共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
2.
中国卫星导航学术年会(China Satellite Navigation Conference,CSNC)是一个开垫的甓杰蕊蕊平台。旨在加强学术创新,促进卫星导航系统的合作与交流;加强技术创新,促进卫星导航系统酌工程建设;加强“囊理娩叫时新。促进卫星导航理论进步;加强应用创新,促进卫星导航产业的科学发展。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
杨元喜 《测绘科学技术学报》2015,(1):2
<正>北斗导航开启了中国自主卫星导航事业,拓展了卫星导航的深度应用。北斗卫星导航系统以其导航、定位、授时及短文通信于一体,成为国际上别具特色的卫星导航系统,也成为中国测绘与导航发展的助推器。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Xavier Collilieux Laurent Métivier Zuheir Altamimi Tonie van Dam Jim Ray 《GPS Solutions》2011,15(3):219-231
The International GNSS Service (IGS) contributes to the construction of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF)
by submitting time series of station positions and Earth Rotation Parameters (ERP). For the first time, its submission to
the ITRF2008 construction is based on a combination of entirely reprocessed GPS solutions delivered by 11 Analysis Centers
(ACs). We analyze the IGS submission and four of the individual AC contributions in terms of the GNSS frame origin and scale,
station position repeatability and time series seasonal variations. We show here that the GPS Terrestrial Reference Frame
(TRF) origin is consistent with Satellite laser Ranging (SLR) at the centimeter level with a drift lower than 1 mm/year. Although
the scale drift compared to Very Long baseline Interferometry (VLBI) and SLR mean scale is smaller than 0.4 mm/year, we think
that it would be premature to use that information in the ITRF scale definition due to its strong dependence on the GPS satellite
and ground antenna phase center variations. The new position time series also show a better repeatability compared to past
IGS combined products and their annual variations are shown to be more consistent with loading models. The comparison of GPS
station positions and velocities to those of VLBI via local ties in co-located sites demonstrates that the IGS reprocessed
solution submitted to the ITRF2008 is more reliable and precise than any of the past submissions. However, we show that some
of the remaining inconsistencies between GPS and VLBI positioning may be caused by uncalibrated GNSS radomes. 相似文献
12.
Timing and Positioning with GLONASS and GPS 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Evgueny Bykhanov 《GPS Solutions》1999,3(1):26-31
Considering GLONASS as one of the pillars of the international Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), the Russian Federation
works toward the integration of GLONASS with other navigation systems, cooperates with the internal user community, and contributes
to the development and coordination of standards concerning GLONASS and the combined use of GLONASS and the global positioning
system (GPS). This work is pursued in conformity with recommendations of respective international organizations.
Most users recognize that the GLONASS/GPS combination has better characteristics in terms of availability, accuracy, integrity,
and so on. However, the combined use of these satellite systems raises problems that must be addressed.
This article reviews problems encountered when using two different navigation systems. Solutions developed thus far are outlined.
The potential of GLONASS and approaches for high accuracy UTC time transfer are discussed. The transformation between the
WGS 84 and PZ 90 reference frames and their conformity with the international terrestrial reference frame (ITRF) is considered.
Various solutions are viewed in connections with recommendations made by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO),
the Global Navigation Satellite System Panel (GNSP), and the Consultative Committee for Definition of the Second (CCDS) concerning
the desirability of using either or both systems interchangeably. ? 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 相似文献
13.
We examine the contribution of the Doppler Orbit determination and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS) technique to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF2005) by evaluating the quality of the submitted solutions as well as that of the frame parameters, especially the origin and the scale. Unlike the previous versions of the ITRF, ITRF2005 is constructed with input data in the form of time-series of station positions (weekly for satellite techniques and daily for VLBI) and daily Earth orientation parameters (EOPs), including full variance–covariance information. Analysis of the DORIS station positions’ time-series indicates an internal precision reaching 15 mm or better, at a weekly sampling. A cumulative solution using 12 years of weekly time-series was obtained and compared to a similar International GNSS Service (IGS) GPS solution (at 37 co-located sites) yielding a weighted root mean scatter (WRMS) of the order of 8 mm in position (at the epoch of minimum variance) and about 2.5 mm/year in velocity. The quality of this cumulative solution resulting from the combination of two individual DORIS solutions is better than any individual solution. A quality assessment of polar motion embedded in the contributed DORIS solutions is performed by comparison with the results of other space-geodetic techniques and in particular GPS. The inferred WRMS of polar motion varies significantly from one DORIS solution to another and is between 0.5 and 2 mas, depending on the strategy used and in particular estimating or not polar motion rate by the analysis centers. This particular aspect certainly needs more investigation by the DORIS Analysis Centers. 相似文献
14.
Sara Bruni Paul Rebischung Susanna Zerbini Zuheir Altamimi Maddalena Errico Efisio Santi 《Journal of Geodesy》2018,92(4):383-399
The realization of the international terrestrial reference frame (ITRF) is currently based on the data provided by four space geodetic techniques. The accuracy of the different technique-dependent materializations of the frame physical parameters (origin and scale) varies according to the nature of the relevant observables and to the impact of technique-specific errors. A reliable computation of the ITRF requires combining the different inputs, so that the strengths of each technique can compensate for the weaknesses of the others. This combination, however, can only be performed providing some additional information which allows tying together the independent technique networks. At present, the links used for that purpose are topometric surveys (local/terrestrial ties) available at ITRF sites hosting instruments of different techniques. In principle, a possible alternative could be offered by spacecrafts accommodating the positioning payloads of multiple geodetic techniques realizing their co-location in orbit (space ties). In this paper, the GNSS–SLR space ties on-board GPS and GLONASS satellites are thoroughly examined in the framework of global reference frame computations. The investigation focuses on the quality of the realized physical frame parameters. According to the achieved results, the space ties on-board GNSS satellites cannot, at present, substitute terrestrial ties in the computation of the ITRF. The study is completed by a series of synthetic simulations investigating the impact that substantial improvements in the volume and quality of SLR observations to GNSS satellites would have on the precision of the GNSS frame parameters. 相似文献
15.
Daniela Thaller Rolf Dach Manuela Seitz Gerhard Beutler Maria Mareyen Bernd Richter 《Journal of Geodesy》2011,85(5):257-272
Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) observations to Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) satellites may be used for several
purposes. On one hand, the range measurement may be used as an independent validation for satellite orbits derived solely
from GNSS microwave observations. On the other hand, both observation types may be analyzed together to generate a combined
orbit. The latter procedure implies that one common set of orbit parameters is estimated from GNSS and SLR data. We performed
such a combined processing of GNSS and SLR using the data of the year 2008. During this period, two GPS and four GLONASS satellites
could be used as satellite co-locations. We focus on the general procedure for this type of combined processing and the impact
on the terrestrial reference frame (including scale and geocenter), the GNSS satellite antenna offsets (SAO) and the SLR range
biases. We show that the combination using only satellite co-locations as connection between GNSS and SLR is possible and
allows the estimation of SLR station coordinates at the level of 1–2 cm. The SLR observations to GNSS satellites provide the
scale allowing the estimation of GNSS SAO without relying on the scale of any a priori terrestrial reference frame. We show
that the necessity to estimate SLR range biases does not prohibit the estimation of GNSS SAO. A good distribution of SLR observations
allows a common estimation of the two parameter types. The estimated corrections for the GNSS SAO are 119 mm and −13 mm on
average for the GPS and GLONASS satellites, respectively. The resulting SLR range biases suggest that it might be sufficient
to estimate one parameter per station representing a range bias common to all GNSS satellites. The estimated biases are in
the range of a few centimeters up to 5 cm. Scale differences of 0.9 ppb are seen between GNSS and SLR. 相似文献
16.
采用全球卫星导航系统(Global Navigation Satellite System,GNSS)模糊度固定解可提高GNSS/惯性导航系统(inertial navigation system,INS)组合导航定位精度,而在复杂环境下,单频GNSS难以实现完善的实时动态周跳探测,影响GNSS模糊度保持。研究了星间单差与站星双差的INS辅助GNSS单频周跳探测检验量,重点分析检验量的误差特性。分析得出检验量误差主要与INS增量误差有关,受接收机至待检星与参考星之间星地矢量夹角的影响。提出了选取两颗参考星并优选探测检验量的方法,降低方位角因素的影响,提高周跳探测性能。周跳探测的阈值在滑动窗口内估计,对INS误差被GNSS误差淹没的部分进行抑制,充分反映INS误差影响,阈值估计具有较强的自适应性。 相似文献
17.
As a first step towards studying the ionosphere with the global navigation satellite system (GNSS), leveling the phase to the code geometry-free observations on an arc-by-arc basis yields the ionospheric observables, interpreted as a combination of slant total electron content along with satellite and receiver differential code biases (DCB). The leveling errors in the ionospheric observables may arise during this procedure, which, according to previous studies by other researchers, are due to the combined effects of the code multipath and the intra-day variability in the receiver DCB. In this paper we further identify the short-term temporal variations of receiver differential phase biases (DPB) as another possible cause of leveling errors. Our investigation starts by the development of a method to epoch-wise estimate between-receiver DPB (BR-DPB) employing (inter-receiver) single-differenced, phase-only GNSS observations collected from a pair of receivers creating a zero or short baseline. The key issue for this method is to get rid of the possible discontinuities in the epoch-wise BR-DPB estimates, occurring when satellite assigned as pivot changes. Our numerical tests, carried out using Global Positioning System (GPS, US GNSS) and BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS, Chinese GNSS) observations sampled every 30 s by a dedicatedly selected set of zero and short baselines, suggest two major findings. First, epoch-wise BR-DPB estimates can exhibit remarkable variability over a rather short period of time (e.g. 6 cm over 3 h), thus significant from a statistical point of view. Second, a dominant factor driving this variability is the changes of ambient temperature, instead of the un-modelled phase multipath. 相似文献
18.
19.