基于性态的建筑工程抗震设计——《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则》述评

《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则(试用)》对抗震设计具有重要的指导意义,其中的抗震设计理念同以往的抗震设计规范在抗震设防的思路、概念和方法上有较大的区别。从工程实践的角度,比较了《通则》和现行抗震设计相关规范的区别并对具体应用提出一些看法。     

对《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则(试用)》的评述

《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则（试用）》（以下简称《通则》）是一部对我国抗震设计规范修订具有重大指导意义的试用标准.本文对《通则》和现行规范的某些不同和改进之处进行了比较,讨论了《通则》所具有的先进性和行业指导性,同时也对应用《通则》的原理,对修订和完善下一代规范还需要研究的问题提出了若干建议.     

现代抗震设计理论的发展过程

介绍了现代抗震设计理论的发展过程，基于性态的抗震设计理论的提出背景、发展情况及研究内容；详细介绍了基于性态的抗震设计理论的抗震设防方法；指出了基于性态的抗震设计理论与传统抗震设计理论的主要区别及特点。     

《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则》与《规范》中地震作用的比较

《建筑工程抗震生态设计通则(试用)》是一部对我国抗震设计规范修订具有重大指导意义的试用标准。地震作用是抗震设计的首要问题,《通则》中地震作用计算方法与现行规范的差异引人关注。首先分析了《通则》和规范的场地设计谱,然后比较了二者地震作用计算方法,最后引入2个算例计算了水平地震作用的差别。对《通则》的应用,对修订和完善下一代规范有一定的参考作用。     

关于《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则(试用)》的讨论

本文是一篇关于《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则（试用）》的讨论,主要针对第3、5、10和第11章的内容,将通则与现行抗震设计规范进行了对比,并就所涉及的方面提了一些建议。     

基于性态的抗震设计理论和方法的研究与发展

基于性态的抗震设计理论和方法是目前世界各国学术和工程界广泛关注的课题，本文从性态设计的理论框架、地震设防水准、结构抗震性态水准、结构抗震设计方法等四方面评术了国内外的研究和发展状况，并提出了若干值得重视的问题。     

基于三参数模型的双向水平地震动相关设计反应谱研究

采用设计反应谱的三参数标定模型研究了双向水平地震动分量间加速度反应谱的相关性，给出了统计回归公式及与新修订的建筑抗震设计规范相对应的相关设计谱的取值建议，为双向水平地震作用下的结构地震反应分析提供更合理的地震动输入。     

美国建筑抗震设计的法规体系与设计地震动的确定

本文论述了美国建筑抗震设计法规体系发展演变过程及其代表性的规范、标准与技术文档;分析了美国当前建筑法规中设计地震动参数的重要技术见解,设计地震动的不同层次与作用,基于目标风险的最大考虑地震概念等技术的进展,同时,也总结了美国抗震设计相关法规中设计地震动确定的基本规定。本文旨在从美国庞大复杂的建筑设计法规体系中,梳理出清晰的建筑抗震设计的法规体系脉络与设计地震动的要求,为我国建筑抗震设计中设计地震动的相关研究提供参照。     

基于位移设计的钢筋混凝土桥墩抗震性能试验研究(Ⅰ):拟静力试验

通过拟静力试验研究了基于位移设计钢筋混凝土桥墩的抗震性能。利用基于位移抗震设计方法和桥梁抗震规范方法设计了各2根和1根1：2．5比例钢筋混凝土桥墩试件,对低周反复荷载作用下试件试验破坏形态、承载力、位移延性、滞回耗能、刚度退化等方面进行了比较分析,可以认为基于位移设计的钢筋混凝土桥墩能够达到预期的延性抗震要求,并且在相对耗能能力（与理想弹塑性模型相比）、刚度退化性能方面与现行规范抗震设计方法设计的桥墩相当。试验表明建议的钢筋混凝土桥墩基于位移的抗震设计方法是实际可行的。     

带加强层高层建筑直接基于位移的抗震设计(Ⅰ)——方法理论

带加强层高层、超高层建筑结构目益增多,针对此类结构提出合理的抗震设计方法十分必要.根据模态理论考虑高阶振型对结构反应的贡献,基于较成熟的多层结构直接基于位移的抗震设计理论,提出了带加强层高层建筑结构直接基于位移的抗震设计方法.方法根据模态理论将结构各个振型分别等效为单自由度体系,计算各单自由度体系的地震响应,进而以振型...     

评估结构抗震性能的能量方法

在抗震概念设计中，虽然确立了一些准则，但这些准则基本上是定性的，目前尚缺乏简明的定量评估准则。本文结合抗震设计规范提出了一种对结构抗震性能评估的能量方法，可用于抗震设计方案的定量评估和比较，以及场地对结构影响的定量评估，减震方案的评估。该方法在实际工程设计中的应用取得预期效果。     

Code‐based record selection methods for seismic performance assessment of buildings

The recent concerns regarding the seismic safety of the existing building stock have highlighted the need for an improvement of current seismic assessment procedures. Alongside with the development of more advanced commercial software tools and computational capacities, nonlinear dynamic analysis is progressively becoming a common and preferable procedure in the seismic assessment of buildings. Besides the complexity associated with the formulation of the mathematical model, major issues arise related with the definition of the seismic action, which can lead to different levels of uncertainty in terms of local and global building response. Aiming to address this issue, a comparative study of different code‐based record selection methods proposed by Eurocode 8, ASCE41‐13 and NZS1170.5:2004 is presented herein. The various methods are employed in the seismic assessment of four steel buildings, designed according to different criteria, and the obtained results are compared and discussed. Special attention is devoted to the influence of the number of real ground motion records selected on the estimation of the mean seismic response and, importantly, to the efficiency that is achieved when an additional selection criteria, based on the control of the spectral mismatch of each individual record with respect to the reference response spectrum, is adopted. The sufficiency of the methods with respect to the pairs of M–R of the selected group of records and the robustness of the scaling procedure are also examined. The paper closes with a study which demonstrates the suitability of a simplified probability‐based approach recently proposed for estimating mean seismic demands. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A new approach of selecting real input ground motions for seismic design: The most unfavourable real seismic design ground motions

This paper presents a new way of selecting real input ground motions for seismic design and analysis of structures based on a comprehensive method for estimating the damage potential of ground motions, which takes into consideration of various ground motion parameters and structural seismic damage criteria in terms of strength, deformation, hysteretic energy and dual damage of Park & Ang damage index. The proposed comprehensive method fully involves the effects of the intensity, frequency content and duration of ground motions and the dynamic characteristics of structures. Then, the concept of the most unfavourable real seismic design ground motion is introduced. Based on the concept, the most unfavourable real seismic design ground motions for rock, stiff soil, medium soil and soft soil site conditions are selected in terms of three typical period ranges of structures. The selected real strong motion records are suitable for seismic analysis of important structures whose failure or collapse will be avoided at a higher level of confidence during the strong earthquake, as they can cause the greatest damage to structures and thereby result in the highest damage potential from an extended real ground motion database for a given site. In addition, this paper also presents the real input design ground motions with medium damage potential, which can be used for the seismic analysis of structures located at the area with low and moderate seismicity. The most unfavourable real seismic design ground motions are verified by analysing the seismic response of structures. It is concluded that the most unfavourable real seismic design ground motion approach can select the real ground motions that can result in the highest damage potential for a given structure and site condition, and the real ground motions can be mainly used for structures whose failure or collapse will be avoided at a higher level of confidence during the strong earthquake. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

关于改进我国抗震设计反应谱的探讨

本文回顾了地震反应分析理论发展的三个阶段,指出反应谱理论仍然是许多国家现阶段抗震设计的理论依据,我国规范也主要采用反应谱法进行抗震设计分析。进一步讨论了反应谱与抗震设计反应谱的联系和区别。把我国《建筑抗震设计规范(GB50011—2001)》中有关地震影响系数分别与ISO 3010:2001(E)和美国的建筑抗震设计规范中的地震影响系数做了对比,发现我国规范有些地方考虑得还不够全面,还需要不断地完善。提出在抗震设计中运用地震动参数代替地震烈度来进行计算能更好地反映工程实际情况。     

Study on the severest real ground motion for seismic design and analysis

How to select the adequate real strong earthquake ground motion for seismic analysis and design of trucures is an essential problem in earthquake engineering research and practice.In the paper the concept of the severest design ground motion is proposed and a method is developed for comparing the severity of the recorded strong ground motions.By using this method the severest earthquake ground motions are selected out as seismic inputs to the structures to be designed from a database that consists of more than five thousand significant strong ground moton records collected over the world.The selected severest ground motions are very likely to be able to drive the structures to their critical response and thereby result in the highest damage potential.It is noted that for different structures with diffferent predominant natural periods and at different sites where structures are located the severest design ground motions are usually different.Finally.two examples are illustrated to demonstrate the rationality of the concept and the reliability of the selected design motion.     

从欧洲抗震设计规范的一般规定浅谈结构抗震概念设计的重要性

由于地震的作用以及在这种作用下的结构与构件的受力状况的复杂性和不确定性,结构抗震设计的计算假定与实际情况存在各种差异,甚至有时还根本无法计算.因此在这种情况下,为确保抗震结构性能,就不得不依赖结构抗震的概念设计.结构抗震概念设计是指工程师们根据结构地震破坏的形态和长期积累的实际工程经验等总结形成的符合工程师专业知识的基...