Discussion/comments regarding “Trends in<Emphasis Type="Italic"> p</Emphasis>CO<Subscript>2</Subscript> and sea–air CO<Subscript>2</Subscript> flux over the global open oceans for the last two decades” by Y. Iida,A. Kojima,Y. Takatani,T. Nakano,H. Sugimoto,T. Midorikawa,M. Ishii

A paper by Iida et al. that was recently published in this journal (J Oceanogr 17:637–661, 2015) presented trends in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in surface seawater and the estimated sea–air carbon dioxide flux over the global open oceans for the last two decades. The purpose of the present discussion is to demonstrate that the formula used by Iida et al. in their assessments can also be employed to estimate the sea–air carbon dioxide flux based on long-term wind statistics, i.e., based on data showing how the mean wind speed 10 m above the sea surface has varied over a long period. Examples of the application of this approach are given here, based on long-term wind statistics for the northern North Sea and the North West Shelf of Australia.     

Discussion of “Experimental investigation of impact generated tsunami; related to a potential rock slide,Western Norway” by G. Sælevik,A. Jensen,G. Pedersen [Coastal Eng. 56 (2009) 897–906]

This paper is a discussion of Sælevik et al. (2009). Their comparison between block and granular model results is described in more detail, along with a discussion of five parameters which may be in general responsible for deviations between block and granular models. New small scale physical model tests have been performed to support some of the statements made. Finally, it is argued that the use of physical model testing based on simplified geometries are justified in practice and normally produce results that are considerably better than an order of magnitude.