采用sPn震相确定四川长宁地区M≥4.0地震震源深度

通过对2013年1月至11月四川长宁地区M≥4.0地震震相的分析得出,在震中距大于260 km时,四川数字地震台网部分台站可记录到较为清晰的sPn震相。本文采用sPn和Pn震相确定震源深度的方法,分别对长宁地区2个M≥4.0地震的震源深度进行了重新计算,2次地震的震源深度较浅,均小于3 km,是较为精确的震源深度值。     

采用sPn震相确定甘肃岷县M>4.0地震震源深度

通过对甘肃岷县2013年7月3个M>4.0地震震相的细致分析,认为在震中距大于250km时四川数字地震台网部分台站可记录到较为清晰的sPn震相。采用sPn和Pn震相确定震源深度的方法分别对岷县3个地震的震源深度进行了重新计算,得到了较为精确的地震震源深度。     

基于sPn震相计算黑龙江地区近震震源深度

采用黑龙江地震台网记录的地震波形,基于sPn震相,计算2005—2021年黑龙江省区域内发生的11次M≥4.0近震的震源深度。分析发现,在研究区域内,可精确识别单台震中距在3°—7°范围内的地震记录波形的sPn震相。计算多台站震源深度,发现其平均值与黑龙江地震台网采用HypoSat方法测定的震源深度结果基本一致,仅3个地震的误差较大。分析认为,采用sPn震相方法测定黑龙江地区近震的震源深度准确度较高,可为日常跟踪分析工作提供依据。     

sPn震相计算近震震源深度研究

震源深度是描述震源信息的基本参数之一,也是目前最难测准的参数之一。近震深度震相sPn与Pn震相到时差与震中距无关,是测定地壳内地震震源深度的主要依据之一。sPn与Pn到时差测定地壳内近震深度的方法简洁、准确,可以在日常地震速报中应用。     

中国台湾地区地震sPn震相分析及其震源深度计算

运用Pn震相对齐的方法分析了发生在中国台湾地区地震的sPn震相,总结了该地区地震sPn震相的一些特征,用sPn震相计算了震源深度并与单纯型定位法结果进行了对比。结果表明,在该地区地震中,sPn震相特征明显;应用该方法可以较准确地测定台湾浅源地震的震源深度。     

利用河北台网sPn震相计算近震震源深度的初步研究

以河北台网记录到的地震数据为基础,根据sPn震相所具有的特征对该震相进行精确识别,计算出2001年以来河北地震台网记录的2个代表性地震的震源深度,为了得到更加准确的震源深度,采用sPn震相计算出多个台站震源深度的平均值,将结果与中国地震台网中心给出的震源深度进行比对,2个地震的震源深度误差均比较小,说明该方法在日常工作中可以得到应用,为地震科研工作提供有利的依据。     

Pn与sPn震相到时差计算震源深度的单台应用

震源深度是地震定位的一个重要参数.本文利用沈阳台记录到4个壳内近震,进行sPn震相识别,利用sPn与Pn震相的到时差计算这几个近震的震源深度,将所得结果与国家局及辽宁台网结果进行对比研究,结果表明沈阳台定出的深度与国家局所定深度75%是一致的,与辽宁局结果也基本一致,误差较小.在2 km范围内.并对利用sPn震相计算震...     

用sPn计算四川省攀枝花地震的震源深度

本文推导了sPn与Pn波走时差与震源深度的方程,方程中sPn与Pn波的走时差与震中距无关,只与震源深度和区域地壳模型有关.根据该方程,提出用sPn与Pn的走时差来测定地震深度.2008年8月30日和8月31日在四川省攀枝花和会理交界处分别发生了Ms6.1、Ms5.6两次地震.但是,在四川省地震台网地震目录中缺少8月30...     

利用sPn震相计算石嘴山M_L4.4地震震源深度

利用sPn和Pn震相走时差计算的2014年2月28日石嘴山M_L4.4地震的震源深度为7.21±0.277km;分析不同震源深度下民勤台的理论波形与观测波形拟合结果,得到震源深度为7~8km。研究认为,石嘴山M_L4.4地震属于浅源地震,震源浅和沉积层较厚是此次地震震感较强的主要原因。另外,合理选取地震波形数据和震相识别方法,可有效提高s Pn震相测定震源深度的可靠性。为便于应用,本文还给出了宁夏地区地震震源分别位于上地壳和下地壳时sPn和Pn震相走时差与震源深度的对应关系表。     

用sPn震相测定近震震源深度

用近震深度震相ｓＰｎ与Ｐｎ波的到时差测定近震深度，方法以求简捷准确。为此，对我国部分地区台网记录的ｓＰｎ震相进行了初步分析研究，通过研制的计算ｓＰｎ走时程序运算，给出华北、山西、华东、西北及四川地区的ｓＰｎ－Ｐｎ走时差对应震源深（ｈ）表和ｓＰｎ－Ｐｎ求震源深度列线图。经过震例检验，该表比较适合本地区的走时特性。为应用ｓＰｎ震相测准我国部分地区震源深度，提供了有利工具。     

以和静地震为例分析sPn震相在震源深度测定中的应用

利用新疆台网波形数据,对2012年6月30日新源、和静交界区MS6.6地震以及2012年6月30日和静MS4.2地震波形中sPn震相进行分析。通过sPn震相与Pn震相的到时差,并结合2015年新疆模型和3400走时表模型对两个地震进行震源深度测定。结果表明,采用两个模型得出的震源深度与中国地震台网中心测定深度的误差分别为1.7km与1.5km,2.4km与2.1km,其结果真实可靠。     

福建仙游ML5.0级地震波形分析

2013年9月4日,福建仙游发生ML5.0级地震,这是福建数字地震台网建成以来记录到的该区域最大地震.本文就此次地震的记录波形进行分析,结果表明：仙游ML5.0级地震的震相出现规律符合一般近震记录特征;在波形中分析出sPn震相,并据此测定地震的震源深度为11.1 km,与Hyposat方法测定结果一致;用初至首波估算出震区的地壳厚度约为25.2 km.     

新疆乌鲁木齐地区震源深度分布与断层关系研究

采用新疆维吾尔自治区地震局精度较高的常规地震目录和双差定位目录,对乌鲁木齐地区震源深度的分布特征及与断层的关系进行了研究。结果表明,乌鲁木齐地区的平均震源深度随震级的增加而加深,并形成3个分布层。震源绝大多数分布在上地壳1～35km深度范围内,优势集中在上地壳16～25km深度范围内。平均震源深度的空间分布特征与断层的展布密切相关,乌鲁木齐市附近的3组断裂所夹持的地块震源深度最浅,深度处于17～21km之间,而在周边一些深大断裂上震源深度较深。不同构造部位的震源深度剖面显示,清水河子断裂、齐古断裂、依连哈比尔尕等断裂的断裂面处于无震蠕滑或闭锁状态,地震主要发生在其下的滑脱层中;而在霍尔果斯、西山、二道沟等断裂上,震源深度从滑脱层延伸到断裂面上,反映出断裂未完全闭锁时的弱运动状态,显示这些断裂为新的活动断裂。震源深度的分布还与乌鲁木齐地区复杂的地壳结构有关,地震多分布在低速体之上或低速体和高速体之间的夹层中     

中国地震震源深度与强震活动状态研究

通过对中国绝大部分地区 1970年以来有仪器测定震源深度的地震资料进行详细分析 ,提出了“地震地热说”的假说并对分析结果作出解释 ,得出了一个关于中国强震活动大形势的全新观念 ,认为中国强震活动受到地壳深部 4个“热点”(吉林、新疆兴都库什、台湾和西藏日喀则等中深源震区 ) 70年代强震活动的牵引 ,完成了一个由地震活动高潮期 ( 1970 ?～ 1982 )、调整期 ( 1983～ 1992 )和消减期 ( 1993～ 1999?)所组成的地震链全过程。目前消减期尚未结束 ,但从 1999年 4月 8日吉林7 0级深震开始 ,新的一轮地震链过程可能已在酝酿之中     

Determination Method of Focal Depth of Local Earthquake Using the Travel-time Difference between Pn and sPn

In this paper,we derived the relationships between the travel time difference of sPn and Pn and the local earthquake focal depth.In these equations,the travel time difference of sPn and Pn is not related to the epicentral distance,but depends only on the regional crustal mode and the focal depth.According to the equations,we provided a simple and accurate method to determine local earthquake focal depth by using the travel time difference between phase sPn and Pn.This method has been used to determine the f...     

STUDY ON FOCAL DEPTH OF THE MS5.4 CANGWU EARTHQUAKE IN GUANGXI

On July 31th, 2016, a magnitude 5.4 earthquake struck Cangwu Country, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, it was the largest earthquake recorded by Guangxi Seismological Network since it set up. The number of people affected by the earthquake had reached 20 000, and the direct economic losses caused by the earthquake were nearly 100 million Yuan. After the earthquake, USGS provided a global earthquake catalog showing that the focal depth of Cangwu earthquake was about 24.5km. However, the result given by the Global Centroid Moment Tensor showed the focal depth of this earthquake was 15.6km. However, the result obtained by Xu Xiaofeng et al. using CAP method was 5.1km. It was clear that the focal depths of Cangwu earthquake given by different institutions were quite different from each other. However, accurate focal depth of the earthquake has important significance for exploring the tectonic mechanism near the epicenter, so it is necessary to further determine the more accurate depth of the Cangwu earthquake. In order to further accurately determine the focal depth of Cangwu earthquake, we used the global search method for travel-time residual to calculate the focal depth of this earthquake and its error range, based on the regional velocity model, which is a one-dimensional velocity model of the Xianggui tectonic belt produced by the comprehensive geophysical profile. Then, we inverted the focal mechanism of this earthquake with the CAP method. Based on this, the focal depth of Cangwu M_S5.4 earthquake was further determined by the method of the Rayleigh surface wave amplitude spectrum and the sPL phase, respectively. Computed results reveal that the focal depth of this earthquake and its error range from the travel-time residual global search method is about(13±3)km, the focal depth inverted by CAP method is about 10km, the focal depth from sPL phase is about 10km, and the focal depth from Rayleigh surface wave amplitude spectrum is about 9~10km. Finally, we confirmed that the focal depth of Cangwu M_S5.4 earthquake is about 10km, which indicates that this earthquake still occurred in the upper crust. In the case of low network density, the sPL phase and Rayleigh wave amplitude spectrum recorded by only 1 or 2 broadband stations could be used to obtain more accurate focal depth. The focal depth's accuracy of Cangwu M_S5.4 earthquake in the USGS global earthquake catalog has yet to be improved. In the future, we should consider the error of the source parameters when using the USGS global earthquake catalog for other related research.     

根据宏观地震资料确定震源深度的Kovesligethy-Gassmann问题的通解及其适应性

根据震源指标几何扩散率ｎ和近场吸收系数ａ／ｋｍ＾２都随实际地震而异的性质，导出了完整震源深度公式，并获得Ｋ－Ｇ问题的通解。对此通解及震源深度公式分别提出３种算法，效果都较好，利用计算所得震源类型，结合宏观场粗略地探索了震源几何学，为直接观察震源的钻孔设计提供了依据。     

RESEARCH OF FOCAL MECHANISM AND DEPTH OF TWOMS4.5 EARTHQUAKES IN YONGNING

TwoM_S4.5 earthquakes happened in Yongning, a county of Yinchuan in Ningxia on June 22, 2010 and November 20, 2012, which were both strongly felt in Yinchuan and its vicinities. In order to understand the seismogenic structure better, we collected the regional earthquake waveform data of Ningxia and nearby seismic networks. Locating main shocks and aftershocks distribution by Hyp2000 and inversing the focal mechanism and depth by TDMT, we got results as follows: for the June 22 earthquake, nodal plane Ⅰ: strike 208, dip 89, and rake -164; nodal plane Ⅱ: strike 117, dip 74, and rake -2. For the November 20 earthquake: nodal plane Ⅰ: strike 284, dip 79, and rake 12, nodal plane II strike 192, dip 79, and rake 169. By means of reference to Snoke method, it is known that the main fractures of the two earthquakes are both strike slip faults with NNE-trending and NNW-dipping, while the former has a small amount of tension component and the latter has a small amount of thrust component. And the moment magnitudes of them areM_W4.5 andM_W4.3. According to Hyp2000 location, TDMT moment tensor fitting error and sPn depth phases, we consider that the focal depths of the two earthquakes are 22km and 8km, both are shallow-focus ones. Though the epicenters of the two earthquakes are 13km apart from each other, the former one is deeper, the reason is that the November 20 earthquake was controlled by the major fault of Yinchuan Fault, while the June 22 earthquake was controlled by south branch of Yinchuan Fault.     

青海数字测震台网速报震级与量规函数的初步研究

对2010年至2012年青海测震台网速报地震震级重新量取,从震级偏差频次分布、量规函数、对单台震级的影响上作了定量统计和分析,给出了量规函数校正值.