SISA完备性监测与WUL可靠性算法

详述了Galileo完备性概念,分析了空间信号有效参数完备性监测系统和监测机理,给出Galileo系统中描述SISA预报形式和算法模型.基于空间信号完备性参数的算法,优化计算最坏用户位置方法,建立了算法模型,得出相应结论.算法和结论初步验证适用于全球,为进一步研究Galileo系统完备性算法和估计用户保护水平奠定基础.     

多系统多频率的EGNOS系统完备性模拟分析

推导了EGNOS系统不同频率情况下的完备性算法。针对GPS和GPS/Galileo组合导航的情况,模拟计算了EGNOS增强系统能为多频用户提供的完备性能。分析结果表明,EGNOS能够使GPS/Galileo系统的双频用户满足Cat-Ⅰ飞行阶段的完备性要求。     

GALILEO系统局域完备性监测设计与实现

根据GALILEO系统局域完备性概念和网络RTK的基本理论,建立导航系统局域网络完备性监测理论和算法。算法主要包括网络系统完备性算法和用户完备性算法,内容包括网络误差模型的建立、插值算法的选择、误差改正数完备性指标的计算、完备性指标的验证和用户保护水平的计算等。仿真结果表明,采用网络RTK技术和完备性监测算法,飞机的平面保护水平和垂直保护水平均小于完备性告警门限值,可以满足飞机Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类精密进近的完备性要求,为卫星导航系统在民航中的应用提供完备性理论基础。     

卫星自主完备性监测及其在提高GPS用户工作性能方面的应用

卫星自主完备性监测方法(SAIM)是将完备性监测功能直接设置于导航卫星之中,每个卫星的SAIM子系统只用于监测该卫星本身的测距信号(码、相位/信号、导航信息等),而不像广域增强系统(WAAS)、空基增强系统(SBAS)、地基增强系统(GBAS,LAAS)那样必须同步处理12颗或更多颗卫星的信息。因此SAIM可以在1s之内完成对该卫星信号的完备性监测,并向用户发出完备性监测信息。它可以满足几乎所有用户对完备性的要求,甚至不用任何增强也能满足民航部门CAT Ⅰ级精密进近的技术指标。对于完备性监测要求十分高的应用,例如民航CAT     

EGNOS系统及其测试平台ESTB

欧洲的全球卫星导航系统的开发分为两个阶段,第一阶段的主要任务是发展EGNOS(European Geo-stationary Navigation OverlaySystem)系统,第二阶段是全球卫星导航系统Galileo系统。主要介绍EGNOS系统。EGNOS是一种星基的广域增强系统,利用地球静止卫星播发测距增强信号、完备性信号、卫星轨道参数、钟差改正信号和电离层改正信号,从而极大地改善了卫星定位的精度、完备性和可用性。EGNOS测试系统简称ESTB(EGNOS SystemTest Bed),ESTB在最大程度上减少了EGNOS系统的复杂度,重点考虑了它的可用性、健壮性和其他一些辅助设施。     

Galileo系统接收机测距性能分析

Galileo系统是欧盟提出并正在研制建设的全球卫星导航定位系统,本文从用户使用角度出发,简要论述了Galileo系统频率计划和信号体制设计情况,详细分析了不同频点、不同信号体制下Galileo系统接收机测距性能。     

卫星导航系统基本完好性算法及性能分析

卫星导航系统基本完好性监测对象是基本导航电文,其算法模型有两种:一是用户伪距精度(URA)和实时用户距离精度(RURA);二是空间信号精度(SISA)和空间信号监测精度/完好性标示(SISMA/IF).通过对卫星导航系统基本完好性监测技术进行分析定义,研究了系统基本完好性的两种主流算法.分别在正常情况下、卫星钟差和轨道...     

Galileo系统频率和信号设计现状

介绍了Galileo系统频率和信号设计方案。对Galileo系统选用的信号频段、各频段的中心频率、码率等主要参数、Galileo系统服务与信号的对应关系进行了研究。并对Galileo系统和GPS系统的兼容性和协同工作性进行了比较分析。     

Galieo系统频率和信号设计现状

介绍了Galileo系统频率和信号设计方案。对Galileo系统选用的信号频段、各频段的中心频率、码率等主要参数、Galileo系统服务与信号的对应关系进行了研究。并对Galileo系统和GPS系统的兼容性和协同工作性进行了比较分析。     

GPS/BDS系统实时用户保护水平研究分析

针对全球卫星导航定位系统的完备性监测领域中,用户保护水平估计不准会使系统性能降低或产生误警信息等问题,该文比较BDS系统、GPS系统、BDS/GPS组合系统下实时用户保护水平,并验证BDS系统下的实时用户保护水平是否满足用户的需求。利用水平保护水平和垂直保护水平模型,选取了3个监测站2d的监测结果分析了GPS系统、BDS系统与GPS/BDS系统组合的实时用户保护水平,并验证了该算法的稳定性。     

SBAS与Galileo系统完好性的比较研究

介绍了空基增强系统完好性的算法,包括用户差分距离误差的检验和格网点电离层误差的检验。在此基础上阐述了Galileo完好性的基本概念,SISA、SISE、和IF的生成方法。对两系统中相似的概念作了比较,并用GPS数据模拟了矢量SISE的分布。     

伽利略系统的完好性

导航系统的完好性体现了系统在不能用于导航时为用户提供及时、有效告警信息的能力,是导航系统的重要指标之一。本文介绍了伽利略（Galileo）系统完好性的概念、实施方法,并分析比较了空间信号精度（Signalin Space Accuracy-SISA）和用户距离精度（User Range Accuracy-URA）、用户差分距离误差（User Differential Range Error-UDRE）等概念的异同。     

基于IGS精密星历的完备性监测指标SISA研究

在卫星导航定位系统中,空间信号精度SISA是反映完备性参数的重要指标之一。从SISE与SISA的基本概念出发,描述了SISA的计算算法,根据卫星星钟的不同,选取了不同类型的GPS卫星,并利用IGS精密星历,预报精密星历进行了SISE和SISA的计算,结果表明:IGR星历计算的SISA指标满足系统要求,SISA主要受卫星钟差的精度影响,不同原子钟类型的卫星计算出来的SISA值变化不大。该成果对于卫星导航的完备性监测数据处理具有参考意义。     

卫星导航完备性监测的最新进展

自从美国于2000年取消GPS SA政策并开始实施GPS现代化,以及欧洲伽利略导航系统正式开始启动以来,在完备性监测技术方面出现了许多新的发展和动向,本文将对其作简要的介绍。GPS和伽利略的完备性监测新技术主要包括:卫星自主完备性监测(SAIM)、星载和星间完备性监测、伽利略完备性能力评估(GIPA)的概念、用户自主完备性监测(UAIM)等。     

GALILEO系统完备性指标SISMA的计算和分析

利用GALILEO全球监测网络和中国地壳运动监测网络分别对GALILEO系统完备性指标SISMA进行仿真计算。结果表明,全球完备性监测SISMA结果不稳定,随地理位置的变化较大,不能满足局部地区的生命安全服务要求;利用适当布设的局域监测网络进行的SISMA局域监测数值稳定,变化较小,结果明显优于全球SISMA监测结果,可以满足生命安全服务要求,可信度达到100%。在我国进行局域SISMA监测,是对全球完备性监测进行的有效和必要补充,提高系统的可用性和定位可信度。     

GPS和Galileo系统下RAIM算法可用性分析

介绍了RAIM算法中故障检测及其完好性保证的原理,采用STK仿真得到GPS和Galileo系统的卫星坐标及中国区域内的格网点坐标,结合航空用户对完好性需求,比较了GPS和Galileo系统下、不同类型导航性能需求的RAIM算法的可用性结果,分析了截止高度角、可视卫星数对故障检测可用性的影响。结果表明:当截止高度角越低、可视卫星数越多,故障检测的可用性越高;相同截止高度角条件时,Galileo系统下的RAIM可用性要高于GPS系统;单一的GPS导航系统难以满足垂直引导进近和精密进近等高等级的航空需求。     

An Assessment of the RAIM Performance of a Combined Galileo/GPS Navigation System Using the Marginally Detectable Errors (MDE) Algorithm

Integrity relates to the trust that can be placed in the correctness of information supplied by a navigation system. It includes the ability of the navigation system to provide timely warning to users when the system fails to meet its stated accuracy. Specifically, a navigation system is required to deliver a warning (alarm) when the error in the derived user position solution exceeds an allowable level (alarm limit). This warning must be issued to the user within a given period of time (time-to-alarm) and with a given probability (integrity risk). The two main approaches to monitoring the integrity of satellite navigation systems are Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM), and monitoring based on an independent network of integrity monitoring stations and a dedicated Ground Integrity Channel (GIC). More recently Satellite Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (SAIM) methods have also been investigated. This article presents the results of a study to assess the RAIM capability of the Galileo system when used alone and when combined with the Global Positioning System (GPS). The assessment was based on the Marginally Detectable Error (MDE) algorithm. The results show a significant improvement in the capability to perform RAIM using a combined Galileo/GPS system compared to the performance using the Galileo system alone. This study was supported by Alcatel Space and was a contribution to the Galileo definition studies carried out for the European Community under the GALA project. ? 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

GNSS receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) performance analysis

The availability of GPS signals is a major concern for many existing and potential applications. Fortunately, with the development of Galileo by the European Commission (EC) and European Space Agency (ESA) and new funding for the restoration of the Russian GLONASS announced by the Russian Federation (Revnivykh et al., in European Navigation Conference 2005, Munich, Germany, July 19–22), the future for satellite-based positioning and navigation applications is extremely promising. With the complete cooperation from all these global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), greater levels of satellite visibility and therefore integrity can be expected. In this paper, a receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) scheme along with reliability and separability measures are used to assess integrity performance levels of standalone GPS and integrated GPS/GLONASS, GPS/Galileo and GPS/GLONASS/Galileo systems where the clock offsets for each of the additional systems are estimated. It is shown, herein, that a minimum of three satellites must be visible in an additional system in order to provide a full integrity contribution when the system’s clock offset is to be estimated within the adjustment. A comparison of the integrity results obtained via system clock offsets estimated in the adjustment versus the case where the offsets are known and the measurements are corrected prior to the adjustment is also made for a high elevation mask scenario. Global simulation results for combined GPS/GLONASS/Galileo show that, theoretically, for the time of simulation and for any point on the globe, an outlier of 20 m can be detected with 80% probability at the 0.5% significance level and then separated from any other measurement with 90% probability. Corresponding values for the GPS only and combined GPS/GLONASS and GPS/Galileo systems, respectively, are approximately 435, 110 and 28 m, respectively, for the maximum MSBs and 312, 50 and 26 m, respectively, for the maximum MDBs. Temporal 24 h simulations for the GPS/GLONASS/Galileo scenario delivered agreeable results with the global snapshots for a 15° elevation mask. For the case where system clock offsets are estimated within the adjustment, it was shown that only the reliability measure was available for 100% of the time, with horizontal external reliability values of no more than about 12 m when a 30° masking angle was used. By assuming the clock offsets were determined and corrected for prior to the adjustment, the separability measure was markedly improved and was also available 100% of the time.