深圳市1 km高分辨率厘米级高精度大地水准面的确定

利用65个精度优于2 cm的GPS水准数据、5 213个实测重力点数据、100 m分辨率的数字地形模型和WDM94地球重力场模型,采用移去-恢复技术计算了深圳市1 km分辨率的大地水准面模型.将该模型大地水准面高与由29个GPS水准得到的大地水准面高进行比较,其差值的标准差为±1.4 cm.     

陆海交界区域厘米级精度似大地水准面的确定

为了得到我国某陆海交界区厘米级精度的区域(似)大地水准面,利用43个高精度GPS/水准点和1 045个实测重力点数据对EGM96,WDM94和GFZ计算的局部重力(似)大地水准面进行了比较与评价。结果表明,在该测区用移去-恢复法确定重力(似)大地水准面时,EGM96应该是首选参考重力场模型。该测区处在陆海交界处,海域无GPS/水准数据。经比较发现,采用距离倒数加权平均法将该区重力似大地水准面拟合于GPS/水准数据比在大范围使用的多项式法效果更好。采用该方法计算的测区(似)大地水准面精度优于3cm。     

陆海交界区域厘米级精度似大地水准面的确定

为了得到我国某陆海交界区厘米级精度的区域（似）大地水准面,利用43个高精度GPS／水准点和1045个实测重力点数据对EGM96,WDM94和GFZ计算的局部重力（似）大地水准面进行了比较与评价。结果表明,在该测区用移去．恢复法确定重力（似）大地水准面时,EGM96应该是首选参考重力场模型。该测区处在陆海交界处,海域无GPS／水准数据。经比较发现,采用距离倒数加权平均法将该区重力似大地水准面拟合于GPS／水准数据比在大范围使用的多项式法效果更好。采用该方法计算的测区（似）大地水准面精度优于3cm。     

应用双输入单输出法确定局部似大地水准面的实例研究

利用了双输入单输出法,融合处理了我国某地区的重力异常和地形资料两类数据,结合WDM94地球重力场模型和63个高精度GPS水准数据,计算了该区域的似大地水准面。     

全国及部分省市地区高精度高分辨率似大地水准面的研究和实施

结合我国重力和地形资料及国内外较优的重力场模型,研制适合我国重力场特征的360阶重力场模型WDM94;建立中国新一代分米级似大地水准面CQG2000,包括建立新的以GPS/水准为基础的高程异常控制网、利用海洋卫星测高数据计算海洋大地水准面、陆地重力似大地水准面的研制及陆海似大地水准面的拼接等;研制江苏省、海南省、深圳市、大连市、南京市及"南水北调"西线工程具有厘米级精度的局域似大地水准面模型;结合GPS技术和高精度似大地水准面模型,研制GPS测图软硬件一体化系统.本研究项目获得2004年度国家科技进步二等奖.     

全国及部分省市地区高精度、高分辨率大地水准面的研究及其实施

结合我国重力和地形资料及国内外较优的重力场模型,研制了适合我国重力场特征的360阶重力场模型WDM94,建立了中国新一代包括全部陆海国土的dm级(似)大地水准面CQG2000,建立了中国以GPS/水准为基础的高程异常控制网,利用海洋卫星测高数据进行我国海洋大地水准面的计算、我国陆地重力(似)大地水准面的研制及我国陆海(似)大地水准面的拼接;研制了江苏省、海南省、深圳市、大连市、南京市及南水北调西线工程具有cm级精度的省市地区(似)大地水准面模型;结合GPS技术和高精度(似)大地水准面模型,研制了GPS测图软硬件一体化系统。     

GPS水准和重力数据联合平差技术及其性能分析

本文推荐一种适合高精度大地水准面精化的GPS水准和重力数据联合平差技术。这种技术以重力场积分公式为约束条件,在统计框架中,使GPS水准高程异常和其他重力场元(平差值)满足重力场边值条件,进而利用条件平差技术构造大地水准面的统计解。实测和模拟计算结果表明,利用本文推荐的GPS水准和重力数据联合平差技术,可以较好地解决目前高精度大地水准面精化中地面重力数据精度分布存在较大差异,重力数据、GPS水准数据存在多种系统偏差,以及局部重力场积分的“远区效应”等一系列难题。     

基于重力场模型统一亚太高程基准的方法研究

针对不同国家和地区高程基准不一致的问题,该文采用GOCE重力场模型和GPS/水准数据对高程基准统一的方法进行了研究,分析了基于GOCE的不同重力场模型用于计算亚太区域(110°E~180°E,50°S~50°N)高程基准偏差的差异,基于重力场模型GECO,利用亚太区域36个验潮站附近的GPS/水准点数据计算的平均海平面与大地水准面垂直偏差的平均值为0.416m,利用日本沿岸5个GPS/水准点数据计算的高程基准与大地水准面垂直偏差的平均值为0.185m,利用澳大利亚沿岸4个GPS/水准点数据计算的高程基准与大地水准面垂直偏差的平均值为0.41m。     

我国陆海统一似大地水准面构建的三维重力矢量法

基于重力场水平分量-垂线偏差对地形信息敏感的特点,根据边值理论由重力与地形数据确定格网垂线偏差模型,在此基础上,首先利用三维重力矢量-格网垂线偏差与格网重力异常,联合格网高程数据求得格网点间高程异常差,然后通过GPS/水准点的控制,构成紧密的几何条件,进行严密平差,从而获得高分辨率、高精度似大地水准面的数值模型。按照本文方法,利用我国6600多个GPS/水准点、1'×1'的格网垂线偏差、格网重力异常、格网高程数据,整体平差计算了我国陆海统一的似大地水准面模型,经GPS/水准点检核,全国似大地水准面的绝对精度达到了4 cm,相对精度优于7 cm。     

联合GRACE/GOCE重力场模型和GPS/水准数据确定我国85高程基准重力位

GRACE、GOCE卫星重力计划的实施,对确定高精度重力场模型具有重要贡献。联合GRACE、GOCE卫星数据建立的重力场模型和我国均匀分布的649个GPS/水准数据可以确定我国高程基准重力位,但我国高程基准对应的参考面为似大地水准面,是非等位面,将似大地水准面转化为大地水准面后确定的大地水准面重力位为62 636 854.395 3m~2s~(-2),为提高高阶项对确定大地水准面的贡献,利用高分辨率重力场模型EGM2008扩展GRACE/GOCE模型至2190阶,同时将重力场模型和GPS/水准数据统一到同一参考框架和潮汐系统,最后利用扩展后的模型确定的我国大地水准面重力位为62 636 852.751 8m~2s~(-2)。其中组合模型TIM_R4+EGM2008确定的我国85高程基准重力位值62 636 852.704 5m~2s~(-2)精度最高。重力场模型截断误差对确定我国大地水准面的影响约16cm,潮汐系统影响约4~6cm。     

GPS-gravimetric geoid determination in Egypt

The main objective of this study is to improve the geoid by GPS/leveling data in Egypt. Comparisons of the gravimetric geoid with GPS/leveling data have been performed. On the basis of a gravimetric geoid fitted to GPS/leveling by the least square method, a smoothed geoid was obtained. A high-resolution geoid in Egypt was computed with a 2.5′×2.5′ grid by combining the data set of 2600 original point gravity values, 20″×30″ resolution Digital Terrain Model (DTM) grid and the spherical harmonic model EGM96. The method of computation involved the strict evaluation of the Stokes integral with 1D-FFT. The standard deviation of the difference between the gravimetric and the GPS/leveling geoid heights is ±0.47 m. The standard deviation after fitting of the gravimetric geoid to the GPS/leveling points is better than ±13 cm. In the future we will try to improve our geoid results in Egypt by increasing the density of gravimetric coverage.     

GPS-GRAVIMETRIC GEOID DETERMINATION IN EGYPT

1　ＩｎｔｒｏｄｕｃｔｉｏｎＤｉｆｆｅｒｅｎｔｇｅｏｉｄｓｏｌｕｔｉｏｎｓｗｅｒｅｃａｒｒｉｅｄｏｕｔｆｏｒＥ ｇｙｐｔｕｓｉｎｇｈｅｔｅｒｏｇｅｎｅｏｕｓｄａｔａａｎｄｄｉｆｆｅｒｅｎｔｍｅｔｈｏｄｏｌｏｇｉｅｓ (Ｅｌ＿Ｔｏｋｈｅｙ ,1 993) .ＴｈｅｍａｉｎｇｏａｌｏｆｔｈｉｓｐａｐｅｒｉｓｔｏｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅａｍｏｓｔａｃｃｕｒａｔｅｎｅｗｇｅｏｉｄｆｏｒＥｇｙｐｔｔａｋｉｎｇａｄｖａｎｔａｇｅｏｆａｎｅｗｕｐｄａｔｅｄｇｒａｖｉｔｙｄａｔａｂａｓｅ,ｔｈｅｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎｇｉｖｅｎｂｙ…     

Two different methods of geoidal height determinations using a spherical harmonic representation of the geopotential, topographic corrections and the height anomaly–geoidal height difference

 It is suggested that a spherical harmonic representation of the geoidal heights using global Earth gravity models (EGM) might be accurate enough for many applications, although we know that some short-wavelength signals are missing in a potential coefficient model. A `direct' method of geoidal height determination from a global Earth gravity model coefficient alone and an `indirect' approach of geoidal height determination through height anomaly computed from a global gravity model are investigated. In both methods, suitable correction terms are applied. The results of computations in two test areas show that the direct and indirect approaches of geoid height determination yield good agreement with the classical gravimetric geoidal heights which are determined from Stokes' formula. Surprisingly, the results of the indirect method of geoidal height determination yield better agreement with the global positioning system (GPS)-levelling derived geoid heights, which are used to demonstrate such improvements, than the results of gravimetric geoid heights at to the same GPS stations. It has been demonstrated that the application of correction terms in both methods improves the agreement of geoidal heights at GPS-levelling stations. It is also found that the correction terms in the direct method of geoidal height determination are mostly similar to the correction terms used for the indirect determination of geoidal heights from height anomalies. Received: 26 July 2001 / Accepted: 21 February 2002     

利用大地边值问题方法统一全球高程基准

为解决世界各国高程基准差异的问题,提出联合卫星重力场模型、地面重力数据、GNSS大地高、局部高程基准的正高或正常高,按大地边值问题法确定局部高程基准重力位差的方法。首先推导了利用传统地面"有偏"重力异常确定高程基准重力位差的方法;接着利用改化Stokes核函数削弱"有偏"重力异常的影响,并联合卫星重力场模型和地面"有偏"重力数据,得到独立于任何局部高程基准的重力水准面,以此来确定局部高程基准重力位差;最后利用GNSS+水准数据和重力大地水准面确定了美国高程基准与全球高程基准W₀的重力位差为-4.82±0.05 m²s^-2。     

WZD94中国重力大地水准面研究

利用我国实测重力值计算完成了全国5'×5'格网平均空间重力异常,并结合重力场模型WDM94,利用国内外最新发展起来的快速谱算法确定了我国高分辨率5'×5'重力大地水准面WZD94。     

Geoid determination using one-step integration

A residual (high-frequency) gravimetric geoid is usually computed from geographically limited ground, sea and/or airborne gravimetric data. The mathematical model for its determination from ground gravity is based on the transformation of observed discrete values of gravity into gravity potential related to either the international ellipsoid or the geoid. The two reference surfaces are used depending on height information that accompanies ground gravity data: traditionally orthometric heights determined by geodetic levelling were used while GPS positioning nowadays allows for estimation of geodetic (ellipsoidal) heights. This transformation is usually performed in two steps: (1) observed values of gravity are downward continued to the ellipsoid or the geoid, and (2) gravity at the ellipsoid or the geoid is transformed into the corresponding potential. Each of these two steps represents the solution of one geodetic boundary-value problem of potential theory, namely the first and second or third problem. Thus two different geodetic boundary-value problems must be formulated and solved, which requires numerical evaluation of two surface integrals. In this contribution, a mathematical model in the form of a single Fredholm integral equation of the first kind is presented and numerically investigated. This model combines the solution of the first and second/third boundary-value problems and transforms ground gravity disturbances or anomalies into the harmonically downward continued disturbing potential at the ellipsoid or the geoid directly. Numerical tests show that the new approach offers an efficient and stable solution for the determination of the residual geoid from ground gravity data.     

A strategy for determining the regional geoid by combining limited ground data with satellite-based global geopotential and topographical models: a case study of Iran

The computation of regional gravimetric geoid models with reasonable accuracy, in developing countries, with sparse data is a difficult task that needs great care. Here we investigate the procedure for gathering, evaluating and combining different data for the determination of a gravimetric geoid model for Iran, where limited ground gravity data are available. Heterogeneous data, including gravity anomalies, the high-resolution Shuttle Radar Topography Mission global digital terrain model and different global geopotential models including recently published Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment models, are combined through least-squares modification of the Stokes formula. The new gravimetric geoid model, IRG04, agrees considerably better with GPS/levelling than any of the other recent local geoid model in the area. Its RMS fit with GPS/levelling is 0.27 m and 3.8 ppm in the absolute and relative view, respectively. The relative accuracy of IRG04 is four times better than the most recently published global and regional geoid models available in this area. This progress shows the practical potential of the method of least-squares modification of Stokes’s formula in combination with heterogeneous data for regional geoid determination