基于极球面投影的极区格网等角航线

针对传统极区航行通常采用格网导航执行大圆航线,大圆航线上格网航向角不同不利于航行控制以及大圆航线在极区投影图上不完全投影为直线引起固有原理性误差的问题,借鉴中低纬度地区等角航线上地理航向角相等以及在墨卡托投影图上为直线便于航行控制和绘算的思想,提出了一种在极球面投影图中表现为直线的"等角航线"——格网等角航线。在研究双重投影的极球面投影以及格网导航方法的基础上,提出了格网等角航线的定义,推导了航线方程,并根据该航线的航程和航向角计算方法进行航线仿真设计。理论分析和仿真验证表明:航线上格网航向角处处相等,在极区投影图上表现为直线;格网等角航线与大圆航线、大椭圆航线相近,航程较短。因此,极区格网等角航线可以与格网导航方法、极球面投影精确配合应用,适合于极区航行。     

THE MODIFIED MERIDIAN DISTANCE IN THE CONICAL ORTHOMORPHIC PROJECTION

Abstract

Recently the writer of this article became interested in the conical orthomorphic projection and wanted to see a simple proof of the formula for the modified meridian distance for the projection on the sphere. Owing to the exigencies of the war, however, he has been separated from the bulk of his books, and, consequently, has had to evolve a proof for himself. Later, this proof was shown to a friend who told him that he had some memory of a mistake in the sign of the spheroidal term in m⁴given in “Survey Computations”, perhaps the first edition. Curiosity therefore suggested an attempt to verify this sign, which meant extending his work to the spheroid. This has now been done, with the result that the formula given in “Survey Computations”, up to the terms of the fourth order at any rate, is found correct after all.     

基于等距圆的极球面投影距离量测方法

研究了极球面投影海图上准确便捷地量测距离的方法。推导了极球面投影下大圆航线和等角航线的方程,形状分析表明极区宜采用大圆航线量测距离;根据极球面投影下直线的几何意义推导了其距离计算公式,距离差值分析表明可用直线代替大圆航线准确量测距离;根据极球面投影上小圆线投影为圆的性质,提出了一种基于等距圆的准确便捷的距离量测方法,以满足极球面投影海图的极区导航应用需要。     

Generalization of the Lambert–Lagrange projection

The Lagrange projection represents conformally the terrestrial globe within a circle. This is achieved by compressing the latitude and longitude and by applying the new coordinates into the equatorial stereographic projection. The same concept can be generalized to any conformal projection, although the application of this technique to other analytical functions is less known. In this work, the general Lambert–Lagrange projection formula is proposed and the application of the modified coordinates is discussed on projections: stereographic, conformal conic and Gauss–Schreiber. In general, the results are merely a curiosity, except for the case of Gauss–Schreiber, where the use of coordinates with altered scale can be applied in the optimization of conformal projections.     

THE SCALE ERRORS OF AIRY'S PROJECTION BY BALANCE OF ERRORS,WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE BRITISH ISLES

Abstract

THE formula for the projection is based upon the spherical assumption. To calculate it for the spheroid might be very complicated and would not be worth while. The projection is suitable for very large areas as a compromise between the Zenithal Equal-area projection on the one hand and the Zenithal Equidistant or Zenithal Orthomorphic on the other. Its application to an area as small as the British Isles would not serve any useful purpose. An analysis of its errors in the general case reveals some unexpected simplicities. This analysis is given below, followed by its application to the particular case of the British Isles on the ten-mile scale. This is done merely to find out what changes would have occurred if the supposed drawing of that map on Airy's projection had been real.     

THE TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION

Abstract

I. Introduction.—Map projection is a branch of applied mathematics which owes much to J. H. Lambert (v. this Review, i, 2, 91). In his “Beyträge zum Gebrauche der Mathematik und deren Anwendung” (Berlin, 1772) he arrived at a form of projection whereof the Transverse Mercator is a special case, and pointed out that this special case is adapted to a country of great extent in latitude but of small longitudinal width. Germain (“Traité des Projections”, Paris, 1865) described it as the Projection cylindrique orthomorphe de Lambert, but he also introduced the name Projection de Mercator transverse or renversée; he shows that Lambert's treatment of the projection was remarkably simple.     

MARGINAL SCALES OF LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE ON TRANSVERSE MERCATOR MAPS

Abstract

The problem of computing marginal scales of latitude and longitude on a rectangular map on the Transverse Mercator projection, where the sheet boundaries are projection co-ordinate lines, may be solved in various ways. A simple method is to compute the latitudes and longitudes of the four corners of the sheet, and then, assuming a constant scale, to interpolate the parallels and meridians between these corner values. Although it is probably sufficiently accurate for practical purposes, this method is not precise. It is not difficult to adapt the fundamental formulce of the projection to give a direct solution of the problem.     

TRANSFORMATION OF RECTANGULAR CO-ORDINATES ON THE TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION

Abstract

The necessity of transforming rectangular co-ordinates from one system of projection to another may arise from, various causes, One case, for example, with which the present writer is concerned involves the transformation, to the standard belt now in use, of the co-ordinates of some hundreds of points of a long existing triangulation projected a quarter of a, century ago on a, belt of Transverse Mercator projection, In this case conversion is complicated by the fact that the spheroid used in the original computation differs from that now adopted, and, also, the geodetic datums are not the same, The case in fact approaches the most general that can occur in practice, One step in one solution of this problem, however, is of perhaps wider Interest: that is, the transformation from one belt of Transverse Mercator projection to another when the spheroids and datums are identical. It is this special case which will be discussed here.     

THE STEREOGRAPHIC SOLUTION OF THE SPHERICAL TRIANGLE

Abstract

The Stereographic Projection, owing to the ease and accuracy with which it can be drawn on a small scale, offers natural attractiveness for the treatment of spherical geometry upon a plane surface. It would therefore be rash for a present-day writer to claim as novel what may well be an infringement of patent rights morally belonging to Hipparchus, who possibly knew most of what is worth knowing about the matter 2,000 years ago. However, since a fairly extensive delving into writings upon the subject has not brought to light anything quite on the lines here put forward, it may be worth while to systematize in this paper some processes which the present writer has found practically useful for some time past.     

THE DERIVATION OF CERTAIN PROJECTION FORMULAE FOR THE SPHERE

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to make available to readers of the Review a simple method of derivation from first principles of the projection farmulae for same of the more impartant normal conical projections.     

THE STEREOGRAPHIC SOLUTION OF THE SPHERICAL TRIANGLE

Abstract

In the course of his stimulating and suggestive paper in your recent issue, No. ro, pp. 226–38, Mr. A. J. Potter writes on p. 233 “but there is no simple construction by which X can then be found”, and again on p. 237 “a direct construction, if there be such”. This cheerful challenge invites the construction of a circle centred on a given line, passing through a given point thereon, and touching a given circle, and I have found the lure of Mr. Potter's gauntlet as irresistible as its recovery has proved delicate. In order to shoulder responsibility and by no means to claim highly improbable originality, let me confess that the problem is new to me and the two constructions I offer are my own; I venture to hope that Mr. Potter may consider one or other of them not unworthy of his epithet “simple”, though I freely admit the aptitude of his empiric procedure to its purpose. The proofs are not long, but for fear of overshooting my welcome I offer them to anyone for the asking; and for the same reason my diagrams are small and therefore mere.     

A COMBINED CYLINDRICAL PROJECTION

Abstract

The projection in question is a mean between Mercator's and the Equal-Area Cylindrical Projection which is formed by orthographic projection from the sphere upon the circumscribing cylinder. Both projections are computed on the spherical assumption. Mercator's Projection is, of course, the best known of the orthomorphic group; the Equal-Area Cylindrical Projection is the simplest of the equal-area group. Each projection may be said to represent an extreme case; and the mean between them may perhaps, for some purposes, be a useful compromise.     

THE EFFECTS OF ECCENTRICITY AND MISPLACED INDICES OF DIVIDED CIRCLES

Abstract

Special precautions are taken in the workshop to ensure that divided circles are so mounted that the point from which the circle graduations radiate lies accurately on the axis about which rotation of the circle and reading index or indices takes place. If, through some accident, eccentricity is present, it is still possible to obtain accurate readings if the instrument is used to the best advantage, and the object of the following notes is to assist the surveyor to this end. It will be found that errors arising from eccentricity can be made to cancel out, except in the case of a vertical circle fitted with a single reading index.     

THE NOMENCLATURE OF MAP PROJECTIONS

Abstract

Map Projections.—A matter that should have been mentioned in the original article under this title (E.S.R., vii, 51, 190) is the definition of a map projection. In the list of carefully worded “Definitions of Terms used in Surveying and Mapping” prepared by the American Society of Photogrammetry (Photogrammetrie Engineering, vol. 8,1942, pp. 247–283), a map projection is defined as “a systematic drawing of lines on a plane surface to represent the parallels of latitude and the meridians of longitude of the earth or a section of the earth”, and most other published works in which a definition appears employ a somewhat similar wording. This, however, is an unnecessary limitation of the term. Many projections are (and all projections can be) plotted from rectangular grid co-ordinates, and meridians and parallels need not be drawn at all; but a map is still on a projection even when a graticule is not shown. Objection could be raised also to the limitation to “plane surface”, since we may speak of the projection of the spheroid upon a sphere, or of the sphere upon a hemisphere. Hence, it is suggested that “any systematic method of representing the whole or a part of the curved surface of the Earth upon another (usually plane) surface” is an adequate definition of a map projection.     

AIR SURVEY AND THE PHOTOGRAPH

Abstract

As air-photographs are being more and more used for survey purposes, Empire surveyors who have not yet made a thorough study of aerial survey may be interested in a little elementary photographic geometry and its application to map-making. A map may be described as an orthogonal proj ection of the ground upon a horizontal plane, reduced to some convenient scale, and a photograph as a conical projection of the ground upon the focal plane of the camera. If the focal plane is horizontal at the instant of exposure and the ground being photographed is perfectly level, the two projections are exactly similar and the photograph is indeed a map. Unfortunately these conditions which are illustrated in fig. 1 are extremely rarely encountered, and photographs usually need correcting for various distortions.     

THE MERCATOR PROJECTION AND THE RHUMB LINE

Abstract

Introductory Remarks.—A line of constant bearing was known as a Rhumb line. Later Snel invented the name Loxodrome for the same line. The drawing of this line on a curvilinear graticule was naturally difficult and attempts at graphical working in the chart-house were not very successfuL Consequently, according to Germain, in 1318 Petrus Vesconte de Janua devised the Plate Carree projection (“Plane” Chart). This had a rectilinear graticule and parallel meridians, and distances on the meridians were made true. The projection gave a rectilinear rhumb line; but the bearing of this rhumb line was in general far from true and the representation of the earth's surface was greatly distorted in high latitudes. For the former reason it offered no real solution of the problem of the navigator, who required a chart on which any straight line would be a line not alone of constant bearing but also of true bearing; the first condition necessarily postulated a chart with rectilinear meridians, since a meridian is itself a rhumb line, and for the same reason it postulated rectilinear parallels. It follows, therefore, that the meridians also must be parallel inter se, like the parallels of latitude. The remaining desideratum—that for a true bearing—was attained in I569 by Gerhard Kramer, usually known by his Latin name of Mercator, in early life a pupil of Gemma Frisius of Louvain, who was the first to teach triangulation as a means for surveying a country. Let us consider, then, that a chart is required to show a straight line as a rhumb line of true bearing and let us consider the Mercator projection from this point of view.     

TRIANGULATION BEACONS AND THE WILD THEODOLITE

Abstract

Following recent discussions in the E.S.R. some experiences in Sarawak may be of interest.

The argument for opaque beacons has been strengthened by the experience here of the past season, when combined day-and-night observing was carried out on the primary series, the daylight pointings being made to black-painted opaque beacons. No difference in the accuracy obtained by the two methods was noticeable in the results. Beacons were necessary in any case for the breaking down to secondary points.     

SOLUTION OF PROBLEM IN THE SUBDIVISION OF A TRIANGLE

Abstract

The division of a triangle into three lots of equal area by lines, drawn from a point within it perpendicular to the sides, appears at first sight to be a very simple problem, in which an average surveyor would experience no difficulty in performing the necessary computations for the determination of the position of the required point where the division lines meet.     

TRAVERSE ADJUSTMENT: WHY NOT “LEAST SQUARES”?

Abstract

I. Introduction.—The literature of least squares is extensive and much of it is theoretical and prosy. I propose, therefore, in the present paper to scrape the jam off the bread, so to speak, and present the pabulum to the reader first; in other words, to give first the solution in as simple and neat a form as possible, then the proof, and finally an example and some notes. The problem is that of adjusting in plane coordinates a traverse beginning at a known point and closing on a known point, having also in the general case an angular closure. If, as I believe, the proof does not appear anywhere else in its present form and nowhere in the English language, I am at a loss to know why. It is not enough to say that the traverse is not a precise enough form of survey to warrant a practical application of the method of least squares. Nor does the admitted difficulty of assigning relative probable errors to linear and angular measurements, coupled with a tendency for the linear errors to be systematic, quite account for it. One has only to read what little there is on the subject of simple traverse adjustment in the English language to detect diversity, vagueness, and sometimes even uneasiness in the statements on it.