VLF hiss,visual aurora and the geomagnetic activity

Observations and analyses of hiss events, recorded at College (dp. lat. 64.62°N) and Bar 1 (dp. lat. 70.20°N) during periods of varying auroral and geomagnetic activity, reveal three different types of events. These are (1) auroral substorm events with associated hiss bursts during disturbed period, (2) quiet-time hiss events accompanying stationary quiet auroral arcs and (3) hissless events at times of auroral and magnetic activity. Quiet-time observations seem to suggest that the substorm activity is not a necessary requirement for generating wideband hiss. On the other hand, examples of auroral and magnetic activity with complete absence of VLF hiss indicate that the ground reception of VLF/ELF natural emissions is largely controlled by propagation conditions in the ionosphere. There is either little or no correlation found between hiss observations at the two stations separated by about 600 km.     

The polar substorm and electron ‘islands’ in the Earth's magnetic tail

The behaviour of energetic electrons in the distant magnetosphere near the midnight meridian during polar substorms has been studied for the period March 5th–April 4th, 1965, using data from two end window Geiger counters flown on the IMP 2 satellite (apogee 15.8 Earth radii) and magnetic records from a chain of auroral zone stations around the world at magnetic latitudes equivalent to L = 7.4 ± 2.0.

When the satellite was in the distant radiation zone or in the plasma sheet which extends down the Earth's magnetic tail, sudden decreases in the horizontal magnetic field component at ground stations near the midnight meridian (negative magnetic bays) were followed by sudden increases in 40 keV electron fluxes (electron islands) at the satellite. When the satellite was at high latitudes in the magnetic tail ‘bays’ often were not followed by ‘islands.’ When the satellite was near the centre of the plasma sheet, energetic electron fluxes were observed even during magnetically quiet periods. The time delay between the sharp onset of magnetic bays in the auroral zone and the corresponding rapid increase in energetic electron intensity at the satellite, typically some tens of minutes, was least when the satellite was close to the Earth and increased with its increasing radial distance from the Earth. The delay was also a function of distance of the satellite from the centre of the plasma sheet, and of the magnitude of the intensity increase (smaller delays for larger intensity increases). We deduce that the disturbance producing the magnetic bays and associated particle acceleration originates fairly deep in the magnetosphere and propagates outward to higher L values, and down the plasma sheet in the Earth's magnetic tail on the dark side of the Earth. It is unlikely that the accelerated electrons are themselves drifting away from the Earth, because the apparent velocity with which the islands move away from the Earth decreases with increasing distance from the Earth.

It is suggested that the polar substorm and the associated particle acceleration are part of an impulsive ejection mechanism of magnetospheric energy into the ionosphere, rather than an impulsive injection mechanism of solar wind energy into the magnetosphere.     

A mechanism for the growth phase of magnetospheric substorms

A mechanism is presented whereby the rate of energy dissipation in the magnetosphere is controlled by the particle density in the plasma sheet in the near geomagnetic tail. The mechanism is based on a model in which the plasma sheet is sustained by injection of solar-wind particles into the dayside magnetosphere. The efficiency of the injection is controlled by solarwind parameters, in particular, the north-south component of the interplanetary magnetic field; the maximum injection rate occurs when the interplanetary field is northward. During geomagnetically quiet times, this source balances the loss of particles from the edges of the tail current sheet. If the dayside source rate is reduced (e.g. by a southward-turning interplanetary magnetic field), then the plasma sheet is depleted and the rate of magnetic merging is enhanced in the earthward portion of the tail current sheet. This period of steadily-enhanced merging is associated with the growth phase, i.e. the period of enhanced magnetospheric convection for about one hour preceding the breakup of a polar magnetic or auroral substorm. The breakup can be understood as the result of the collapse of a portion of the tail current sheet following the local depletion of the plasma sheet.     

Atmospheric expansion through Joule heating by horizontal electric fields

Incoherent scatter measurements made along a magnetic field line into aurora during a period of high electric field in the recovery phase of a substorm show (1) considerably increased electron densities well above the normal F-region maximum, and (2) field-aligned plasma drifts that increase with altitude. A model invoking atmospheric expansion through Joule heating by the horizontal electric field driving the auroral electrojet is used to explain the observations. From this study it is concluded that during magnetically disturbed periods (1) Joule heating by the auroral electrojet raises the neutral temperature and density in the auroral zone ionosphere at F-region heights, (2) ionization formed by the aurora is transported upward by the expanding atmosphere, at times producing an appreciable increase in lower exospheric plasma densities on the field lines containing the aurora, and (3) combined satellite, radar, and optical observations during periods of aurora and high electric field could provide measured F-region collision frequencies.     

Development of an auroral absorption substorm: Studies of substorm related absorption events in the afternoon-early evening sector

We discuss the effects in ionospheric absorption of particle precipitation observed in the afternoon-early evening sector during substorms with onset in the midnight sector. All events considered here occurred during magnetically disturbed periods, K_p > 3. For many of the substorm events a smooth southward moving absorption bay is seen in the midnight and evening sectors about 1 h preceeding the onset. The magnetic pulsation activity is low during this preceding bay.

After substorm onset near magnetic midnight the precipitation region may expand with a sharp onset at the front towards the West in spatially confined regions at high and low L-values separately with about equal velocities. The observations are consistent with a model of westward expansion of the energetic electron precipitation in two regions, aligned parallel to the auroral oval, at high and low L-values of about L 6 and L 4.8.

The westward expanding absorption activity correlates well with local magnetic variations. In magnetic pulsations PiB events are seen at high latitudes simultaneously with the westward moving onsets while at low latitudes IPDP pulsations are observed during the active part of the absorption events. Later in the substorm event a slowly varying absorption event (SVA) is sometimes observed at the lower L-values, L 3–4.     

Electron counts in the neutral sheet and magnetic variations at a geomagnetic longitude associated ground station

A comparison of the variations in the count of electrons E > 36 keV on the satellite Vela 4A, and in the Macquarie Island magnetometer H trace, shows for a time lag of 22-8 min a correlation, r = 0.95, over a 90 min period of the recovery phase of a magnetospheric substorm on 17 August 1968. All-sky camera data suggest that during the correlation period the auroral electrojet showed very little latitudinal movement. Each peak in electron count relates to a current surge in the electrojet as shown by a deepening of the negative bay at Macquarie Island.Using the Fairfield (1968) model of the location of auroral shells in the solar magnetic equatorial plane, and the known location of the satellite, an estimate of the velocity of tail to Earth plasma convection in the plasma sheet of about 0·33 R_e/min is obtained for the recovery phase.The relationship is discussed between plasma sheet thinning and subsequent broadening, and the extension of the magnetic field lines into the tail region and their subsequent return. This discussion makes use of the estimated time lags between electron count at the satellite and the time of arrival of auroral particles at the antisolar meridian.From a somewhat speculative explanation, but one largely supported from the literature, of the magnetospheric processes involved in this auroral substorm, a plasma velocity estimate of 0·42 R_e/min for the initial phase of the substorm is obtained. These velocities are of the same order as the 0·5 R_e/min obtained by Lezniak and Winkler (1970) at 6·6 R_e.     

The substorm event of 28 January 1983: A detailed global study

A small, isolated substorm with an expansion phase onset at 07:39 U.T. (±1 min) on 28 January 1983 was well observed by ground-based instrumentation as well as by low- and high-altitude spacecraft. This event period was chosen as a detailed analysis interval because of the comprehensive nature of the data coverage, and because ISEE-3 identified signatures within the distant tail (220 R_E) following the substorm onset which had been interpreted as those of a plasmoid passage. In this paper we provide a comprehensive timeline of the growth, expansion, and recovery phases of the substorm. The magnetospheric energy input rates are evaluated using IMP-8 in the upstream solar wind. For the first time, DE-1 imaging sequences are used to examine auroral features during the growth and expansion phases while ISEE-3 was in the deep tail. Substorm current wedge location and expansion onset information was provided by ground-based magnetometer and geostationary orbit (particle and magnetic field) data. The plasma, energetic particle, and field signatures at ISEE-3 are considered within the framework of the near-Earth data sets. We quantitatively estimate substorm energy input and output relationships for this case and we evaluate the timing and physical dimensions of the distant tail disturbance implied by the global observations available. Overall, the present analysis provides a thorough documentation of a substorm to an unprecedented degree; most of the data support the developing paradigm of the near-Earth neutral line and plasmoid formation model. We also consider the boundary layer dynamics model of substorms as an alternative explanation of the global magnetospheric phenomena in this event, but as presented this model does not provide a superior organization of the available data sets.     

The statistical magnetic signature of magnetospheric substorms

The characteristic magnetic signatures of magnetospheric substorms both on the ground and in space have been determined from the analysis of ～1800 substorm events. The timing and properties of these events were objectively determined according to explicit mathematical criteria by a computer pattern-recognition program. This program processed daily magnetograms from a mid-latitude network of geomagnetic observatories.Ground data analyzed, using onsets determined in this manner, included the AE indices and individual magnetograms at different local times in the auroral zone and at midlatitudes. Superposed epoch averages of these data confirm the local time magnetic substorm signatures, determined in earlier studies of fewer events, and demonstrate the validity of the computerized onset determination procedure.Superposed epoch averages of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) associated with the onsets demonstrates both a distinct southward component prior to the onsets and a dependence of the substorm amplitude on the integrated preceding southward IMF flux. Superposed epoch averages of the tail lobe magnetic field magnitude and vector components demonstrates field magnitude changes and rotations in association with the substorm onsets. These lobe field changes are consistent with the growth-phase model of substorm activity and with variations in the magnetopause flaring angle.     

High latitude equivalent current systems during extremely quiet times

The magnetic perturbation patterns in the polar cap and auroral zone regions are obtained for extremely quiet days using two different techniques. It is shown that the form of the equivalent current flow pattern is extremely sensitive to the level of quietness, and that even so-called quiet days are at times disturbed by substorm activity. Certain characteristic equivalent flow not typically observed during substorms is noted in the polar cap, and this flow appears to be associated with effects associated with polar cap perturbations discussed by Svalgaard (1973). As well a region of equatorward flow appears at high latitudes near the dawn meridian, which appears to be Hall current driven by an eastward electric field. The dayside sub-auroral zone is dominated by the S_q-current system, while the nightside shows no significant current flow in the absence of substorm activity.     

The development of the substorm in auroral radio absorption

Observations with a meridional chain of riometers in the auroral zone show that the onset of an auroral absorption substorm is usually preceded by weak activity. This activity sometimes takes the form of a weak bay-like event, moving slowly equatorward. Its velocity (typically 200–500 m/sec) is consistent with the inward convection of energetic plasma in the magnetosphere— that is, with E × B drift in an electric field of about 1.3 mV/m. The bay intensifies as it moves, indicating energization of the plasma during convection.     

The features of auroral bulge expansion

The development of the auroral bulge during substorms is studied using all-sky data from the dense net of stations and also riometer data. A few features seem to be essential for the interpretation of the expansive phase mechanism. The first is the existence of low energy electron precipitation (auroral arcs with the lower border height near 140 km) polewards of the expanding bulge, suggesting that the bulge often arises and develops on closed field lines. Secondly only the localized bulges (with dimensions 2° and 40°Λ) are generated by the continuous deformation of the auroral arc. The greater expansions develop mainly at the expense of the new bright arc formations at the front of the expanding auroral bulge. During each new arc formation impulsive acceleration and precipitation of energetic electrons takes place and brief changes of plasma sheet geometry are sometimes observed at 18 R_E in the magnetotail. This apparently shows a re-distribution of plasma sheet current during the substorm expansive phase.     

The mechanism of magnetospheric substorm and the MHD waves of the solar wind

A mechanism of the Earth's magnetospheric substorm is proposed. It is suggested that the MHD waves may propagate across the magnetopause from the magnetosheath into the magnetotail and will be dissipated in the plasma sheet, heating the plasma and accelerating the particles. When the solar wind parameters change, the Poynting flux of the waves transferred from the magnetosheath into the tail, may be greater than 10¹⁸ erg s^?1. The heated plasma and accelerated particles in the plasma sheet will be injected into the inner magnetosphere, and this may explain the process of the ring current formation and auroral substorm.The Alfvén wave can only propagate along the magnetic force line into the magnetosphere in the open magnetosphere, but the magnetosonic wave can propagate in both the open and closed magnetosphere. When the IMF turns southward, the configuration of the magnetosphere will change from a nearly closed model into some kind of open one. The energy flux of Alfvén waves is generally larger than that of the magnetosonic wave. This implies that it is easy to produce substorms when the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) has a large southward component, but the substorm can also be produced even if the IMF is directed northward.     

Pi2 pulsations in the magnetosphere

Several substorms were observed at Explorer 45 in November and December 1971, and January and February 1972, while the satellite was in the evening quadrant near L = 5. These same substorms were identified in ground level magnetograms from auroral zone and low latitude stations. The satellite vector magnetic field records and rapid run ground magnetograms were examined for evidence of simultaneous occurrence of Pi2 magnetic pulsations. Pulsations which began abruptly were observed at the satellite during 7 of the 13 substorms studied and the pulsations occurred near the estimated time of substorm onset. These 7 pulsation events were also observed on the ground and 6 were identified in station comments as Pi2. All of the events observed were principally compressional waves, that is, pulsations in field magnitude. There were also transverse components elliptically polarized counter-clockwise looking along the field line. Periods observed ranged from 40 to 200 sec with 80 sec often the dominant period.     

The ionospheric electric field during substorms — An interpretation based on non-uniform reconnection in the geomagnetic tail

It is suggested that changes in the electric field in the night-side auroral zone and polar cap observed during the expansion phase of a substorm are related to a change in the magnetospheric flow pattern. During the substorm growth phase the flow appears to be fairly uniform across the width of the magnetosphere (uniform electric field across the tail), while at expansion the observations are consistent with the magnetospheric potential drop in the tail falling across a narrow region near the dusk magnetopause. Such non-uniform electric fields in the tail have been predicted by recent theoretical work. A rather speculative interpretation of events during a magnetospheric substorm is presented.     

Ionospheric conductivities, electric fields and currents associated with auroral substorms measured by the EISCAT radar

E-region electron density profiles with high resolution in time and altitude (5 s and 2 km, respectively) measured by the EISCAT incoherent scatter radar are used to examine the conductivity changes during substorm growth, onset and expansion phases for seven substorms occurring in the local evening sector. The measurements are related to electric fields and neutral winds measured by the radar, to ground magnetometer and riometer records, and to optical features, including the westward-travelling surge and auroral bulge. Auroral features are identified using all-sky camera photographs and images from the Viking satellite. Conductances and electric fields in the zone of diffuse aurora corresponding to the westward substorm electrojet are found to be consistent with existing models. Conductances in the discrete auroral arcs marking the expanding edge of the substorm are found to be much higher, and electric fields rather lower, than previously assumed. The magnetic signatures of the discrete arcs are found to be best explained by Hall and Pedersen currents driven by a southward neutral wind, as is observed by the radar. The highest conductances observed, with Hall and Pedersen conductances reaching 120 and 48 S, respectively, are found to be associated with arcs appearing at the southern edge of activity in the vicinity of a westward-travelling surge.     

Dynamics of day and night aurora during substorms

The motion of auroral forms on the day- and nightside of the Earth has been studied during different substorm phases by means of all-sky camera films. A substorm is characterized by a shift of the luminescence region towards the equator at noon and mainly towards the pole at midnight. However, individual forms drift predominantly toward the pole on the dayside and towards the equator on the nightside. The velocity of the poleward motion at noon is largest during the expansive phase of a substorm and amounts on the average to 330 $\text{m}\text{sec}$ but even during relatively quiet magnetic conditions a poleward motion is observed.     

A uniform belt of diffuse auroral emission seen by the ISIS-2 scanning photometer

One of the most striking and persistent features in high latitude regions as seen by the ISIS-2 scanning auroral photometer is a fairly uniform belt of diffuse auroral emission extending along the auroral oval. Indications are that this region follows, contributes to, and may in a sense actually define the auroral oval during quiet times.The diffuse belt is sharply defined at its equatorward edge, which is located at an invariant latitude of about 65° in the midnight sector during relatively low magnetic activity (K_p = 1?3). The poleward edge of the region is not as sharply defined but is typically at about 68°. Discrete auroras (arcs and bands) are located, in general, near the poleward boundary of the diffuse aurora. The position of the belt appears to be relatively unaffected by the occurrence of individual substorms, even when discrete forms have moved well poleward. Representative intensities at 5577 Å are 1–2 kR (corrected for albedo) at quiet times and may reach 5 kR during an auroral substorm.It appears that the mantle aurora and proton aurora constitute this diffuse aurora in the midnight sector. Precipitating protons and electrons both contribute to the emissions in this region.     

Pitch-angle scattering of energetic protons in the magnetotail current sheet as the dominant source of their isotropic precipitation into the nightside ionosphere

Characteristics of the nightside isotropic precipitation of energetic protons during a period of 4 quiet days has been studied using data from the ESRO 1A satellite. The observed features of the equatorward precipitation boundary (its thickness, energy dependence, dynamics, dependence of its latitudinal position on the magnetic field at the geosynchronous orbit, etc.) were found to be in good agreement with calculations based on recent magnetospheric magnetic field models. We argue that the mechanism of non-adiabatic pitchangle scattering in the equatorial current sheet is a dominant source of isotropic precipitation of energetic protons observed in the nightside auroral zone. Observations of the isotropic precipitation boundary can be used for monitoring the changes in the magnetotail current intensity.     

A global view at the polar region on 18 December 1971

The ISIS-2 scanning auroral photometer surveyed the polar region during three successive passes on 18 December 1971, at times when Kp values were still high due to an intense magnetic storm which began on 16 December. Two very bright (IBC III) auroral substorm patterns were seen to correspond to rather weak magnetic substorms (about 300 γ in magnitude). A large spiral auroral pattern, with intensity of the order of 100 kR and a size of about 1300 km, was present in the polar cap; it gradually decreased in size and intensity during the interval 0200–0600 UT. A region of enhanced 3914 emission was present in the noon sector of the auroral oval between 0200 and 0400. The presence of the diffuse auroral belt is also evident at all local times during this period, extending down to about 61° corrected geomagnetic latitude in the midnight sector.     

Event study on pre-substorm phases and their relation to the energy coupling between solar wind and magnetosphere

On 11 November 1976, after a magnetically quiet period with the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) directed northward, a sudden southward turning of the IMF immediately led to a world-wide intensification of convection which was observed to start almost simultaneously at stations within the auroral zone and polar cap. The two-dimensional equivalent current system over the northern hemisphere had a typical two-cell convection pattern with a maximum disturbance of ΔH = ?300 nT observed on the morningside in the westward electrojet region. This enhancement of activity ended after 35 min in a localized substorm onset in the midnight sector over Scandinavia.The recordings made in this area indicate large fluctuations of various ionospheric parameters starting several minutes before the substorm onset. Two subsequent stages can be resolved: (1) high-energy particle precipitation recorded by balloon X-ray detectors and maximum ionospheric current density increase, while the electrojet halfwidth shrinks and the total electrojet current becomes weaker; (2) the maximum ionospheric current density stays constant and the high-energy particle precipitation decreases, while the auroral brightness increases and the total electrojet current and its half-width show a growing trend prior to the final breakup. A suggestion is made that the time interval of these two stages should be called “trigger phase”. A short discussion explains the trigger phase observations in a magnetospheric scale. The energy coupling between solar wind and magnetosphere during the pre-substorm phases is discussed by utilizing the energy coupling function ? defined by Perreault and Akasofu (Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.54, 547, 1978). The ? values appear to be on substorm level during the period of enhanced convection. A good correlation between ? and the growth of the Joule heating rate (estimated from the AE data) is found in the beginning, but during the last 20 min before substorm triggering ? is high while the Joule heating rate decreases. The behaviour of ? during the two stages of the trigger phase suggests that the start of the trigger phase is purely internally controlled while the length of the trigger phase and the final substorm onset may be influenced by the variation in ?.