结构双层多重调谐质量阻尼器(DMTMD)控制策略的鲁棒性评价

基于定义的二类优化目标函数,评价双层多重调谐质量阻尼器(DMTMD)控制策略对漂移频率系数(DFR)摄动的鲁棒性。数值研究表明,使用第二类优化准则设计的DMTMD、双重调谐质量阻尼器(DTMD)和多重调谐质量阻尼器(MTMD)比使用第一类优化准则设计的DMTMD、DTMD和MTMD具有更高的对DFR摄动的鲁棒性。而且,使用第二类优化准则设计的总数为4的DMTMD、DTMD和总数为11的MTMD具有近似相同的对DFR摄动的鲁棒性。     

新型半主动调谐质量阻尼器减震性能的数值模拟

为了改良被动式调谐质量阻尼器(TMD)对建筑结构的减震效果,本文提出了一种新型的可实时调节频率和电涡流阻尼的半主动调谐质量阻尼器(SATMD)。由Hilbert-Huang变换(HHT)识别出结构的瞬时频率,通过基于HHT的控制算法实时调节SATMD的质量进行频率的调谐;通过基于线性二次型高斯(LQG)的控制算法实时调整磁导间距来调节电涡流阻尼系数。为了验证SATMD对建筑结构的减震效果,以一单自由度结构模型为例进行地震响应模拟,同时采用一经优化设计的被动TMD作为对比,并考虑由于主结构的累积损伤等引起自身频率下降而造成被动TMD的去谐效应。以主结构的加速度和位移时程峰值、整体均方根值及TMD的耗能性能作为评价指标,对比了SATMD在主结构发生损伤前后对被动TMD的改良效果。数值模拟结果表明,在主结构发生损伤前后,SATMD均比经优化设计的被动TMD有更好的减震效果及耗能能力。     

基于Maxwell型阻尼器的多重调谐质量阻尼器性能评价

研究了基于Maxwell型阻尼器的多重调谐质量阻尼器(MTD—MTMD)在控制结构地震反应方面的最优动力特性。利用建立的设置MTD-MTMD时结构的传递函数,定义了设置MTD—MTMD时结构的动力放大系数(DMF)。将MTD-MTMD的优化准则定义为结构最大动力放大系数的最小值的最小化(Min．Min．Max．DMF)。利用定义的优化准则,评价了Maxwell型阻尼器的松弛时间系数(RTC)对MTD—MTMD最优参数和有效性的影响。利用最大的MTD—MTMD动力放大系数(DMF),评价了RTC对MTD-MTMD冲程的影响。     

装有调谐质量阻尼器的高架桥梁的减震分析

调谐质量阻尼器（ＴＭＤ）是结构控制中发展起来的一种较成熟的控制装置。本文将ＴＭＤ减振技术运用于高架桥梁,建立了安装有ＴＭＤ的桥梁体系的分析计算模型,获得了其动力反应计算公式;探讨了ＴＭＤ装置对桥梁减震的有效性,并分析了ＴＭＤ动力参数对桥梁减震的影响。     

基于碰撞调谐质量阻尼器的矮塔斜拉桥减震研究

以一座矮塔斜拉桥为研究对象,分析碰撞调谐质量阻尼器对于该结构的抑震效果。首先介绍了新型碰撞调谐质量阻尼器（Pounding Tuned Mass Damper,PTMD）的减震机理及基于接触单元的非线性碰撞力模型;之后,通过ANSYS软件中的APDL语言实现了PTMD减震系统的时域分析方法,并通过三条实际地震记录验证了PTMD的抑震效果。数值分析结果表明:（1）传统调谐质量阻尼器（tuned mass damper,TMD）及新型PTMD对于矮塔斜拉桥的位移、加速度及塔身弯矩响应均有较好的抑制效果;（2）PTMD相比传统TMD多了一种碰撞耗能模式,其减震效果略高于传统TMD。     

结构最优主动调谐质量阻尼器风致振动控制的研究

基于我国现行的风荷载规范,建立了在风荷载作用下结构-主动调谐质量阻尼器(ATMD)系统的动力方程。定义ATMD最优参数准则为:结构-ATMD系统的位移或加速度响应方差的最小化。ATMD有效性的评价准则为:设置ATMD结构的最小化位移或加速度响应方差与未设置ATMD结构的位移或加速度响应方差之比(分别称为位移和加速度减振系数)。根据上述准则,在频域内数值研究了结构自振频率、标准化加速度反馈增益系数、质量比对ATMD系统的最优参数(包括最优频率比和阻尼比)、有效性和冲程的影响。此外,为了比较的目的,论文同时考虑了结构TMD风致振动控制的情况。     

大跨桥梁振动控制的杠杆主动多重调谐质量阻尼器策略

提出了适用于控制大跨桥梁风致振动的杠杆式主动多重调谐质量阻尼器（LT-AMTMD）控制策略.利用建立的LT-AMTMD结构系统的动力放大系数,评价了LT-AMTMD的性能.数值结果表明,驱动器置于质量块处的LT-AMTMD比驱动器置于其它位置的LT-AMTMD更加有效.驱动器置于质量块处的LT-AMTMD可以根据实际需要,通过改变支撑位置来调节弹簧的静伸长,而且保持其性能不变（包括冲程）.数值结果还表明,驱动器置于质量块处的LT-AMTMD可以明显地提高LT-MTMD的性能,而且比单个杠杆式主动调谐质量阻尼器（LT-ATMD）更加有效.     

结构多重双重调谐质量阻尼器(MDTMD)的新控制策略

本文提出了一种新的控制策略——多重双重调谐质量阻尼器(以下简称为MDTMD)。MDTMD系统参数的可能组合形成十种MDTMD模型,本文评价其中最易制作的一种MDTMD模型。利用定义的优化目标函数,评价了MDTMD的控制性能。数值结果表明MDTMD比双重调谐质量阻尼器(DTMD)具有更好的有效性和对频率调谐的鲁棒性。但MDTMD的冲程大于DTMD的冲程。     

土木工程结构不同多重调谐质量阻尼器的控制策略

提出了双层多重调谐质量阻尼器（DMTMD）和多重双重调谐质量阻尼器（MDTMD）控制策略。利用定义的优化目标函数,评价了最易制作DMTMD和MDTMD模型的性能。数值结果表明,DMTMD和MDTMD比基于任意整数或基于奇数的多重调谐质量阻尼器（AI-MTMD和ON-MTMD）具有更好的有效性和鲁棒性。MDTMD和DMTMD具有近似相同的有效性,但MDTMD比DMTMD具有更好的鲁棒性。总的来说,MDTMD的冲程大于DMTMD的冲程;DMTMD中小质量块的冲程大于AI-MTMD和ON-MTMD的冲程。     

遗传BP神经网络主动AMD对偏心结构的减震控制

本文采用在结构顶层水平双向设置AMD主动控制装置的方法，对偏心结构在多向地震作用下的振动进行了遗传BP神经网络主动控制研究。首先论述了遗传BP神经网络的基本理论，然后介绍结构—AMD扭转耦联控制系统微分方程及其状态空间求解方法，最后介绍利用遗传BP神经网络对结构反应进行预测及对结构实施主动控制的方法。数值结果表明，利用遗传BP网络进行结构反应预测和控制是可行且有效的，能对结构的平动和扭转反应起到较好的减震效果。     

Seismic response of controlled structures with active multiple tuned mass dampers

Active multiple tuned mass dampers （referred to as AMTMD）, which consist of several active tuned mass dampers （ATMDs） with identical stiffness and damping coefficients but varying mass and control force, have recently been proposed to suppress undesirable oscillations of structures under ground acceleration. It has been shown that the AMTMD can remarkably improve the performance of multiple tuned mass dampers （MTMDs） and is also more effective in reducing structure oscillation than single ATMDs. Notwithstanding this, good performance of AMTMD （including a single ATMD illustrated from frequency-domain analysis） may not necessarily translate into a good seismic reduction behavior in the time-domain. To investigate these phenomena, a three-story steel structure model controlled by AMTMD with three ATMDs was implemented in SIMULINK and subjected to several historical earthquakes. Likewise, the structure under consideration was assumed to have uncertainty of stiffness, such as 4-15% of its initial stiffness, in the numerical simulations. The optimum design parameters of the AMTMD were obtained in the frequency-domain by implementing the minimization of the minimum values of the maximum dynamic magnification factors （DMF） of general structures with AMTMD. For comparison purposes, response analysis of the same structure with a single ATMD was also performed. The numerical analysis and comparison show that the AMTMD generally renders better effectiveness when compared with a single ATMD for structures subjected to historical earthquakes. In particular, the AMTMD can improve the effectiveness of a single ATMD for a structure with an uncertainty of stiffness of 4-15% of its initial stiffness.     

Experimental and analytical study on the performance of particle tuned mass dampers under seismic excitation

A particle tuned mass damper (PTMD), which is a creative integration of a traditional tuned mass damper and an efficient particle damper in the vibration control area, is proposed. This paper presents a comprehensive study that involves experimental, analytical, and computational approaches. The vibration control effects of a PTMD that is attached to a five‐story steel frame under seismic input are investigated by a series of shaking table tests. The influence of some parameters (auxiliary mass ratio, gap clearance, mass ratio of particles to the total auxiliary mass, frequency characteristics, and amplitude level of the input) is explored, and the performance of the PTMD with/without buffered material is compared. The experimental results show that the PTMD can achieve significant damping effects under seismic excitations, and the bandwidth of the suppression frequency is expanded, showing the device's robustness and control efficiency. In addition, an approximately analytical solution that is based on the concept of an equivalent single‐particle damper is presented, and the method to determine the corresponding system parameters is introduced. A comparative study between experimental and numerical results is conducted to verify the feasibility and accuracy of this analytical model. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Lifecycle cost optimization of tuned mass dampers for the seismic improvement of inelastic structures

The seismic performance of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) on structures undergoing inelastic deformations may largely depend on the ground motion intensity. By estimating the impact of each seismic intensity on the overall cost of future seismic damages, lifecycle cost (LCC) proves a rational metric for evaluating the benefits of TMDs on inelastic structures. However, no incorporation of this metric into an optimization framework is reported yet. This paper presents a methodology for the LCC‐optimal design of TMDs on inelastic structures, which minimizes the total seismic LCC of the combined building‐TMD system. Its distinctive features are the assumption of a mass‐proportional TMD cost model, the adoption of an iterative suboptimization procedure, and the initialization of the TMD frequency and damping ratios according to a conventional linear TMD design technique. The methodology is applied to the seismic improvement of the SAC‐LA benchmark buildings, taken as representative of standard steel moment‐resisting frame office buildings in LA, California. Results show that, despite their limited performance at the highest intensity levels, LCC‐optimal TMDs considerably reduce the total LCC, to an extent that depends on both the building vulnerability and the TMD unit cost. They systematically present large mass ratios (around 10%) and frequency and damping ratios close to their respective linearly designed optima. Simulations reveal the effectiveness of the proposed design methodology and the importance of adopting a nonlinear model to correctly evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of TMDs on ordinary structures in highly seismic areas.     

On tuned mass dampers for reducing the seismic response of structures

This paper presents an energy‐based theoretical model for a two degree‐of‐freedom mechanical system. After a general formulation in Appendix A, the model is specialized to study tuned mass dampers as a means to substantially increase modal damping in order to induce a consequential decrease of the seismic response of the structures thus provided. Although approximate since it neglects coupling due to damping, it is shown that the model yields a first‐order approximation to the exact frequencies, providing values of optimum damping that closely match exact results proposed by others. In view of this, it is proposed that the model be applied through an iterative numerical procedure that identifies the pertinent optimum parameters. It is also shown that for certain particular benchmark cases the model provides closed‐form equations for the parameters defining the dynamic states related to these special conditions. Despite its approximate nature the model presented in this paper is rational, and due to its explicit consideration of energy balance and overall simplicity, it provides a convenient platform for the study of tuned mass dampers, as well as for other methods of structural passive control. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Use of a shared tuned mass damper (STMD) to reduce vibration and pounding in adjacent structures

The dynamic response of tall civil structures due to earthquakes is very important to civil engineers. Structures exposed to earthquakes experience vibrations that are detrimental to their structural components. Structural pounding is an additional problem that occurs when buildings experience earthquake excitation. This phenomena occurs when adjacent structures collide from their out‐of‐phase vibrations. Many energy dissipation devices are presently being used to reduce the system response. Tuned mass dampers (TMD) are commonly used to improve the response of structures. The stiffness and damping properties of the TMD are designed to be a function of the natural frequency of the building to which it is connected. This research involves attaching adjacent structures with a shared tuned mass damper (STMD) to reduce both the structures vibration and probability of pounding. Because the STMD is connected to both buildings, the problem of tuning the STMD stiffness and damping parameters becomes an issue. A design procedure utilizing a performance function is used to obtain the STMD parameters to result in the best overall system response. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

An alternative methodology for designing tuned mass dampers to reduce seismic vibrations in building structures

It is well established that small tuned mass dampers (TMDs) attached to structures are very effective in reducing excessive harmonic vibrations induced by external loads but are not as interesting within the context of earthquake engineering problems. For this reason, large mass ratio TMDs have been proposed with the objective of adding a significant amount of damping to structures, thus constituting a good means of reducing structural response in these cases. This solution has other important and attractive dynamic features such as robustness to system uncertainties and reduction of the motion of the inertial mass. In this context, this paper aims to describe an alternative methodology to existing procedures used to tune these devices to earthquake loads and to present some additional considerations regarding its performance in controlling seismic vibrations. The main feature of the proposed method consists of establishing a direct proportion between the damping ratios of the structure's first two vibration modes and the adopted mass ratio. By equalizing the damping ratios of the system's main vibration modes, this proposal also facilitates the use of simplified methods, such as modal analysis based on response spectra. To demonstrate the usefulness of this alternative methodology, an application example is presented, which was also used to perform a parametric study involving other tuning methods and to estimate mass ratio values from which there is no significant advantage in increasing the TMD mass. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Optimal design theories of tuned mass dampers with nonlinear viscous damping

Optimal design theory for linear tuned mass dampers(TMD) has been thoroughly investigated,but is still under development for nonlinear TMDs.In this paper,optimization procedures in the time domain are proposed for design of a TMD with nonlinear viscous damping.A dynamic analysis of a structure implemented with a nonlinear TMD is conducted fi rst.Optimum design parameters for the nonlinear TMD are searched using an optimization method to minimize the performance index.The feasibility of the proposed optimiza...     

Second‐mode tuned mass dampers in base‐isolated structures for reduction of floor acceleration

To reduce floor acceleration of base‐isolated structures under earthquakes, a tuned mass damper (TMD) system installed on the roof is studied. The optimal tuning parameters of the TMD are analyzed for linear base isolation under a generalized ground motion, and the performance of the TMD is validated using a suite of recorded ground motions. The simulation shows that a TMD tuned to the second mode of a base‐isolated structure reduces roof acceleration more effectively than a TMD tuned to the first mode. The reduction ratio, defined as the maximum roof acceleration with the TMD relative to that without the TMD, is approximately 0.9 with the second‐mode TMD. The higher effectiveness of the second‐mode TMD relative to the first‐mode TMD is attributed primarily to the unique characteristics of base isolation, ie, the relatively long first‐mode period and high base damping. The modal acceleration of the second mode is close to or even higher than that of the first mode in base‐isolated structures. The larger TMD mass ratio and lower modal damping ratio of the second‐mode TMD compared to the first‐mode TMD increases its effect on modal acceleration reduction. The reduction ratio with the second‐mode TMD improves to 0.8 for bilinear base isolation. Because of the detuning effect caused by the change in the first‐mode period in bilinear isolation, the first‐mode TMD is ineffective in reducing roof acceleration. Additionally, the displacement experienced by the second‐mode TMD is considerably smaller than that of the first‐mode TMD, thereby reducing the installation space for the TMD.