CCD整体平差方法的FORTRAN语言归算程序

介绍了实现CCD整体平差的FORTRAN归算程序的详细流程,包括(a)数据收集、(b)预处理和(c)整体平差与结果输出共三个步骤,并给出了各步所调用的子程序名称及其功能说明。采用模拟数据对该程序进行了可靠性检验,并将该程序应用于4颗河外射电源的光学定位。结果表明, 由于利用整体平差方法参加归算的观测资料覆盖天区扩大,包含了较多的参考星,因而可以获得高于单底片归算的定位精度。     

网平差在TAI计算中的应用

截至目前，用于TAI计算的GPS共视时间传递链路采用固定链路，以CRL、NIST和OP作为3个主要中心站，形成一个连接全球约50个时间实验室的时间比对链路，采用固定链路是为TAI计算方便，而人为规定的，具有简单、工作量较小等特点，但是整个TAI GPS共视时间比对对这3个中心站的依赖度过高，一旦这3个中心站不能正常观测，将影响TAI的计算，就GPS共视法这种技术本身而言，可支持任意链路的时间比对，并可形成网络化的比对结果，在TAI计算时，对GPS共视比对结果，采用网平差处理技术，可提高TAI计算的可靠性，避免因中心站观测故障而导致一个区无法参加比对的情况发生。     

CCD联合平差方法及其初步实例检验

在常规照相天体测量工作中，对暗天体的定位是采用逐级定标星过渡的方法实现的。由于星表系统差和局部差的存在，最终定位结果可能包含难以把握的误差积累。在CCD小视场观测情况下时常难以找到足够数量的定标星。鉴于此，推导了CCD观测联合平差方法的严格矢量表达式，以期通过共同星的过渡，实现大天区统一平差。原理上此方法可实现相对于河外天体的定位，以削弱星表系统差和局部差对定位结果的影响。讨论了CCD联合平差方法实现中的问题，包括底片常数模型选择、切点位置改正、共同星的较差改正和法方程解算方法等，并分析了具体的处理措施。用实例初步检验了CCD联合平差方法的效果，表明通过对多张CCD观测的联合平差，可以削弱单张CCD观测参考星数目过少、单张CCD观测参考星分布不均、个别参考星存在位置偏差和局部区域参考星存在系统性位置偏差等不利因素对归算结果的影响，进而达到扩大视场和提高归算精度的目的。     

CCD联合平差方法及其初步实例检验

在常规照相天体测量工作中 ,对暗天体的定位是采用逐级定标星过渡的方法实现的。由于星表系统差和局部差的存在 ,最终定位结果可能包含难以把握的误差积累。在CCD小视场观测情况下时常难以找到足够数量的定标星。鉴于此 ,推导了CCD观测联合平差方法的严格矢量表达式 ,以期通过共同星的过渡 ,实现大天区统一平差。原理上此方法可实现相对于河外天体的定位 ,以削弱星表系统差和局部差对定位结果的影响。讨论了CCD联合平差方法实现中的问题 ,包括底片常数模型选择、切点位置改正、共同星的较差改正和法方程解算方法等 ,并分析了具体的处理措施。用实例初步检验了CCD联合平差方法的效果 ,表明通过对多张CCD观测的联合平差 ,可以削弱单张CCD观测参考星数目过少、单张CCD观测参考星分布不均、个别参考星存在位置偏差和局部区域参考星存在系统性位置偏差等不利因素对归算结果的影响 ,进而达到扩大视场和提高归算精度的目的     

关于LAMOST天体测量标准天区选择的建议

简述已有几个天体测量标准天区的大小、星数以及恒星位置和自行的精度；给出LAMOST天体测量标准天区选择的原则；介绍研究疏散星团和古德带附近星团观测的意义；列出13个LAMOST天体测量标准天区J2000．0历元的赤经和赤纬、银经和银纬，如果疏散星团位于这个标准天区，也给出它们的日心距、红化值、金属丰度和年龄。     

CCD漂移扫描的基本原理及在天文上的应用

简要回顾了CCD在天文观测上的发展历程，介绍了CCD漂移扫描观测模式的基本原理；分析了该技术的优点和不足；综述CCD漂移扫描技术的应用现状；最后简述国内在CCD漂移扫描技术上的应用研究现状及对该技术的展望。     

灰色模型修正及其在实时GPS卫星钟差预报中的应用研究

在GPS实时精密单点定位中,卫星钟差的实时可靠预报是实现GPS实时高精度单点定位的关键之一.星载GPS原子钟频率高,非常敏感,极易受到外界及其本身因素的影响,从而很难掌握其复杂细致的变化规律,这些属性符合灰色系统理论的特点.因此,考虑将钟差的变化过程看作一个灰色系统.在探讨二次多项式和灰色模型卫星钟差预报局限性基础上,提出了利用改进的灰色模型实时预报GPS卫星钟差的研究,最后利用3个不同时段的GPS卫星钟差资料进行不同采样间隔钟差预报精度分析、灰色模型指数系数与预报精度的关系、与二次多项式预报精度比较分析,总结不同卫星钟差类型与模型指数系数的一般关系,并与IGS最终钟差星历产品比较,验证本文提出的改进预报模型的可行性和有效性.为实时GPS动态精密单点定位提供较高精度的卫星钟差产品.     

Galileo系统及其在中国的应用

较详细地介绍了Galileo系统的全面体系结构、频率设计、服务内容及其广泛的应用范围，指出了它与GPS系统相比的优点，并对开发和增强Galileo系统在我国多层次、全方位的应用提出了建议。     

CCD探测器在地面天体测量中的应用

ＣＣＤ技术在天体测量领域的应用已得到很大发展，本文回顾了１０年来ＣＣＤ技术应用于大型望远镜和子千环上的基本情况和所取的成果，分析了这些应用中所存在的三个主要问题，并对这些问题提出了相应的解决途径，这些问题的解决，将能促进地面基本天体测量的精度和效率跨上一个新台阶。     

全天相机在多设备巡天中的应用

天文观测站夜天空星像星等信息和天区分布信息可用于指导多设备巡天观测.建立全天相机监测系统(Monitoring all-sky system)对本地天区夜天空实时监测,获取的监测图像需要有效的方法进行处理以提取全天图像星像信息.由于全天图像视场大和高阶扭曲的影响,采用天顶等距投影与多项式函数组合的方法计算图像的底片常数.天文定位的均方根残差约为0.15个像素.通过对图像中亮星部分测光得到的星等差,改正大气消光误差.最后使用HEALPix (Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelation)方法实现天区划分和每个天区可观测极限星等值的存储.     

新参考系的引入对天体测量学的影响

由于观测、参考架、模型、时间尺度精度的不断提高和完善，国际天球参考系(ICRS)被引入使用，IAU2000年大会决定从2003年起采用新的天球中介极(CIP)、新的天球中介原点(CIO)、新的岁差一章动模型和新的UTI定义等，并定义了新的中介的运动参考架，由此给天体测量学带来很大的影响，天体测量学的内容和实践发生了许多重要的变化。据此，对天体测量学的术语、概念和定义的变化作了描述，并讨论了变化的原因和对天体测量学的影响。新的一套天体测量理论和方法正在变更之中，我们应及时跟上这个领域的发展步伐。     

近10年我国天体测量的发展

简述天体测量学研究的内各以及与各相关学科之间的关系；描述近10年来国际天体测量研究的进展和前沿课题；叙述我国天体测量研究的历史背景和研究基础，以及近10年来在国家自然科学基金委员会和其他科学组织支持下取得的成果，并对今后10～20年我国天体测量的发展提出初步看法。     

HST WFPC2天体测量和测光方法最新进展

对于哈勃空间望远镜(HST)来说，其广角行星照相机(WFPC2)的CCD性能的数据处理校正对提高天体测量和测光结果的精度有着重要意义。最近几年由于WFPC2对精度要求越来越高，其数据处理方法和校正方法包括点扩散函数、行误差和畸变修正等各个方面的研究都有了很大改进和进展。对近年来上述方面的最新进展作了介绍，并评价了其优缺点，提出了一些有待解决的问题。     

第二代天体测量卫星及后依巴谷地面天体测量的进展

简述了后依巴谷的天体测量工作。首先给出了第二个天体测量卫星Gaia的最新进展、最近提出的JAMSE和OBSS计划的简介,以及包含天体测量内容的SIM PlanetQuest计划的情况; 叙述了多波段天体参考架的建立和维持,特别是依巴谷星表向暗星方向的扩充和数字巡天,以及其他地面观测计划,如双星和聚星、太阳系天体的观测等;介绍了天体测量与天体物理结合的几个研究课题的进展;最后对我国自然科学基金会“十一五”天体测量优先发展的方向与内容提出建议。     

The SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey – III. Astrometry

In this, the third in a series of three papers concerning the SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey, we describe the astrometric properties of the data base. We describe the algorithms employed in the derivation of the astrometric parameters of the data, and demonstrate their accuracies by comparison with external data sets using the first release of data, the South Galactic Cap survey. We show that the celestial coordinates, which are tied to the International Celestial Reference Frame via the Tycho–2 reference catalogue, are accurate to better than ±0.2 arcsec at J , R ∼19,18 , rising to ±0.3 arcsec at J , R ∼22,21 , with positional-dependent systematic effects from bright to faint magnitudes at the ∼0.1-arcsec level. The proper motion measurements are shown to be accurate to typically ±10 mas yr⁻¹ at J , R ∼19,18 , rising to ±50 mas yr⁻¹ at J , R ∼22,21 , and are tied to zero using the extragalactic reference frame. We show that the zero-point errors in the proper motions are ≤1 mas yr⁻¹ for R >17 , and are no larger than ∼10 mas yr⁻¹ for R <17 mas yr⁻¹ .     

岁差常数改正及 FK5和Hipparcos自行系统

许多研究结果表明,FK5和Hipparcos自行系统的关系,与VLBI和LLR所测定的岁差常数改正值不相符合．利用建立在FK5系统上的PPM和ACRS自行数据的分析,通过多个子样本的考察,发现不论由PPM或ACRS自行资料,都无法给出一致的岁差改正值和分点运动改正值．从而表明,FK5自行内部的系统差是产生这种问题的主要因素．     

Comparison of the four catalogues by pairs,the Hipparcos,new Hipparcos,EOC‐2 and IL,by using μδ for the common 1120 stars

We present comparison results of our Independent Latitude (IL) catalogue of μ_δ determinations for 1120 bright stars with the Hipparcos, new Hipparcos and Earth Orientation Catalogue (EOC‐2) values. Also, we took into consideration the EOC3 and EOC4 (recent versions of EOC catalogues). Our μ_δ values are based on zenith telescope observations from seven Independent Latitude (IL) observatories. The IL measures are spanning a time baseline of up to 90 years which is the key advantage to the accurate determination of μ_δ. The short interval of the Hipparcos satellite observations is a disadvantage for a good accuracy of stellar proper motion, especially in the case of double and multiple stars. For this reason many astrometric catalogues have appeared after the publication of the Hipparcos including our IL catalogue. These catalogues are an appropriate combination of the Hipparcos satellite and ground‐based data which yields more accurate stellar coordinates and/or their proper motions. Among various types of ground‐based observations the latitude and universal time variations obtained from several million observations of stars reduced to the Hipparcos reference system were used for this purpose. These observations were obtained during almost the entire last century and were originally used to determine the Earth Orientation Parameters. It is also possible to use these data in the inverse task of checking the accuracy of stellar coordinates and/or their proper motions listed in the Hipparcos Catalogue. Such latitude and universal time variations data are the basis of the EOC and IL catalogues. In this paper, we computed the differences in μ_δ values between pairs of catalogues and analyzed the results to characterize the μ_δ errors for the four catalogues with a special focus on our IL catalogue. The standard errors of μ_δ for IL stars observed over more than 20 years are mostly smaller than or equal to the Hipparcos errors, and close to the accuracy level of the EOC‐2 (EOC‐3, EOC‐4) and the new Hipparcos. The resulting investigations of errors of differences of μ_δ, show that all four catalogues have relatively small random and systematic errors which are close to each other meaning that the corresponding μ_δ values have a high accuracy. Our sample also contains detected double and multiple stars for which the effects of the orbital and proper motions are difficult to separate. The differences of μ_δ values for these stars generally exceed those obtained for single stars. Also, these discrepancies could be attributed to effect of possible, still unrecognized, astrometric binaries. These investigations about the proper motions and double stars are in line with the activity of the IAU Working Group on Astrometry by Small Ground‐Based Telescopes. (© 2013 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Error analysis of proper motions in decination obtained for 807 Hipparcos stars from PZT observations over many decades

After publication of the Hipparcos catalogue (in 1997), a few new astrometric catalogues have appeared (TYCHO‐2, ARIHIP, etc.), as a good combination of the Hipparcos satellite and ground‐based data, to get more accurate coordinates and proper motions of stars than the Hipparcos catalogue ones. There are also investigations on improving the Hipparcos coordinates and proper motions by using the astrometric observations of latitude and universal time variations (via observed stars referred to Hipparcos catalogue), together with Hipparcos data, carried out during the last few years. These kind of ground‐based data were collected at the end of the last century by J. Vondrák. There are about 4.4 million optical observations made worldwide at 33 observatories and with 47 instruments during 1899.7–1992.0; our Belgrade visual zenith telescope data (for the period 1949.0‐1986.0) were included. First of all, these data were used to determine the Earth Orientation Parameters – EOP, but they are also useful for the opposite task – to check the accuracy of coordinates and proper motions of Hipparcos stars which were observed from the ground over many decades. Here, we use the latitude part of ten Photographic Zenith Tubes – PZT data (more than 0.9 million observations made at 6 observatories during the time interval 1915.8–1992.0), and combine them with the Hipparcos catalogue ones, with suitable weights, in order to check the proper motions in declination for 807 common PZT/Hipparcos stars (and to construct the PZT catalogue of μ_δ for 807 stars). Our standard errors in proper motions in declination of these stars are less than or equal to the Hipparcos ones for 423 stars. The mean value of standard errors of 313 stars observed over more than 20 years by PZT is 0.40 mas/yr. This is 53% of 0.75 mas/yr (the suitable value from the Hipparcos catalogue). We used the Least Squares Method – LSM with the linear model. Our results are in good agreement with the Earth Orientation Catalogue – EOC‐2 and the new Hipparcos ones. The main steps of the method and the investigations of systematic errors in determined proper motions (the proper motion differences with respect to the Hipparcos values, the EOC‐2 ones and the new Hipparcos ones, as a function of α, δ, and magnitude) are presented here. A comparison of the four catalogues by pairs shows that there is no significant relationship between the differences of their μ_δ values and magnitudes and color indices of the common 807 stars. All catalogues have relatively small random and systematic errors which are close to each other. However, the comparison shows that our formal errors are too small. They are underestimated by a factor of nearly 1.7 (for EOC‐2, it is 2.0) if we take the new Hipparcos (or Hipparcos) data as reference (© 2010 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

The XPM Catalogue: absolute proper motions of 280 million stars

We combined data from the Two-Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) and USNO-A2.0 catalogues in order to derive the absolute proper motions of about 280 million stars distributed all over the sky excluding a small region near the Galactic Centre, in the magnitude range  12 < B < 19 mag  . The proper motions were derived from the 2MASS Point Sources and USNO-A2.0 catalogue positions with a mean epoch difference of about 45 years for the Northern hemisphere and about 17 years for the Southern one. The zero-point of the absolute proper motion frame (the 'absolute calibration') was specified with the use of about 1.45 million galaxies from 2MASS. Most of the systematic zonal errors inherent in the USNO-A2.0 catalogue were eliminated before the calculation of proper motions. The mean formal error of absolute calibration is less than 1 mas yr⁻¹. The XPM Catalogue will be available via CDS in Strasbourg during 2010. The generated catalogue contains the International Celestial Reference System positions of stars for the J2000 epoch, original absolute proper motions, as well as   B , R , J , H   and K magnitudes. A comparison of the proper motions obtained in this work with the data of other recent catalogues of quasars was fulfilled.