共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
2.
耗能梁段作为偏心支撑结构的耗能元件,在大震作用下通过弹塑性变形吸收地震能量,保护主体结构处于弹性受力状态。现行规范基于强度的设计理论,为了保证耗能梁段进入塑性或破坏,梁柱构件需要进行放大内力设计,导致截面过大,而且基于强度的设计方法很难保证结构的整体破坏状态。目前,抗震设计越来越重视基于性能的设计思想,该方法能够评估结构的弹塑性反应。对于高强钢组合偏心支撑,其中耗能梁段和支撑采用Q345钢,框架梁柱采用Q460或者Q690高强度钢材,高强钢不仅带来良好的经济效益,而且能够推广高强钢在抗震设防区的应用。利用基于性能设计方法设计了4种不同形式的高强钢组合偏心支撑钢框架,包括K形、Y形、V形和D形,考虑4层、8层、12层和16层的影响。通过Pushover分析和非线性时程分析评估该结构的抗震性能,研究结果表明:4种形式的高强钢组合偏心支撑钢框架具有类似的抗震性能,在罕遇地震作用下,几乎所有耗能梁段均参与耗能,而且层间侧移与耗能梁段转角沿高度分布较为均匀。其中:D形偏心支撑具有最大的抗侧刚度,但延性较差,而Y形偏心支撑的抗侧刚度最弱,但延性最佳。 相似文献
3.
K形高强钢组合偏心支撑(K-HSS-EBF)是指耗能连梁和支撑采用Q345钢,而框架梁、框架柱采用高强度钢(如Q460)。为研究其在罕遇地震作用下的抗震性能,在试验研究的基础上,采用直接基于位移的抗震设计方法设计了5层、8层和12层算例,分别进行静力推覆分析和动力弹塑性分析,研究高强钢组合偏心支撑钢框架在罕遇地震作用下层间侧移分布和破坏模式。研究结果表明:直接基于位移的抗震设计方法设计的算例在罕遇地震作用下,结构的层间侧移满足我国现行抗震规范的要求,结构呈理想的渐进式梁铰屈服机构,并证明该设计方法的合理性和可靠性。 相似文献
4.
隅撑支撑框架是一种新型的耗能支撑钢框架结构形式,在小震作用下,具有较大的抗侧移刚度,在大震作用下,具有较好的耗能性能。隅撑是隅撑支撑框架中的耗能构件,其设计参数对隅撑支撑框架的抗震性能有重大影响。本文主要通过非线性有限元分析,探讨了隅撑的设计参数对隅撑支撑钢框架抗震性能的影响。 相似文献
5.
为研究高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架在反复荷载作用下的受力性能,在已有拟静力试验的基础上,利用有限元软件OpenSEES对一个高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架模型进行了精细化建模研究。首先,探讨了模型的单元选择,纤维截面划分和材料本构参数定义问题。同时,考虑到在地震荷载作用下,高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架主要依靠消能梁段的剪切变形来耗能,因此,如何模拟结构中消能梁段的剪切效应成为研究的关键。本文采用OpenSEES提供的组合截面和零长度单元两种方法来对消能梁段进行建模,剪切材料分别考虑了Steel 02和滞回材料。将不同消能梁段建模方法的模拟滞回曲线和骨架曲线与试验结果进行比较。结果表明:精细化模型的数值模拟结果和试验结果具有较好的吻合度,验证了数值模型的正确性和可行性;采用零长度单元和Steel 02的组合方式来模拟消能梁段的剪切效应能够同时满足计算效率和计算精度的要求,为进一步利用OpenSEES进行高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架的动态响应分析和复杂模型分析提供了建模参考依据。 相似文献
6.
7.
耗以支撑钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震性能研究 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
本文通过普通钢筋混凝土框架、耗能支撑钢筋混凝土框架结构1/8比例模型的地震模拟震动台对比试验,研究两类框架结构在地震作用下的破坏形态和动力特征,揭示了耗能支撑钢筋混凝土框架结构良好的抗震性能;以试验模型进行了弹塑性时程分析,理论分析和试验结果符合较好;结合场州电厂二期主厂房框架结构,研究了其纵向框架结构采用耗能支撑体系时结构的抗震性能,为该类结构形式的工程应用提供依据。 相似文献
8.
为了研究自复位中心支撑钢框架(SC-CBF)结构的抗震性能,对一四层SC-CBF结构进行了静力弹塑性分析、低周往复加载分析和动力弹塑性时程分析,并与中心支撑钢框架(CBF)结构进行对比,探究了不同GAP单元刚度和预应力筋截面积对SC-CBF结构自复位性能及抗震性能的影响规律。结果表明:与传统CBF结构相比,SC-CBF结构的抗侧能力强,地震作用下基底剪力小,卸载后的残余变形较小,具有良好的延性性能;在极罕遇地震作用下SC-CBF结构的位移响应大,耗散的能量多,层间位移角大而残余位移小,表现出良好的自复位性能和抗震性能;GAP单元刚度对预应力筋的受力性能影响较为明显,对结构的整体受力性能和延性性能影响较小,但结构的整体受力性能和延性性能受预应力筋截面积影响显著。 相似文献
9.
耗能段腹板高厚比对Y型偏心支撑钢框架滞回性能影响的试验研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Y型偏心支撑钢框架是偏心支撑结构中抗震耗能的结构形式之一,为了研究Y型偏心支撑钢框架中耗能梁段腹板高厚比对结构滞回性能的影响,进行了2榀1/3缩尺Y型偏心支撑钢框架的低周反复荷载试验.本文主要介绍了试验过程,分析了Y型偏心支撑钢框架在循环荷载作用下的破坏机理、滞回性能、延性、刚度退化规律以及耗能能力.试验结果表明:Y型偏心支撑钢框架延性好、耗能能力强,耗能梁段腹板高厚比的改变对Y型偏心支撑钢框架强度、刚度以及耗能能力具有较大的影响.耗能梁段腹板高厚比设计得合理,Y型偏心支撑钢框架侧向刚度较大,可以满足在小震或中震作用下的结构变形要求,在大震作用下提供良好的变形能力和耗散地震能量的功能. 相似文献
10.
自定心钢框架抗震性能研究进展 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
自定心(Self-Centering,SC)钢框架是一种新型的抗震结构体系。其中,预应力构件提供了结构在地震作用下的复位功能,角钢、摩擦件等构件则提供了耗能能力。主体结构在地震作用后可基本保持完好,并且无残余变形(或很小),附属构件的更换或修复也非常方便。介绍了自定心钢框架的构造和工作原理。节点试验、自定心抗弯钢框架(SC-MRF)、自定心中心支撑钢框架(SC-CBF)的动力试验结果表明,自定心钢框架具有良好的抗震性能和自复位能力,有望发展成为实用的结构形式。指出了自定心钢框架结构体系中需进一步研究的问题。 相似文献
11.
Hayato Asada Andrew D. Sen Tao Li Jeffrey W. Berman Dawn E. Lehman Charles W. Roeder 《地震工程与结构动力学》2020,49(15):1619-1639
Current seismic design requirements for special concentrically braced frames (SCBFs) in chevron configurations require that the beams supporting the braces be designed to resist the demands resulting from the simultaneous yielding of the tension brace and degraded, post-buckling strength of the compression brace. Recent research, including large-scale experiments and detailed finite-element analyses, has demonstrated that limited beam yielding is not detrimental to chevron braced frame behavior and actually increases the story drift at which the braces fracture. These findings have resulted in new expressions for computing beam demands in chevron SCBFs that reduce the demand in the tension brace to be equal to the expected compressive capacity at buckling of the compression brace. In turn, the resultant force on the beam is reduced as is the required size of the beam. Further study was undertaken to investigate the seismic performance of buildings with SCBFs, including chevron SCBFs with and without yielding beams and X-braced frames. Prototype three- and nine-story braced frames were designed using all three framing systems, that is, chevron, chevron with yielding beams, and X SCBFs, resulting in six building frames. The nonlinear dynamic response was studied for ground motions simulating two different seismic hazard levels. The results were used to characterize the seismic performance in terms of the probability of salient damage states including brace fracture, beam vertical deformation, and collapse. The results demonstrate that the seismic performance of chevron SCBFs with limited beam yielding performs as well as or better than the conventionally designed chevron and X SCBFs. 相似文献
12.
Structural damage in buildings designed according to the dissipative design philosophy can be significant, even under moderate earthquakes. Repair of damaged members is an expensive operation and may affect building use, which in turn increases the overall economic loss. If damage can be isolated to certain dissipative members realized to be removable following an earthquake, the repair costs and time of interruption of building use can be reduced. Dual structural configurations, composed of a rigid subsystem with removable ductile elements and a flexible subsystem, are shown to be appropriate for the application of removable dissipative element concept. Eccentrically braced frames with removable links connected to the beams using flush end‐plate bolted connections are investigated as a practical way of implementing this design concept. High‐strength steel is used for members outside links in order to enhance global seismic performance of the structure by constraining plastic deformations to removable links and reducing permanent drifts of the structure. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
13.
为了进一步完善Q460钢材在抗震设计规范中相关限值的要求,本文利用有限元软件ABAQUS,以轴压比、翼缘宽厚比、腹板高厚比和壁板宽厚比为变量,建立了共48根“工”字型框架柱和“箱”型框架柱,分析了其抗震性能。结果表明:翼缘宽厚比对框架柱的能量耗散系数影响较小;能量耗散系数随轴压比、腹板高厚比(“工”字型)和壁板宽厚比(“箱”型)增大而明显减小;框架柱的极限承载力随轴压比的减小及壁板宽厚比和翼缘宽厚比的增大而逐渐增大,当腹板高厚比接近规范限值时,承载力下降趋势明显增大。与采用Q235钢材的框架柱相比,Q460钢材框架柱的延性较小,仅为2左右;当采用Q460钢材时,“工”字型框架柱的极限位移角限值建议取为0.03,“箱”型框架柱的极限位移角限值建议取为0.032。规范中对翼缘宽厚比限值的规定偏于保守,其值最大可取至9。无论是“工”字型框架柱还是“箱”型框架柱,其腹板高厚比均不宜过大。Q460钢材框架柱的刚度退化率随轴压比的增大而增强,且翼缘宽厚比越大,腹板高厚比越小,柱的初始刚度越大,刚度退化程度越明显。 相似文献
14.
A unified approach for the design of high ductility steel frames with concentric braces in the framework of Eurocode 8 下载免费PDF全文
Edoardo M. Marino 《地震工程与结构动力学》2014,43(1):97-118
Eurocode 8 (EC8) stipulates design methods for frames with diagonal braces and for chevron braced frames, which differ as regards the numerical model adopted, the value of the behavior factor q and the estimation of the lateral strength provided by braces. Instead, in this paper, the use of the same design method is suggested for both types of concentrically braced frames. The design method is a generalization of the one proposed for chevron braced frames in a previous study. A numerical investigation is conducted to assess the reliability of this design method. A set of concentrically braced frames is designed according to the EC8 and proposed design methods. The seismic response of these frames is determined by nonlinear dynamic analysis. Finally, it is demonstrated that the proposed design method is equivalent to those provided by EC8, because it can ensure the same level of structural safety which would be expected when using EC8. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
15.
16.
Maria Teresa Giugliano Alessandra Longo Rosario Montuori Vincenzo Piluso 《地震工程与结构动力学》2011,40(13):1455-1474
Structural engineering problems are always affected by many sources of uncertainty, such as aleatory of material properties, applied loads and earthquake intensity, therefore, seismic assessment of structures should be based on probabilistic methods. Since PBSD (Performance‐based Seismic Design) philosophy was formulated, many researches have been conducted in this field in order to develop simple and accurate procedures for evaluating structural reliability. An important contribution has been provided by Jalayer and Cornell, who have developed a closed‐form expression to evaluate the mean annual frequency of exceeding a defined limit state. In this paper, by assuming the record‐to‐record variability as the only source of uncertainty, the seismic reliability of concentrically braced frames designed according to traditional and innovative methodologies is investigated, and a comparison between their performances is presented. In particular, two design methodologies have been applied: Eurocode 8 provisions and a new design methodology based on a rigorous application of ‘capacity design’ criteria. The innovative reduced section solution strategy, based on the reduction of cross sections at bracing member ends, has also been analysed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献