从板块构造到地体

从板块构造的发生、发展到地体概念的提出，论述了地体解析和拼贴构造，并根据中国东部的地体研究，特别是中国东北那丹哈达地体和日本美浓地体的对比研究，论述了亚洲东部中生代构造发展史，认为在侏罗纪时，亚洲大陆边缘的地体拼贴活动已经开始，形成了拼贴沉积的复合地体；白垩纪时由于大陆边缘的侧向挤压和离散作用，这些地体产生左行运动和变形；早第三纪晚期由于日本海的扩张，形成了弧形的日本列岛。     

四川攀西拼贴构造

攀枝花－西昌地区位于扬子板块的西南缘。文章运用地体学说，根据断裂、沉积建造、岩浆活动和地球物理等标志的地体解析方法，将其划分为六大地体。并探讨了晋宁期以来，各地体拼合和离散的历史。研究表明该区在地质历史中构造面貌是不断变化的，是一典型的拼贴构造。     

桂北四堡群火山岩形成环境及构造意义

通过野外地质、岩石化学、稀土配分、微量元素等的综合分析表明,桂北四堡群火山岩形成于火山岛弧的构造环境,由四堡群组成的地质体是中元古代位于扬子大陆边缘以南的岛弧地体,中元古代末期该地体与扬子大陆边缘发生碰撞拼贴造山作用,这一作用决定了中、晚元古代桂北及邻区的大陆边缘构造及其演化过程。     

怀玉山地体略论

地质，地球化学和地球物理的综合分析表明，以赣东北断裂带，东乡－江山－绍兴断裂带和宁波－嵊泗断裂带围限的地区是一外来地体，其形成的构造环境与边缘海相当。晋宁期，该地体与扬子大陆边缘九岭区发生碰撞拼贴造山作用，相伴形成了一系列的碰撞造山构造。     

中生代东亚大陆边缘构造演化

摘　要　根据东亚陆缘增生带生物古地理、放射虫时代研究的进展并结合同位素年代及东亚 地区火山活动、构造演化探讨了中生代东亚大陆与古太平洋板块之间的运动学关系及俯冲带 后退特征。中、晚三叠世那丹哈达岭、美浓等地体还位于北纬１２°以内及赤道附近,晚侏罗世 到达中高纬度。东亚活动大陆边缘开始于中侏罗世末,在此之前属转换大陆边缘。洋壳板块 向大陆下俯冲之后,由于地体拼贴引起俯冲带快速、长距离后退。     

新疆北部古生代大陆增生构造

古生代亚洲中部是一幅两陆夹一洋、洋中多地体的构造图案，大地构造框架与现代西南太平洋格局十分相似。中亚造山带是晚古生代复杂地体的拼贴带。新疆北部古生代存在4类成因的8个地体构造。它们以裂解陆块地层块体、海山和火山弧的形式散布在中蒙大洋中，诸地体间是一系列的小洋盆。晚古生代，这些地体开始彼此拼贴并导致强烈推覆作用。石炭纪末－二叠纪初，中蒙大洋闭合，散布其中的诸地体分别增生到塔里木大陆北缘和西伯利亚大陆南缘。北天山－准噶尔地区6条蛇绿岩带记录了诸地体间碰撞事件。     

川西双鱼石构造反转的有限元模拟证据

川西双鱼石研究区位于龙门山构造带北段，近年双鱼石区块进行的油气勘探证明该区具有良好的油气资源条件，查明该区构造发育特征和构造演化历史对区内油气勘探和开发具有重要意义。本文通过野外地质调研和地震资料解释，认为双鱼石研究区具有构造正反转特征；通过有限元模拟分析，印证了双鱼石研究区构造演化经历了晚三叠世之前被动大陆边缘环境，发育高角度正断层，而后在燕山期和喜山期受到龙门山造山运动影响构造反转，早期高角度正断层上下相邻软弱层诱发逆断层。     

东澳的地体增生与大陆生长

澳洲大陆向海洋方向的生长是现今保存在新英格兰造山带的地体逐渐增生的结果。这个造山带是众多以断层为界的构造地层地体的拼贴,其中包括火山弧(大陆边缘火山弧和洋内岛屿火山弧)、前弧盆地和俯冲杂岩。其主体属中晚古生代时期。在每一地体向澳洲大陆边缘增生期间或期后,都有横推断层作用造成某些地体解体成一系列不连续的构造岩块。含有各种外来岩块且以蛇纹岩为基质的混杂岩带标志着主要地体缝合线的存在。这些     

地体学说的兴起及其意义

一、地体学说产生的背景自七十年代初期以来,随着大陆边缘构造研究的沉入开展和古地磁学方法的广泛使用,在北美科迪勒拉地区产生了构造地层地体(Tectonstratigraphic terrane)理论。这一学说的出现,引起了地质学家们的关注和兴趣。美、加、日等国学者共同努力,很快使研究工作扩展到了北起阿留中群岛,南至南极大陆的整个环太平洋地区。在原来认为均一的构造岩相带中,识别出了大小不等、性质不同的许多地体,成功地解释     

粤西古水地区寒武纪地层研究

粤西古水地区区域上位于扬子板块与华夏地块的交接地带,为明确其构造性质,对该区寒武纪地层的沉积环境及构造背景进行分析。综合分析岩石类型及其组合特征,确认研究区以深水盆地和陆棚为主。通过地球化学特征分析,该区寒武纪砂岩中主量元素显示出被动大陆边缘的特征,而微量元素不同程度显示出大陆岛弧或活动大陆边缘信息。综合分析,认为该区处于被动大陆边缘更合适。     

那丹哈达岭地层与地体的关系

<正> 位于中国东北隅的那丹哈达岭(实为完达山北段,近年来地质文献中多称为那丹哈达岭),是我国北方唯一出露海相中生代地层的地区。该区森林覆盖面广,全面认识地层有困难;相对出露较多的硅质岩又缺乏大化石;此外对该区构造演化历史的认识也影响了对地层归属的研究。王秀璋(1959)根据放射虫和藻类的研究将地层划分为上三叠统镇江岩     

The Nadanhada Terrane

Abstract The Nadanhada terrane, a Jurassic disrupted terrane in Heilongjiang Province of China, is principally composed of Permo- Carboniferous limestone and greenstone, Triassic bedded chert and middle Jurassic siliceous shale, all enclosed within younger (presumably Late Jurassic- Early Cretaceous) clastics. Palaeontological and lithological characteristics and structural features of these formations are entirely identical to those of the Mino terrane of the Japanese Islands. Prior to opening of the Sea of Japan, these terranes formed a single superterrane together with the Western Sikhote-Alin terrane. Tectono-stratigraphic terranes very similar to the Nadanhada and Mino terranes are also found in the Ryukyu are, the Philippines and probably in Borneo. All these terranes constituted a belt of accretionary complexes during Late Jurassic and / or Early Cretaceous time along the eastern continental margin of Asia after completion of the Triassic collage of the Chinese continent.     

中国东北地块群及其构造演化

东北地块群主要有额尔古纳、兴华、松嫩、佳木斯和兴凯等地块,它们都不是从西伯利亚克拉通分裂出来的,而都具有独立的演化史.额尔古纳、兴华地块参与到西伯利亚板块东南大陆边缘古亚洲洋弧盆体系中,组成岛弧-山弧或弧后盆地的一部分;松嫩、佳木斯和兴凯地块分别为泛古洋和古太平洋作用区内亲西伯利亚和亲华北的地块,具有前白垩纪较复杂的演化史.在较详细讨论了东北地块群的构造演化的基础上,认为东北大地构造格架,除可以划分出西伯利亚板块和华北板块外,还应划分出滨太平洋松嫩-佳木斯联合地块、环太平洋兴凯地块、胶辽地块和那丹哈达地体.     

First evidence for the Middle Triassic volcanism in South Primorye

A detailed study of a relatively well-exposed fragment of the Barabash Formation in the southern part of the Voznesenka terrane is carried out to specify the geodynamic settings of the Permian volcanogenic and volcanogenic-sedimentary complexes in South Primorye. It is established that the basaltic flows juxtaposed in the studied sequence originated from sharply different sources. The geochemical characteristics indicate that the basalts from the sequence base were presumably derived by melting of oceanic lithospheric mantle or asthenosphere, while the source of the overlying basalts was lithospheric mantle reworked by a subduction process. The basalts are subsequently overlain by tuffaceous–terrigenous and terrigenous rocks and limestones with remains of Capitanian (Middle Permian) fauna. Accessory zircons extracted from the tuffaceous–terrigenous rocks yield an U–Pb concordant age of 233.3 ± 3.3 Ma (Middle Triassic Ladinian Stage) for the youngest zircon population. The obtained data lead us to conclude that the Barabash Formation is a tectonostratigraphic rather than stratigraphic unit and may be a fragment of the Triassic accretionary wedge. The obtained data cast doubt on the accepted assignment of this unit to the Voznesenka terrane. It is more logical to include it in the Laoelin–Grodekov terrane, which represents a fragment of the Late Paleozoic active continental margin. This suggests that the boundary between these blocks should be specified and the timing of the final stage of amalgamation of the Laoelin–Grodekov terrane with the terranes of the Bureya–Khanka orogenic belt should be revised.     

Composition,age, and tectonic position of granitoids of the Shmakovka complex

The geological, geochemical, and geochronological data on the granitiods of the Shmakovka massif, which represents a petrotype of the synonymous complex (southern Russian Primorye), show that the granitoid intrusions of the Shmakovka Complex play a “coupling” role, occurring in different blocks of the Khanka composite terrane. The geochemical and isotopic features of the granitoids indicate that their formation resulted from melting of a “mixed,” substantially metapelite, source similar to the most intensely metamorphosed rocks of the Khanka massif. According to U–Pb measurements, the granitoids are 490 ± 1 Ma old. The analysis of the distribution of Early Paleozoic I-, S-, and A-type granitoids in southern Primorye reveals that Late Cambrian–Early Ordovician endogenic events marked the amalgamation of Precambrian–Early Paleozoic blocks and the eventual formation of the Bureya–Jiamusi superterrane (Bureya–Khanka orogenic belt).     

扬子板块东北缘的随县－应山地区早古生代沉积盆地演化

位于扬子板块和大别变质地体之间的随－应地区，早古生代是一被动大陆边缘扩张盆地。根据沉积盆地基底、地层层序、沉积体系和火山岩亲缘关系，随一应地体的发展史可追溯到晚元古代，并划分为４个阶段：（１）晚元古代至早震旦世地壳上拱和拉伸阶段；（２）晚震旦世至早寒武世被动大陆边缘阶段；（３）中寒武世至奥陶纪海底扩张阶段；（４）志留纪至泥盆纪盆地充填回返阶段。本区沉积盆地发育模式是由大陆边缘裂谷盆地转化为前陆盆地模式。     

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987113001606

The paper reviews previous and recently obtained geological, stratigraphic and geochronological data on the Russian-Kazakh Altai orogen, which is located in the western Central Asian Orogenic Belt （CAOB）, between the Kazakhstan and Siberian continental blocks. The Russian-Kazakh Altai is a typical Pacific-type orogen, which represents a collage of oceanic, accretionary, fore-arc, island-arc and continental margin terranes of different ages separated by strike-slip faults and thrusts. Evidence for this comes from key indicative rock associations, such as boninite- and turbidite （graywacke）-bearing volcanogenic-sedimentary units, accreted pelagic chert, oceanic islands and plateaus, MORB-OIB-protolith blueschists. The three major tectonic domains of the Russian-Kazakh Altai are： （1） Altai-Mongolian terrane （AMT）; （2） subduction-accretionary （Rudny Altai, Gorny Altai） and collisional （Kalba-Narym） terranes; （3） Kurai, Charysh-Terekta, North-East, Irtysh and Char suture-shear zones （SSZ）. The evolution of this orogen proceeded in five major stages： （i） late Neoproterozoic-early Paleozoic subduction-accretion in the Paleo-Asian Ocean; （ii） Ordovician-Silurian passive margin; （iii） Devonian-Carboniferous active margin and collision of AMT with the Siberian conti- nent; （iv） late Paleozoic closure of the PAO and coeval collisional magmatism; （v） Mesozoic post-collisional deformation and anarogenic magmatism, which created the modern structural collage of the Russian- Kazakh Altai orogen. The major still unsolved problem of Altai geology is origin of the Altai-Mongolian terrane （continental versus active margin）, age of Altai basement, proportion of juvenile and recycled crust and origin of the middle Paleozoic units of the Gorny Altai and Rudny Altai terranes.     

The Olkhon metamorphic terrane in the Baikal region: An Early Paleozoic collage of Neoproterozoic active margin fragments

We report data from the Khadarta, Khoboi, and Orso metamorphic complexes of the Olkhon terrane in the western Baikal region. High-grade rocks in the three complexes may have been derived from active continental margin rocks (island arc–backarc basin system). The backarc basin history possibly began at 840–800 Ma, according to SHRIMP-II U-Pb zircon ages of the Orso gneiss. Many tectonic units in the Olkhon terrane belonged to the active margin of the Barguzin microcontinent which rifted off the Aldan province of the Siberian craton in the early Neoproterozoic. The accretion of the microcontinent to the craton was accompanied by high-grade metamorphism recorded in the Khadarta and Khoboi granulites. The 507 ± 8 Ma and 498 ± 7 Ma SHRIMP-II U-Pb zircon ages of the latter complexes, respectively, may refer to the earliest evolution stage of the Olkhon metamorphic terrane. New data for the Olkhon terrane agree well with the ages of other high-grade complexes along the southern Siberian craton (Slyudyanka, Kitoikin, Derba) and correspond to the initiation of the Central Asian orogen. With these data, the Olkhon metamorphic terrane has been interpreted as an Early Paleozoic collisional collage of fragments of the microcontinent’s Neoproterozoic active margin.     

大别山前寒武纪变质地体基本组成

本文以新城－圻春断裂为界将大别山前寒武纪变质地体划分为华北陆块南缘和场子陆块北缘两个次级变质地体，两个次级地体不仅在地球物理，构造变形方面明显不同，而且在物质成分上有显著差异，它们有各自独立的变质地层系统，遭受了不同类型的变质作用，有完全不同的岩浆活动图象，上述差异均可指示华北，扬子两古陆碰掸对接时扬子陆块北缘向北俯冲至华北陆块南缘之下，这可能包括两次合作用，从元古代开始至中生代最终结束的长期复杂