青海省枪口南银多金属矿床地质特征、控矿因素及矿床成因

枪口南银多金属矿床地处东昆仑多金属成矿带东段,枪口—哈龙休玛海西-燕山期铁、银、铅、锌、铜、金、钼成矿亚带部分,成矿地质条件优越。枪口南银多金属矿区目前已圈定9条矿化带,21个矿体,主要矿种有金、银、铜、铅、锌、钼等,矿石类型主要为构造热液(脉)型铜铅锌银矿石、构造蚀变岩型金矿石。枪口南矿区构造-岩浆活动强烈,印支期—燕山期构造岩浆活动为矿区成矿提供了热源、成矿物质,区内NE向断裂控制区内金、铜、铅锌等矿体的产出,NW向断裂组控制着区内金、银矿(化)体。NW向断裂组,是区内重要控矿构造;区内中部发现的Ⅳ号含矿斑岩体,具有斑岩型矿床蚀变特征,显示其具有斑岩成矿条件。枪口南银多金属矿床成因有构造热液(脉)型、构造蚀变岩型和斑岩型。     

白秧坪铅锌多金属矿集区东矿带成矿地球化学作用与成矿年龄

通过成矿期方解石的C、O、Sr和含硫矿物的S、Pb同位素,成矿期方解石Sm-Nd测年研究,探讨白秧坪矿集区东矿带矿床成因。测试结果表明,白秧坪矿集区东矿带方解石δ13C_PDB值变化范围-4.0‰~2.3‰,平均值-0.2‰,δ18O_PDB值范围-27.2‰~20.4‰,平均值-14.1‰,δ18O_SMOW值范围2.9‰~24.4‰,平均值16.4‰;方解石Sr同位素值变化范围0.707669~0.710115,平均值0.709320;硫化物δ34S_V-CDT值分布范围-20.2‰~1.3‰,平均值约-8.8‰,天青石δ34S_V-CDT值分布范围为17.1‰~19.4‰,平均值约18.0‰;Pb同位素测试结果中,206Pb/204Pb的变化范围为18.553~18.857,207Pb/204Pb变化范围为15.501~15.826,208Pb/204Pb变化范围为38.54~39.456;成矿阶段方解石Sm-Nd等时线年龄为29.5±1.7 Ma。对测试结果的研究表明,白秧坪矿集区东矿带碳质的来源较为均一,矿石中热液方解石碳质源自地层中碳酸盐岩溶解,成矿流体来自地层水和大气降水,属于盆地卤水流体系统;成矿物质硫来自海水硫酸盐的还原作用,成矿早期以有机质还原硫为主,成矿后期以生物还原硫为主;金属成矿物质来自沉积地层和盆地基底;测定白秧坪矿集区东矿带铅锌成矿年龄为29.5±1.7 Ma,与地质年龄限定的较为吻合。      

Giant Mineral Deposits and Their Geodynamic Setting in the Lanping Basin, Yunnan, China

There are giant mineral deposits, including the Jinding Zn-Pb and Baiyangping Ag-Co-Cu, and otherimportant mineral deposits (e.g., Baiyangchang Ag-Cu, Jinman Cu deposits, etc.) in the Lanping Mesozoic-Cenozoic Basin, Yunnan Province, China. The tabular ore-bodies and some veins hosted in terrestrial clastic rocks of the Mesozoic-Cenozoic age and no outcropping of igneous rocks in the giant deposits lead to the proposal of syngenetic origin, but the giant mineral deposits are not stratabound (e.g. MVT, sandstone- and Sedex-type). They formed in a continental red basin with intense crust movement. The mineralization is controlled by structures and lithology and occurs in different strata, and no sedimentary nature and no exhalative sediments are identified in the deposits. The deposits show some relations with organic matter (now asphalt and petroleum) and evaporates (gypsum). The middle-low-temperature (mainly 110℃ to 280℃) mineralization took place at a depth of about 0.9 km to 3.1 km during the early     

云南澜沧江中南段多金属成矿谱系分析

基于GIS空间分析技术,对云南澜沧江中南段多金属矿床的赋矿地层时间谱系、容矿构造空间谱系和矿床成因谱系进行了较系统的分析.研究表明,下-中元古界、三叠系、泥盆系、二叠系是本区最重要的赋矿层位,有两个聚矿期和多个时代地层含矿的特点,不同时代地层的含矿性具有多样性和专属型特征,元古宙火山沉积为主的建造是铁-铜、钨-锡矿为主的赋矿层位,晚古生代-中生代早期是沉积、裂谷火山活动强烈时期,金、铜、铅、锌、银、汞、锑、钨、锡多金属矿床高度聚集.自东向西为中生代坳陷区金、铜、镍成矿带,思茅-龙洞河晚古生代-三叠纪沉积盆地铜、铅、锌、银成矿带,岩浆弧地块钨、锡、铅-锌、铁成矿带,浅变质岩基底铅-锌-银、铁成矿带,被动边缘活动带金、铅-锌-银、锡成矿区和保山-镇康微地块铅-锌、铜、铁、汞成矿带,构成了容矿构造空间谱系.全区多金属矿床有沉积、沉积改造、岩浆-变质热液、火山沉积-火山热液四大成矿谱系,14种成矿类型,铜多金属、铅-锌-银、锡-钨矿床是研究区最具找矿前景的优势矿种.     

滇西兰坪盆地白秧坪Pb-Zn-Cu-Ag多金属矿床东矿带成矿年代学探讨

白秧坪Pb-Zn-Cu-Ag多金属矿集区夹持于金沙江和澜沧江断裂之间,隶属兰坪盆地北部,分为东、西2个矿带。文章采用闪锌矿、方铅矿的Rb-Sr法和成矿阶段方解石的Sm-Nd法,对白秧坪Pb-Zn-Cu-Ag多金属矿床东矿带华昌山和下区五矿段进行了成矿年代厘定,获得方铅矿以及闪锌矿和方铅矿的矿物组合Rb-Sr等时线年龄为(32.8±1.5)Ma,方解石的Sm-Nd等时线年龄为(33.32±0.43)Ma。研究表明,通过对特定矿床的主要矿石矿物采用Rb-Sr法和Sm-Nd法获得的年龄在误差范围内是一致的,从而起到了相互验证的作用,并对矿床的成矿背景具有一定的指示性。通过成矿年龄的探讨,认为东矿带铅锌为主的矿化期主要产生于青藏高原东缘晚碰撞阶段(40~26)Ma,伴随印度-亚洲大陆碰撞造山,形成逆冲推覆构造和赋矿地层,控制了Pb-Zn矿床的形成和发育。该期Pb-Zn矿床与兰坪盆地金顶和西矿带Pb-Zn矿床、囊谦盆地Pb-Zn矿床和沱沱河盆地Pb-Zn矿床具有一定的可比性。     

云南白秧坪银多金属矿集区成矿流体特征及成矿机制

云南白秧坪银多金属矿集区是滇西兰坪盆地内新发现的矿集区,属东特提斯—喜马拉雅成矿域的一部分。通过流体包裹体的类型、均一温度和盐度的研究分析,结合流体包裹体的化学成分和C、H、O同位素资料及成矿地质条件的综合分析,提出流体包裹体主要具有盆地沉积卤水及大气降水的特征,但成矿流体具有壳幔混合来源的特征。这些特征与该区特定的地质背景和演化历史密切相关。兰坪盆地是在澜沧江和金沙江两条深大断裂之间发展起来的一个拉分盆地,这两条深断裂连同盆地中央的中轴断裂,不仅控制了盆地的发生和发展过程,而且也控制了盆地内成矿流体的来源及银、铜等多金属矿床的成矿作用。因此认为成矿作用是流体混合作用、有机质和膏盐地层的还原作用等综合作用的结果。     

内蒙古鄂伦春旗那吉河铅锌银矿床地质特征及成因

那吉河铅锌银矿床产出于大兴安岭成矿带北段,目前所控制的资源储量规模达到中型,是该区近年来为数不多的找矿成果之一。矿体主要赋存于侏罗系上统流纹岩、火山碎屑岩和安山岩中,呈平缓倾斜的似层状或透镜状,受层间构造裂隙系统控制。成矿流体主要来自火山期后热液,后期有地表水的加入。成矿物质主要为深部来源（幔源）,以及对古老地层中的成矿物质的萃取。矿床形成时代为燕山中-晚期,与中国东部中生代大规模成矿事件时间一致。矿床类型为与中酸性火山岩浆侵入作用有关的中-低温火山热液型矿床。认为在已知矿床深部有可能存在斑岩型矿床,矿床边部发现银品位达几千×10-6的银矿化,有望找到独立的银矿床。     

Sensitive High-Resolution Ion Microprobe U-Pb Zircon and 40Ar-39Ar Muscovite Ages of the Yinshan Deposit in the Northeast Jiangxi Province, South China

The Yinshan deposit in the Jiangnan tectonic belt in South China consists of Pb‐Zn‐Ag and Cu‐Au ore bodies. This deposit contains approximately 83 Mt of the Cu‐Au ores at 0.52% Cu and 0.8 g/t Au, and 84 Mt of the Pb‐Zn‐Ag ores at 1.25% Pb, 1.02% Zn and 33.3 g/t Ag. It is hosted by low‐grade metamorphosed sedimentary rocks and mafic volcanic rocks of the lower Mesoproterozoic Shuangqiaoshan Group, and continental volcanic rocks of the Jurassic Erhuling Group and dacitic subvolcanic rocks. The ore bodies mainly consist of veinlets of sulfide minerals and sulfide‐disseminated rocks, which are divided into Cu‐Au and Pb‐Zn‐Ag ore bodies. The Cu‐Au ore bodies occur in the area close to a dacite porphyry stock (No. 3 stock), whereas Pb‐Zn‐Ag bodies occur in areas distal from the No. 3 stock. Muscovite is the main alteration mineral associated with the Cu‐Au ore bodies, and muscovite and chlorite are associated with the Pb‐Zn‐Ag ores. A zircon sensitive high‐resolution ion microprobe U‐Pb age from the No. 3 dacite stock suggests it was emplaced in Early Jurassic. Three ⁴⁰Ar‐³⁹Ar incremental‐heating mineral ages from muscovite, which are related to Cu‐Au and Pb‐Zn‐Ag mineralization, yielded 179–175 Ma. These muscovite ages indicate that Cu‐Au mineralization occurred at 178.2±1.4 Ma (2σ), and Pb‐Zn‐Ag mineralization at 175.4±1.2 Ma (2σ) and 175.3±1.1 Ma (2σ), which supports a restricted period for the mineralization. The Early Jurassic ages for the mineralization at Yinshan are similar to that of the porphyry Cu mineralization at Dexing in Jiangnan tectonic belt, and suggest that the polymetallic mineralization occurred in a regional transcompressional tectonic regime.     

陕西八方山-银母寺铅锌矿床外围成矿条件及找矿方法探讨

八方山-银母寺铜铅锌成矿带位于凤太金铅锌矿集区西部的次级热水沉积盆地中，成矿条件优越，已探明八方山大型铅锌矿床、银母寺中型铅锌矿床及多个小型铅锌矿床。目前已进入寻找隐伏铜铅锌矿阶段，找矿靶区的确定和找矿方法的选择显得尤为重要。通过对带内典型矿床的控矿条件进行分析，矿床明显受一定的层位、热水沉积岩相和次级紧闭（倒转）背斜等因素综合控制。在已知矿床延伸地段及与其控矿背斜平行的次级背斜构造部位，优选甘沟铅锌铜矿点、尖端山东西部及杨家湾铜（铅锌）矿点等为主要找矿靶区，需开展物探工作、大比例尺地质测量及工程验证等综合方法进行找矿勘查。     

The Lower Changjiang (Yangzi/Yangtze River) metallogenic belt, east central China: intrusion- and wall rock-hosted Cu–Fe–Au, Mo, Zn, Pb, Ag deposits

The lower valley of Changjiang, from Wuhan of the Hubei Province in the west to Zhenjiang of the Jiangsu Province in the east, contains more than 200 polymetallic (Cu–Fe–Au, Mo, Zn, Pb, Ag) deposits and is one of the most important metallogenic belts in China. This metallogenic belt, situated at the northern margin of the Yangzi craton and bordered by the Dabieshan ultrahigh pressure metamorphic belt to the north, consists mainly of Cambrian–Triassic marine clastic sedimentary rocks and carbonate and evaporite rocks, which overlay a Precambrian basement and are intruded by Yanshanian (205 to 64 Ma) granitoid intrusions and subvolcanic complexes. Repeated tectonism from Late Proterozoic to Triassic resulted in extensively developed networks of faults and folds involving the Cambrian–Triassic sedimentary strata and the Precambrian basement. The Yanshanian granitoid intrusions and subvolcanic complexes in the Lower Changjiang metallogenic belt are characterized by whole-rock δ¹⁸O of +8‰ to +10‰, initial ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr of 0.704 to 0.708, and εNd^t from −10 to −17 and have been interpreted to have originated from mixing between juvenile mantle and old crustal materials. Also, the Yanshanian granitoids exhibit eastward younging and increase in alkalinity (i.e., from older calc–alkaline in the west to younger subalkaline–alkaline in the east), which are related to oblique collision between the Yangzi and Sino-Korean cratons and tectonic evolution from early compressional to late extensional or rifting regimes. Most polymetallic deposits in the Lower Changjiang metallogenic belt are clustered in seven districts where the Yanshanian magmatism is particularly extensive: from west to east, Edong, Jiurui, Anqing–Guichi, Luzhong, Tongling, Ningwu and Ningzhen. Mineralization is characterized by the occurrence of three distinct types of orebodies in individual deposits: orebodies in Yanshanian granitoid intrusions, skarn orebodies at the contact zones between the Yanshanian intrusions and Late Paleozoic–Early Mesozoic sedimentary rocks, and stratabound massive sulfide orebodies in the Late Paleozoic–Early Mesozoic sedimentary strata. The most important host sedimentary strata are the Middle Carboniferous Huanglong Formation, Lower Permian and Lower–Middle Triassic carbonate and evaporite rocks. The intrusion-hosted and skarn orebodies exhibit well-developed zonation in alteration assemblages, metal contents, and isotopic compositions within individual deposits, and apparently formed from hydrothermal activities related to the Yanshanian magmatism. The stratabound massive sulfide orebodies in the Late Paleozoic–Early Mesozoic sedimentary strata have long been suggested to have formed from sedimentary or volcano-sedimentary exhalative processes in shallow marine environments. However, extensive research over the last 40 years failed to produce unequivocal evidence for syngenetic mineralization. On the basis of geological relationships and isotope geochemical characteristics, we propose a carbonate-hosted replacement deposit model for the genesis of these stratabound massive sulfide orebodies and associated skarn orebodies. This model suggests that epigenetic mineralization resulted from interactions between magmatic fluids evolved from the Yanshanian intrusions with carbonate and evaporite wall rocks. Mineralization was an integral but distal part of the larger hydrothermal systems that formed the proximal skarn orebodies at the contact zones and the intrusion-hosted orebodies. The stratabound massive sulfide deposits of the Lower Changjiang metallogenic belt share many features with the well-studied, high-temperature, carbonate-hosted replacement deposits of northern Mexico and western United States, particularly with respect to association with small, shallow granitoid complexes, structural and stratigraphic controls on mineralization, alteration assemblages, geometry of orebodies, metal association, metal zonation and isotopic systematics.     

新疆和静县查岗诺尔铁矿床FeⅠ矿体围岩蚀变特征

新疆和静县查岗诺尔铁矿床位于伊犁微板块北缘之博洛科努早古生代岛弧带,属于阿吾拉勒金、铜、铅、锌、铁成矿带东段。矿区出露地层主要为下石炭统大哈拉军山组火山岩和上石炭统伊什基里克组火山岩,两者为断层接触关系。由于成矿矿浆的多期次活动,查岗诺尔铁矿广泛发育围岩蚀变,形成沿断裂带分布的带状蚀变带。通过研究发现,矿床主矿体FeⅠ号主矿体的围岩蚀变情况,按不同蚀变矿物组合,自东向西可分出石榴石带、绿帘石-阳起石带、阳起石-磁铁矿带、蚀变大理岩带和阳起石带,对应三期蚀变作用。各阶段的矿物共生组合分别为：磁铁矿＋透辉石＋石榴石、磁铁矿＋阳起石＋绿帘石、磁铁矿-石榴石-阳起石-绿帘石-石英-碳酸盐。矿区蚀变是由高、中温火山热液交代中酸性火山碎屑岩而形成。     

Mineralization age and sources of ore‐forming material of the Nanmushu Zn‐Pb deposit in the Micangshan Tectonic Belt at the northern margin of the Yangtze Craton,China: Constraints from Rb‐Sr dating and Sr‐Pb isotopes

The Nanmushu Zn‐Pb deposit, hosted by the Neoproterozoic Dengying Formation dolostone, is located in the eastern part of the Micangshan tectonic belt at the northern margin of the Yangtze Craton, China. This study involves a systematic field investigation, detailed mineralogical study, and Rb‐Sr and Pb isotopic analyses of the deposit. The results of Rb‐Sr isotopic dating of coexisting sphalerite and galena yield an isochron age of 486.7 ± 3.1 Ma, indicating the deposit was formed during the Late Cambrian to Early Ordovician. This mineralization age is interpreted to be related to the timing of destruction of the paleo‐oil reservoir in the Micangshan tectonic belt. All initial ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr ratios of sphalerite and galena (0.70955–0.71212) fall into the range of the Mesoproterozoic Huodiya Group basement rocks (0.70877–0.71997) and Dengying Formation sandstone (0.70927–0.71282), which are significantly higher than those of Cambrian Guojiaba Formation limestone (0.70750–0.70980), Cambrian Guojiaba Formation carbonaceous slate (0.70766–0.71012), and Neoproterozoic Dengying Formation dolostone (0.70835–0.70876). Such Sr isotope signatures suggest that the ore strontium was mainly derived from a mixed source, and both of the Huodiya Group basement rocks and Dengying Formation sandstone were involved in ore formation. Both sphalerite and galena are characterized by an upper‐crustal source of lead (²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb = 17.849–18.022, ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁴Pb = 15.604–15.809, and ²⁰⁸Pb/²⁰⁴Pb = 37.735–38.402), and their Pb isotopes are higher than, but partly overlap with, those of the Huodiya Group basement rocks, but differ from those of the Guojiaba and Dengying Formations. This suggests that the lead also originated from a mixed source, and the Huodiya Group basement rocks played a significant role. The Sr and Pb isotopic results suggest that the Huodiya Group basement rocks were one of the most important sources of metallogenic material. The geological and geochemical characteristics show that the Nanmushu Zn‐Pb deposit is similar to typical Mississippi Valley type, and the fluid mixing may be a reasonable metallogenic mechanism for Nanmushu Zn‐Pb deposit.     

兰坪盆地白秧坪Cu-Pb-Zn-Ag多金属矿集区元素共生分异机制及物质来源

兰坪白秧坪Cu-Ag多金属矿集区夹持于金沙江和澜沧江断裂之间,属兰坪-思茅中新生代坳陷带之兰坪盆地北部,可分东矿带和西矿带二部分。本文通过对白秧坪金属矿集区东西2个矿带的矿石矿物电子探针分析、成矿元素含量和组合分析及S同位素的讨论得出:(1)东西2个矿带矿石矿物组合类型及微量元素组合特征具明显不同,前者矿石矿物组分较为简单,西带较为复杂,不仅有Pb、Zn和Cu的独立矿物,还存在Co和Bi的矿物;(2)东矿带Ag、As、Cd、Pb、Sb和Zn的富集从南到北依次减弱,Bi的富集依次增强,Cu的富集趋势越往北越富集,亏损元素为Co、Cr、Ni和V;西矿带Ag、Pb、Zn的富集属吴底厂和李子坪矿段最富集,而Cu则在小丫口和白秧坪矿段最富集。亏损元素为Ba、Co、Cr、Ni和V,但各个矿段这些元素的亏损程度有所不同,有的矿段部分元素有稍富集趋势;(3)Co、Ni和Cr等微量元素西带高于东带,而Sr、Pb、Zn和Ba元素则东带高于西带,与各自的矿物组合类型一致,且元素的共生分异机制与构造分带存在一定的耦合关系;(4)兰坪盆地火山岩为白秧坪多金属矿集区提供了主要物源,Mo、Co和Ni等元素显示其成矿可能与隐伏基性-超基性岩浆有关的深部来源有关;S同位素特征表明东西矿带金属硫化物硫源均以幔源为主。     

鄂西北地区银金多金属矿床地质特征与成矿规律

鄂西北地区指湖北省武当山及其西北部等地,位于青峰断裂北侧,是秦岭成矿带的重要组成部分,以产银、金等多金属而闻名,蕴含了银洞沟、许家坡、佘家院、六斗等大中型银金(铅锌)或金(锑)矿床。根据区内矿床分布特征及控制因素,以十堰—鲍峡断裂为界将其划分为北带与南带。北带多以金、金锑矿床为主,沿郧阳—郧西断裂两侧分布,矿床多产在上覆陡山沱组地层和古生界地层中;南带主要有银洞沟银金矿床、许家坡金银矿床,矿床集中产于新元古界武当山群。区内矿床均受NW向韧性韧脆性剪切带及其次级断裂控制。碳氢氧同位素组成显示区内银金、金矿床成矿流体以变质热液为主,后期混入了大气降水,而金锑矿床可能为大气降水主导。硫同位素组成显示成矿流体的区域活动性和地层硫源特征。根据成矿元素的富集特征,下伏武当山群Cu、Pb、Zn、Au、Ag元素富集,在上覆陡山沱组、灯影组及古生界地层中依次出现Ag-Au、Au-Ag、Au、Au-Sb矿床,而在研究区西部的陕西境内泥盆纪地层有大量的Au-Sb、Hg-Sb矿。区内成矿元素的垂向分布特征符合地壳连续模式,矿床形成与地层本身具有较高丰度有密切联系,并在构造控制下就位。结合矿床地质、成矿流体及成矿时代,认为鄂西北地区银金、金、金锑矿床是形成于三叠纪古特提斯洋缝合过程中洋陆增生体制下的造山型矿床。     

Types,features, and prospecting potential for Mesozoic metal ore deposits in Zhejiang Province,southeast China

The geotectonic units of Zhejiang Province include the Yangtze Plate in the northwest juxtaposed against the South China fold system in the southeast along the Jiangshan–Shaoxing fault. The South China fold system is further divided into the Chencai–Suichang uplift belt and the Wenzhou–Linhai geotectogene belt, whose boundary is the Yuyao–Lishui fault. The corresponding metallogenic belts are the Mo–Au(–Pb–Zn–Cu) metallogenic belt in northwest Zhejiang, the Chencai–Suichang Au–Ag–Pb–Zn–Mo metallogenic belt, and the coastal Ag–Pb–Zn–Mo–Au metallogenic belt. The main Mesozoic metal ore deposits include epithermal Au–Ag(Ag), hydrothermal vein-type Ag–Pb–Zn(Cu), and porphyry–skarn-type Mo and vein-type Mo deposits. These ore bodies are related to the Mesozoic volcanic-intrusive structure: the epithermal Au–Ag(Ag) deposits are represented by the Zhilingtou Au–Ag deposit and Houan Ag deposit and their veins are controlled by volcanic structure; the hydrothermal vein-type Ag–Pb–Zn deposits are represented by the Dalingkou Ag–Pb–Zn deposit and also controlled by volcanic structure; and the porphyry–skarn-type Mo deposits are represented by the Tongcun Mo deposit and the vein-type Mo deposits are represented by the Shipingchuan Mo deposit, all of which are related to granite porphyries. These metal ore deposits have close spatio-temporal relationships with each other; both the epithermal Au–Ag(Ag) deposits and the hydrothermal vein-type Ag–Pb–Zn deposits exhibit vertical zonations of the metallic elements and form a Mo–Pb–Zn–Au–Ag metallogenetic system. These Jurassic–Cretaceous deposits may be products of tectonic-volcanic-intrusive magmatic activities during the westward subduction of the Pacific Plate. Favourable metallogenetic conditions and breakthroughs in the recent prospecting show that there is great resource potential for porphyry-type deposits (Mo, Cu) in Zhejiang Province.     

Isotopes and Geochronology of the Meixian-type Pb-Zn-(Ag)Deposits,Central Fujian Rift,South China:Implications for Geological Events

Central Fujian Rift is another new and important volcanogenic massive sulfide Pb-Zn polymetallic metallogenetic belt. In order to find out the material genesis and mineralization period of Meixian-type Pb-Zn-Ag deposits, S and Pb isotope analysis and isotope geochronology of ores and wall rocks for five major deposits are discussed. It is concluded that the composition of sulfur isotope from sulfide ore vary slightly in different deposits and the mean value is close to zero with the 834S ranging from -3.5‰ to ＋5.6‰ averaging at ＋2.0‰, which indicates that the sulfur might originate from magma or possibly erupted directly from volcano or was leached from ore-hosted volcanic rock. The lead from ores in most deposits displays radioactive genesis character （206pb/204pb〉18.140, 207Pb/204pb〉15.584, 208pb/204pb〉38.569） and lead isotope values of ores are higher than those of wall rocks, which indicates that the lead was likely leached from the ore-hosted volcanic rocks. Based on isotope data, two significant Pb-Zn metallogenesis are delineated, which are Mid- and Late-Proterozoic sedimentary exhalative metailogenesis （The single zircon U-Pb, Sm-Nd isochronal and Ar-Ar dating ages of ore- hosted wall rocks are calculated to be among 933-1788 Ma.） and Yanshanian magmatic hydrothermal superimposed and alternated metallogenesis （intrusive SHRIMP zircon U-Pb and Rb-Sr isochronal ages between 127-154 Ma）.     

陕西商洛马角寺钼矿区土壤地球化学特征及找矿前景——地球化学找矿的典型实例

陕西商洛马角寺钼矿位于小秦岭多金属成矿带西部,矿区出露元古界至新生界地层,区内褶皱和断裂较为发育。1∶50 000水系沉积物测量在本区圈出Mo、Pb、Zn等元素异常,指示有多金属找矿前景。在区内开展1∶10 000土壤测量工作,并对取得的大量数据进行统计分析,研究总结矿区土壤地球化学特征,显示本区Mo、(Au)为成矿元素,Ag、Pb、Zn等为指示元素;同时,在区内再次圈出Mo、Ag、Pb、Zn等元素异常,异常再现性较好。运用1∶2 000地球化学剖面对土壤异常进行查证,发现一条含钼矿化构造带(Q1),从中圈出Mo矿体多条。综合研究1∶10 000地球化学特征显示,本区仍有Mo、(Au)矿床的找矿前景。     

俄罗斯贝辰加镍-铜硫化物矿床研究进展

贝辰加镍-铜硫化物矿床位于俄罗斯北极圈内科拉半岛西北部,是一个世界级镍-铜矿集区。矿集区目前共发现25个含工业矿体的侵入体,分东、西2个矿带,已探明镍资源量470×104t,品位1.2%,铜储量350×104t,品位0.9%,与俄罗斯诺里尔斯克、加拿大萨德伯里、中国金川等矿床并列为世界级大型铜镍硫化物矿床。贝辰加杂岩体由4套古元古代火山-沉积旋回构成,含矿的为第四套火山-沉积旋回皮尔咖加维建造。矿集区内的火山-沉积作用发生在1940~2500Ma之间,成矿作用发生在1950~1990Ma之间,矿化作用发生在古元古代该地区岩浆演化的晚期阶段。贝辰加镍-铜矿赋矿岩石为富铁苦橄岩,具有高铁、低Al2O3,高Ti O2、Zr和其他不相容元素的特点,强烈富集LREE,地球化学特征类似于板内玄武岩或碱性玄武岩。矿床成矿模式为地幔柱分支分异成的贝辰加岩体侵入裂陷槽,其西部矿体侵入至沉积地层之上,东部矿体侵入到沉积地层内部。硫通过岩浆侵位过程中的同化作用进入岩浆,形成硫化物熔融体,并在后期经历了构造变形、热液叠加等作用后形成了浸染状、角砾状等多种类型的矿化。     

抽拉—逆冲岩片控矿研究

抽拉—逆冲岩片构造是杨志华等在研究秦岭造山带过程中提出的一种关于大陆造山带形成与演化的全新构造观。通过西秦岭造山带腹地的西成矿田西汉水群的解体和再划分，结合必要的测试分析，首次在该区发现元古宇地层单元。该地层单元无论在变质程度，还是在变形层次、序列、样式上均与古生界存在巨大差别。经详细的构造解析及区域地质的调研，我们认为该区元古宇是在晚三叠世由西向东抽拉—逆冲至地表的，西成矿田中矿床分布严格受抽拉—逆冲岩片控制，而且西成矿田中最大的矿床——厂坝铅锌矿是产于元古宇而不是泥盆系中。因此，过去在该区建立的热水沉积成矿模式的基础已不复存在。我们结合抽拉—逆冲岩片构造思想，提出了抽拉—逆冲岩片构造控矿模式，建立了不同岩片系统与相应的不同类型矿床相互对应的关系。这为大陆造山带成矿理论的研究提供了新的思维。     

Noble Gas and Stable Isotopic Constraints on the Origin of the Ag–Cu Polymetallic Ore Deposits in the Baiyangping Area,Yunnan Province,SW China

The Lanping basin, Yunnan province, SW China, is located at the juncture of the Eurasian and Indian Plates in the eastern part of the Tibetan Plateau. The Lanping basin, in the Sanjiang Tethyan metallogenic province, is a significant Cu–Ag–Zn–Pb mineralized belt in China that includes the largest sandstone‐hosted Zn–Pb deposit in the world, the Jinding deposit, as well as several Ag–Cu deposits (the Baiyangping and Jinman deposits). These deposits, with total reserves of over 16.0 Mt Pb + Zn, 0.6 Mt Cu, and 7,000 t Ag, are mainly hosted in Meso‐Cenozoic clastic rocks and are dominantly controlled by two Cenozoic thrust systems developed in the western and eastern segments of the basin. The Baiyangping, Babaoshan, and Hetaoqing ore deposits are representative of the epithermal base metal deposits in the Lanping basin. The microthermometric data show that the ore‐forming fluids for these deposits were low temperature (110–180 °C) and had bimodal distribution of salinity at moderate and mid to high salinities (approximately 2–8 wt.% and 18–26 wt.% NaCl equivalent). The C and O isotope data indicate that the ore‐forming fluids were related to hot basin brines. We present new He and Ar isotope data on volatiles released from fluid inclusions contained in sulfides and in barite in these three deposits. ³He/⁴He ratios of the ore‐forming fluids are 0.01 to 0.14 R/Ra with a mean of 0.07 Ra (where R is the ³He/⁴He ratio and Ra is the ratio for atmospheric helium). This mean value is intermediate to typical ³He/⁴He ratios for the crust (R/Ra = 0.01 to 0.05) and the ratio for air‐saturated water (R/Ra = 1). The mean ratio is also significantly lower than the ratios found for mantle‐derived fluids (R/Ra = 6 to 9). The ⁴⁰Ar/³⁶Ar ratios of the ore‐forming fluids range from 298 to 382 with a mean of 323. This value is slightly higher than that for the air‐saturated water (295.5). The ³He/⁴He ratios of fluids from the fluid inclusions imply that the ore‐forming fluid for the Baiyangping, Babaoshan, and Hetaoqing deposits was derived from the crust and that any mantle‐derived He was negligible. The content of the radiogenic Ar ranges between 0.2 to 20.4%, and the proportion of air‐derived ⁴⁰Ar averages 94.1%. This indicates that atmospheric Ar was important in the formation of these deposits but that some radiogenic ⁴⁰Ar was derived from crustal rocks. Based on these observations coupled with other geochemical evidence, we suggest that the ore‐forming fluids responsible for the formation of the Ag–Cu–Pb–Zn polymetallic ore deposits in the Baiyangping area of the Lanping basin were mainly derived from crustal fluids. The fluids may have mixed with some amount of air‐saturated water, but there was no significant involvement of mantle‐derived fluids.