CMIP6模式对亚洲陆地生态系统的模拟评估与预估

基于国际耦合模式比较计划第六阶段（CMIP6）模式模拟以及观测数据,评估了9个CMIP6模式对亚洲地区叶面积指数（LAI)、总初级生产力（GPP）和净初级生产力（NPP）的模拟性能。模拟评估结果表明,9个CMIP6模式能够较好地模拟出亚洲地区陆地生态系统LAI、GPP和NPP的时空分布特征。综合来看,多模式集合（MME）模拟效果最佳,其模拟的LAI、GPP和NPP与观测的空间相关系数分别达到0.90、0.81和0.89,均方根误差在0.5左右。在此基础上,利用MME结果进一步预估了亚洲地区陆地生态系统在SSP1-2.6、SSP2-4.5和SSP5-8.5情景下的未来变化。总体而言,亚洲地区LAI、GPP和NPP到21世纪末都呈现上升趋势。其中,温室气体高排放情景下的上升趋势大于温室气体低排放情景下的上升趋势,亚洲中高纬度地区的增幅大于低纬度地区的增幅。从区域平均来看,到21世纪末期,与当今气候态相比,北亚LAI、GPP和NPP的增幅最大,其在SSP5-8.5情景下分别增加68%、106%和90%;东南亚增幅最小,分别为15%、34%和39%。在SSP1-2.6情景下,北亚LAI、GPP和NPP在21世纪末的增幅分别为23%、29%和26%;东南亚分别为3%、10%和11%,意味着未来全球变暖背景下亚洲区域陆地生态系统变绿和固碳幅度加强。     

Assessment of CMIP5 historical simulations of rainfall over Southeast Asia

Theoretical and Applied Climatology - We present preliminary analyses of the historical (1986–2005) climate simulations of a ten-member subset of the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project...     

Impact of the Asian-Pacific Oscillation on early autumn precipitation over Southeast China:CMIP6 evaluation and projection

本文对32个CMIP6模式对8月亚洲-太平洋涛动(APO)与我国东南初秋(9月)降水及大气环流联系的模拟能力进行了评估,并就SSP2-4.5和SSP5-8.5情景下,未来2021-2040年(近期),2041-2060(中期)和2081-2100(长期)期间二者联系的变化进行了预估.基于模式对APO与我国东南初秋降水之间显著正相关关系的再现能力,选取3个模式作为“最优”模式集合(BMME).研究表明,BMME较好地模拟了与APO相关的我国东南初秋降水和大气环流异常,且在再现APO与我国东南部降水的正相关关系,以及东亚高空急流(EAJ)经向位移与APO和我国东南部初秋降水之间的负相关关系方面均优于单个模式.总体而言,未来不同SSP情景下尽管APO与EAJ之间仍呈负相关关系,但APO与我国东南初秋降水以及EAJ与我国东南降水的关系将呈减弱确实.此外,不同模式预估结果之间存在明显差异,仅对未来APO-EAJ关系的预估表现出较好的一致性.     

CMIP6模式对亚洲中高纬区极端温度变化的模拟及预估

利用观测的亚洲中高纬区逐日最高、最低气温和CMIP6计划中28个全球气候模式资料,系统评估了CMIP6模式对亚洲中高纬区日最高温(TXx)和日最低温(TNn)的模拟性能,并对其未来演变趋势进行了科学预估.主要结论如下:1)CMIP6大部分模式能合理地模拟亚洲中高纬区TXx和TNn自南向北、自西到东逐渐降低的空间分布特征...     

CMIP6全球气候模式对中亚极端降水模拟能力的评估

本文基于NOAA再分析逐日降水数据和22个CMIP6模式的降水模拟数据,选取了6个极端降水指数,从气候态和相对变率两个角度对CMIP6模式在中亚地区极端降水方面的模拟能力开展了评估。结果表明,在气候态方面,中亚地区降水的空间分布表现为由西南向东北递增,其东南部山地迎风侧降水偏多;多模式集合对SDII(简单降水强度)和CDD(最大无雨期)模拟的平均误差分别为-5.43%和0.45%,对PRCPTOT(年总降水量)、R1mm(有雨日数)、Rx5day(最大连续五日降水)和CWD(最大雨期)的模拟结果存在明显高估,且在中亚东南部高海拔地区误差偏高。在相对变率方面,多模式集合模拟的中亚极端降水的相对变率偏小,其中对CWD的模拟效果相对较好,平均误差为-4.78%;对R1mm的模拟效果最差,平均误差为-36.16%。模式间进行比较,TaiESM1、EC-Earth3-Veg-LR和GFDL-ESM为22个CMIP6模式中模拟能力最好的前3个模式。     

Super-ensemble of three RCMs for climate projection over East Asia and Taiwan

Runs of three regional climate models (RCMs) dynamically downscaling the outputs of atmosphere?Cocean coupling general circulation models (AOGCMs) are studied. These RCMs are NCAR-MM5, NCEP-RSM (Regional Spectral Model), and Purdue-PRM (Purdue Regional Model). A useful approach is developed to compare the variability, error, and spatial distribution of model-simulated results with respect to the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) datasets over East Asia and seven sub-regions during the 1990s. The results show that NCEP-RSM outperforms the other two in meeting criteria selected on evaluating the model performance. Furthermore, three super-ensemble approaches are tested on merging RCMs?? outputs. The inverse of the square error summation (ISES) method is selected as a suitable method with a generally good performance during the verification period. The projected future climate changes by ISES indicate larger temperature increases over high-latitude continent and smaller over low-latitude maritime areas. Rainfall will increase in summer over the central simulation domain, i.e. the eastern China, but decrease in winter, which are clearly linked to the variation in the synoptic airflows. Also, a more frequent occurrence of extreme rainfall events than what happened in the 1990s is projected. The projection over Taiwan suggests strong warming in summer, followed by autumn, winter, and spring. The interaction between the synoptic flow and the local terrain affects significantly the changes in precipitation. In general, larger change of the variability of rainfall will be over areas with lesser rainfall in the future, while lesser change will be over areas with more projected rainfall.     

Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin,China

Theoretical and Applied Climatology - This study compared precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 GCMs over Yulin City, China. The performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 GCMs in replicating Global...     

A projection of extreme climate events in the 21st century over east Asia using the community climate system model 3

A series of coupled atmosphere-ocean-land global climate model (GCM) simulations using the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Climate System Model 3 (CCSM3) has been performed for the period 1870–2099 at a T85 horizontal resolution following the GCM experimental design suggested in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). First, a hindcast was performed using the atmospheric concentrations of three greenhouse gases (CO₂, CH₄, N₂O) specified annually and globally on the basis of observations for the period 1870–1999. The hindcast results were compared with observations to evaluate the GCM’s reliability in future climate simulations. Second, climate projections for a 100-year period (2000–2099) were made using six scenarios of the atmospheric concentrations of the three greenhouse gases according to the A1FI, A1T, A1B, A2, B1, and B2 emission profiles of the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. The present CCSM simulations are found to be consistent with IPCC’s AR4 results in the temporal and spatial distributions for both the present-day and future periods. The GCM results were used to examine the changes in extreme temperatures and precipitation in East Asia and Korea. The extreme temperatures were categorized into warm and cold events: the former includes tropical nights, warm days, and heat waves during summer (June–July–August) and the latter includes frost days, cold days, and cold surges during winter (December–January–February). Focusing on Korea, the results predict more frequent heat waves in response to future emissions: the projected percentage changes between the present day and the late 2090s range from 294% to 583% depending on the emission scenario. The projected global warming is predicted to decrease the frequency of cold extreme events; however, the projected changes in cold surge frequency are not statistically significant. Whereas the number of cold surges in the A1FI emission profile decreases from the present-day value by up to 24%, the decrease in the B1 scenario is less than 1%. The frequency and intensity of extreme precipitation events year-round were examined. Both the frequency and the intensity of these events are predicted to increase in the region around Korea. The present results will be helpful for establishing an adaptation strategy for possible climate change nationwide, especially extreme climate events, associated with global warming.     

基于CMIP6模式的东南亚极端降水未来预估及热动力成因研究

本文利用26个CMIP6全球气候模式,研究了21世纪末东南亚极端降水事件的变化,通过分解水汽收支方程分析降水变化的动力和热力效应。结果表明,21世纪末(2071—2100年)相对历史参考期(1985—2014年),东南亚大部分地区的气候态降水、极端降水事件的发生频率和强度均显著增加。除大于10 mm降水日数(R10mm)外,其他极端降水指数在SSP5-8.5情景下的变化幅度比SSP2-4.5情景更大。其中强降水量贡献率(R95pTOT)的增长幅度最大,在SSP2-4.5(SSP5-8.5)情景下增加22％(41％)。极端降水变化对气候变暖的响应存在明显的区域性差异。加里曼丹岛将出现更短时集中的极端降水。苏门答腊岛南部的极端降水频率略有减小,且可能发生较强的持续性干旱事件。进一步分析水汽收支方程可知,SSP2-4.5(SSP5-8.5)情景下,热力作用项对P-E(降水减蒸发)的变化贡献为65％(64％),并且模式间一致性更高。而动力作用项对P-E的变化呈抵消趋势,贡献为35％(36％)。这说明相比大尺度环流变化,大气比湿变化引起的水汽辐合是未来东南亚降水量增多的主要因子。     

云南初夏干湿演变特征和基于CMIP6模式模拟的预估分析

使用1961—2020年的观测数据和2021—2080年的模式预估数据,首先分析了云南初夏干燥度指数（aridity index,AI）的演变特征和影响因子相对贡献,然后采用国际耦合模式比较计划第六阶段（CMIP6）中的20个全球模式,对SSP1-2.6、SSP2-4.5以及SSP5-8.5情景下云南初夏未来干湿变化进行了预估研究。结果表明：(1) 1961—2020年云南初夏气候整体湿润,但为变干燥的趋势,有明显的年代际变化特征,1960s、1970s以及2000s气候相对湿润,其余年代相对干燥,2000s（2010s）为1961年以来最湿润（干燥）的10年。(2) 2021—2080年在3种排放情景下,云南初夏气候较1995—2014年均为变干燥的趋势,SSP1-2.6、SSP2-4.5以及SSP5-8.5情景下,AI分别减少13.9%、17.9%以及24.9%,西南部将可能是湿润度降幅最大值中心。(3) 1961—2020年,降水对云南初夏气候干湿变化的贡献大于潜在蒸散量;而2021—2080年,潜在蒸散量对气候变干燥的贡献大于降水量,且随排放情景的增高和时间推移,其贡献将逐渐增大。     

Regional climate simulations of summer diurnal rainfall variations over East Asia and Southeast China

This study evaluates the performance of RegCM3 (Regional Climate Model Version 3) in simulating the East Asian rainfall, with emphasis on the diurnal variations of rainfall over Southeast China during the 1998–2002 summer (June–August) seasons. The evaluation focuses on the sensitivity of the choice of cumulus parameterizations and model domain. With the right setup, the spatial and temporal evolution of diurnal rainfall over Southeast China, which has not been well simulated by past studies, can be accurately simulated by RegCM3. Results show that the Emanuel cumulus scheme has a more realistic simulation of summer mean rainfall in East Asia, while the GFC (Grell scheme with the Frisch-Chappell convective closure assumption) scheme is better in simulating the diurnal variations of rainfall over Southeast China. The better performance of these two schemes [relative to the other two schemes in RegCM3: the Kuo scheme and the GAS (Grell scheme with the Arakawa–Schubert closure assumption) scheme] can be attributed to the reasonable reproduction of the major formation mechanism of rainfall—the moisture flux convergence—over Southeast China. Furthermore, when the simulation domain covers the entire Tibetan Plateau, the diurnal variations of rainfall over Southeast China are found to exhibit a noticeable improvement without changes in the physics schemes.     

Future change of extreme temperature climate indices over East Asia with uncertainties estimation in the CMIP5

How well the climate models simulate extreme temperature over East Asia and how the extreme indices would change under anthropogenic global warming are investigated. The indices studied include hot days (HD), tropical nights (TN), growing degree days (GDD), and cooling degree days (CDD) in summer and heating degree days (HDD) and frost days (FD) in winter. The representative concentration pathway 4.5 (RCP 4.5) experiments for the period of 2075–2099 are compared with historical simulations for the period of 1979–2005 from 15 coupled models that are participated in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). To optimally estimate future change and its uncertainty, groups of best models are selected based on Taylor diagrams, relative entropy, and probability density function (PDF) methods previously suggested. Overall, the best models’ multi-model ensemble based on Taylor diagrams has the lowest errors in reproducing temperature extremes in the present climate among three methods. Selected best models in three methods tend to project considerably different changes in the extreme indices from each other, indicating that the selection of reliable models are of critical importance to reduce uncertainties. Three groups of best models show significant increase of summerbased indices but decrease of the winter-based indices. Over East Asia, the most significant increase is seen in the HD (336 ± 23.4% of current climate) and the most significant decrease is appeared in the HDD (82 ± 4.2%). It is suggested that the larger future change in the HD is found over in the Southeastern China region, probably due to a higher local maximum temperature in the present climate. All of the indices show the largest uncertainty over Southeastern China, particularly in the TN (~3.9 times as large as uncertainty over East Asia) and in the HD (~2.4). It is further noted that the TN reveals the largest uncertainty over three East Asian countries (~1.7 and 1.4 over Korea and Japan, respectively). These future changes in extreme temperature events have an important implication for energy-saving applications and human molarity in the future.     

从检验CMIP5气候模式看CMIP6地球系统模式的发展

世界气候研究项目（WCRP）正在组织第六次气候模式对比计划（CMIP6）,全球各个气候模式组正在抓紧发展新模式和做多种相关的数值试验。此时,有必要回顾大量CMIP5气候模式模拟气候变化的效果,以便展望CMIP6的地球系统模式的可能发展前景。目前IPCC第六次评估报告正在启动和进行中,其中所用的主要工具是CMIP6的地球系统模式。     

CMIP5西北太平洋气候变率的模拟评估

利用观测海温资料和CMIP5模式模拟结果分析西北太平洋(120°E~120°W,20~60°N)海表温度的气候态和年代际变化特征。结果表明,所选22个模式可以较好地模拟出西北太平洋海表温度的气候特征及其年际、年代际变化特征;模式模拟的海表温度总体标准偏差在黑潮延伸体区域最大;绝大多数模式能模拟出海表温度的第一EOF模态;西北太平洋海表温度具有较明显的年代际振荡现象,13/22的模式模拟的海表温度存在明显的年代际振荡,同时海表温度气候态的模拟偏差对其周期振荡模拟的影响较大,尤其在黑潮延伸体区域。     

基于CMIP5资料的东亚夏季环流的BMA预测研究

利用CMIP5的17个全球气候系统模式对500 hPa位势高度场的年代际回报结果,采用距平相关系数、均方根误差、平均绝对误差及连续等级概率评分4种指标,评估了贝叶斯模式平均(Bayesian model average,BMA)预报方法对东亚夏季环流的回报能力,并与最优单模式MIROC5和多模式简单集合平均结果进行了比较。结果表明,BMA方法对东亚夏季500 hPa位势高度场的回报效果是最好的,优于最优单模式MIROC5和简单集合平均的回报结果。BMA模型能产生高集中度的概率密度函数,并包含了多模式集成回报不确定性的定量估计。此外,BMA方法对西太平洋副热带高压的年际变率也有较好的回报效果,对西太平洋副热带高压的预报,选取60~70%概率下的结果更为合理。     

Linkage between the Asian-Pacific Oscillation and winter precipitation over southern China:CMIP6 simulation and projection

评估了30个CMIP6模式对冬季亚洲-太平洋涛动(APO)与中国南方降水关系的模拟性能.结果表明,有12个模式能够再现APO与中国南方降水间的显著负相关关系.当APO位于正位相时,东亚西风急流北移,中国南方呈现异常下沉运动和水汽通量辐散,不利于降水的发生.进一步利用这12个模式,集合预估了SSP5-8.5情景下冬季APO与中国南方降水的联系.21世纪下半叶期间,两者的关系仍显著,但比现在略有减弱.这种减弱可能由于东亚急流位置经向摆动同中国南方降水的联系减弱所致.     

Evaluation of spring persistent rainfall over East Asia in CMIP3/CMIP5 AGCM simulations

The progress made fi＇om Phase 3 to Phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project （CMIP3 to CMIP5） in simulating spring persistent rainfall （SPR） over East Asia was examined from the outputs of nine atmospheric general circulation models （AGCMs）. The majority of the models overestimated the precipitation over the SPR domain, with the mean latitude of the SPR belt shifting to the north. The overestimation was about 1mm d-1 in the CMIP3 ensemble, and the northward displacement was about 3°, while in the CMIP5 ensemble the overestimation was suppressed to 0.7 mm d-i and the northward shift decreased to 2.5°. The SPR features a northeast-southwest extended rain belt with a slope of 0.4°N/°E. The CMIP5 ensemble yielded a smaller slope （0.2°N/°E）, whereas the CMIP3 ensemble featured an unre- alistic zonally-distributed slope. The CMIP5 models also showed better skill in simulating the interannual variability of SPR. Previous studies have suggested that the zonal land-sea thermal contrast and sensible heat flux over the southeastern Tibetan Plateau are important for the existence of SPR. These two ther- mal factors were captured well in the CMIP5 ensemble, but underestimated in the CMIP3 ensemble. The variability of zonal land-sea thermal contrast is positively correlated with the rainfall amount over the main SPR center, but it was found that an overestimated thermal contrast between East Asia and South China Sea is a common problem in most of the CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. Simulation of the meridional thermal contrast is therefore important for the future improvement of current AGCMs.