Eurekadumpite, (Cu,Zn)16(TeO3)2(AsO4)3Cl(OH)18·7H2O, a new supergene mineral species

A new mineral eurekadumpite found at the Centennial Eureka Mine in the Tintic district of Juab County in Utah in the United States occurs in the oxidation zone along with quartz, macalpineite, malachite, Zn-bearing olivenite, goethite, and Mn oxides. Eurekadumpite forms spherulites or rosettes up to 1 mm in size and their clusters and crusts up to 1.5 cm² in cavities. Its individuals are divergent and extremely thin (up to 0.5 mm across and less than 1 μm thick) hexagonal or roundish leaflets. The mineral is deep blue-green or turquoise-colored. Its streaks are light turquoise-colored. Its luster is satiny in aggregates and pearly on individual flakes. Its cleavage is (010) perfect and micalike. Its flakes are flexible but inelastic. Its Mohs hardness is 2.5–3.0, and D(meas) = 3.76(2) and D(calc) = 3.826 g/cm³. The mineral is optically biaxial negative, and α = 1.69(1), β ∼ γ = 1.775(5), and 2V _meas = 10(5)°. Its pleochroism is strong: Y = Z = deep blue-green, and X = light turquoise-colored. Its orientation is X = b. The wavenumbers of the bands in the IR spectrum (cm⁻¹; the strong lines are underlined, and w denotes the weak bands) are 3400, 2990, 1980w, 1628, 1373w, 1077, 1010, 860, 825, 803, 721w, 668, 622, 528, 461. The IR spectrum shows the occurrence of the tellurite (Te⁴⁺,O₃)²⁻ and arsenate (As⁵⁺,O₄)³⁻ anionic groups and H₂O molecules; Cu and Zn cations are combined with OH⁻ groups. The chemical composition of eurekadumpite is as follows (wt %, average of 14 electron-microprobe analyses; H₂O determined using the Alimarin method): 0.04 FeO, 36.07 CuO, 20.92 ZnO, 14.02 TeO₂, 14.97 As₂O₅, 1.45 Cl, 13.1 H₂O, O = Cl₂ −0.33, total 100.24. The empirical formula based on 2 Te atoms is (Cu_10.32Zn_5.85Fe_0.01)_Σ16.18(TeO₃)₂(AsO₄)_2.97[Cl_0.93(OH)_0.07]_Σ1(OH)_18.45 · 7.29H₂O. The idealized formula is (Cu,Zn)₁₆(TeO₃)₂(AsO₄)₃Cl(OH)₁₈ · 7H₂O. Eurekadumpite is monoclinic (pseudohexagonal), and the most probable space groups are P2/m, P2, or Pm. The unit-cell parameters refined from the powder X-ray data are as follows: a = 8.28(3), b = 18.97(2), c = 7.38(2) ?, β = 121.3(6)°, V = 990(6) ?³, and Z = 1. The strongest reflections of the X-ray powder pattern (d, ? (I) [hkl]) are as follows: 18.92(100) [010], 9.45(19) [020], 4.111(13) [[`2]\bar 2 01], 3.777(24) [050, [`2]\bar 2 21, 041], 2.692(15) [[`3]\bar 3 11, 151, [`3]\bar 3 02], 2.524(41)[170, [`2]\bar 2 52, [`1]\bar 1 71], 1.558(22) [[`4]\bar 4 82, [`3]\bar 3 .10.1, 024]. The name of the mineral means, firstly, that it was found in specimens from dumps of the Centennial Eureka Mine. In addition, it could mean found in a dump (the Greek word eureka means I have found it). There is an allusion to the great role that dumps of abandoned mines have played in the discovery of new minerals. Type specimens are deposited at the Fersman Mineralogical Museum of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow, at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History in Washington, and at the American Museum of Natural History in New York.     

Biachellaite, (Na,Ca,K)8(Si6Al6O24)(SO4)2(OH)0.5 · H2O, a new mineral species of the cancrinite group

Biachellaite, a new mineral species of the cancrinite group, has been found in a volcanic ejecta in the Biachella Valley, Sacrofano Caldera, Latium region, Italy, as colorless isometric hexagonal bipyramidal-pinacoidal crystals up to 1 cm in size overgrowing the walls of cavities in a rock sample composed of sanidine, diopside, andradite, leucite and hauyne. The mineral is brittle, with perfect cleavage parallel to {10$ \bar 1 $ \bar 1 0} and imperfect cleavage or parting (?) parallel to {0001}. The Mohs hardness is 5. D_meas = 2.51(1) g/cm³ (by equilibration with heavy liquids). The densities calculated from single-crystal X-ray data and from X-ray powder data are 2.515 g/cm³ and 2.520 g/cm³, respectively. The IR spectrum demonstrates the presence of SO₄²⁻, H₂O, and absence of CO₃²⁻. Biachellaite is uniaxial, positive, ω = 1.512(1), ɛ = 1.514(1). The weight loss on ignition (vacuum, 800°C, 1 h) is 1.6(1)%. The chemical composition determined by electron microprobe is as follows, wt %: 10.06 Na₂O, 5.85 K₂O, 12.13 CaO, 26.17 Al₂O₃, 31.46 SiO₂, 12.71 SO₃, 0.45 Cl, 1.6 H₂O (by TG data), −0.10 −O=Cl₂, total is 100.33. The empirical formula (Z = 15) is (Na_3.76Ca_2.50K_1.44)_Σ7.70(Si_6.06Al_5.94O₂₄)(SO₄)_1.84Cl_0.15(OH)_0.43 · 0.81H₂O. The simplified formula is as follows: (Na,Ca,K)₈(Si₆Al₆O₂₄)(SO₄)₂(OH)_0.5 · H₂O. Biachellaite is trigonal, space group P3, a =12.913(1), c = 79.605(5) ?; V = 11495(1) ?³. The crystal structure of biachellaite is characterized by the 30-layer stacking sequence (ABCABCACACBACBACBCACBACBACBABC)_∞. The tetrahedral framework contains three types of channels composed of cages of four varieties: cancrinite, sodalite, bystrite (losod) and liottite. The strongest lines of the X-ray powder diffraction pattern [d, ? (I, %) (hkl)] are as follows: 11.07 (19) (100, 101), 6.45 (18) (110, 111), 3.720 (100) (2.1.10, 300, 301, 2.0.16, 302), 3.576 (18) (1.0.21, 2.0.17, 306), 3.300 (47) (1.0.23, 2.1.15), 3.220 (16) (2.1.16, 222). The type material of biachellaite has been deposited at the Fersman Mineralogical Museum of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, registration number 3642/1.     

Synthesis, crystal structure and crystal chemistry of ferri-clinoholmquistite, ?Li 2Mg 3Fe 3+ 2Si 8O 22(OH) 2

This work reports the synthesis of ferri-clinoholmquistite, nominally _Li2(Mg₃Fe³⁺₂)Si₈O₂₂(OH)₂, at varying f_O2 conditions. Amphibole compositions were characterized by X-ray (powder and single-crystal) diffraction, microchemical (EMPA) and spectroscopic (FTIR, Mössbauer and Raman) techniques. Under reducing conditions ( NNO+1, where NNO = Nickel–Nickel oxide buffer), the amphibole yield is very high (>90%), but its composition, and in particular the FeO/Fe₂O₃ ratio, departs significantly from the nominal one. Under oxidizing conditions ( NNO+1.5), the amphibole yield is much lower (<60%, with Li-pyroxene abundant), but its composition is close to the ideal stoichiometry. The exchange vector of relevance for the studied system is ^M2(Mg,Fe²⁺) ^M4(Mg,Fe²⁺) ^M2Fe³⁺_–1 ^M4Li_–1, which is still rather unexplored in natural systems. Amphibole crystals of suitable size for structure refinement were obtained only at 800 °C, 0.4 GPa and NNO conditions (sample 152), and have C2/m symmetry. The X-ray powder patterns for all other samples were indexed in the same symmetry; the amphibole closest to ideal composition has a = 9.428(1) Å, b = 17.878(3) Å, c = 5.282(1) Å, = 102.06(2)°, V = 870.8(3) ų. Mössbauer spectra show that Fe³⁺ is strongly ordered at M2 in all samples, whereas Fe²⁺ is disordered over the B and C sites. FTIR analysis shows that the amount of ^CFe²⁺ increases for increasingly reducing conditions. FTIR data also provide strong evidence for slight but significant amounts of Li at the A sites.     

K-H3OFe3(SO4)2(OH)6铁矾的XRD研究

根据X射线衍射(XRD)分析发现: A Fe₃(SO₄)₂(OH)₆(A=K⁺、H₃O⁺)系列铁钒的XRD数据十分相近,难以用XRD区别,需通过能谱(EDS)辅助分析,才能区分此类铁矾。另外,此类铁矾的003和107面网间距d随K⁺含量增大而增大,且呈一元三次方程的关系;而033和220面网间距d随K⁺含量增大而减小,呈一元二次方程的关系。对该现象从铁矾晶体结构方面进行解释:K⁺、H₃O⁺离子位于较大空隙中,且沿着Z轴方向排列,当K⁺、H₃O⁺离子之间相互替换时,会导致该铁矾晶体结构在Z轴方向有较明显的变化。     

Shlykovite KCa[Si4O9(OH)] · 3H2O and cryptophyllite K2Ca[Si4O10] · 5H2O, new mineral species from the Khibiny alkaline pluton, Kola Peninsula, Russia

New minerals, shlykovite and cryptophyllite, hydrous Ca and K phyllosilicates, have been identified in hyperalkaline pegmatite at Mount Rasvumchorr, Khibiny alkaline pluton, Kola Peninsula, Russia. They are the products of low-temperature hydrothermal activity and are associated with aegirine, potassium feldspar, nepheline, lamprophyllite, eudialyte, lomonosovite, lovozerite, tisinalite, shcherbakovite, shafranovskite, ershovite, and megacyclite. Shlykovite occurs as lamellae up to 0.02 × 0.02 × 0.5 mm in size or fibers up to 0.5 mm in length usually combined in aggregates up to 3 mm in size, crusts, and parallel-columnar veinlets. Cryptophyllite occurs as lamellae up to 0.02 × 0.1 × 0.2 mm in size intergrown with shlykovite being oriented parallel to {001} or chaotically arranged. Separate crystals of the new minerals are transparent and colorless; the aggregates are beige, brownish, light cream, and pale yellowish-grayish. The cleavage is parallel to (001) perfect. The Mohs hardness of shlykovite is 2.5–3. The calculated densities of shlykovite and cryptophyllite are 2.444 and 2.185 g/cm³, respectively. Both minerals are biaxial; shlykovite: 2V _meas = −60(20)°; cryptophyllite: 2V _meas > 70°. The refractive indices are: shlykovite: α = 1.500(3), β = 1.509(2), γ = 1.515(2); cryptophyllite: α = 1.520(2), β = 1.523(2), γ = 1.527(2). The chemical composition of shlykovite determined by an electron microprobe (H₂O determined from total deficiency) is as follows, wt %: 0.68 Na₂O, 11.03 K₂O, 13.70 CaO, 59.86 SiO₂, 14.73 H₂O; the total is 100.00. The empirical formula calculated on the basis of 13 O atoms (OH/H₂O calculated from the charge balance) is (K_0.96Na_0.09)_Σ1.05Ca_1.00Si_4.07O_9.32(OH)_0.68 · 3H₂O. The idealized formula is KCa[Si₄O₉(OH)] · 3H₂O. The chemical composition of cryptophyllite determined by an electron microprobe (H₂O determined from the total deficiency) is as follows, wt %: 1.12 Na₂O, 17.73 K₂O, 11.59 CaO, 0.08 Al₂O₃, 50.24 SiO₂, 19.24 H₂O, the total is 100.00. The empirical formula calculated on the basis of (Si,Al)₄(O,OH)₁₀ (OH/H₂O calculated from the charge balance) is (K_1.80Na_0.17)_Σ1.97Ca_0.99Al_0.01Si_3.99O_9.94(OH)_0.06 · 5.07H₂O. The idealized formula is K₂Ca[Si₄O₁₀] · 5H₂O. The crystal structures of both minerals were solved on single crystals using synchrotron radiation. Shlykovite is monoclinic; the space group is P2₁/n; a = 6.4897(4), b = 6.9969(5), c = 26.714(2)?, β = 94.597(8)°, V = 1209.12(15)?³, Z = 4. Cryptophyllite is monoclinic; the space group is P2₁/n; a = 6.4934(14), b = 6.9919(5), c = 32.087(3)?, β = 94.680(12)°, V= 1451.9(4)?, Z = 4. The strongest lines of the X-ray powder patterns (d, ?-I, [hkl] are: shlykovite 13.33–100[002], 6.67–76[004], 6.47–55[100], 3.469–45[021], 3.068–57[$ bar 1 $ bar 1 21], 3.042–45[121], 2.945–62[ 23], 2.912–90[025, 12, 211]; cryptophyllite 16.01–100[002], 7.98–24[004], 6.24–48[101], 3.228–22[$ bar 1 $ bar 1 09], 3.197–27[0.0.10], 2.995–47[122], 2.903–84[123, 204, $ bar 1 $ bar 1 24, 211], 2.623–20[028, 08, 126]. Shlykovite and cryptophyllite are members of new related structural types. Their structures are based on a two-layer packet consisting of tetrahedral Si layers linked with octahedral Ca chains. Mountainite, shlykovite and cryptophyllite could be combined into the mountainite structural family. Shlykovite is named in memory of Russian geologist V. G. Shlykov (1941–2007); the name cryptophyllite is from the Greek words meaning concealed and leaf that allude to its layered structure (phyllosilicate) in combination with a lamellar habit and intimate intergrowths with visually indistinguishable shlykovite. Type specimens of the minerals are deposited at the Fersman Mineralogical Museum of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.     

Nanoinclusions of high-pressure hydrous silicate, Mg3Si4O10(OH)2 · n H2O (10?-phase), in mantle olivine: Mechanisms of formation and transformation

The 10?-phase, Mg₃Si₄O₁₀(OH)₂ · nH₂O, where n = 0.65÷2, belongs to the group of dense hydrous magnesium silicates (DHMS), which were produced in experiments and are regarded as hypothetical mineral carriers for H₂O in the mantle. However, DHMS were almost never observed in nature. The only exception is the finding of the 10?-phase as nanoinclusions in olivines from mantle nodules in kimberlites. The inclusions with sizes of a few ten nanometers have a pseudohexagonal habit and are characterized by the presence of voids free of solids. The 10?-phase fills the equatorial parts of the inclusions, and, in the majority of inclusions, it is replaced by the low-pressure serpentine + talc assemblage. Based on the analysis of electron microscope images, a model was proposed for the solid-state formation of inclusions, the precursory material of which was transformed to the 10?-phase with the liberation of a water fluid. According to this model, the formation of hydrous nanoinclusions and their subsequent autoserpentinization occurred without the influx of H₂O from the external medium through the mobilization of intrinsic hydroxyl-bearing point defects trapped during olivine crystallization. The subsequent autoserpentinization of the inclusions occurred during decompression owing to interaction between the inclusion material and the host olivine matrix. The process was accompanied by the partial exhaustion of the fluid phase and the replacement 10?-phase + H₂O = Serp + Tc. The criterion for the credibility of the model is the conservation of the volume of material during the reaction at P = const and T = const. Original Russian Text ? N.R. Khisina, R. Wirth, 2008, published in Geokhimiya, 2008, No. 4, pp. 355–363.     

Burovaite-Ca, (Na,K)4Ca2(Ti,Nb)8[Si4O12]4(OH,O)8·12H2O, a new labuntsovite-group mineral species and its place in low-temperature mineral formation in pegmatites of the Khibiny pluton, Kola Peninsula, Russia

This paper presents data on burovaite-Ca, the first Ti-dominant member of the labuntsovite group with a calcium D-octahedron. The idealized formula of burovaite-Ca is (K,Na)₄Ca₂(Ti,Nb)₈[Si₄O₁₂]₄(OH,O)₈ · 12H₂O. The mineral has been found in the hydrothermal zone of aegirine-microcline pegmatite located in khibinite at Mt. Khibinpakhkchorr, the Khibiny pluton, Kola Peninsula, Russia. Radiaxial intergrowths of burovaite-Ca and labuntsovite-Mn associated with lemmleynite-Ba, analcime, and apophyllite have been identified in caverns within microcline. The mean composition of the mineral is as follows, wt %: 3.72 Na₂O, 2.76 K₂O, 4.22 CaO, 0.47 SrO, 0.23 BaO, 0.01 MnO, 0.30 Fe₂O₃, 0.14 Al₂O₃, 42.02 SiO₂, 17.30 TiO₂, 15.21 Nb₂O₅, 12.60 H₂O (measured); the total is 98.98. Its empirical formula has been calculated on the basis of [(Si,Al)₁₆O₄₈]: {(Na_3.10K_1.07Ca_0.37Sr_0.04Ba_0.04)_4.62}(Ca_1.28Zn_0.01)_1.29(Ti_4.97Nb_2.56Fe_0.08Ta_0.02)_7.63(Si_15.93Al_0.07)₁₆O₄₈(OH_6.70O_0.93)_7.63 · 12H₂O. The strongest lines in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern of burovaite-Ca (I-d ?] are as follows: 70–7.08, 40–6.39, 40–4.97, 30–3.92, 40–3.57, 100–3.25, 70–3.11, 50–2.61, 70–2.49, 40–2.15, 50–2.05, 70–1.712, 70–1.577, and 70–1.444. The structure of burovaite-Ca was solved by A.A. Zolotarev, Jr. The mineral is monoclinic, space group C2/m. The unit-cell dimensions are a = 14.529(3), b = 14.203(3), c = 7.899(1), β = 117.37(1)°, V = 1447.57 ?₃. Burovaite-Ca is an isostructural Ti-dominant analogue of karupm?llerite-Ca and gjerdingenite-Ca. Two stages of mineral formation—pegmatite proper and hydrothermal—have been recognized in the host pegmatite. The hydrothermal stage included K-Ba-Na, Na-K-Ca, and Na-Sr substages. Burovaite-Ca is related to the intermediate Na-K-Ca substage. At the first substage, labuntsovite-Mn and lemmleynite-Ba were formed, and tsepinite-Na, paratsepinite-Nd, and tsepinite-Sr were formed at the final substage. Thus, the sequence of crystallization of labuntsovite-group minerals is characterized by the replacement of the potassium regime by the sodium regime of alkaline solutions in the evolved host pegmatite.     

Alloriite, Na5K1.5Ca(Si6Al6O24)(SO4)(OH)0.5 · H2O, a new mineral species of the cancrinite group

Alloriite, a new mineral species, has been found in volcanic ejecta at Mt. Cavalluccio (Campagnano municipality, Roma province, Latium region, Italy) together with sanidine, biotite, andradite, and apatite. The mineral is named in honor of Roberto Allori (b. 1933), an amateur mineralogist and prominent mineral collector who carried out extensive and detailed field mineralogical investigations of volcanoes in the Latium region. Alloriite occurs as short prismatic and tabular crystals up to 1.5 × 2 mm in size. The mineral is colorless, transparent, with a white streak and vitreous luster. Alloriite is not fluorescent and brittle; the Mohs’ hardness is 5. The cleavage is imperfect parallel to {10 0}. The density measured with equilibration in heavy liquids is 2.35g/cm³ and calculated density (D _calc) is 2.358 g/cm³ (on the basis of X-ray single-crystal data) and 2.333 g/cm³ (from X-ray powder data). Alloriite is optically uniaxial, positive, ω = 1.497(2), and ɛ = 1.499(2). The infrared spectrum is given. The chemical composition (electron microprobe, H₂O determined using the Penfield method, CO₂, with selective sorption, wt %) is: 13.55 Na₂O, 6.67 K₂O, 6.23 CaO, 26.45 Al₂O₃, 34.64 SiO₂, 8.92 SO₃, 0.37 Cl, 2.1 H₂O, 0.7 CO₂, 0.08-O = Cl₂, where the total is 99.55. The empirical formula (Z = 1) is Na_19.16K_6.21Ca_4.87(Si_25.26Al_22.74O₉₆)(SO₄)_4.88(CO₃)_0.70Cl_0.46(OH)_0.76 · 4.73H₂O. The simplified formula (taking into account the structural data, Z = 4) is: [Na(H₂O)][Na₄K_1.5(SO₄)] · [Ca(OH,Cl)_0.5](Si₆Al₆O₂₄). The crystal structure has been studied (R = 0.052). Alloriite is trigonal, the space group is P31c; the unit-cell dimensions are a = 12.892(3), c = 21.340(5) ?, and V = 3071.6(15) ?³. The crystal structure of alloriite is based on the same tetrahedral framework as that of afghanite. In contrast to afghanite containing clusters [Ca-Cl]⁺ and chains ...Ca-Cl-Ca-Cl..., the new mineral contains clusters [Na-H₂O]⁺ and chains ...Na-H₂O-Na-H₂O.... The strongest reflections in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern [d, ? (I, %)(hkl)] are: 11.3(70)(100), 4.85(90)(104), 3.76(80)(300), 3.68(70)(301), 3.33(100)(214), and 2.694(70)(314, 008). The type material of alloriite is deposited in the Fersman Mineralogical Museum, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow. The registration number is 3459/1. Original Russian Text ? N.V. Chukanov, R.K. Rastsvetaeva, I.V. Pekov, A.E. Zadov, 2007, published in Zapiski Rossiiskogo Mineralogicheskogo Obshchestva, 2007, No. 1, pp. 82–89. A new mineral alloriite and its name were accepted by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, Russian Mineralogical Society, May 8, 2006. Approved by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, International Mineralogical Association, August 2, 2006.     

Florencite-(Sm)—(Sm,Nd)Al3(PO4)2(OH)6: A new mineral species of the alunite-jarosite group from the subpolar urals

Florencite-(Sm), a new mineral species of the florencite subgroup, was found in association with xenotime-(Y) in quartz veins of the Maldynyrd Range of the Subpolar Urals as thin zones within rhombohedral crystals of florencite-(Ce) with faceting by { 01[`1]1}\{ 01\bar 11\} and { 10[`1]2}\{ 10\bar 12\} . The thickness of particular florencite-(Sm) zones is 0.01–0.1 mm, and the total thickness of a series of such zones is 1–3 mm. Florencite-(Sm) is colorless and pale pink or pale yellow with white streaks; its Mohs hardness is 5.5–6.0. Its measured and calculated densities are 3.70 and 3.743 g/cm³, respectively. The mineral is transparent, nonpleochroic, and uniaxial (positive), and ω = 1.704(2) and ɛ = 1.713(2). The electron beam’s fluorescence spectrum was 592 nm (intense green luminescence of Sm³⁺) and 558 nm (yellow luminescence of Nd³⁺). The chemical composition was as follows (microprobe, average of 2 WDS, wt %): 0.62 La₂O₃, 3.29 Ce₂O₃, 1.05 Pr₂O₃, 10.31 Nd₂O₃, 12.62 Sm₂O₃, 0.41 Eu₂O₃, 2.30 Gd₂O₃, 0.13 Dy₂O₃, 0.71 SrO, 0.35 CaO, 29.89 Al₂O₃, 26.14 P₂O₅, 0.85 SO₃, 0.09 SiO₂, 88.76 in total; 10.74 H₂O (meas.). The empirical formula based on 14 oxygen atoms is (Sm_0.38Nd_0.32Gd_0.07Ce_0.10Pr_0.03La_0.02Eu_0.01Sr_0.04Ca_0.03)1.0Al_3.04(P_1.91S_0.05Si_0.01)_1.97O₁₄H_5.92. The idealized formula is (Sm,Nd)Al₃(PO₄)₂(OH)₆. Mineral is trigonal, space group R3m, a = 6.972(4), c = 16.182(7) ?, V = 681.2 ?³, Z = 3. The XRD pattern is as follows: dln (I) (hkl): 2.925 (10) (113), 1.881 (6) (303), 2.161 (5) (107), 5.65 (4) (101), and 3.479 (4) (110). The IR spectrum: 466, 510, 621, 1036, 1105, 1223, 2957, and 3374 cm⁻¹.     

Early diagenetic vivianite [Fe3(PO4)2 · 8H2O] in a contaminated freshwater sediment and insights into zinc uptake: A μ-EXAFS, μ-XANES and Raman study

The sediments in the Salford Quays, a heavily-modified urban water body, contain high levels of organic matter, Fe, Zn and nutrients as a result of past contaminant inputs. Vivianite [Fe₃(PO₄)₂ · 8H₂O] has been observed to have precipitated within these sediments during early diagenesis as a result of the release of Fe and P to porewaters. These mineral grains are small (<100 μm) and micron-scale analysis techniques (SEM, electron microprobe, μ-EXAFS, μ-XANES and Raman) have been applied in this study to obtain information upon the structure of this vivianite and the nature of Zn uptake in the mineral. Petrographic observations, and elemental, X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopic analysis confirms the presence of vivianite. EXAFS model fitting of the FeK-edge spectra for individual vivianite grains produces Fe–O and Fe–P co-ordination numbers and bond lengths consistent with previous structural studies of vivianite (4O atoms at 1.99–2.05 Å; 2P atoms at 3.17–3.25 Å). One analysed grain displays evidence of a significant Fe³⁺ component, which is interpreted to have resulted from oxidation during sample handling and/or analysis. EXAFS modelling of the Zn K-edge data, together with linear combination XANES fitting of model compounds, indicates that Zn may be incorporated into the crystal structure of vivianite (4O atoms at 1.97 Å; 2P atoms at 3.17 Å). Low levels of Zn sulphate or Zn-sorbed goethite are also indicated from linear combination XANES fitting and to a limited extent, the EXAFS fitting, the origin of which may either be an oxidation artifact or the inclusion of Zn sulphate into the vivianite grains during precipitation. This study confirms that early diagenetic vivianite may act as a sink for Zn, and potentially other contaminants (e.g. As) during its formation and, therefore, forms an important component of metal cycling in contaminated sediments and waters. Furthermore, for the case of Zn, the EXAFS fits for Zn phosphate suggest this uptake is structural and not via surface adsorption.     

Local relaxation around [6]Cr 3+ in synthetic pyrope–knorringite garnets, [8]Mg 3 [6](Al 1-X Cr X 3+) 2 [4]Si 3O 12, from electronic absorption spectra

Pyrope-knorringite garnets, Mg₃(Al_1-X Cr³⁺_X)₂Si₃O₁₂ with X=0.25, 0.50, and 1.00, were synthesized between 9 and 16 GPa and 1300 and 1600 °C, using multianvil high-pressure techniques. The garnets with X=0.25 and 0.50 are fine-grained, pink and violet in color. The end-member knorringites with X=1.00 are black when compact and gray when coarse-grained. The fine powder is greenish gray in natural light and pale pink under a tungsten lamp. Powder remission spectra in the wavenumber range 30 000–10 000 cm^–1 on finely powdered crystals were measured by two different methods: (I.) by the use of a small integrating sphere for small samples or (II.) microscope-spectrometric measurement using diffusely reflected radiation from a 45° illuminated microsample. Both methods yielded similar diffuse reflectance spectra. The following crystal-field parameters of ^[6]Cr³⁺ were determined for garnets with X=0.25, 0.50, 1.00: 10 Dq=17 856, 17 596, 17 286 cm^–1; and B=654, 677, 706 cm^–1; nephelauxetic ratio =(B_field/B_free)= 0.71, 0.74, 0.77. The -values indicate decreasing covalency of the Cr–O bond with increasing Cr content. The 10 Dq value for together with the mean Cr–O distance in end-member knorringite, 1.96 Å (Novak and Gibbs 1971), were used to calculate from the spectral data, local mean Cr–O distances (Langer 2001a) as a function of composition. The results indicate relatively strong local site relaxation with a value of =0.77.     

Fivegite K4Ca2[AlSi7O17(O2 ? xOHx)][(H2O)2 ? xOH]Cl: A new mineral species from the Khibiny alkaline pluton of the Kola Peninsula in Russia

A new mineral fivegite has been identified in a high-potassium hyperalkaline pegmatite at Mt. Rasvumchorr in the Khibiny alkaline complex of the Kola Peninsula in Russia. This mineral is a product of the hydrothermal alteration of delhayelite (homoaxial pseudomorphs after its crystals up to 2 × 3 × 10 cm in size). Hydrodelhayelite, pectolite, and kalborsite are products of fivegite alteration. The associated minerals are aegirine, potassic feldspar, nepheline, sodalite, magnesiumastrophyllite, lamprophyllite, lomonosovite, shcherbakovite, natisite, lovozerite, tisinalite, ershovite, megacyclite, shlykovite, cryptophyllite, etc. Areas of pure unaltered fivegite are up to 2 mm in width. The mineral is transparent and colorless; its luster is vitreous to pearly. Its Cleavage is perfect (100) and distinct (010). Its Mohs hardness is 4, D(meas) = 2.42(2), and D(calc) = 2.449 g/cm³. Fivegite is optically biaxial positive: α 1.540(1), β 1.542(2), γ 1.544(2), and 2V(meas) 60(10)°. Its orientation is X = a, y = c, and Z = b. Its IR spectrum is given. Its chemical composition (wt %; electron microprobe, H₂O determined by selective sorption) is as follows: 1.44 Na₂O, 19.56 K₂O, 14.01 CaO, 0.13 SrO, 0.03 MnO, 0.14 Fe₂O₃, 6.12 Al₂O₃, 50.68 SiO₂, 0.15 SO₃, 0.14 F, 3.52 Cl, 4.59 H₂O; −O = −0.85(Cl,F)2; total 99.66. The empirical formula based on (Si + Al + Fe) = 8 is H_4.22K_3.44Na_0.39Ca_2.07Sr_0.01Fe_0.01Al_1.00Si_6.99O_21.15F_0.06Cl_0.82(SO₄)_0.02. The simplified formula is K₄Ca₂[AlSi₇O₁₇(O_{2 − x} OH _x ][(H₂O)_{2 − x} OH _x ]Cl (X = 0−2). Fivegite is orthorhombic: Pm2₁ n, a = 24.335(2), b = 7.0375(5), c = 6.5400(6) ?, V = 1120.0(2) ?³, and Z = 2. The strongest reflections of the X-ray powder pattern are as follows (d, ?, (I, %), [hkl]): 3.517(38) [020], 3.239(28) [102], 3.072(100) [121, 701], 3.040(46) [420, 800, 302], 2.943 (47) [112], 2.983(53) [121], 2.880 (24) [212, 402], 1.759(30) [040, 12.2.0]. The crystal structure was studied using a single crystal: R _hkl = 0.0585. The base of fivegite structure is delhayelite-like two-layer terahedral blocks [(Al,Si)₄Si₁₂O₃₄(O_{4 − x} OH _x )] linked by Ca octahedral chains. K⁺ and Cl⁻ are localized in zeolite-like channels within the terahedral blocks, whereas H₂O and OH occur between the blocks. The mineral is named in memory of the Russian geological and mining engineer Mikhail Pavlovich Fiveg (1899–1986), the pioneering explorer of the Khibiny apatite deposits. The type specimen is deposited at the Fersman Mineralogical Museum of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow. The series of transformations is discussed: delhayelite K₄Na₂Ca₂[AlSi₇O₁₉]F₂Cl—fivegite K₄Ca₂[AlSi₇O₁₇(O_{2 − x} OH _x ]Cl—hydrodelhayelite KCa₂[AlSi₇O₁₇(OH)₂](H₂O)_{6 − x} .     

Schüllerite, Ba2Na(Mn,Ca)(Fe3+,Mg,Fe2+)2Ti2(Si2O7)2(O,F)4, a new mineral species from the Eifel volcanic district, Germany

A new heterophyllosilicate mineral schüllerite was found in the L?hley basalt quarry in the Eifel volcanic region, Germany, as a member of the late mineral assemblage comprising nepheline, leucite, augite, phlogopite, magnetite, titanite, fresnoite, barytolamprophyllite, fluorapatite, perovskite, and pyrochlore. Flattened brown crystals of schüllerite up to 0.5 × 1 × 2 mm in size and their aggregates occur in miarolic cavities of alkali basalt. The mineral is brittle, with a Mohs hardness 3–4 and perfect cleavage parallel to (001). D _calc = 3.974 g/cm³. Its IR spectrum is individual and does not contain bands of OH⁻, CO₃²⁻ or H₂O. Schüllerite is biaxial (−), α = 1.756(3), β = 1.773(4), γ = 1.780(4), 2V _meas = 40(20)°. Dispersion is weak, r < ν. Pleochroism is medium X > Y > Z, brown to dark brown. Chemical composition (electron microprobe, mean of five-point analyses, Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺ ratio determined by the X-ray emission spectroscopic data, wt %): 3.55 Na₂O, 0.55 K₂O, 3.89 MgO, 2.62 CaO, 1.99 ArO, 28.09 BaO, 3.43 FeO, 8.89 Fe₂O₃, 1.33 Al₂O₃, 11.17 TiO₂, 2.45 Nb₂O₅, 26.12 SiO₂, 2.12 F, −0.89 -O=F₂, 98.98 in total. The empirical formula is (Ba_1.68Sr_0.18K_0.11Na_1.05Ca_0.43Mn_0.47Mg_0.88Fe_0.44²⁺Fe_1.02³⁺Ti_1.28Nb_0.17Al_0.24)_Σ7.95Si_3.98O_16.98F_1.02. The crystal structure was refined on a single crystal. Schüllerite is triclinic, space group P1, unit cell parameters: a = 5.4027(1), b = 7.066(4), c = 10.2178(1)?, α = 99.816(1), β = 99.624(1), γ = 90.084(1)°, V = 378.75(2) ?³, Z = 1. The strongest lines of the X-ray powder diffraction pattern [d, ?, (I, %)]: 9.96(29), 3.308(45), 3.203(29), 2.867(29), 2.791(100), 2.664(46), 2.609(36), 2.144(52). The mineral was named in honor of Willi Schüller (born 1953), an enthusiastic, prominent amateur mineral collector, and a specialist in the mineralogy of Eifel. Type specimens have been deposited at the Fersman Mineralogical Museum of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, registration no. 3995/1,2.     

Thermodynamics of iron oxides: Part III. Enthalpies of formation and stability of ferrihydrite (∼Fe(OH)3), schwertmannite (∼FeO(OH)3/4(SO4)1/8), and ε-Fe2O3

Enthalpies of formation of ferrihydrite and schwertmannite were measured by acid solution calorimetry in 5 N HCl at 298 K. The published thermodynamic data for these two phases and ε-Fe₂O₃ were evaluated, and the best thermodynamic data for the studied compounds were selected.Ferrihydrite is metastable in enthalpy with respect to α-Fe₂O₃ and liquid water by 11.5 to 14.7 kJ•mol⁻¹ at 298.15 K. The less positive enthalpy corresponds to 6-line ferrihydrite, and the higher one, indicating lesser stability, to 2-line ferrihydrite. In other words, ferrihydrite samples become more stable with increasing crystallinity. The best thermodynamic data set for ferrihydrite of composition Fe(OH)₃ was selected by using the measured enthalpies and (1) requiring ferrihydrite to be metastable with respect to fine-grained lepidocrocite; (2) requiring ferrihydrite to have entropy higher than the entropy of hypothetical, well-crystalline Fe(OH)₃; and (3) considering published estimates of solubility products of ferrihydrite. The ΔG°_f for 2-line ferrihydrite is best described by a range of −708.5±2.0 to −705.2±2.0 kJ•mol⁻¹, and ΔG°_f for 6-line ferrihydrite by −711.0±2.0 to −708.5±2.0 kJ•mol⁻¹.A published enthalpy measurement by acid calorimetry of ε-Fe₂O₃ was re-evaluated, arriving at ΔH°_f (ε-Fe₂O₃) = −798.0±6.6 kJ•mol⁻¹. The standard entropy (S°) of ε-Fe₂O₃ was considered to be equal to S° (γ-Fe₂O₃) (93.0±0.2 J•K⁻¹•mol⁻¹), giving ΔG°_f (ε-Fe₂O₃) = −717.8±6.6 kJ•mol⁻¹. ε-Fe₂O₃ thus appears to have no stability field, and it is metastable with respect to most phases in the Fe₂O₃-H₂O system which is probably the reason why this phase is rare in nature.Enthalpies of formation of two schwertmannite samples are: ΔH°_f (FeO(OH)_0.686(SO₄)_0.157•0.972H₂O) = −884.0±1.3 kJ•mol⁻¹, ΔH°_f (FeO(OH)_0.664(SO₄)_0.168•1.226H₂O) = −960.7±1.2 kJ•mol⁻¹. When combined with an entropy estimate, these data give Gibbs free energies of formation of −761.3 ± 1.3 and −823.3 ± 1.2 kJ•mol⁻¹ for the two samples, respectively. These ΔG_f° values imply that schwertmannite is thermodynamically favored over ferrihydrite over a wide range of pH (2-8) when the system contains even small concentration of sulfate. The stability relations of the two investigated samples can be replicated by schwertmannite of the “ideal” composition FeO(OH)_3/4(SO₄)_1/8 with ΔG°_f = −518.0±2.0 kJ•mol⁻¹.     

Crystal field and covalency of octahedral chromium in natural [8](Mg1?xCax) 3[6] (Al0.67Cr0.33)2Si3O12 garnets from upper mantle rocks

In the course of a thorough study of the influences of the second coordination sphere on the crystal field parameters of the 3d ^N -ions and the character of 3d ^N –O bonds in oxygen based minerals, 19 natural Cr³⁺-bearing (Mg,Ca)-garnets from upper mantle rocks were analysed and studied by electronic absorption spectroscopy, EAS. The garnets had compositions with populations of the ^[8] X-sites by 0.881 ± 0.053 (Ca + Mg) and changing Ca-fractions in the range 0.020 ≤ w _Ca[8] ≤ 0.745, while the ^[6] Y-site fraction was constant with x _Cr³⁺ _[6] = 0.335 ± 0.023. The garnets had colours from deeply violet-red for low Ca-contents (up to x _Ca = 0.28), grey with 0.28 ≤ x _Ca ≤ 0.4 and green with 0.4 ≤ x _Ca. The crystal field parameter of octahedral Cr³⁺ 10Dq decreases strongly on increasing Ca-fraction from 17,850 cm⁻¹ at x _Ca[8] = 0.020 to 16,580 cm⁻¹ at x _Ca[8] = 0.745. The data could be fit with two model which do statistically not differ: (1) two linear functions with a discontinuity close to x _Ca[8] ≈ 0.3,

Thermal expansion along the NaAlSi2O6–NaFe3+Si2O6 and NaAlSi2O6–CaFe2+Si2O6 solid solutions

The high temperature volume and axial parameters for six C2/c clinopyroxenes along the NaAlSi₂O₆–NaFe³⁺Si₂O₆ and NaAlSi₂O₆–CaFe²⁺Si₂O₆ joins were determined from room T up to 800°C, using integrated diffraction profiles from in situ high temperature single crystal data collections. The thermal expansion coefficient was determined by fitting the experimental data according to the relation: ln(V/V ₀) = α(T − T ₀). The thermal expansion coefficient increases by about 15% along the jadeite–hedenbergite join, whereas it is almost constant between jadeite and aegirine. The increase is related to the Ca for Na substitution into the M2 site; the same behaviour was observed along the jadeite–diopside solid solution, which presents the same substitution at the M2 site. Strain tensor analysis shows that the major deformation with temperature occurs in all samples along the b axis; on the (010) plane the higher deformation occurs in jadeite and aegirine at a direction almost normal to the tetrahedral–octahedral planes, and in hedenbergite along the projection of the longer M2–O bonds. The orientation of the strain ellipsoid with temperature in hedenbergite is close to that observed with pressure in pyroxenes. Along the jadeite–aegirine join instead the high-temperature and high-pressure strain are differently oriented.     

Was the lethal eruption of Lake Nyos related to a double CO2/H2O density inversion?

The 1986 lethal eruption of Lake Nyos (Cameroon) was caused by a sudden inversion between deep, CO₂-loaded bottom lake waters and denser, gas-free surface waters. A deep CO₂ source has been found in fluid inclusions which occur predominantly in clinopyroxenes from lherzolitic mantle xenoliths, brought to the surface by the last erupted alkali basalts. P–T conditions of CO₂ trapping correspond to a gas density equal (or higher) than that of liquid water. It is suggested that this dense CO₂, found in many ultrabasic mantle xenoliths worldwide, has accumulated at km depth, below a column of descending lake water. It may remain in a stable state for a long period, as long as the temperature is above the density inversion temperature for pure H₂O/CO₂ systems. At an estimated depth of about 3 km, cooling by descending waters (to about 30 °C) induces a density inversion for the upper part of the CO₂ reservoir. This causes a constant, regular upstream of low-density CO₂ which, in its turn, feeds the shallower lake density inversion.     

Experimental investigations of the reaction path in the MgO–CO2–H2O system in solutions with various ionic strengths,and their applications to nuclear waste isolation

The reaction path in the MgO–CO₂–H₂O system at ambient temperatures and atmospheric CO₂ partial pressure(s), especially in high-ionic-strength brines, is of both geological interest and practical significance. Its practical importance lies mainly in the field of nuclear waste isolation. In the USA, industrial-grade MgO, consisting mainly of the mineral periclase, is the only engineered barrier certified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for emplacement in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for defense-related transuranic waste. The German Asse repository will employ a Mg(OH)₂-based engineered barrier consisting mainly of the mineral brucite. Therefore, the reaction of periclase or brucite with carbonated brines with high-ionic-strength is an important process likely to occur in nuclear waste repositories in salt formations where bulk MgO or Mg(OH)₂ will be employed as an engineered barrier. The reaction path in the system MgO–CO₂–H₂O in solutions with a wide range of ionic strengths was investigated experimentally in this study. The experimental results at ambient laboratory temperature and ambient laboratory atmospheric CO₂ partial pressure demonstrate that hydromagnesite (5424) (Mg₅(CO₃)₄(OH)₂ · 4H₂O) forms during the carbonation of brucite in a series of solutions with different ionic strengths. In Na–Mg–Cl-dominated brines such as Generic Weep Brine (GWB), a synthetic WIPP Salado Formation brine, Mg chloride hydroxide hydrate (Mg₃(OH)₅Cl · 4H₂O) also forms in addition to hydromagnesite (5424).