Analysis of seismological and tsunami data from the 1993 Guam earthquake

The fault parameters of the Guam earthquake of August 8, 1993 are estimated from seismological analyses, and the possibility of identifying the actual fault plane from tsunami waveforms is tested. The Centroid Moment Tensor solution of long-period surface waves shows one nodal plane shallowly dipping to the north and the other nodal plane steeply dipping to the south. The seismic moment is 3.5×10²⁰ Nm and the corresponding moment magnitude is 7.7. The Moment Tensor Rate Function inversion ofP waves also yields a similar focal mechanism and seismic moment. The point source depth is estimated as 40–50 km.This earthquake generated tsunamis that propagated toward the Japanese coast along the Izu-Bonin-Mariana ridge system. The tsunamis are recorded on ocean bottom pressure gauges and tide gauges. Numerical computation of tsunamis shows that the computed waveforms from the two possible fault planes match well with the observed tsunami waveforms. The numerical computation also shows that the tsunami waveforms at Guam Island, just above the fault, should contain useful information regarding the identification of the actual fault plane. However, the current sampling rate of the tide gauges is so small that the records cannot help the identification.     

利用FOCMEC方法反演2011年江西瑞昌与湖北阳新交界M_S4.6地震的震源机制解

利用FOCMEC方法反演了2011年9月10日江西瑞昌与湖北阳新交界MS4.6地震的震源机制解。反演结果为:节面I的走向304°,倾角76°,滑动角4°;节面Ⅱ的走向213°,倾角86°,滑动角165°;P轴的方位角、倾角分别为260°、7°;T轴的方位角、倾角分别为168°、13°;B轴的方位角、倾角分别为19°、75°。其中节面Ⅱ的走向和活动性质与震中附近的郯庐断裂带的分支断裂——池河—西山驿断裂较为接近。分析认为NNE向的池河—西山驿断裂可能是瑞昌—阳新MS4.6地震的发震构造。     

1996年5月3日内蒙古包头西M_S6.4级地震的震源机制研究

利用地幔波波形拟合和P波初动符号联合反演的方法,估计了1996年5月3日内蒙古包头西MS6．4级地震的震源机制．得到节面1（40°,70°,－174°）,节面2（308°,84°,－20°）。主压力轴P（-13．95×1017Nm,262°,19°）,主张力轴T（15．66×1017Nm,356°,10°）,中性轴N（B）（1．52×1017Nm,112°,69°）．地震形成左旋走滑兼弱倾滑断裂,断裂面较陡．据ML≥3.0级的余震分布、Ⅷ度区的烈度分布以及宏观震中与微观震中的相对位置推测,节面2可能与实际的地震破裂面相近．据宽频垂直向（BHZ）波形记录中SP与P的到时差估计,震源深度约为21Km．     

2018年9月4日伽师5.5级地震序列震源机制解及震源处应力场特征

本文采用新疆测震台网数字波形记录，利用CAP和P、S波初动和振幅比方法计算2018年9月4日伽师5.5级地震序列中M_S≥2.5地震的震源机制解，结合地震烈度等震线和双差重定位后的地震序列空间展布等特征分析了此次地震的发震构造，反演了震源处应力场。结果表明，伽师5.5级地震呈NE向的节面I为发震断层面，属于左旋走滑断层，震源深度为9km，发震构造可能为浅部超基底断裂；地震序列中有21次为走滑型，4次为正断型，说明绝大多数序列的破裂方式与主震相近，表明余震应力场主要受主震震源应力场控制；P轴方位在NNE向有明显的优势分布且倾伏角较小，T轴方位在NWW向有明显的优势分布且倾伏角较小，说明震源处主要以NNE向水平挤压和NWW向水平拉张作用为主；此次伽师5.5级地震序列表现的浅部应力场与已有研究得出的震源区深部应力场基本一致，应力形因子R的最优解为0.17，说明震源处近NE向中间主应力σ₂有一定挤压成分。     

引潮力对显著地震触发作用与大震关系的机理讨论

初步讨论了引潮力对显著地震触发作用与大震关系的机理。 结果表明, 这一机理是比较复杂的。 地震发生时水平引潮力方位与地震断层面走向接近, 可能增加断层面上的剪应力, 有利于地震的发生; 水平引潮力方位与地震主张应力轴T轴接近, 可能减小断层面上的正应力, 从而减小断层面上的摩擦力, 也会有利于地震的发生。 所讨论的3个震例中有2个共同点: 其一为大震前显著地震发生时水平引潮力方位相互比较接近; 其二为显著地震破裂面走向和大震破裂面走向基本一致。     

澄江5.2级地震的震源机制、震源应力场和震源断层

利用地震波资料对澄江5．2级地震序列的震源机制、震源应力场和震源断层作了分析研究。结果表明，整个序列发展中，震源区及附近、构造应力场以南东东方向、水平作用为主的压应力场为主。其次还有南南东向、水平作用为主的压应力场的作用。由序列震源机制解分析，主震发震断层是走向北北东、倾角较陡的断层面，在南南东－南东向，接近水平的压应力场作用下，该断层面具有以左旋走滑为主的错动性质。该断层面是序列的主破裂面。在序列发展过程中，北西西－北西向断层也参与了活动。有的余震，虽然发生在与主破裂面一致或接近的断层面上，但破裂错动的旋性发生了变化，出现了相对主破裂事件的反向错动。极少数余震破裂错动性质呈现以倾向滑动为主的特征。在序列发展过程中，破裂面及其错动性质显地复杂。由于强震的发生，主破裂的错动，使得震源区局部应力场状态错综复杂。     

应用震源机制方法研究鹤岗煤田开采区的构造应力环境

求解鹤岗强矿震震源机制解结果,表现出走滑伴随逆断层和正断层活动、非双力偶型的多样性。两组节面优势分布方向和节面的倾角优势分布不显著,两者分布无明显规律,反映出矿井下破裂面比较复杂。矿震震源主压应力释放优势方向北西310°左右,优势倾角为25°～60°;主张应力轴走向NE,主张应力场优势方向为北东60°左右,仰角在30～70°之间;中等应力轴(N)近于垂直,优势倾角为70～90°。矿震震源机制解显示的矿区最大主应力方向与区域构造应力场的最大主应力方向近似正交,矿震震源机制主应力轴优势倾角远大于区域构造地震,反映的是矿区采煤生产的次生构造应力环境重力应力场的贡献明显。     

STUDY ON THE SEISMOGENIC FAULT AND DYNAMICS PARAME-TERS OF THE 2014 MS6.6 JINGGU EARTHQUAKE IN YUNNAN

On October 17, 2014, a M_S6.6 earthquake occurred in Jinggu, Yunnan. The epicenter was located in the western branch of Wuliang Mountain, the northwest extension line of Puwen Fault. There are 2 faults in the surrounding area, one is a sinistral strike-slip and the other is the dextral. Two faults have mutual intersection with conjugate joints property to form a checkerboard faulting structure. The structure of the area of the focal region is complex. The present-day tectonic movement is strong, and the aftershock distribution indicates the faulting surface trending NNW. There is no obvious surface rupture related to the known fault in the epicenter, and there is a certain distance from the surface of the Puwen fault zone. Regional seismic activity is strong. In 1941, there were two over magnitude 7.0 earthquakes in the south of the epicenter of Jinggu County and Mengzhe Town. In 1988, two mainshock-aftershock type earthquakes occurred in Canglan-Gengma Counties, the principal stress axes of the whole seismic area is in the direction of NNE. Geological method can be adopted to clarify the distribution of surficial fracture caused by active faults, and high-precision seismic positioning and spatial distribution characteristics of seismic sequences can contribute to understand deep seismogenic faults and geometric features. Thus, we can better analyze the three-dimensional spatial distribution characteristics of seismotectonics and the deep and shallow tectonic relationship. The focal mechanism reveals the property and faulting process to a certain extent, which can help us understand not only the active property of faults, but also the important basis for deep tectonic stress and seismogenic mechanism. In order to study the fault characteristic of the Jinggu earthquake, the stress field characteristics of the source area and the geometric parameters of the fault plane, this paper firstly uses the 15 days aftershock data of the Jingsuo M_S6.6 earthquake, to precisely locate the main shock and aftershock sequences using double-difference location method. The results show that the aftershock sequences have clustering characteristics along the NW direction, with a depth mainly of 5~15km. Based on the precise location, calculations are made to the focal mechanisms of a total of 46 earthquakes including the main shock and aftershocks with M_L ≥ 3.0 of the Jinggu earthquake. The double-couple(DC)component of the focal mechanism of the main shock shows that nodal plane Ⅰ:The strike is 239°, the dip 81°, and the rake -22°; nodal plane Ⅱ, the strike is 333°, the dip 68°, and the rake -170.31°. According to focal mechanism solutions, there are 42 earthquakes with a focal mechanism of strike-slip type, accounting for 91.3%. According to the distribution of the aftershock sequence, it can be inferred that the nodal plane Ⅱ is the seismogenic fault. The obtained focal mechanism is used to invert the stress field in the source region. The distribution of horizontal maximum principal stress orienation is concentrated. The main features of the regional tectonic stress field are under the NNE-SSW compression(P axis)and the NW-SE extension(T axis)and are also affected by NNW direction stress fields in the central region of Yunnan, which indicates that Jinggu earthquake fault, like Gengma earthquake, is a new NW-trending fault which is under domination of large-scale tectonic stress and effected by local tectonic stress environment. In order to define more accurately the occurrence of the fault plane of the Jinggu earthquake, with the precise location results and the stress field in the source region, the global optimal solution of the fault plane parameters and its error are obtained by using both global searching simulated annealing algorithm and local searching Gauss-Newton method. Since the parameters of the fault plane fitting process use the stress parameters obtained by the focal mechanism inversion, the data obtained by the fault plane fitting is more representative of the rupture plane, that is, the strike 332.75°, the dip 89.53°, and the rake -167.12°. The buried depth of the rupture plane is 2.746km, indicating that the source fault has not cut through the surface. Based on the stress field characteristics and the inversion results of the fault plane, it is preliminarily believed that the seismogenic structure of the Jinggu earthquake is a newly generated nearly vertical right-lateral strike-slip fault with normal component. The rupture plane length is about 17.2km, which does not extend to the Puwen fault zone. Jinggu earthquake occurred in Simao-Puer seismic region in the south of Sichuan-Yunnan plate. Its focal mechanism solution is similar to that of the three sub-events of the Gengma earthquake in November 1988. The seismogenic structure of both of them is NW-trending and the principal stress is NE-SW. The rupture plane of the Jinggu main shock(NW direction)is significantly different from the known near NS direction Lancang Fault and the near NE direction Jinggu Fault in the study area. It is preliminarily inferred that the seismogenic structure of this earthquake has a neogenetic feature.     

2010年4月14日玉树Ms7.1地震加速度场预测

基于有限断层震源、且使用动力学拐角频率的地震动随机模拟方法预测玉树地震近断层的加速度场.首先,基于有限断层震源建模方法建立该次地震的震源模型;然后,基于上述地震动模拟方法预测玉树地震近断层191个节点的加速度时程.在此基础上,取每个结点的加速度峰值绘制该次地震的近断层加速度场.结果表明:(1)近断层加速度场主要受震源破裂过程和断层面上滑动分布的影响.断层面上凹凸体投影到地表的区域附近,加速度峰值最大,也是震害最严重的区域;(2)对于走滑地震,断层沿线附近的场地并非均会发生破裂方向性效应;发生破裂方向性效应的场地与凹凸体在断层面上的位置有关.     

2018年9月8日墨江地震及周边地区构造应力场特征分析

2018年9月8日,云南省墨江县发生MS5.9地震并伴随一系列余震,探究该地震周围的应力场对于理解该地震的发生机制和后续地震的发展趋势具有着重要的参考意义.本研究收集了震源及其邻区中前人研究和Global CMT所给出的震源机制资料,对该地区进行了构造应力场反演,并同时利用反演得到的应力张量模拟墨江地区的震源机制解表现.结果表明:(1)在应力轴整体分布上,自西向东σ₁轴(压轴)从NNE-SSW向逐渐转向NNW-SSE向,σ₃轴(张轴)从WWN-EES向逐渐转向WWS-EEN向,张轴呈弧形分布,压轴呈放射状分布.(2)在应力轴倾伏角上,研究区域内的压应力轴和张应力轴倾伏角都比较小,即两轴均接近水平.(3)R值分布大体是在东南部相较于西北部大,结合当地地质背景分析得到,物质逃逸自西北向东南呈逐渐变缓的趋势.(4)利用反演得到的应力张量和应力状态计算墨江地震震源区的相对剪应力和相对正应力大小.由此推测,墨江地震恰好发生在相对剪切应力值和相对正应力正值最大的节面上.从而可以确定墨江地震的发震节面的基本参数:走向216.32°,倾角86.91°,滑动角...     

2004年7月11日西藏Mw62级地震震源破裂过程研究

基于有限断层模型，利用远场体波波形数据研究了2004年7月11日西藏MW62级地震的震源破裂过程.结果表明该地震是一个以倾滑为主的浅源正断层型地震，震源深度为125km，断层面走向152°，倾角44°，平均倾滑角-117°.破裂在震中处成核，然后以28km/s的平均速度向两侧传播，在震中以东偏北5km处达到最大滑动43cm.该地震主张力轴近E W方向，受浅部NNW SSE或N S向裂谷带控制，青藏高原南部的逆冲运动是引发这次地震的直接原因.     

用宽频带波形资料研究青海西捷6.8级地震的震源过程

利用中国数字地震台网（ＣＤＳＮ）的宽频带数字化波形资料进一步研究了１９８８年１１月５日青海省西捷ＭＳ６．８级强震的震源过程。通过波形模拟和基于优化遗传算法的全局反演,对该地震的震源参数和破裂特征进行了分析。初步结果表明,此强震是以一次主破裂为特征的事件,与略带逆掩分量的走滑活动断层有关。根据单向破裂对各台站视震源时间函数的影响的分析,认为破裂可能是沿北西走向的断层面由东南向西北传播     

FOCAL MECHANISM AND SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE M5.0 YUEXI EARTHQUAKE ON 1 OCT. 2014, SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

The Oct.1,2014 M5.0 Yuexi earthquake occurred on the Daliang Shan fault zone where only several historical moderate earthquakes were recorded.Based on the waveform data from Sichuan regional seismic network,we calculated the focal mechanism solution and centroid depth of the M5.0 Yuexi earthquake by CAP (Cut and Paste) waveform inversion method,and preliminarily analyzed the seismogenic structure.We also calculated the apparent stress values of the M5.0 earthquake and other 14 M_L≥4.0 events along the Shimian-Qiaojia fault segment of the eastern boundary of the Sichuan-Yunnan block.The result indicates that the parameters of the focal mechanism solution are with a strike of 256°,dip of 62°,and slip of 167° for the nodal plane Ⅰ,and strike of 352°,dip of 79°,and slip of 29° for the nodal plane Ⅱ.The azimuth of the P axis is 121° with dip angle of 11°,the azimuth of T axis is 217° with dip angle of 28°,and the centroid depth is about 11km,and moment magnitude is M_W5.1.According to the focal mechanism solution and the fault geometry near the epicenter,we infer that the seismogenic fault is a branch fault,i.e.,the Puxiong Fault,along the central segment of the Daliang Shan fault zone.Thus,the nodal plane Ⅱ was interpreted as the coseismic rupture plane.The M5.0 Yuexi earthquake is a strike-slip faulting event with an oblique component.The above findings reveal the M5.0 Yuexi earthquake resulted from the left-lateral strike-slip faulting of the NNW Dalang Shan fault zone under the nearly horizontal principal compressive stress regime in an NWW-SEE direction.The apparent stress value of the Yuexi earthquake is 0.99MPa,higher than those of the M_L ≥ 4.0 earthquakes along the eastern boundary of the Sichuan-Yunnan block since 2008 Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake,implying a relatively high stress level on the seismogenic area and greater potential for the moderate and strong earthquake occurrence.It may also reflect the current increasing stress level of the entire area along the eastern boundary,and therefore,posing the risk of strong earthquakes there.     

2018年5月松原MS5.7地震序列发震断层及应力场特征

利用双差定位方法对2018年松原M_S5.7地震序列中M_L≥1.0地震重新定位,之后使用CAP方法求解松原M_S5.7地震序列中强地震的震源机制解,再借助MSATSI软件包反演得到松原地区的区域应力场。综合分析以上研究结果得到如下结论:① 松原M_S5.7地震序列发生在NW走向的第二松花江断裂与NE走向的扶余—肇东断裂交会处,将地震精定位结果沿两条断层走向作剖面分析,NW向剖面主轴长度约为5 km,震中分布均匀,NE向剖面主轴长度亦约为5 km,震中呈倾向NE的高倾角分布;② 该序列中的4次M_L≥3.7地震的震源机制解具有良好的一致性:节面Ⅰ走向为NE向,节面Ⅱ走向为NW向,均为高倾角走滑断层。中强地震的震源机制节面解与第二松花江断裂性质基本一致,由此推断第二松花江断裂是本次松原地震的发震断层;③ 松原地区的主压应力方位角为N86°E,倾角为7°,主张应力方位角为N24°E,倾角为71°。松原地区的区域应力场既受到大尺度的板块构造运动的控制,又受到区域构造运动的影响。在太平洋板块对北东亚板块向西俯冲作用下,东北地区产生了近EW向的主压应力,受周边地质构造控制,松辽盆地内NE向断裂与NW向断裂交会处易发生走滑型地震,2018年松原M_S5.7地震正是在这种构造作用控制下发生的中强地震。      

2020年西藏尼玛MS6.6和MS4.8地震震源机制测定

北京时间2020年7月23日04时07分,西藏自治区那曲市尼玛县发生M_S6.6地震,震源深度10 km,震中位置为（33.19°N,86.81°E）。主震发生当日18时50分,发生一次M_S4.8强余震,震源深度为10 km。本文基于西藏、青海、新疆区域波形资料,采用ISOLA近震全波形方法对这两次地震进行震源机制反演。结果显示,尼玛M_S6.6主震的最佳断层面解为:节面Ⅰ走向8°/倾角46°/滑动角?93°,节面Ⅱ走向191°/倾角44°/滑动角?87°;矩震级M_W6.4,最佳矩心深度7 km。震源区应力主轴的空间取向为:主压力轴P的方位角220°、倾伏角88°,主张力轴T方位角99°、倾伏角1°。M_S4.8强余震的最佳断层面解为:节面Ⅰ走向12°/倾角47°/滑动角?106°,节面Ⅱ走向214°/倾角45°/滑动角?74°;矩震级M_W5.0,最佳矩心深度6 km。震源区应力主轴的空间取向为:主压力轴P的方位角207°、倾伏角78°,主张力轴T方位角113°、倾伏角1°。震源机制反演结果表明,这两次地震均为以正断型为主的地震事件,与震源区附近先前地震的震源机制有较好的一致性。结合周边地质构造和余震分布,我们认为尼玛M_S6.6地震可能是由位于日干配错断裂和依布茶卡盆地西缘断裂之间的一条正断层活动所引发的。      

利用大地测量资料反演地震震源参数的若干问题

本文利用大地测量资料反演地震震源参数的一般理论,归纳为震源模型的建立、最优化计算的实施和观测资料的使用等三部分.文中着重研究了后两部分:提出了利用原始观测资料(地面长度、角度、高差、倾斜、应变的变化值)直接进行反演的严密方法;改进了单纯形最优化计算方法,加速了迭代的收敛并给出了收敛准则;按逐渐趋近法进行观测资料的标准化,保证了标准化后的各类资料都属于同一正态分布.文中根据地震前、后的大地测量资料,对1976年唐山7.8级地震的震源参数进行了反演,并对成果的稳定性和可靠性进行了检验,得到地震断层长度为112公里,走向为北东56,倾角为90,断层破裂至地面,断层面延深(宽)15公里,水平错距(右旋)2.51米,垂直错距(东南盘下降)0.70米,断层迹线中点位置为北纬3936'6、东经11811'4.由此计算得到的地震矩为1.451027达因厘米,应力降为37.2巴,应变降为5.610-5.这个结果与根据地震波及震时其它地球物理资料求得的结果相近,因此认为本次地震前(或后),发生相当于主震规模的断层蠕动的可能性不大.      

2015年11月23日祁连5.2级地震发震构造初步研究

基于喜马拉雅地震科学台阵和青海区域数字地震台网的资料,采用广义极性振幅技术反演了2015年11月23日祁连5.2级地震的震源机制;利用逆时成像技术重新定位了祁连5.2级地震及64次ML1.0以上余震的震源位置。基于上述研究,综合分析祁连5.2级地震的震源位置和震源机制以及64次ML1.0以上的余震空间分布特征,结合托莱山断裂构造性质探讨了发震构造。结果显示,祁连5.2级地震的发震时刻为北京时间2015年11月23日5时2分38.9秒,震中位置位于(37.95°N,100.46°E),震源深度为12.4km。祁连5.2级地震的震源机制为节面Ⅰ的走向108°/倾角44°/滑动角40°,节面Ⅱ的走向347°/倾角63°/滑动角126°。节面Ⅰ与托莱山断裂左旋走滑兼具逆冲的性质相同,也与余震勾勒出的断层面倾向SW,倾角约48°的产状相同,因此节面Ⅰ为发震断层面。结合震源机制结果和托莱山断裂的构造性质,推测主震的发震构造为一条北西西向的断层,倾向SW,倾角在深部较缓而在浅部可能较陡。由于托莱山断裂带次级断裂发育、产状复杂、缺乏准确位置,因此无法通过定位结果来判断发震构造为托莱山主断裂还是其次级断裂。     

STUDY ON SOURCE PARAMETERS OF THE 8 AUGUST 2017 M7.0 JIUZHAIGOU EARTHQUAKE AND ITS AFTERSHOCKS,NORTHERN SICHUAN

On August 8, 2017, a strong earthquake of M7.0 occurred in Jiuzhaigou County, Aba Prefecture, northern Sichuan. The earthquake occurred on a branch fault at the southern end of the eastern section of the East Kunlun fault zone. In the northwest of the aftershock area is the Maqu-Maqin seismic gap, which is in a locking state under high stress. Destructive earthquakes are frequent along the southeast direction of the aftershocks area. In Songpan-Pingwu area, only 50~80km away from the Jiuzhaigou earthquake, two M7.2 earthquakes and one M6.7 earthquake occurred from August 16 to 23, 1976. Therefore, the Jiuzhaigou earthquake was an earthquake that occurred at the transition part between the historical earthquake fracture gap and the neotectonic active area. Compared with other M7.0 earthquakes, there are few moderate-strong aftershocks following this Jiuzhaigou earthquake, and the maximum magnitude of aftershocks is much smaller than the main shock. There is no surface rupture zone discovered corresponding to the M7.0 earthquake. In order to understand the feature of source structure and the tectonic environment of the source region, we calculate the parameters of the initial earthquake catalogue by Loc3D based on the digital waveform data recorded by Sichuan seismic network and seismic phase data collected by the China Earthquake Networks Center. Smaller events in the sequence are relocated using double-difference algorithm; source mechanism solutions and centroid depths of 29 earthquakes with M_L≥3.4 are obtained by CAP method. Moreover, the source spectrum of 186 earthquakes with 2.0≤M_L≤5.5 is restored and the spatial distribution of source stress drop along faults is obtained. According to the relocations and focal mechanism results, the Jiuzhaigou M7.0 earthquake is a high-angle left-lateral strike-slip event. The earthquake sequence mainly extends along the NW-SE direction, with the dominant focal depth of 4~18km. There are few shallow earthquakes and few earthquakes with depth greater than 20km. The relocation results show that the distribution of aftershocks is bounded by the M7.0 main shock, which shows obvious segmental characteristics in space, and the aftershock area is divided into NW segment and SE segment. The NW segment is about 16km long and 12km wide, with scattered and less earthquakes, the dominant focal depth is 4~12km, the source stress drop is large, and the type of focal mechanism is complicated. The SE segment is about 20km long and 8km wide, with concentrated earthquakes, the dominant depth is 4~12km, most moderate-strong earthquakes occurred in the depth between 11~14km. Aftershock activity extends eastward from the start point of the M7.0 main earthquake. The middle-late-stage aftershocks are released intensively on this segment, most of them are strike-slip earthquakes. The stress drop of the aftershock sequence gradually decreases with time. Principal stress axis distribution also shows segmentation characteristics. On the NW segment, the dominant azimuth of P axis is about 91.39°, the average elevation angle is about 20.80°, the dominant azimuth of T axis is NE-SW, and the average elevation angle is about 58.44°. On the SE segment, the dominant azimuth of P axis is about 103.66°, the average elevation angle is about 19.03°, the dominant azimuth of T axis is NNE-SSW, and the average elevation angle is about 15.44°. According to the fault profile inferred from the focal mechanism solution, the main controlling structure in the source area is in NW-SE direction, which may be a concealed fault or the north extension of Huya Fault. The northwest end of the fault is limited to the horsetail structure at the east end of the East Kunlun Fault, and the SE extension requires clear seismic geological evidence. The dip angle of the NW segment of the seismogenic fault is about 65°, which may be a reverse fault striking NNW and dipping NE. According to the basic characteristics of inverse fault ruptures, the rupture often extends short along the strike, the rupture length is often disproportionate to the magnitude of the earthquake, and it is not easy to form a rupture zone on the surface. The dip angle of the SE segment of the seismogenic fault is about 82°, which may be a strike-slip fault that strikes NW and dips SW. The fault plane solution shows significant change on the north and south sides of the main earthquake, and turns gradually from compressional thrust to strike-slip movement, with a certain degree of rotation.     

盈江地区构造应力场和断层识别的联合迭代式反演研究

搜集了盈江及其邻区5组地震序列震源机制解并反演得到该区域的构造应力场。研究结果显示：盈江地区整体主压应力以NNE向为主,主张应力以ESE向为主;但其局部应力场不完全一致,沿苏典断裂分布的主压应力轴走向随着断裂走向由北向南延伸角度逐渐向北偏移,而盈江地区的西南部,其主压应力走向更偏向于东,这可能与大盈江断裂的横向拉伸有关。此外,本研究通过应力场反演识别出了5组地震序列震源机制解的主发震断层节面的走向、倾角、滑动角及发震断层的摩擦系数,为今后该区域的地震研究及地壳动力学变迁提供了参考。     

2021年吴忠—灵武ML3.6震群重新定位及震源机制研究

2021年7月18日—8月7日,宁夏吴忠—灵武地区发生M_L3.6显著震群活动。本文利用多阶段定位方法对该震群进行了重新定位,并根据gCAP方法反演了2021年7月20日灵武M_L3.6地震的震源机制及震源矩心深度,采用Snoke方法计算了震群中3次ML3.0以上地震的震源机制,测定了同一地震多个震源机制的中心解。结果表明,该震群中最大的地震即7月20日02时40分M_L3.6地震的震源机制为节面Ⅰ走向289°,倾角72°,滑动角-22°,节面Ⅱ走向26°,倾角69°,滑动角-161°,震源矩心深度为12 km,初始破裂深度为12.5 km;7月20日03时15分ML3.2地震的震源机制为节面Ⅰ走向290°,倾角82°,滑动角-2°,节面Ⅱ走向20°,倾角88°,滑动角-172°,初始破裂深度为11.9 km;7月21日04时55分ML3.1地震的震源机制为节面Ⅰ走向285°,倾角53°,滑动角2°,节面Ⅱ走向194°,倾角88°,滑动角143°,初始破裂深度为11.6 km,这些地震震源机制的主压应力轴主要为NE向。该震群序...