地震期间的地磁脉动效应

１９９６年１１月１７日至１１月２９日在新疆喀仁地区８次地震期间观测到的震前发生的高频地磁脉动现象,文中对每次地震前的Ｐｃｌ－２脉动的形态,以及脉动的起动时刻,持续时间,Ｈ分量和Ｄ分量的平均振幅随北京地方时的分布进行了详细研究分析,对这种震前观测到的高频地磁脉动的激发机制也做了深入的讨论,事实表明,这种震前发生的高频地磁脉动的地震的短期预报上可能有广泛的应用前景。     

地磁脉动预报地震的研究

阐述了利用数字化地磁脉动观测资料预报地震的研究工作及其结果．根据感应磁效应理论，地磁脉动比起常规的地磁观测方法，更能有效地反映震前地下介质电导率的异常变化，尤其是震前的短临异常变化．我们的研究结果也表明，震前地磁脉动传递函数，有明显的短临异常，且有典型的异常形态，并取得较好的预报震例．地磁脉动预报地震是很有前途的地震预报新方法，它将会使以磁报震的研究工作取得新的进展．      

地磁数据处理与地震关系之探

研究了上海崇明、佘山和杭州这3个地磁台的观测资料在2004年4月21日南黄海ML4．0级、5月26日浙江省舟山群岛ML4．3级和11月15日南黄海％4．6级地震前的异常变化特征,结果表明：杭州台和崇明台数字化地磁观测资料分钟值空间差值于4月14日～17日、4月30日、5月8日出现的异常信息很可能是震磁异常信息;杭州台和余山台数字化地磁观测资料分钟值、模拟观测21时值Z分量地磁场相关系数R值分别在震前2天、24天和震前5天、15天出现了超出2σ值的震磁异常变化：崇明和余山地磁台数字化地磁Z分量分钟值的空间差值异常信息在4月21日南黄海尬4．0级地震前后有所显示。但在5月26日舟山群岛ML4．3级地震前不太明显,可能与谈两个地磁台站相距较近日震中距较近有美．     

汶川MemSsub8.0地震前地磁短临异常与强震预测探索l

强震前地磁垂直分量日变化异常主要表现在幅度与相位上的变化．利用中国地磁台网多年观测资料,研究了2008年5月12日四川汶川8.0级地震前,地磁垂直分量日变极小值出现的时间（低点时间）在空间分布上的异常特征,即低点位移现象;并用此方法预测了汶川8.0级地震6级余震平静2个月后的一组6级强余震．这种少见的异常现象与强震发生有较好的相关性．发震日期为异常出现后的第27天或第41天的前后4天,强震发生地区在低点位移突变分界线附近．此外,还研究了汶川8.0级地震临震前,震中周围出现的地磁日变幅异常现象．      

邢台5．4级地震前的流动重力和地磁异常初步研究

根据测值空间变化等值线和时序变化曲线,分析了2002年邢台5．4级地震前流动重力和流动地磁异常的动态演化。两种异常震前表现出如下特征：①流动重力、流动地磁观测资料均有较为明显的前兆异常反应;②地震发生在重力变化的“0”等值线附近;③流动地磁部分点位测值呈现趋势性异常,震前全部点位观测值整体上升,形成完整的高值异常区。     

云南地磁场变化与异常特征分析

对云南地区地磁观测资料进行分析研究,总结了1986～2002年以来云南地磁场变化形态与异常特征。利用均方差、斜率、拟合等方法分析研究,以日均值为基础建立了一系列判定指标,获得发生在云南及邻区一些地震的震磁前兆信息。研究结果表明,云南地磁观测震前出现以下几种特征：1．短临加速变化异常;2．多台准同步异常;3．有一定形态过程的异常;4．破年变趋势异常。地磁异常以短临显示为多数,中期向短期过渡异常不明显。     

2013年岷县-漳县6.6级地震震前地磁异常分析

区域地磁在一定范围内,在排除空间环境、仪器本身故障等因素的前提下,各地磁台所观测到的地磁曲线是具一定相关性的,但强震孕震过程中会引起电导率等电磁性质发生改变,从而改变台站间地磁本应呈现出来的相关性,因此地磁异常可以为震前地震预报提供有用信息。以2013年7月22日岷县-漳县6.6级地震为研究对象,对其震前地磁前兆异常进行研究。分析表明：震前有明显的低点位移异常现象,且在此次异常后36天发生了6.6级地震;地磁Z值的每日一值空间相关分析也出现了明显异常,从空间上看,相关系数与地震震中有很好的对应关系,震中刚好处在相关系数最低的位置;且地磁台的密集程度对计算区域相关系数具有较大影响。     

山西及邻区中强地震地磁异常综合特征分析

收集数字化观测以来山西及邻区地磁台站数据,利用地磁低点位移法、地磁加卸载响应比法和地磁日变幅逐日比法等多种地磁分析方法,分析了山西及邻区4次中强地震前地磁异常特征。研究发现,这些异常类型与该区域中强地震间存在一定相关性,地震多发生在异常预测线集中交汇区域,这缩小了地震预测范围;异常数量的增加提高了单一方法的可信度,预示着发震概率的增高。通过对震前各种异常类型的分析,认为地磁异常综合特征对山西及邻区中强地震的短临预测有一定参考价值。     

2018年精河5.4级地震前地磁日变化畸变异常分析

2018年10月16日新疆精河5.4级地震发生时,震中附近的台站不同程度上记录了地磁日变化畸变异常,如地磁总强度F02时每日一值空间相关异常、地磁垂直分量加卸载响应比异常、地磁低点位移以及地磁日变化空间相关异常等。统计震前观测到的所有地磁异常,并分析研究了其震前异常变化特征。得到如下结论:(1)从全国每日一值相关分析结果看,震前114天出现每日一值空间相关异常,异常高值台为乌鲁木齐和克拉玛依;(2)震前59天沿北天山断裂带分布的地磁台站加卸载响应比均成组出现超限的高值,且异常高值的空间分布跟震中位置有一定关联;(3)中国大陆地磁台站震前37天出现低点位移突变分界线,且异常集中于震中附近;(4)震前出现地磁垂直分量日变化空间相关异常,异常台站空间上也主要集中于北天山地区。因此地磁垂直分量日变形态及有关的计算方法短期内具有一定的预报效能,可为今后利用地磁方法预测地震积累经验和震例。     

新疆伽师MS6.4地震前地磁日变化异常分析

以新疆伽师M S6.4地震为案例,利用地磁日变化异常分析方法,对中国地磁台网所记录的地磁观测资料进行分析,结果显示:1、离震中最近的喀什台震前59 d和39 d出现一组逐日比高值异常,排除干扰,且地磁日变形态也出现明显的畸变,异常集中于震中附近台站,震中位于异常阈值线附近;2、震前,新疆及周边地区出现地磁垂直分量日变化幅度的极小值时间在空间上出现地磁低点位移现象,低点时间分界线横穿南天山西段,呈现近EW走向分布,分界线两侧低点时间相差超过2 h,发震日期为异常发生后的38(41±4)d,震中位于低点位移分界线附近;3、地磁逐日比和低点位移异常的发生时间和空间分布可能与伽师M S6.4地震的孕育和发生有非常高的关联性。该研究进一步推广和检验了地磁日变化异常分析方法在地震预报方面的应用。     

2013年松原震群地磁ULF波动异常研究

为了提取2013年10月至11月吉林省松原市Ms5.0以上震群前后地磁异常变化信息,利用短时快速傅里叶变换方法,分析平均震中距为79 km的长春地磁台地磁场能量波动,发现该台Z分量在震前4个月于0.02 Hz频点能量出现异常波动,震前2个月达到峰值,随后逐渐平稳,恢复到正常水平期间发生地震.排除空间变化磁场影响和环境干扰,认为该异常变化与2013年松原Ms5.0以上震群有关.     

The Beijing network of digital geomagnetic pulsation observatories

ＴｈｅＢｅｉｊｉｎｇｎｅｔｗｏｒｋｏｆｄｉｇｉｔａｌｇｅｏｍａｇｎｅｔｉｃｐｕｌｓａｔｉｏｎｏｂｓｅｒｖａｔｏｒｉｅｓＪｕｎ－ＣｈｅｎｇＺＨＯＵ（周军成）；Ｋｅ－ＬｉＨＡＮ（韩克礼）；ＹｕｅＬＵ（鲁跃）（ＩｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅｏｆＧｅｏｐｈｙｓｉｃｓ，Ｓ...     

On the earthquake effects in the regime of Pc1

While searching for electromagnetic effects of the earthquakes, impulse-type signals in the frequency range of 0–5 Hz preceding the earthquake or following it have been detected. The advance or delay time is from 0 to 5 min. The signals are observed as single or pair impulses. It is supposed that the signals make a significant impact on the state of the magnetosphere and ionosphere. As a result, a sharp change in the regime of Pc1 geomagnetic pulsations is possible. These effects are analyzed on the basis of observations of the geomagnetic pulsations at the Borok Geophysical Observatory.     

Wave structure of magnetic substorms at high latitudes

A new type of high-latitude magnetic bays is revealed at geomagnetic latitudes higher than 71°, called ??polar substorms.?? It is shown that polar substorms differ from both classical substorms and high-latitude geomagnetic disturbances of the type of polar boundary intensifications (PBIs). While classical substorms start at latitudes below 67° and then expand poleward, polar substorms start almost simultaneously in the evening-night polar region of the oval. In contrast to PBIs, accompanied by auroral streamers expanding southward, polar substorms are accompanied by auroral arcs quickly traveling northward. It is shown that polar substorms are observed before midnight (20?C22 MLT) under weak geomagnetic activity (Kp ?? 2) during the late recovery phase of a magnetic storm. It is shown that a typical feature of polar substorms is the simultaneous excitation of highly intensive Pi2 and Pi3 geomagnetic pulsations at high latitudes, which exceed the typical amplitude of these pulsations at auroral latitudes by more than an order of magnitude. The duration of pulsations is determined by the substorm duration, and their amplitude decreases sharply at geomagnetic latitudes below ??71°. It is suggested that pulsations reflect fluctuations in ionospheric currents connected with polar substorms.     

Planetary distribution of geomagnetic pulsations during a geomagnetic storm at solar minimum

We investigate the features of the planetary distribution of wave phenomena (geomagnetic pulsations) in the Earth’s magnetic shell (the magnetosphere) during a strong geomagnetic storm on December 14–15, 2006, which is untypical of the minimum phase of solar activity. The storm was caused by the approach of the interplanetary magnetic cloud towards the Earth’s magnetosphere. The study is based on the analysis of 1-min data of global digital geomagnetic observations at a few latitudinal profiles of the global network of ground-based magnetic stations. The analysis is focused on the Pc5 geomagnetic pulsations, whose frequencies fall in the band of 1.5–7 mHz (T ～ 2–10 min), on the fluctuations in the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and in the solar wind density in this frequency band. It is shown that during the initial phase of the storm with positive IMF Bz, most intense geomagnetic pulsations were recorded in the dayside polar regions. It was supposed that these pulsations could probably be caused by the injection of the fluctuating streams of solar wind into the Earth’s ionosphere in the dayside polar cusp region. The fluctuations arising in the ionospheric electric currents due to this process are recorded as the geomagnetic pulsations by the ground-based magnetometers. Under negative IMF Bz, substorms develop in the nightside magnetosphere, and the enhancement of geomagnetic pulsations was observed in this latitudinal region on the Earth’s surface. The generation of these pulsations is probably caused by the fluctuations in the field-aligned magnetospheric electric currents flowing along the geomagnetic field lines from the substorm source region. These geomagnetic pulsations are not related to the fluctuations in the interplanetary medium. During the main phase of the magnetic storm, when fluctuations in the interplanetary medium are almost absent, the most intense geomagnetic pulsations were observed in the dawn sector in the region corresponding to the closed magnetosphere. The generation of these pulsations is likely to be associated with the resonance of the geomagnetic field lines. Thus, it is shown that the Pc5 pulsations observed on the ground during the magnetic storm have a different origin and a different planetary distribution.     

Features of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Pc</Emphasis>5 pulsations in the geomagnetic field,auroral luminosity,and Riometer absorption

Simultaneous morning Pc5 pulsations (f ~ 3–5 mHz) in the geomagnetic field, aurora intensities (in the 557.7 and 630.0 nm oxygen emissions and the 471.0 nm nitrogen emission), and riometer absorption, were studied based on the CARISMA, CANMOS, and NORSTAR network data for the event of January 1, 2000. According to the GOES-8 satellite observations, these Pc5 geomagnetic pulsations are observed as incompressible Alfvén waves with toroidal polarization in the magnetosphere. Although the Pc5 pulsation frequencies in auroras, the geomagnetic field, and riometer absorption are close to one another, stable phase relationships are not observed between them. Far from all trains of geomagnetic Pc5 pulsations are accompanied by corresponding auroral pulsations; consequently, geomagnetic pulsations are primary with respect to auroral pulsations. Both geomagnetic and auroral pulsations propagate poleward, and the frequency decreases with increasing geomagnetic latitude. When auroral Pc5 pulsations appear, the ratio of the 557.7/630.0 nm emission intensity sharply increases, which indicates that auroral pulsations result from not simply modulated particle precipitation but also an additional periodic acceleration of auroral electrons by the wave field. A high correlation is not observed between Pc5 pulsations in auroras and the riometer absorption, which indicates that these pulsations have a common source but different generation mechanisms. Auroral luminosity modulation is supposedly related to the interaction between Alfvén waves and the region with the field-aligned potential drop above the auroral ionosphere, and riometer absorption modulation is caused by the scattering of energetic electrons by VLF noise pulsations.     

汶川8.0级地震前地磁日变化异常综合分析

运用地磁低点位移、地磁加卸载响应比和地磁Z分量日变幅逐日比3种地磁分析方法,分析了2008年5月12日汶川8.0级地震前的地磁前兆异常现象。研究发现,运用上述3种方法,汶川地震前出现多次异常,地震发生在异常预测线集中交汇区域。综合分析结果显示,地磁多方法综合分析可以有效提升地震预测的精确性。文章还讨论了地磁日变化畸变异常机理问题。     

2016年门源6.4级地震地磁谐波振幅比异常特征分析

2016年门源6.4级地震为甘—青地区孤立地震事件,且震中附近地磁台站分布均匀,分析总结此次地震前后地磁谐波振幅比变化特征。结果显示：①地震发生前后,震中附近台站地磁谐波振幅比下降—转折—恢复的异常变化过程,持续时间约1—2年;②震中距较小的台站记录显示,地震基本发生在谐波振幅比曲线转折恢复的变化后期阶段,且异常持续时间长;震中距较大的台站记录显示,地震一般发生在曲线趋势性下降—转折阶段,且异常持续时间稍短;③地震发生后,距震中较近的台站1年内Y_ZHx（NS）和Y_ZHy（WE）方向所有或大部分周期基本趋于恢复状态,且同步变化;距震中较远的台站1年内Y_ZHx（NS）和Y_ZHy（WE）方向大部分周期未达到恢复状态,且不同步变化显著。