于现势性较差的ITRF97的,结果不理想,因此数据处理过程中宜采用现势性较好的ITRF2008或ITRF2014站点联合解算。     

ITRF 2008与ITRF 2014的差异对GNSS数据处理的影响

针对全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)数据处理过程中旧的ITRF 2008参考框架现势性不足及新的ITRF2014框架在数据的数量与质量、参数模型、测站的分布合理性上均有提高等状况,该文以陆态网的最近两年的观测数据为例,对比分析了ITRF2008和ITRF2014框架下各测站的坐标、基线长度、水平速度场的差异,以期为当前高精度GNSS数据处理提供参考。实验表明:两个框架下的成果经基准转换后,测站在X、Y、Z方向的差异均为毫米级;基线差异平均在1 mm以内;水平速度场差值的最大值为5.75(mm·a~(-1)),最小值为-4.88(mm·a~(-1)),平均值为-0.45(mm·a~(-1)),方向上差值的平均值为0.02rad。目前两个框架的差异对一般工程应用基本上可以忽略,但对地震监测的陆态网来说,则必须考虑。     

ITRF2014框架下地面沉降GNSS数据处理方法研究

2016年1月,最新版本的国际地球参考框架-ITRF2014发布,目前IGS发布的精密星历以及卫星和GNSS天线的天线高改正数据也是基于ITRF2014的,在新的国际框架下利用GNSS严密的分析地面沉降势在必行。本文利用国内某地面沉降严重地区的GNSS数据,基于ITRF2014、瞬时参考历元,详细介绍了利用GNSS分析地面沉降的数据处理方法,并利用框架转换参数、参数年变化率及转换模型,将成果转换至已有资料的相同基准,分析比较重合点,获取点位年变化量,以便后期对沉降严重地区密切的监测,对今后利用GNSS高精度分析地面沉降具有重要的指导意义。     

WGS84与ITRF框架间的坐标转换分析

简要介绍了WGS84坐标系和ITRF框架,给出了不同ITRF框架间的坐标转换流程,并利用实例对WGS84与ITRF框架间的转换关系进行了验证分析.结果表明,ITRF2008与WGS84坐标基本一致,但由于ITRF框架的站速度对站坐标的影响与时间成正相关,当需要采用ITRF框架时,应选用最新的国际地球参考框架.     

坐标系统任意框架和历元转换研究

研究国际陆地参考框架(ITRF)坐标转换问题,分析坐标框架的转换模型,构建一种实用的历元转换方法.研究结果表明在相同历元下,不同框架之间的坐标差异较小,不同活动块体下ITRF2008和ITRF2014在2020.00历元时各分量坐标差小于3 mm.受不同区域地壳活动程度影响,相同框架下不同历元之间的坐标差异明显,基于建立的历元转换方法,实际测试精度可达1 cm左右,能够在工程应用中快速获得CGCS2000坐标.     

ITRF2005参考框架的综合探讨

对近年来精度高、应用较多的国际地球参考架ITRF2005做了简单概述,指出了ITRF2000与ITRF2005之间在解的生成、基准的定义和实现等方面的不同。此外,ITRF2005除了包含作为参考框架体现的站点坐标和速率之外,还包含一起参与联合处理的地球定向参数：极移、极移速率、日长、UT1的时间序列[1]。重点阐明ITRF2005的实现的基本情况及其相对于ITRF2000所作改进的理由和合理性。     

坐标框架转换若干问题的研究

介绍了ITRF框架之间的转换问题,用IERS公布的不同ITRF转换的14个参数,把不同ITRF下的精密星历文件和IGS站的坐标转换到其他的ITRF框架下,并利用GAMIT软件进行数据处理,根据得到的结果分析ITRF框架。     

Improvement of the transformation between ITRF and Doppler-Realized WGS84

The WGS84 (World Geodetic System 1984) reference system is, originally, mathematically defined from the NSWC-9Z2 (Naval Surface Weapons Center — 9Z2) reference system. The WGS84 associated realization, called in this paper WGS84-D, is a 1 meter consistency NNSS (US Navy Navigation Satellite System) Doppler realized reference frame. In contrast, the ITRF (IERS Terrestrial Reference Frame) is a 1 centimeter consistency reference frame realized through the most accurate techniques of Space Geodesy. This work intends to improve the transformation parameters between the WGS84-D and the ITRF through the use of both a NSWC-9Z2/Doppler realization and an extension of the ITRF network. A strong linear correlation was also modeled between the Doppler determined scale factor and the mean smoothed sunspot number, due to uncompensated ionospheric effects. This correction improved NSWC-9Z2 (i.e. WGS84) Doppler realization consistency. The uncertainty of adjusted transformation parameters between the ITRF and the WGS84-D is improved by a factor 2 over previous determinations.     

ITRF2008: an improved solution of the international terrestrial reference frame

ITRF2008 is a refined version of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame based on reprocessed solutions of the four space geodetic techniques: VLBI, SLR, GPS and DORIS, spanning 29, 26, 12.5 and 16?years of observations, respectively. The input data used in its elaboration are time series (weekly from satellite techniques and 24-h session-wise from VLBI) of station positions and daily Earth Orientation Parameters (EOPs). The ITRF2008 origin is defined in such a way that it has zero translations and translation rates with respect to the mean Earth center of mass, averaged by the SLR time series. Its scale is defined by nullifying the scale factor and its rate with respect to the mean of VLBI and SLR long-term solutions as obtained by stacking their respective time series. The scale agreement between these two technique solutions is estimated to be 1.05 ± 0.13 ppb at epoch 2005.0 and 0.049 ± 0.010?ppb/yr. The ITRF2008 orientation (at epoch 2005.0) and its rate are aligned to the ITRF2005 using 179 stations of high geodetic quality. An estimate of the origin components from ITRF2008 to ITRF2005 (both origins are defined by SLR) indicates differences at epoch 2005.0, namely: ?0.5, ?0.9 and ?4.7?mm along X, Y and Z-axis, respectively. The translation rate differences between the two frames are zero for Y and Z, while we observe an X-translation rate of 0.3?mm/yr. The estimated formal errors of these parameters are 0.2?mm and 0.2?mm/yr, respectively. The high level of origin agreement between ITRF2008 and ITRF2005 is an indication of an imprecise ITRF2000 origin that exhibits a Z-translation drift of 1.8?mm/yr with respect to ITRF2005. An evaluation of the ITRF2008 origin accuracy based on the level of its agreement with ITRF2005 is believed to be at the level of 1?cm over the time-span of the SLR observations. Considering the level of scale consistency between VLBI and SLR, the ITRF2008 scale accuracy is evaluated to be at the level of 1.2?ppb (8?mm at the equator) over the common time-span of the observations of both techniques. Although the performance of the ITRF2008 is demonstrated to be higher than ITRF2005, future ITRF improvement resides in improving the consistency between local ties in co-location sites and space geodesy estimates.     

VLBI terrestrial reference frame contributions to ITRF2008

In late 2008, the Product Center for the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) issued a call for contributions to the next realization of the International Terrestrial Reference System, ITRF2008. The official contribution of the International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS) to ITRF2008 consists of session-wise datum-free normal equations of altogether 4,539 daily Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) sessions from 1979.7 to 2009.0 including data of 115 different VLBI sites. It is the result of a combination of individual series of session-wise datum-free normal equations provided by seven analysis centers (ACs) of the IVS. All series are completely reprocessed following homogeneous analysis options according to the IERS Conventions 2003 and IVS Analysis Conventions. Altogether, nine IVS ACs analyzed the full history of VLBI observations with four different software packages. Unfortunately, the contributions of two ACs, Institute of Applied Astronomy (IAA) and Geoscience Australia (AUS), had to be excluded from the combination process. This was mostly done because the IAA series exhibits a clear scale offset while the solution computed from normal equations contained in the AUS SINEX files yielded unreliable results. Based on the experience gathered since the combination efforts for ITRF2005, some discrepancies between the individual series were discovered and overcome. Thus, the consistency of the individual VLBI solutions has improved considerably. The agreement in terms of WRMS of the Terrestrial Reference Frame (TRF) horizontal components is 1 mm, of the height component 2 mm. Comparisons between ITRF2005 and the combined TRF solution for ITRF2008 yielded systematic height differences of up to 5 mm with a zonal signature. These differences can be related to a pole tide correction referenced to a zero mean pole used by four of five IVS ACs in the ITRF2005 contribution instead of a linear mean pole path as recommended in the IERS Conventions. Furthermore, these systematics are the reason for an offset in the scale of 0.4 ppb between the IVS’ contribution to ITRF2008 and ITRF2005. The Earth orientation parameters of seven series used as input for the IVS combined series are consistent to a huge amount with about 50 μas WRMS in polar motion and 3 μs in dUT1.     

ITRF2000和新的全球板块运动模型

地学工作者一直关注的ITRF2000地球参考框架初步结果已于2001年3月19日公布，ITRF2000综合了VLBI、SLR，LLR，GPS和DORIS技术，产生736个点位坐标和54个核心站，文中介绍了ITRF2000，并利用ITRF2000综合解的结果计算全球板块的欧拉矢量，建立了基于空间实测数据基础 的最新全球板块运动模型。     

我国毫米级框架实现与维持发展现状和趋势

主要从技术实现和维持方面讨论了我国CGCS2000框架与当前ITRF框架的不同。随着空间技术的进步,特别是我国自主的北斗卫星第三代卫星将实现信号的全球覆盖,发展以北斗卫星为主的毫米级全球基准将是我国基准发展的未来目标。毫米级站点坐标涉及两个因素:一是地球质心变化反演;二是站点的非线性运动建模。本文就国际上采用的地心反演方法进行了讨论、分析、比较。非线性运动建模部分重点介绍了奇异谱非线性建模技术,此方法相比地球物理效应分析建模方法有很明显的优势,可为我国CGCS2000框架点非线性运动维持提供依据。     

IGS contribution to the ITRF

We examine the contribution of the International GNSS Service (IGS) to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) by evaluating the quality of the incorporated solutions as well as their major role in the ITRF formation. Starting with the ITRF2005, the ITRF is constructed with input data in the form of time series of station positions (weekly for satellite techniques and daily for VLBI) and daily Earth Orientation Parameters. Analysis of time series of station positions is a fundamental first step in the ITRF elaboration, allowing to assess not only the stations behavior, but also the frame parameters and in particular the physical ones, namely the origin and the scale. As it will be seen, given the poor number and distribution of SLR and VLBI co-location sites, the IGS GPS network plays a major role by connecting these two techniques together, given their relevance for the definition of the origin and the scale of the ITRF. Time series analysis of the IGS weekly combined and other individual Analysis Center solutions indicates an internal precision (or repeatability) <2 mm in the horizontal component and <5 mm in the vertical component. Analysis of three AC weekly solutions shows generally poor agreement in origin and scale, with some indication of better agreement when the IGS started to use the absolute model of antenna phase center variations after the GPS week 1400 (November 2006).     

北斗坐标系

北斗坐标系是北斗卫星导航系统的大地基准.本文在扼要叙述背景情况之后,首先给出了北斗坐标系原点、尺度、定向的定义和参考椭球的定义和导出常数;其次介绍北斗坐标系的首次实现,这次实现由北斗系统的8个监测站在历元2010.0的ITRF2014框架下的坐标和速度体现,它们是通过处理一个包括8个监测站的全球GNSS网4期GPS数据、框架对准与监测站坐标序列的线性回归拟合得到的;最后就参考框架的更新周期、监测站境外布设和连续观测、精密星历的生成与发布,北斗坐标系的标准化问题进行了讨论,并提出一些建议.     

坐标参考框架长期解内约束模型

地球参考框架是一切测绘活动、地球科学研究的物理基础。目前,地球参考框架常采用长期解的形式,即利用一组全球分布的基准站在某一参考历元的坐标和速度来表示。由于观测有误差,且各基准站又具有非线性变化,故需要对不同历元的瞬时地球参考框架进行累积,形成稳定的长期参考框架。以不同历元观测数据得到的瞬时参考框架成果为输入,构建了一种基于多历元观测数据建立参考框架长期累积解的融合模型。从坐标转换模型和测站坐标的时变模型出发,详细推导了建立长期解的函数模型,依据该函数模型的秩亏数设计了转换参数的内约束基准。采用2010-08—2014-12的国际全球导航卫星系统服务第2次处理结果进行试算,并与国际地球参考框架2014成果进行了对比。结果表明,X、Y、Z方向标准偏差分别为3.45 ?mm、4.04 mm、2.84 mm,速度精度分别为1.53 mm/a、1.46 mm/a、1.21 mm/a,X、Y、Z方向的加权均方根误差优于3 ?mm。