“一带一路”沿线区域耕地格局变化（英文）

The Belt and Road Initiative(BRI)–a development strategy proposed by China – provides unprecedented opportunities for multi-dimensional communication and cooperation across Asia,Africa and Europe.In this study,we analyse the spatio-temporal changes in cultivated land in the BRI countries(64 in total) to better understand the land use status of China along with its periphery for targeting specific collaboration.We apply FAO statistics and Globe Land30(the world's finest land cover data at a 30-m resolution),and develop three indicator groups(namely quantity,conversion,and utilization degree) for the analysis.The results show that cultivated land area in the BRI region increased 3.73×10~4 km~2 between 2000 and 2010.The increased cultivated land was mainly found in Central and Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia,while the decreased cultivated land was mostly concentrated in China.Russia ranks first with an increase of 1.59×10~4 km~2 cultivated land area,followed by Hungary(0.66×10~4 km~2) and India(0.57×10~4 km`2).China decreased 1.95×10~4 km~2 cultivated land area,followed by Bangladesh(–0.22×10~4 km~2) and Thailand(–0.22×10~4 km~2).Cultivated land was mainly transferred to/from forest,grassland,artificial surfaces and bare land,and transfer types in different regions have different characteristics:while large amount of cultivated land in China was converted to artificial surfaces,considerable forest was converted to cultivated land in Southeast Asia.The increase of multi-cropping index dominated the region except the Central and Eastern Europe,while the increase of fragmentation index was prevailing in the region except for a few South Asian countries.Our results indicate that the negative consequence of cultivated land loss in China might be underestimated by the domestic-focused studies,as none of its close neighbours experienced such obvious cultivated land losses.Nevertheless,the increased cultivated land area in Southeast Asia and the extensive cultivated land use in Ukraine and Russia imply that the regional food production would be greatly improved if China' "Go Out policy" would help those countries to intensify their cultivated land use.     

“一带一路”沿线地区隐含碳流动研究

随着全球各区域的连通性不断增强,碳流动以及碳泄漏在全球碳减排过程中扮演着越来越重要的角色。伴随全球产业跨境转移的过程,发达国家的高碳行业逐渐转移到发展中国家,并从这些国家进口成品用于自身最终消费。基于多区域投入产出分析,本文测算了“一带一路”沿线地区隐含碳流动,分析了生产碳及消费碳强度在全球的空间分布,并以此为基础探讨了“一带一路”沿线地区的生产者及消费者责任。结果显示,“一带一路”沿线地区的生产碳强度大都高于消费碳强度,且两者的差值大多高于“一带一路”区域外发达地区。全球95%以上的隐含碳净流出发生在“一带一路”沿线地区,美国、西欧等发达国家/地区的消费所引发的“一带一路”沿线主要区域直接碳排放占比约为30%。考虑到跨国贸易中的隐含碳排放,“一带一路”沿线地区整体承受了较大的碳排放压力。从消费者责任着手衡量各国家/地区在全球气候变化中的碳排放责任,并以包容性全球化为基础推进“一带一路”气候治理体系构建,可为长期难以达成协议的全球气候治理问题提供有效思路。     

“一带一路”沿线地区关键生物多样性区域生态变化特征（英文）

KBA (Key Biodiversity Areas)是由IUCN提出并被国际社会认可的生态保护优先区域,评估其生态变化特征对生物多样性保护与自然保护地建设至关重要。“一带一路”沿线地区生态系统类型丰富,生物多样性保护价值极高,而沿线KBA更应该成为生态保护的核心目标。本文利用土地覆盖、归一化植被指数（NDVI）和夜间灯光数据（NTL）,从植被覆盖度和人类活动方面分别对沿线KBA的生态状况及其时空变化特征进行分析,得到以下结论：（1）KBA内的土地覆盖长期保持稳定,林地、荒野和草地是主要的土地覆盖类型;（2）KBA内NDVI总体上呈现增加的趋势,表明植被覆盖度在不断提高,少数植被退化的KBA主要分布在中南半岛、青藏高原以及西亚地区;（3）KBA内NTL总体上处于很低的水平,表明人类活动对自然生态系统的干扰程度十分有限,极少数分布于中东欧、印度、中南半岛以及地中海附近国家的KBA具有较强的人类活动且呈现出增加的趋势。本研究结果强调在KBA生态保护中充分利用生物群落演替规律,同时限制人类活动对自然生态系统的干扰,以推动沿线地区生物多样性保护与自然保护地建设。     

“一带一路”沿线国家石油资源流动类型演变

综合运用石油自给率、流动比率等方法,以“一带一路”沿线国家为研究对象,对1995—2014年各国石油资源流动类型时空演变进行研究。结果表明：1）1995—2014年石油净补给型国家数量较为稳定,无产型或低产型国家的石油贸易倾向变化相对较小;基本自给型国家数量占比最大,1995年占比1/2,其余四个年份占比稳定在1/3;净支出型国家数量显著增加,至2014年其中有5个国家保持不变,表明这些国家的石油产量具有较大的优势。2）1995年和2014年汇地国家均为39个国家,其中有34个国家一直保持汇地职能,空间分布上呈东多西少,南多北少,东西分化以西亚、中亚、东欧为界;有14个国家一直保持源地职能,其空间分布格局与汇地相应,西多东少,南多北少,主要分布于西亚、东欧及中亚;交流地数量较少,呈分散分布,且分布地不稳定。3）从数量变化来看,研究期内汇地略有增加,源地略有减少,交流地略有增加;“一带一路”源地总出口量与汇地总进口量的比呈逐年降低趋势。     

“一带一路”地区的生态承载力与绿色发展（英文）

20世纪70年代以来,全球性资源危机、环境污染和生态退化问题凸显,增长的极限始终是一个重要的理论与政策问题。承载力评价、预警与调控在自然资源利用、环境管理和生态保护中都有巨大的应用潜力。本文梳理了承载力演变历程及生态承载力的概念,将已有生态承载力评价方法归纳为生态足迹法、综合指标体系法、生态系统服务法、净初级生产力人类占用分析法等4类。分析了当前生态承载力研究中问题,并展望了未来发展趋势。结合"一带一路"地区的生态承载力与绿色发展专辑,从生态承载力评价方法与应用、生态系统服务供给与消费、资源利用与环境变化等方面对"一带一路"地区的生态承载力研究进展做了介绍。建议"一带一路"地区生态承载力研究应深入刻画生态承载力的时空异质性及动态变化,模拟生态过程与人类活动的相互作用,将气候变化、人类活动及生态产品与服务流等因素纳入生态承载力评价体系与模型中,提高评价结果的精度和可靠性,提升生态承载力研究对相关决策的支撑能力。     

基于虚拟水理论的“一带一路”沿线国家水资源承载力分析（英文）

"一带一路"沿线国家大多面临水资源短缺情况,水资源能否支撑其经济社会发展关系到"一带一路"倡议的顺利实施。本文构建水资源承载力评价指标体系,对各评价指标进行分级和权重分配,并对沿线65个国家的水资源承载指标进行了计算,同时结合虚拟水理论,分析中国重点大宗类农产品国际贸易的净进口虚拟水含量。对沿线一半以上的国家来说,他们的水资源将无法支撑他们的经济发展,而经济发展是实现该倡议目标所必需的。中国作为水资源承载力不足的国家,在虚拟水贸易中属于虚拟水净进口国家,虚拟水贸易有利于中国提高水资源支撑能力,对未来保障中国水资源安全、食物安全都有积极意义。     

“一带一路”生态系统服务消耗格局与演变（英文）

生态系统服务消耗研究对于生态系统保护与可持续发展具有重要意义,已成为生态学研究的热点。本研究基于FAOSTAT数据,以生物量消耗为主要指标,动态研究"一带一路"沿线全域及分区生态消耗格局、构成及其演变规律,揭示该区域生态消耗模式主要类型、分布格局与演变态势。得出以下结论:(1)全域生态消耗主要来自农田消耗,其次为草地消耗;生态消耗整体呈波动增加,消耗总量从2000年的12911.89Tg增加到2016年的16810.00Tg,年人均消耗量从2000年的332.28万g增加到2016年的363.92万g。(2)生态消耗及其变化在国家间、分区间及生态系统类型间差异显著,人均生态消耗以蒙古国最高,分区尺度以中东欧最高,东南亚最低,这是区域资源禀赋、生态消耗模式及生活水平等共同作用的结果。(3)农田消耗为主是该区域主导生态消耗模式,约占总面积的76.71%,其次为农草消耗,约占总面积的19.0%,仅少数国家为草地消耗为主、森林消耗为主或农林草消耗并重,这可能与该区域人口密度大且多为发展中国家有关。因此该区域在依据自身资源优势发展农林牧产业时,应扩大贸易,互惠共赢,优化生态消耗模式,促进区域社会、经济与生态可持续发展。     

“一带一路”国家贸易关系结构与演进（英文）

Trade facilitation is one of the five main agendas of the Belt and Road Initiative(BRI). Social network analysis has helped understand the complexity of trade networks, but existing studies tend to overlook the fact that not all bilateral trade relations are equally important to a country. To fill this gap in the literature, this paper focuses on the top 2 trade relations networks to illuminate the structure and evolution of BR trade relations, the relative positions of different countries, and changes in the composition of trade communities(e.g., the community leaders) and the changing patterns of trade between them. We find rich dynamics over time both inter-and intra-communities. The overall international trade networks of BR countries experienced a leadership change from Russia to China on one hand, some temporary communities experienced emergence, disappearance(e.g. the Kuwait-and Thailand-led communities) or reemergence(e.g. Poland-led community), and a community membership was generally consistent on the other hand. Since the future impacts of China's BRI will depend on the degree of integration of the connected regions, some countries with stable and high centrality indices(e.g. Russia, Singapore, Serbia, Greece, Turkey, Iran, Poland, Hungary and Romania) could be selected by China as strategic regional partners, and countries with a strategically important geographical position but weak trade links(e.g. Myanmar, Pakistan, and Belarus) should be prioritized.     

1950–2050年“一带一路”沿线国家人口与城市化发展的时空演变研究（英文）

This paper uses data for the period 1950–2050 compiled by the United Nations Population Division together with methods including spatial autocorrelation analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis and the standard deviational ellipse, to analyze the spatio-temporal evolution of population and urbanization in the 75 countries located along the routes of the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21 st-century Maritime Silk Road, to identify future population growth and urbanization hotspots. The results reveal the following: First, in 2015, the majority of Belt and Road countries in Europe, South Asia and Southeast Asia had high population densities, whereas most countries in Central Asia, North Africa and West Asia, as well as Russia and Mongolia, had low population densities; the majority of countries in South Asia, Southeast Asia, Central Asia, West Asia and North Africa had rapid population growth, whereas many countries in Europe had negative population growth; and five Belt and Road countries are in the initial stage of urbanization, 44 countries are in the acceleration stage of urbanization, and 26 are in the terminal stage of urbanization. Second, in the century from 1950 to 2050, the mean center of the study area's population is consistently located in the border region between India and China. Prior to 2000, the trajectory of the mean center was from northwest to southeast, but from 2000 it is on a southward trajectory, as the population of the study area becomes more concentrated. Future population growth hotspots are predicted to be in South Asia, West Asia and Southeast Asia, and hotspot countries for the period 2015–2030 include India, China, Pakistan and Indonesia, though China will move into negative population growth after 2030. Third, the overall urban population of Belt and Road countries increased from 22% in 1950 to 49% in 2015, and it is expected to gradually catch up with the world average, reaching 64% in 2050. The different levels of urbanization in different countries display significant spatial dependency, and in the hundred-year period under con-sideration, this dependency increases before eventually weakening. Fourth, between 2015 and 2030, urban population hotspots will include Thailand, China, Laos and Albania, while Kuwait, Cyprus, Qatar and Estonia will be urban "coldspots." Fifth, there were 293 cities with populations over 1 million located along the Belt and Road in 2015, but that number is expected to increase to 377 by 2030. Of those, 43 will be in China, with many of the others located in India, Indonesia and the eastern Mediterranean.     

“一带一路”沿线贸易便利化发展格局研究

贸易便利化是"一带一路"贸易合作的关键环节,提高贸易便利化水平有利于促进区域内经济要素有序自由流动。论文从贸易便利化入手,基于已有文献回顾,构建包含29个指标的贸易便利化评价体系,分析2013—2017年"一带一路"沿线国家的贸易便利化发展态势和空间格局,并提出相关政策建议。研究结果显示:①2013—2017年,沿线国家贸易便利化水平呈缓慢上升态势,蒙俄、中亚、中东欧、西亚增长较明显;②沿线国家贸易便利化水平呈"东西高、中间低,北高南低"的空间格局,空间差异呈缩小态势;③二级指标与贸易便利化总指标的发展态势相对一致,电子商务、市场准入、海关环境、口岸设施等增长态势较明显;④综合发展高水平型、综合发展低水平型是沿线国家主要模式,通关成本与国际合作滞后型、内部贸易环境领先型、基础设施建设领先型分别成为东南亚、中东欧和中亚部分国家的重要发展模式。     

“一带一路”沿线地区城市扩张和形态变化分析

尽管越来越多的人认识到“一带一路”沿线各国的城市化进程对其经济、政治和环境系统所起的重要作用,但对监测区域范围内城市扩张和形态变化的比较研究却极为有限。基于欧空局气候变化倡议项目最新发布的1992—2015年300 m分辨率的全球土地覆盖数据集、1992—2012年DMSP/OLS夜间灯光数据和2000—2015年LandScan人口数据,本文首先分析了1992—2015年“一带一路”陆域城市用地增长的空间格局和十大分区城市用地面积的动态。其次,通过分析3个时间点（1992年、2003年和2015年）上同心环内城市用地密度的时空变化,量化了“一带一路”沿线80个城市的扩张和形态变化。最后采用3种统计模型（线性、幂律和指数函数模型）来分析城市用地面积、加权灯光面积和城市人口之间的长期关系。结果显示,“一带一路”陆域城市用地面积占土地总面积的比例从1992年的0.24%上升至2015年的0.56%,并且非洲和亚洲的发展中国家是“一带一路”监测区域城市化的主要贡献者。同心环内城市用地密度从城市中心到城市边缘呈递减趋势,且城市间的空间分布完全不同。中国、欧洲、非洲、西亚、东南亚和印度6个分区人口数超过100万的城市间比较显示,除了中国城市形态变得分散,其他分区城市形态总体变得紧凑。分析结果也显示,夜间灯光信号所反映的城市经济活力和城市人口分布趋势在不同程度上影响城市空间扩张和形态变化。     

基于可持续发展目标（SDGs）的“一带一路”农业可持续性分析（英文）

"一带一路"国家需要在顶层谋划方面做出努力,方能确保农业的可持续发展。而这需要对"一带一路"沿线国家农业可持续性有一个准确的评判。本文在"一带一路"可持续农业概念认识与可持续发展目标(SDGs)中农业目标解读的基础上,借助统计回归分析、趋势预测等方法,预测了2030年"一带一路"沿线国家经济增长和城镇化等社会经济发展的趋势,以及这些发展趋势相应地对农业资源环境的冲击。结果表明,"一带一路"沿线国家农业资源环境前景不容乐观,且难以支撑起该地区未来对粮食安全需求的保障,只有采用积极应对政策和措施,并在战略上进行规划和布局,才能确保该地区2030年粮食安全这一农业可持续发展目标的实现。为此,"一带一路"沿线国家需要从构建农业合作平台、设立专项基金,以及创新农业合作模式等三个方面进行战略合作,推动"一带一路"沿线国家的农业实现可持续发展。     

“一带一路”陆域地理格局与环境变化风险（英文）

Building the Belt and Road is initiatives of China to promote win-win international cooperation in the new era, aiming at green, health, intellect and peace and the joint development with people of the countries along the route. Systematic analysis on environmental characteristics, evolutionary tendency and future risks are certainly the scientific fundamentals of sustainable development for the Belt and Road construction. Applied remote sensing monitoring, statistical analysis, this paper investigates the regional characteristics of climate, topography, soil, hydrology, vegetation cover and terrestrial ecosystems production, as well as socio-economic conditions. Based on the regional characteristics, the Belt and Road is divided into 9 sub-regions: Central and Eastern Europe sub-region with cold and humid climate, Mongolia and Russia sub-region with cold and arid climate, Central and West Asia arid sub-region, Southeast Asia sub-region with warm and humid climate, Pakistan arid sub-region, Bangladesh-India-Myanmar sub-region with warm and humid climate, Eastern China monsoon sub-region, Northwest China arid sub-region and Tibetan Plateau sub-region. Combining modeling simulation with scenario projections, natural disaster assessment methodology is used to assess the risk of extreme events including heat waves, droughts and floods in the coming 30 years(2021–2050). Results show that, on the basis of the regional framework, the western Eurasia would be a warming trend; both sides of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in high temperature and heat waves risk; Central and Eastern Europe sub-region with cold and humid climate in high drought risk; Bangladesh-India-Myanmar sub-region with warm and humid climate as well as Eastern China in high risk of flooding.     

“一带一路”建设模式研究——基于制度与文化视角（英文）

There is a gap between the great vision and high-quality targets of the Belt and Road Initiative(BRI) and Western recognition of them, which challenges Chinese and Western scholars. This gap should be narrowed by conducting in-depth case studies and comparative studies at the project level. In recent years, the international academic community has paid increasing attention to Chinese outward foreign direct investment(FDI), but Belt and Road construction is much broader in scope, comprising not only FDI projects but also China-financed projects and emerging mixed projects. Our investigation, observation, and examination of the BRI projects find that compared to their Western counterparts, Chinese enterprises have less experience in doing business in other countries and often pay less attention to institutional and cultural differences between China and the host countries. Thus, revisiting the institutional and cultural turn in economic geography and employing its ideas to analyze the BRI projects and summarize their construction modes may contribute to the development of both economic geography and the BRI. This paper first briefly reviews the background and research trends of the institutional and cultural turn and then summarizes three major modes of Belt and Road construction, namely, EPC(Engineering Procurement Construction)-based projects, concession-based projects, and FDI; finally, it draws on the institutional and cultural turn to classify the BRI projects according to the two indicators of "Breadth and Depth of Territorial Embeddedness" and "Destructive Effect of a Project and/or Technology" into four types: transformative, supportive, ordinary projects and overseas industrial cooperation parks. Different institutional and cultural sensitivity can be observed for each type of project. The preliminary theorization proposed in this paper may offer a potential framework for further research on the BRI.     

“一带一路”沿线国家投资悖论的形成机理研究

投资与贸易合作是“一带一路”倡议实施的重点。投资者往往会选择低风险且具有高收益潜力的国家或地区进行高投资,然而中国企业对“一带一路”沿线国家的投资却存在高风险与高投资并存的投资悖论现象。本文遴选2013—2018年“一带一路”沿线吸纳中国对外直接投资金额较高且存在较高投资风险的国家,解析这些国家的时空特点,探究投资悖论的形成机理。研究发现：（1）从空间视角看,投资悖论国家大多数为中国的周边邻国。从“一带一路”的空间走向看,海上丝绸之路沿线国家分布较多;从分布密度看,东南亚地区是投资悖论国家分布的集中区。（2）从时间视角看,高风险高投资在时间上具有延续性,6年间有13个国家出现两次以上的投资悖论现象。按投资悖论出现的频次,将“一带一路”沿线国家分为高频国家、中频国家和低频国家。（3）从形成机理看,地缘区位、能源资源、地缘政治、地缘经济和人文社会这五个因素分别从不同的方面作用于投资悖论的产生。     

“一带一路”沿线重点省份旅游经济高质量发展研究

从旅游资源转换效率的视角,以“一带一路”沿线18个重点省份为研究靶区,运用修正的DEA模型等方法探究2008—2017年的旅游经济增长质量的时空演变及发展趋势。研究结论有：① 10 a间,18个重点省份旅游资源转换效率均值仅为0.312,远未达到生产前沿面。② 经过邹检验（Chow test）,2014年为“一带一路”沿线18个重点省份旅游资源转换效率时间序列的突变点。③ 18个重点省份的旅游资源转换效率均存在σ收敛、绝对β收敛和条件β收敛;开放先行区、战略支点区未通过σ收敛检验、战略支点区未通过绝对β收敛。     

中国对“一带一路”沿线直接投资空间格局

2015年3月28日,中国政府正式发布了《推动共建丝绸之路经济带和21世纪海上丝绸之路的愿景与行动》。如何通过对"一带一路"国家和地区直接投资,提升主要产业的国际竞争力,促进中国产业转型升级,实现与沿线国家共同繁荣,已成为当前迫切需要解决的重大课题。现有对外投资理论多基于发达国家的经验,不完全适用于中国;目前的研究侧重从自然资源、市场要素等方面分析中国企业的海外投资动因及影响机制,缺少面向国家战略需求的宏观投资格局研究。本文通过集成统计数据、实地调研和高层访谈等,在回顾国内外对外直接投资研究基础上,提出中国对"一带一路"沿线直接投资空间战略的分析框架,进一步分析中国对沿线国家和地区直接投资的空间分布和产业选择;尔后,剖析投资面临的困境和挑战,并提出中国对沿线地区的空间差异化投资引导战略。     

中国贸易隐含碳净出口的流向及原因分析（英文）

本文使用投入产出模型,基于最新的GTAP8数据库,分析了2004年和2007年中国与发达国家和发展中国家贸易隐含碳流向、结构及变化,结果显示中国均为隐含碳净出口国。基于LMDI法对隐含碳净出口进一步分解发现,影响中国对发达国家和发展中国家隐含碳净出口的因素不同,贸易顺差和排放系数差异是导致中国对发达国家隐含碳净出口的关键因素,行业结构差异和排放系数差异是影响中国对发展中国家净出口的关键原因。这与发达国家、中国和其他发展中国家在全球产业链中的分工密切相关。2004-2007年,中国出口结构逐渐转向高端制造业,生产技术逐渐接近发达国家水平。未来随着中国国内技术进步和产业升级、出口结构优化,隐含碳净出口将会下降,贸易对中国碳排放的驱动力会减弱。     

“一带一路”沿线国家地缘政治风险评估及影响因素

构建科学合理的地缘政治风险评估体系是“一带一路”沿线国家防范和化解地缘政治风险的重要前提。基于事后交易成本构建地缘政治风险评估体系,通过全排列多边形图示指标法、全局莫兰指数以及空间杜宾模型,分析“一带一路”沿线国家地缘政治风险水平、时空分布特征与影响因素。结果表明：1）从时间维度看,“一带一路”沿线国家地缘政治风险呈现“先上升后下降”的态势。2）从空间分布看,沿线国家地缘政治风险集聚特征明显,主要集中在中东和东欧地区,但东亚的地缘政治风险近年有所升级。3）地缘政治风险影响因素研究结果表明,政治稳定、经济自由、经济增长率、教育支出以及自然资源对地缘政治风险有显著的抑制作用。基于此,研究认为“一带一路”沿线国家需要提高政府治理能力,加快国家现代化转型,主动融入“一带一路”区域经济合作框架,提高地缘政治风险抵御能力。