Cosmic ray ionization of lower Venus atmosphere

Cosmic ray particles passing through dense lower atmosphere of Venus decay giving rise to various charged and neutral particles. The flux and degradation of dominant cascade particles namely neutrinos and pions are computed and ionization contributions at lower altitudes are estimated. Using the height profile of pion flux, the muon flux is computed and used to estimate ionization at lower altitudes. It is shown that cosmic ray produced ionization descends to much lower altitudes intercepting the thickness of Venus cloud deck. The dynamical features of Venus cloud deck are used to allow the likely charging and charge separation processes resulting into cloud-to-cloud lightning discharges.     

A bulk cloud parameterization in a Venus General Circulation Model

A condensing cloud parameterization is included in a super-rotating Venus General Circulation Model. A parameterization including condensation, evaporation and sedimentation of mono-modal sulfuric acid cloud particles is described. Saturation vapor pressure of sulfuric acid vapor is used to determine cloud formation through instantaneous condensation and destruction through evaporation, while pressure dependent viscosity of a carbon dioxide atmosphere is used to determine sedimentation rates assuming particles fall at their terminal Stokes velocity. Modifications are described to account for the large range of the Reynolds number seen in the Venus atmosphere.Two GCM experiments initialized with 10 ppm-equivalent of sulfuric acid are integrated for 30 Earth years and the results are discussed with reference to “Y” shaped cloud structures observed on Venus. The GCM is able to produce an analog of the “Y” shaped cloud structure through dynamical processes alone, with contributions from the mean westward wind, the equatorial Kelvin wave, and the mid-latitude/polar Mixed Rossby/Gravity waves. The cloud top height in the GCM decreases from equator to pole and latitudinal gradients of cloud top height are comparable to those observed by Pioneer Venus and Venus Express, and those produced in more complex microphysical models of the sulfur cycle on Venus. Differences between the modeled cloud structures and observations are described and dynamical explanations are suggested for the most prominent differences.     

The composition and vertical structure of the lower cloud deck on Venus

The opportunity to determine the planetwide temperature and cloud structure of Venus using radio occultation techniques arose with Pioneer Venus. Amplitude and Doppler data provided by the radio occultation experiment offered a unique and powerful means of examining the atmospheric properties in the lower cloud region.Absorption due to gaseous components of the atmosphere was subtracted from the measured absorption coefficient profiles before they were used to compute cloud mass contents. This absorption was found to represent a small part of the total absorption, depending on the latitude. In the main cloud deck, gaseous absorption contributes 10 to 20%, however, at the bottom of the detected absorption layer the sulfuric acid vapor contributes up to 100% due to increased vapor pressures. The clouds are the primary contributing absorbers in the 1- to 3-bar level of the Venus atmosphere. Below about 3 bars, depending on the latitude, absorption due to sulfuric acid vapor dominates.If a cloud particle model consisting of a solid nonabsorbing dielectric sphere with a concentric liquid sulfuric acid coating is invoked, the absorptivity of the particles increases from that of a pure sulfuric acid liquid sphere, and the mass content derived from the absorption coefficient profiles decreases. As the ratio of the core radius to the total radius (q) increases, absorption increases by more than a factor of 10 for high values of q. In the case of pure sulfuric acid droplets, the conductivity is sufficiently high that some of the field is excluded from the interior of the droplet thereby reducing the absorption. When a dielectric core of nonabsorbing material is introduced, the surface charge density is reduced and the absorption increases.The mass contents for all orbits in the equatorial region of Venus were calculated using values of q from 0 to 1. The resulting profiles match the probe mass content profiles at similar locations when a q of 0.97 is chosen.The wavelength dependence of the absorption for the spherical shell model varies with q from 1/λ² for pure liquid to λ^0.2 for a large core. A q of from 0.96 to 0.98 results in a wavelength dependence of 1/λ^1.0 to 1/λ^1.4 which matches the radio occultation absorption wavelength dependence and the microwave opacity wavelength dependence.Mass content profiles using a q of 0.97 were determined for occultations in the polar, collar, midlatitudinal, and equatorial regions assuming q remains constant over the planet. The results show considerable variability in both the level and the magnitude of the lower cloud deck. The cloud layer is lowest in altitude in the polar region. This might be expected as the temperature profile is cooler in the polar region than over the rest of the planet. The mass content is greatest in the polar and collar regions; however, many of the collar profiles were cut off due to fluctuations resulting from increased turbulence in the collar region. The mass contents are least dense in the midlatitude regions. There is a sharp lower boundary at about 1.5 bars in the equatorial and midlatitude regions and at about 2.5 bars in the polar region. Measurements made by the Particle Size Spectrometer and nephelometers also showed sharp lower cloud boundaries at this level.     

On the interpretation of the “inverse phase effect” for CO2 equivalent widths on Venus

Computations of the equivalent widths of absorption lines as a function of planetary phase angle are made for a homogeneous cloud with particles having the properties (shape, refractive index, and size distribution) deduced from polarimetry of Venus. The computed equivalent widths show an “inverse phase effect” comparable to that which is observed for CO₂ lines on Venus. This result verifies a recent suggestion of Regas et al. that the existence of an inverse phase effect does not by itself imply the presence of multiple layers of scattering particles in the atmosphere of Venus.     

The thermosphere of Venus and its exploration by a Venus Express Accelerometer Experiment

The forthcoming observations by Venus Express provide an ideal opportunity to comprehensively study the atmosphere of Venus for the first time since Pioneer Venus (1978–1992), and for the first time ever in detail at polar latitudes. This article reviews some of our current knowledge from space and ground-based observations about the upper atmosphere of Venus, such as its thermal structure, the global distribution of gases and dynamics. We discuss the processes most likely responsible for phenomena such as the cold nightside cryosphere, the cloud top superrotation and waves, and highlight outstanding scientific challenges for Venus Express measurements. In particular, we describe an experiment to measure atmospheric drag using the on-board accelerometers.     

Decadal variations in a Venus general circulation model

The Community Atmosphere Model (CAM), a 3-dimensional Earth-based climate model, has been modified to simulate the dynamics of the Venus atmosphere. The most current finite volume version of CAM is used with Earth-related processes removed, parameters appropriate for Venus introduced, and some basic physics approximations adopted. A simplified Newtonian cooling approximation has been used for the radiation scheme. We use a high resolution (1° by 1° in latitude and longitude) to take account of small-scale dynamical processes that might be important on Venus. A Rayleigh friction approach is used at the lower boundary to represent surface drag, and a similar approach is implemented in the uppermost few model levels providing a ‘sponge layer’ to prevent wave reflection from the upper boundary. The simulations generate superrotation with wind velocities comparable to those measured in the Venus atmosphere by probes and around 50-60% of those measured by cloud tracking. At cloud heights and above the atmosphere is always superrotating with mid-latitude zonal jets that wax and wane on an approximate 10 year cycle. However, below the clouds, the zonal winds vary periodically on a decadal timescale between superrotation and subrotation. Both subrotating and superrotating mid-latitude jets are found in the approximate 40-60 km altitude range. The growth and decay of the sub-cloud level jets also occur on the decadal timescale. Though subrotating zonal winds are found below the clouds, the total angular momentum of the atmosphere is always in the sense of superrotation. The global relative angular momentum of the atmosphere oscillates with an amplitude of about 5% on the approximate 10 year timescale. Symmetric instability in the near surface equatorial atmosphere might be the source of the decadal oscillation in the atmospheric state. Analyses of angular momentum transport show that all the jets are built up by poleward transport by a meridional circulation while angular momentum is redistributed to lower latitudes primarily by transient eddies. Possible changes in the structure of Venus’ cloud level mid-latitude jets measured by Mariner 10, Pioneer Venus, and Venus Express suggest that a cyclic variation similar to that found in the model might occur in the real Venus atmosphere, although no subrotating winds below the cloud level have been observed to date. Venus’ atmosphere must be observed over multi-year timescales and below the clouds if we are to understand its dynamics.     

The optical properties of Venus and the Jovian planets I. The atmosphere of Jupiter according to polarimetric observations

Results are given for polarization measurements of both the entire Jupiter disk and its centre for seven wavelength regions in the 0.373–0.800 μm range. Interpretation of these observations is based on two model atmospheres: (A) The cloud layer particles and molecules are mixed with a constant ratio. (B) A gas layer with small optical thickness, τ₀, is situated above the cloud layer which consists of aerosol particles. The aerosol particles are considered to be non-absorbing spheres, their size distribution being normal Gaussian. The index of refraction for the particles is considered to be independent of wavelength in the above spectral range. An approximate method is used for the determination of parameters of the Jovian atmosphere. This method was tested by evaluation of the parameters for the Venus cloud layer: The refractive index was found to be n = 1.435 ± 0.015, the square of the logarithmic dispersion of the radius of particles σ² = 0.12 and the mean geometrical radius of particles r₀ = 0.74 μm which agree well with exact values given by Hansen and Arking (1971). For the atmosphere of Jupiter it was found: n = 1.36 ± 0.01, σ² ? 0.3, r₀ ? 0.2 μm. This refractive index for the particles agrees well with the ammonia cloud layer hypothesis.     

Are the clouds of venus sulfuric acid?

Water solutions of sulfuric acid, containing about 75% H₂SO₄ by weight, have a refractive index within 0.01 of the values deduced from polarimetric observations of the Venus clouds. These solutions remain liquid at the cloud temperature, thus explaining the spherical shape of the cloud particles (droplets). The equilibrium vapor pressure of water above such solutions is 0.01 that of liquid water or ice, which accounts for the observed dryness of the cloud region. Furthermore, H₂SO₄ solutions of such concentration have spectra very similar to Venus in the 8–13 μm region; in particular, they explain the 11.2 μm band. Cold sulfuric acid solutions also seem consistent with Venus spectra in the 3–4 μm region. The amount of acid required to make the visible clouds is quite small, and is consistent with both the cosmic abundance of sulfur and the degree of out-gassing of the planet indicated by known atmospheric constituents. Sulfuric acid occurs naturally in volcanic gases, along with known constituents of the Venus atmosphere such as CO₂, HCl, and HF ; it is produced at high temperature by reactions between these gases and common sulfate rocks. The great stability and low vapor pressure of H₂SO₄ and its water solutions explain the lack of other sulfur compounds in the atmosphere of Venus—a lack that is otherwise puzzling.Sulfuric acid precipitation may explain some peculiarities in Venera and Mariner data. Because sulfuric acid solutions are in good agreement with the Venus data, and because no other material that has been proposed is even consistent with the polarimetric and spectroscopic data, H₂SO₄ must be considered the most probable constituent of the Venus clouds.     

Acoustic-gravity waves in the thermosphere of Venus

Properties of acoustic-gravity waves in the upper atmosphere of Venus are studied using a two-fluid model which includes the effects of wave-induced diffusion in a diffusively separated atmosphere. In conjunction with neutral mass spectrometer data from the Pioneer Venus orbiter, the theory should provide information on the distribution of wave sources in the Venus upper atmosphere. Observed wave structure in species density measurements should generally have periods ?30–35 min, small N₂, CO, and O amplitudes, and highly variable phase shifts relative to CO₂. A near resonance may exist between downward phase-propagating internal gravity and diffusion waves near the 165-km level at periods near 29 min. As a result, if very large He wave amplitudes are observed near this level, it will indicate that the wave source is below the 150- to 175-km level and that the exospheric temperature is close to 350°K. Wave energy dissipation may be an important mechanism for heating of the nightside Venus thermosphere. Large-density oscillations in stratospheric cloud layer constituents are also possible and may be detectable by the Pioneer Venus large probe neutral mass spectrometer.     

An investigation of the SO2 content of the venusian mesosphere using SPICAV-UV in nadir mode

Using the SPICAV-UV spectrometer aboard Venus Express in nadir mode, we were able to derive spectral radiance factors in the middle atmosphere of Venus in the 170-320 nm range at a spectral resolution of R ? 200 during 2006 and 2007 in the northern hemisphere. By comparison with a radiative transfer model of the upper atmosphere of Venus, we could derive column abundance above the visible cloud top for SO₂ using its spectral absorption bands near 280 and 220 nm. SO₂ column densities show large temporal and spatial variations on a horizontal scale of a few hundred kilometers. Typical SO₂ column densities at low latitudes (up to 50°N) were found between 5 and 50 μm-atm, whereas in the northern polar region SO₂ content was usually below 5 μm-atm. The observed latitudinal variations follow closely the cloud top altitude derived by SPICAV-IR and are thought to be of dynamical origin. Also, a sudden increase of SO₂ column density in the whole northern hemisphere has been observed in early 2007, possibly related to a convective episode advecting some deep SO₂ into the upper atmosphere.     

Venus: Mesospheric hazes of ice,dust, and acid aerosols

We speculate on the origin and physical properties of haze in the upper atmosphere of Venus. It is argued that at least four distinct types of particles may be present. The densest and lowest haze, normally seen by spacecraft, probably consists of a submicron sulfuric acid aerosol which extends above the cloud tops (at ～70 km) up to ～80 km; this haze represents an extension of the upper cloud deck. Measurements of the temperature structure between 70 and 120 km indicate that two independent water ice layers may occasionally appear. The lower one can form between 80 and 100 km and is probably the detached haze layer seen in high-contrast limb photography. This ice layer is likely to be nucleated on sulfuric acid aerosols, and is analogous to the nacreous (stratospheric) clouds on Earth. At the Venus “mesopause” near 120 km, temperatures are frequently cold enough to allow ice nucleation on meteoric dust or ambient ions. The resulting haze (which is analogous to noctilucent clouds on Earth) is expected to be extremely tenous, and optically invisible. On both Earth and Venus, meteoric dust is present throughout the upper atmosphere and probably has similar properties.     

Predictions of the electrical conductivity and charging of the aerosols in Titan's atmosphere

The electrical conductivity and electrical charge on the aerosols in atmosphere of Titan are computed for altitudes from 0 to 400 km. Ionization due to both galactic cosmic rays and electron precipitation from the Saturnian magnetosphere is considered. This ionization results in free electrons and the primary ions N₂⁺ and N⁺ which are then rapidly converted into secondary ions such as H₂CN⁺ and NH₄⁺ which in turn form ion clusters such as H₂CN⁺(HCN)_n and NH₄⁺(NH₃)_m. In contrast to the atmospheres of Venus and Earth, we find no species in the Titan atmosphere that lead to the formation of appreciable concentrations of negative ions. Consequently, the predicted conductivity is quite different in that a substantial concentration of electrons exists all the way to the surface of Titan. The ubiquitous aerosols observed in the Titan atmosphere also play an important role in determining the charge distribution in the atmosphere. At altitudes above 100 km and for aerosol concentrations above approximately 10/cc, the recombination of electrons and positive ions is controlled by the recombination on the surface of the aerosols rather than by the gas-kinetic recombination rate. For small aerosol concentrations, the ratio of the number of charges per particle to the radius of the particle is approximately 30, for radii in microns. This value is similar to that obtained by previous investigators for terrestrial noctilucent clouds. Because the aerosol particles are highly charged, coagulation is inhibited, particle sizes are smaller, and their settling rates are reduced. As a consequence, the optical depth of the atmosphere is much higher than it would be if the particles were uncharged.     

Mars Express and Venus Express multi-point observations of geoeffective solar flare events in December 2006

In December 2006, a single active region produced a series of proton solar flares, with X-ray class up to the X9.0 level, starting on 5 December 2006 at 10:35 UT. A feature of this X9.0 flare is that associated MeV particles were observed at Venus and Mars by Venus Express (VEX) and Mars Express (MEX), which were ∼80° and ∼125° east of the flare site, respectively, in addition to the Earth, which was ∼79° west of the flare site. On December 5, 2006, the plasma instruments ASPERA-3 and ASPERA-4 on board MEX and VEX detected a large enhancement in their respective background count levels. This is a typical signature of solar energetic particle (SEP) events, i.e., intensive MeV particle fluxes. The timings of these enhancements were consistent with the estimated field-aligned travel time of particles associated with the X9.0 flare that followed the Parker spiral to reach Venus and Mars. Coronal mass ejection (CME) signatures that might be related to the proton flare were twice identified at Venus within <43 and <67 h after the flare. Although these CMEs did not necessarily originate from the X9.0 flare on December 5, 2006, they most likely originated from the same active region because these characteristics are very similar to flare-associated CMEs observed on the Earth. These observations indicate that CME and flare activities on the invisible side of the Sun may affect terrestrial space weather as a result of traveling more than 90° in both azimuthal directions in the heliosphere. We would also like to emphasize that during the SEP activity, MEX data indicate an approximately one-order of magnitude enhancement in the heavy ion outflow flux from the Martian atmosphere. This is the first observation of the increase of escaping ion flux from Martian atmosphere during an intensive SEP event. This suggests that the solar EUV flux levels significantly affect the atmospheric loss from unmagnetized planets.     

Circular polarization of sunlight reflected by planetary atmospheres

Multiple scattering calculations are performed in order to investigate the nature of the circular polarization of sunlight reflected by planetary atmospheres. Contour diagrams as a function of size parameter and phase angle are made for the integrated light from a spherical but locally plane-parallel atmosphere of spherical particles. To investigate the origin of the circular polarization, results are also computed for second-order scattering and for a simpler semiquantitative model of scattering by two particles. Observations of the circular polarization of the planets are presently too meager for accurate deduction of cloud particle properties. However, certain very broad constraints can be placed on the properties of the dominant cloud particles on Jupiter and Saturn. The cloud particle size and refractive index deduced for the Jupiter clouds by Loskutov, Morozhenko, and Yanovitskii from analyses of the linear polarization are not consistent with the circular polarization. The few available circular polarization observations of Venus are also examined.     

The transmission to space of the light produced by lightning in the clouds of Venus

A Monte Carlo program by Thomason and Krider has been adapted to the Venus cloud geometry and optical properties. If lightning flashes occur within or just below the clouds, the fraction of photons of visible light escaping to space is 0.1–0.4, depending on the location of the flash. For flashes near the surface, only one blue photon in 10⁴ was found to escape; about 5% of the red ones are transmitted. Failure of the Pioneer Venus Orbiter to unambiguously detect optical lightning signals from space is not due to attenuation by the atmosphere and clouds. In any case, lightning is not acceptable as an explanation for ashen light.     

How Many Convective Zones Are There in the Atmosphere of Venus?

The qualitative characteristics of the vertical structure of the atmospheres of Venus and the Earth essentially differ. For instance, there are at least two, instead of one, zones with normal (thermal) convection on Venus. The first one is near the surface (a boundary layer); the second is at the altitudes of the lower part of the main cloud layer between 49 and 55 km. Contrary to the hypotheses proposed by Izakov (2001, 2002), the upper convective zone prevents energy transfer from the upper clouds to the subcloud atmosphere by anomalous turbulent heat conductivity. It is possible, however, that the anomalous turbulent heat conductivity takes part in the redistribution of the heat fluxes within the lower (subcloud) atmosphere.     

Initiation of Run-Out Flows on Venus by Oblique Impacts

A hypervelocity oblique impact results in a downrange-moving vapor cloud, a significant fraction of which is derived from the projectile. Since the vapor cloud expands to great extent and becomes very tenuous quickly on a planet with a thin or no atmosphere, it does not leave a well-defined geologic expression. The thick atmosphere of Venus, however, is sufficient to contain such a rapidly expanding vapor cloud. As a result of atmospheric interactions, impact vapor condenses and contributes to run-out flows around craters on Venus. Previous results of both laboratory experiments and simple semi-analytical calculations indicate that an impact-vapor origin can account for the morphology of run-out flows on Venus most consistently. However, the detailed dynamics and geologic record of downrange-moving impact vapor clouds in Venus's atmosphere are not understood quantitatively. To approach these problems, we carried out two-dimensional hydrocode calculations. Parametric studies of these hydrocode calculations yield simple scaling laws for both the total downrange travel distance and the final temperature of impact vapor clouds under conditions on Venus. Under typical impact conditions, impact vapor clouds travel downrange more than a crater radius prior to the completion of crater formation. Furthermore, the scaling law for the total travel distance is compared with observations for the downrange offset of the source regions of run-out flows around oblique craters. The results of this comparison suggest that energy/momentum-partitioning processes other than pure shock coupling may play important roles in hypervelocity impact at planetary scales. The results of hydrocode calculations also indicate that the terminal temperature of the impact vapor is close to the condensation temperatures of silicates, suggesting that two scenarios are possible for expected range of impact conditions: 1. Impact vapor condenses and forms run-out flows. 2. Impact vapor fails to condense and leaves no run-out flows. Consequently, natural variation in impact angle, velocity, and projectile composition may account for partial occurrence of run-out flows around impact craters on Venus.     

Aeolian regime of the surface of Venus

Recent probes of the planet Venus reveal a probable surface temperature exceeding 700K and a pressure exceeding 100 atm. A very dusty lower atmosphere may exist which is composed of micron-sized particles kept airborne by mild turbulence and a gentle circulation of deep adiabatic currents. A study of surface conditions responsible for generation and persistence of surface dust clouds is of fundamental importance in the radiative and dynamic properties of the atmosphere. Also spurious radar echoes may be caused by suspended particulate matter, thus explaining the high relief reported by radar altimeters.Equations describing transportation and deposition of dust and sand have been solved for the surface conditions of Venus. It is concluded that the minimum wind velocity for initiating grain movement is about one order of magnitude smaller than on Earth. In addition, this minimum wind velocity occurs for smaller particles on Venus than on Earth. Once the particles are raised, they can be maintained aloft for longer periods of time and over a larger size range on Venus.Surface structures such as ripples evolved from aeolian deposition are likely to be of smaller vertical dimensions but larger horizontally when compared with equivalent structures on Earth.     

An improved Venus cloud model

A simple radiative-transfer theory that allows for the change in the absorptions of sulfur and carbon dioxide with depth in the atmosphere of Venus can account simultaneously for (1) the spectral reflectance of Venus; (2) the wavelength dependence of contrast in uv cloud features; (3) the CO₂ line profile; (4) the change in slope of the curve of growth from the 7820- to the 10488-Å CO₂ bands; and (5) the rotational temperature near 246°K found for all CO₂ bands. The model cloud consists of 1-μm sulfuric-acid particles, which are well mixed between about 64 km and the 49-km cloud base found by Veneras 9 and 10, plus an overlapping cloud of much larger sulfur particles that extends down to the 35-km cloud base found by Venera 8. The mixing ratios (by number of molecules) below about 64 km are: H₂O, 2 × 10^?4; H₂SO₄, 10^?5; and sulfur, 10^?4. Although the cloud contains an order of magnitude more sulfur than sulfuric acid, the sulfur particles are an order of magnitude larger, and so have only about 1% of the number density of the acid droplets. The “black-white” radiative-transfer model assumes perfectly conservative scattering above the level (which depends on wavelength) where an absorber becomes “black” due to the local temperature and pressure. So-called homogeneous scattering models are inherently self-contradictory, and are inapplicable to planetary atmospheres; the vertical inhomogeneity is an essential feature that must be modeled correctly. The pressure of CO₂ line formation is about half the pressure in the region where uv markings occur.