岷县M_S6.6地震震源机制及构造应力研究

利用甘肃省测震台网观测到的主震波形记录的初动符号求解了2013年7月22 日岷县Ms6.6地震主震的震源机制,并与哈佛及usgs发布的震源机制进行了对比,对这一地区过去发生过的若干次Mb4.5以上的地震也利用初动符号求解了震源机制,发现与Ms6.6地震的震源机制形态较为相似.进而利用2010年至2011年甘东南宽频带流动台阵的大量近震资料,对在震中距50 km范围内,并且接近岷县Ms6.6地震发震断裂临潭-宕昌断裂的中小地震进行了检索,对检索到的地震进行初动识别后得到初动数目大于10个、并且对震源包络良好的中小地震31个,利用小震的震源机制解求解了该区域的区域应力场.结果表明这一区域的主压力方向为NEE方向.     

岷县漳县6.6级地震发震构造与区域地形地貌特征关系讨论

为了清晰认识岷县漳县6.6级地震的发震构造环境和区域地貌特征,本文利用DEM（数字高程模型）数据分析了甘东南地区的地形地貌基本特征,结合区域活动断裂分布及其运动学特征讨论了岷县漳县6.6级地震所处在的青藏高原东北缘的区域构造环境和地壳运动学特征,研究了甘肃东南部的基本构造环境、发震断裂的断裂活动性及孕震过程等基本发震条件.主要利用地形剖面方法分析了通过地震震源区的地貌特征,反映出区域地形地貌特征与发震构造的关系,从地貌学角度探讨了区域中上地壳变形特征及孕震过程.最后讨论了区域发震构造、地球动力学背景,通过地形剖面及区域地貌分析了岷县漳县6.6级地震发震构造特点,认为此次地震可能与汶川地震的同震及震后变形过程相关.     

采用sPn震相确定甘肃岷县M>4.0地震震源深度

通过对甘肃岷县2013年7月3个M>4.0地震震相的细致分析,认为在震中距大于250km时四川数字地震台网部分台站可记录到较为清晰的sPn震相。采用sPn和Pn震相确定震源深度的方法分别对岷县3个地震的震源深度进行了重新计算,得到了较为精确的地震震源深度。     

2013年7月22日岷县漳县6.6级地震震源机制解

利用甘肃"十五"数字地震台网的波形资料,采用CAP方法反演了2013年7月22日岷县漳县6.6级地震的震源机制解。结果显示:本次地震的震源性质为逆冲兼走滑型,矩震级MW6.1,震源矩心深度为7km。最佳双力偶节面Ⅱ走向304°,倾角64°,滑动角44°,其走向与附近的临潭-宕昌断裂的走向一致;倾角和滑动角,表现为左旋走滑的特性与临潭-宕昌断裂的性质相符合,判定该节面代表了主震的发震断层面。分析认为岷县漳县6.6级地震的发生与该断裂的活动密切相关。     

甘肃迭部M_s4.0地震震源机制解和震源深度精确测定

综合利用了2011年2月23日迭部M_s4.0地震的近震宽频带波形资料,采用CAP方法反演了该地震的震源机制解和震源深度,结合深度震相sPL对震源深度进行了精确确定。结果表明:迭部4.0级地震是一次走滑兼逆冲型地震;最佳双力偶解为节面Ⅰ走向110°、倾角57°,滑动角23°;发震构造可能为光盖山-迭山北麓断裂;震源深度为7 km。     

甘东南地下流体异常与甘肃岷县6.6级地震关系探讨

近年来南北地震带强震频发,位于南北地震带北段的甘东南地区被认为可能是未来发生强震的区域之一。2013年7月22日岷县6.6级地震发生在这一区域,本文对岷县地震前后甘东南地区地下流体资料进行了分析,认为岷县地震前距震中300 km内的一些地下流体资料出现了明显的中期异常、短临异常和同震响应。本文从中期异常、短临异常、同震响应等几个方面对甘东南地区的水氡、水温、水位、流量资料进行分析和探讨。利用从属函数方法定量提取出的中期异常效果较为理想,震前7-32个月各测点资料开始出现异常;震前几个月地下流体资料出现了上升速率加快、趋势性上升、下降及与正常形态不一致等短临异常。     

基于地震学资料探讨2013年岷县漳县6.6级地震发震构造

应用速度和Q值成像方法以及小震精定位方法获得了2013年岷县漳县6.6级地震震源区的深部结构和余震序列的空间分布图像。结果表明:发震断层为一隐伏断裂,走向NW,倾向SW,逆冲兼左旋走滑,在地表距临潭-宕昌断裂岷县段约20km,在深部可能与临潭-宕昌断裂交汇在一起,向南组成一条NW向的断裂带。2003年11月13日岷县MS5.2、2004年9月7日岷县-卓尼MS5.0和本次MS6.6地震的发震断层可能属同一发震断层,位于漳县南部块体的西南边缘;该块体为次级块体(三角形),近几年来块体西南边界强震活跃,其它两边平静。     

岷县漳县6.6级地震前区域地壳运动变形背景与断层形变异常特征

利用甘肃岷县漳县6.6级地震区所在的青藏块体东北缘地区的区域水准、GPS、流动重力和跨断层短测线等地形变监测资料,结合地质构造、动力环境和已往的研究结果,分析了不同类型资料反映的震前区域性地壳变形背景、断层形变异常特征和可能的机理.结果认为：（1）岷县漳县6.6级地震前西秦岭、六盘山等构造区不同程度地存在着GPS水平挤压闭锁高应变积累、垂直隆升异常高梯度带和重力升、降差异剧烈变化等中长期背景;（2）震前到震时发震断裂附近及其外围相关构造区域断层形变异常在空间和时间上的起伏波动变化显著,尤其是汶川地震以来的波动变化在一定程度上反映了与本区构造比邻的龙门山断裂带剧烈右旋错动对本区的影响,与本次岷县6.6级地震过程有关;（3）本区有地形变监测资料积累以来缺乏6级以上震例,虽然存在不同程度的中长期形变背景异常,但何时进入短期-短临阶段确实很难把握,需要不断积累总结和探索提高.     

2013年甘肃岷县漳县M_S6.6地震及其余震序列重定位

使用甘东南地区三维速度模型,利用三维网格搜索法和双差地震定位法对2013年7月22日甘肃岷县漳县MS6.6地震及其震后三天的余震序列进行了精确定位,结合地质构造资料对本次地震的发震构造进行了初步研究。其结果显示:主震的震中位置为34.54°N,104.189°E,震源深度13.5km;余震震中呈NW或NWW方向分布,与临潭-宕昌断裂的走向基本吻合,主要分布于5～20km的深度,震中在深度剖面上呈SW向;发震断裂为倾向SW的隐伏断层,位于临潭-宕昌断裂NE方向,距临潭-宕昌断裂约20km。     

岷县漳县6.6级地震震害特征及其启示

通过对2013年7月22日甘肃岷县漳县6.6级地震的发震构造、房屋和生命线工程震害、次生地质灾害的现场科学考察,系统介绍了本次地震发震构造、宏观地震烈度分布特征、不同烈度区房屋震害特点及破坏机制,并对地震中突出的黄土滑坡震害开展了深入的分析,进而总结归纳了此次地震中的断层效应、山体放大作用和边坡效应等震害特征。在此基础上提出了针对灾区灾后重建和今后我国的抗震设防工作的几点启示。     

2011年6月8日新疆托克逊MS5.3地震震源机制解反演

2011年6月8日9时53分,新疆维吾尔自治区吐鲁番地区托克逊县发生Ms5.3地震.据新疆自治区民政厅报告,截至6月9日7时,地震造成托克逊县1241人受灾,324户1335间房屋不同程度受损,其中50户168间农牧民住房成为危房、无法居住,274户1135间房屋墙体开裂,博斯坦乡中学24间教室房屋开裂,伊拉湖乡医院8间病房开裂,无人员伤亡报告.     

Three-dimensional characteristics of focal fault of 1995 M S=6.5 Wuding earthquake occurring in Yunnan Province

By means of the hypocenter distribution and focal mechanism of Wuding MS=6.5 earthquake sequence occurred in 1995, the space orientation and activity characteristics of focal fault of Wuding earthquake have been studied from the three-dimensional space-time process. The results indicate that the focal fault of Wuding earthquake is a subsurface, NWW-trending, upright and right-lateral strike slip fault which is consistent with the intensity distribution in the meizoseismal region. Although the large-scale NS-trending Tanglang-Yimen active fault passes through the earthquake region, it is irrelevant to the MS=6.5 Wuding main earthquake. Since the relationship between the strong earthquake and the shallow geological active fault can not be determined, the crustal deep structure should be studied. The method proposed in the paper can be used to distinguish the focal fault in the deep crust.     

红河断裂带的震源机制与现代构造应力场

利用震源机制解对红河断裂带的现代构造应力场和震源破裂进行分析,结果表明沿断裂带震源机制、应力场和震源破裂存在着主体类型、优势作用和主要特征,同时也存在着复杂性特征,断裂带北、中、南段存在差异,反映了断裂带各段构造活动的差异。     

The Yecheng, Xinjiang, China, earthquake of February 14, 1980 —A destructive intermediate earthquake

In this study, we have checked the location and focal depth of the Yecheng earthquake (m _b = 6.0, maximum intensity VII) of February 14, 1980. The result shows that this is an intermediate event with a focal depth of 90 km. The microepicenter is located at 36. 4°N, 76, 9°E, while the macroepicenter is at 37.3°N, 76.9°E, 90 km to the north of the microepicenter. This is the first destructive intermediate event in China which led to a damage as severe as of intensity VII. The focal mechanism of the event is determined to be of thrust type. Combined with the analysis of seismological and geological data in surrounding area, the possible relation between the event and plate movement has been discussed. The result in this paper indicates that in some particular place, the destructive effect of intermediate event should be considered in seismic hazard assessment. The Chinese version of this paper appeared in the Chinese edition ofActa Seismologica Sinica,14, 137–143, 1992.     

云南地区强震前震源深度的时空展布

通过对云南地区1986年以来强震前中小地震的震源深度及时空特点的研究分析,找出震源深度的变化特性,深度异常与大震之间的关系。分析结果表明,强震发生的时间集中在震源深度首次出现15km的180天以内,而且深度异常形成的条带常沿断裂带分布,强震的震中区主要位于异常条带上或异常条带的延长线上。     

A priliminary study on the sequence characteristics and focal mechanism solution of the Jiashi strong earthquake swarm

ｎｔｒｏｄｕｃｔｉｏｎＸｉｎｊｉａｎｇｉｓａｓｅｉｓｍｉｃａｌｙａｃｔｉｖｅｒｅｇｉｏｎｉｎＣｈｉｎａ,ａｎｄＪｉａｓｈｉｉｓａｆｏｃａｌｍｏｎｉｔｏｒｉｎｇａｒｅａｉｎＸｉｎｊｉａｎｇ．ＩｎｔｈｅｐｅｒｉｏｄｆｒｏｍＪａｎｕａｒｙ２１ｔｏＡｐｒｉｌ...     

2010年玉树地震序列ML≥4.0事件震源机制解特征分析

采用CAP方法反演2010年玉树7.1级地震序列前震、主震及余震19个M_L≥4.0事件的震源机制解,19个结果以走滑类型为主,前震、主震的震源机制解十分接近,反映出前震、主震之间密切的联系;震源深度集中在7~12 km,震源最浅（4.5 km）与最深（34 km）的两个余震事件具有明显的逆冲性质,表现出明显的边界特征;19个事件的震中分布在甘孜-玉树断裂北支玉树-隆宝断裂上,目前已经证明该断裂即为玉树地震的发震构造。自SE-NW沿玉树-隆宝断裂走向拉一剖面,观察震源深度沿剖面的变化情况,可看出玉树-隆宝断裂西北段震源深度要大于东南段,该段主要是余震活动的中后期,因此在地震活动的中后期,余震向地壳深部扩展,断裂累积的应变能得到更进一步的释放;P轴方位角优势分布集中在220°~230°,T轴方位优势分布集中在310°~320°,两个优势分布互相垂直性与单个事件的沙滩球应力轴一样,说明玉树地震的震源机制解类型较为简单;玉树周边地区应力场分布比较均匀,并不像汶川周边地区那么复杂,本次玉树地震为巴颜喀拉地块与羌塘块体边界处甘孜-玉树断裂应变能量的正常释放。     

2011年安庆MS4.8地震SmS震相观测与研究.

2011年1月19日发生的安庆MS4.8地震,在较远范围引起了明显震感．通过仔细辨认此次地震不同频段的波形记录,发现在一些台站记录到了清晰的SmS震相．采用CAP方法反演了其震源机制解,并利用理论地震图与实际观测数据对比进一步确认了SmS震相的存在．结合已有实验结果,推断在人类有感频率（1Hz至几Hz）范围内,震中距70——200 km内SmS震相往往是振幅最大的震相,是引起远距离有感的主要原因．利用理论地震图研究了震源深度对SmS震相的影响. 结果表明,震源深度可改变SmS震相发育的临界震中距,震源越深对应的临界震中距越小．进一步通过对比SmS与S的振幅比,定性讨论了震源机制解中倾角、滑动角和地壳浅层衰减等因素对SmS震相的影响．结果表明,倾角和滑动角对其振幅比影响呈现比较复杂的关系,而SmS与S振幅比随地壳浅层衰减的增大而减小,说明浅层衰减对SmS震相影响较大．综合分析认为,除当地地壳速度结构的影响外,SmS震相的发育受到震源机制解的倾角、滑动角,震源深度以及地壳浅层衰减等多种因素的影响．      

RESEARCH ON GENESIS OF M4.2 AND M4.5 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCES IN MARCH 2014 IN ZIGUI COUNTY,HUBEI PROVINCE

On 27^th and 30^th March 2014, an M4.2 and M4.5 earthquake sequence occurred in Zigui County, Hubei Province, and the earthquake sequence type is double seismic type. The two earthquake sequences occurred at the water unloading stage of the 175m trial impounding, and G-R relations showed the similar characteristics with that of the tectonic earthquakes. In order to verify the influences of dam reservoir on earthquake triggering, ETAS model was introduced, the results showed that the slow water level changes had little impact on the occurrence of earthquake. Double difference precision relocation results indicated that the two earthquake sequences occurred at the intersection part of a NE-striking fault and the NNW-striking Xiannvshan Fault, and the preferred direction of aftershock distribution was separately NE and NNW. Moment tensor inversion method and P wave initial motion method were used to determine the focal mechanisms of the two earthquakes, and the results indicated that the two earthquakes were controlled by the regional tectonic stress field and were of reverse-slip type. Comprehensive analysis showed that the M4.2 earthquake was caused by a small-scale fault striking NE with a big dip angle. From the hypocenter profile, it can be seen that the M4.2 earthquake sequence was restrained by an east-dip fault, and the M4.5 earthquake sequence was the product under the conjugate action of the NE-striking fault and the NNW-striking Xiannvshan fault.     

SOURCE PARAMETERS OF THE CANGWU MS5.4 EARTHQUAKE, 31 JULY, 2016

On July 31^st, 2016, an earthquake of M_S5.4 occurred in Cangwu County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, which is the first M_S ≥ 5.0 earthquake in coastal areas of southern China in the past 17a. The moderate earthquake activities have come into a comparatively quiet period in coastal areas of southern China for decades, so the study about the Cangwu M_S5.4 earthquake is very important. However, differernt research institutions and scholars have got different results for the focal depth of the Cangwu M_S5.4 earthquake. For this reason, we further measured the focal depth by using CAP method and sPL phase method. sPL phase was first put forward by Chong in 2010. It is often observed between P and S wave of continental earthquakes with epicentral distance of about 30km to 50km. The energy of sPL phase is mainly concentrated on the radial component. Arrival time difference between sPL phase and direct P wave is insensitive to epicentral distancs, but increases almost linearly with the increase of focal depth. Based on these characteristics and advantages, sPL phase method is chosen to measure the focal depth of Cangwu M_S5.4 earthquake in the paper. First of all, we selected the broadband waveform data through seismic stations distributed mainly in Guangxi and adjacent provinces from Data Management Centre of China National Seismic Network and Guangxi Earthquake Networks Center. And an appropriate velocity model of Cangwu area was constructed by the teleseismic receiver function method. Then, the focal mechanism and focal depth of Cangwu M_S5.4 earthquake were determined by using the CAP(Cut and Paste)method. Next, we compared the synthetic waveforms simulated by F-K forward method of different focal depth models with the actual observed waveforms. According to the difference of arrival times between sPL and Pg phases, we finally obtained the focal depth of Cangwu earthquake. The results show that the focal depth is 11km measured by CAP method and 9km by sPL phase method. Based on the focal mechanism solution, isoseismal shapes, aftershocks distributions and investigation on spot, we conclude that the Cangwu M_S5.4 earthquake is a left-lateral strike-slip earthquake which occurred in the upper crust. Our preliminary analysis considers that the seismogenic structure of Cangwu earthquake is a north-northwest branch fault, and the control fault of this earthquake is the Hejie-Xiaying Fault.