黄河健康生命的指标体系

河流健康是人们对河流生命存在状态的描述,是人类对河流向其提供服务的认可程度。通过分析人类和河流生态系统的生存需求,认为连续的河川径流、通畅安全的水沙通道、良好的水质、良性运行的河流生态系统和一定的供水能力是健康黄河的标志,提出用低限流量、河道最大排洪能力、平滩流量、滩地横比降、水质类别、湿地规模、水生生物、供水能力等8项定量指标作为健康黄河的标志,并根据相关的历史水文资料和1956~2004年的实测数据分析,确定了相应的健康指标量值。     

河流健康及其指标

Based on the author’s practice in river harnessing, this paper defines that a healthy river is a river whose social and natural functions can be balanced or compromised in terms of the socio-economic, ecological and environmental values associated with the river. The environmental values of river systems should be judged according to the following criteria: the signal of a healthy river should be associated with favorable riverbed, acceptable water quality, sustainable river ecosystem and compatible runoff. The river health criterion should reflect the river’s natural function status which includes the riverbed, water quality, river ecosystem and runoff. But, the variety and quantity would be different for different rivers depending on different natural features and social background. The standards to be adopted for a healthy river should be determined according to the requirements for maintaining river’s normal natural functions and the extent whether the social and natural functions could perform in a balanced way, and also the standards adopted should be adjusted according to the change of the given conditions. The key factor of river health is the enough and clean flow. The authors stressed that human activities would hurt the river health which include excessive water diversion and excessive power generation from the river, improper regulation of flood and sediment, and over discharge of sewage into the river and over change in fish habitat. Taking the Yellow River as a case, this paper also discussed the method to identify what are the standards of a healthy river as well as environmental flows. Foundation: Chinese National Research Program, No.2006BAB06B; National Key Basic Research Development Program of China “973”, No.G1999043601 Author: Liu Changming, Academician     

新疆河流径流量三十余年来的变化

本文利用新疆河流地表径流量统计资料，分析了全疆范围地表径流量３０多年来的年际变化，年内变化以及引起水量变化的原因。     

河流健康评价的主评指标筛选

河流健康是近年来探讨水资源问题的一个热点,其评价指标体系正成为河流管理的目标。为了筛选出一些基本的、易于量化的主要评价指标来揭示河流健康基本状况和变化趋势,通过对1972～2010年约150篇相关文献、45个河流健康评价指标体系902项指标的整理和归纳,应用统计、层次和相关性分析法,确定各指标的被采用率,并同时综合考虑指标的重要性、普遍性、可量化性和易获得性,筛选出揭示河流生境物理、水环境、生物和水资源利用4类特征的主要指标。结果表明,有以下8个指标可作为河流健康的主评指标：河岸植被覆盖率、河流连通性、湿地保留率、径流量变化率、水质达标率、鱼类生物完整性指数、水资源利用率和流域天然植被覆盖率。     

山区河流系统健康评价方法研究

本文通过对山区河流的基本特征研究,从生态功能和人类服务功能两大角度建立了山区河流健康评价系统,并基于投影寻踪理论构建了山区河流健康评估指标体系。以中国西南地区某典型山区河流为研究对象,本文对该河流水电开发前后的健康状况进行了研究。结果显示水电开发后河流综合健康状况较现状有显著提高。在此基础上,本文进一步通过对投影指标体系的结构特征分析,提出了维持河流健康的对策。     

河流健康:概念、评价方法与方向

人类不合理的社会经济活动严重干扰了河流生态系统,河流健康问题引起广泛的重视。在详细概括了有关河流健康概念的不同认识基础上,介绍了河流健康评价的生物监测法与综合指标法的优缺点与发展历程,并就有关河流健康评价的发展趋势提出建议。认为今后的重点是评价标准确定、河流对干扰敏感性、生态过程性指标及流域尺度上的健康评价的研究。     

我国河流水化学研究进展

河流水资源是我国水资源的最重要组成部分,本文从我国河流水质监测站网的发展、河流水化学特征和３０ａ来河流水质变化３方面,总结我国学者对我国河流水化学的研究进展。     

河流伦理与人类文明的延续

一、黄河明的独特性和唯一性。河流伦理的基础是河流明，只有充分认识了河流明，才能进一步认识人与河流的关系，人应该与河流建立一种什么样的关系。在这方面，黄河是一个绝无仅有的例证。     

基于二元水循环的河流生态需水水量与水质综合评价方法——以辽河流域为例

通过考虑水的自然循环与水在人类活动影响下的循环 (二元水循环),后者包括水资源开发利用率、耗水率、污水排放浓度影响,探讨了二元水循环下河流生态需水“质”与“量”的综合评价,以区别以往仅从自然水循环 (一元) 出发评价河流生态需水的缺陷。建立了二元水循环下的河流生态需水的水量与水质计算方法,并确定了河流生态需水的“质”与“量”的评价标准,实现了河流生态需水水量与水质的综合评价。以辽河流域为例进行实证分析,计算了一元水循环下西辽河、东辽河、辽河干流、浑太河、东北沿黄渤海诸河等水资源分区的河流生态需水,分别占径流的39.3%、63.0%、43.9%、43.3%、43.5%,采用Tennant推荐流量及等级进行评价,结果是：除西辽河属于“中”等级外,东辽河、浑太河、辽河干流、东北沿黄诸河等均在“好”等级以上,东辽河达到“极好”等级。与之对应的二元水循环下的河流生态需水比例分别是57.5%、74.1%、60.8%、60.3%、60.4%,综合评价结果显示：从水量角度评价,西辽河不能达到生态需水“量”的标准,其余能够达标,从水质角度评价,西辽河、浑太河、辽河干流、东北沿黄诸河等均不能够达到“质”的标准,东辽河可以达标。从“量”与“质”相结合的角度评价,仅有东辽河可以达标。因此,水质状况是决定辽河流域河流生态需水是否满足生态系统需求的主要问题。     

水质恢复能力评价方法及其在黄河流域的应用

在探讨水体水质恢复途径的基础上,建立了水质恢复能力评价标准和方法。根据黄河干流1998年的纳污情况及河水中三类主要污染物 (BOD、氨氮和挥发酚) 的浓度对黄河干流的水质恢复能力进行了评价,发现对于单位河长,除潼关-三门峡河段水质恢复能力属中等以外,其余河段水质恢复能力均较弱。物理稀释作用对水相中污染物浓度降低的贡献相对较小;各河段的水质恢复能力与泥沙含量呈显著正相关,与水温呈一定程度的正相关。黄河干流这种较差的水质恢复能力表明黄河干流的环境功能较弱,且现有的污染物排放已经超过了其水质恢复的能力,从而致使水质恶化,影响水资源的可持续利用。     

基于二元水循环的河流生态需水水量与水质综合评价方法——以辽河流域为例

In this article the meaning of the quantity and quality of environmental flows of river in dualistic water cycle is discussed,and compared with the meaning of unitary water cycle. Based on the analysis of the relationship between environmental flows of river re-quirements,the efficiency of water resource usage,the consumption coefficient,and the concentration of waste water elimination,the water quantity and water quality calculation method of the environmental flows of river requirements in dualistic water cycle is developed,and the criteria for environmental flows of river requirements are established,and therefore the water quantity-quality combined evaluation of natural river flows requirements are realized. Taking the Liaohe River as a model,the environmental flows of river requirements for Xiliao River,Dongliao River,mainstream Liaohe River,Huntai River and northeast rivers along the coasts of the Yellow and Bohai seas in unitary water cycle are calculated,each taking up 39.3%,63.0%,43.9%,43.3% and 43.5% of runoff respectively. Evaluated according to Tennant recommended flow,the results show that: except Xiliao River is "median",the rest are all upon "good",the Dongliao River is even "very good". The corresponding results in dualistic water cycle are that,the proportion of natural flows for each river is 57.5%,74.1%,60.8%,60.3% and 60.4%; while the combined evaluation results show that: considering "quantity",except Xiliao River,the rest rivers can all achieve the "quantity" criteria of the en-vironmental flows of river requirements,but if considering the aspect of "quality",only Dongliao River can reach the "quality" standard. By water quantity-quality combined evalua-tion method,only Dongliao River can achieve the criteria. So the water quality is the main factor that determines whether the environmental flows can meet the river ecosystem de-mands.     

Water quantity-quality combined evaluation method for rivers&rsquo|water requirements of the instream environment in dualistic water cycle: A case study of Liaohe River Basin

In this article the meaning of the quantity and quality of environmental flows of river in dualistic water cycle is discussed, and compared with the meaning of unitary water cycle. Based on the analysis of the relationship between environmental flows of river re-quirements, the efficiency of water resource usage, the consumption coefficient, and the concentration of waste water elimination, the water quantity and water quality calculation method of the environmental flows of river requirements in dualistic water cycle is developed, and the criteria for environmental flows of river requirements are established, and therefore the water quantity-quality combined evaluation of natural river flows requirements are realized. Taking the Liaohe River as a model, the environmental flows of river requirements for Xiliao River, Dongliao River, mainstream Liaohe River, Huntai River and northeast rivers along the coasts of the Yellow and Bohai seas in unitary water cycle are calculated, each taking up 39.3%, 63.0%, 43.9%, 43.3% and 43.5% of runoff respectively. Evaluated according to Tennant recommended flow, the results show that: except Xiliao River is “median”, the rest are all upon “good”, the Dongliao River is even “very good”. The corresponding results in dualistic water cycle are that, the proportion of natural flows for each river is 57.5%, 74.1%, 60.8%, 60.3% and 60.4%; while the combined evaluation results show that: considering “quantity”, except Xiliao River, the rest rivers can all achieve the “quantity” criteria of the en-vironmental flows of river requirements, but if considering the aspect of “quality”, only Dongliao River can reach the “quality” standard. By water quantity-quality combined evalua-tion method, only Dongliao River can achieve the criteria. So the water quality is the main factor that determines whether the environmental flows can meet the river ecosystem de-mands.     

人类活动对黄河中游高含沙水流的影响

以黄河中游干流和渭河、无定河的资料研究了人类活动对黄土高原河流高含沙水流的发生频率的影响。人类破坏森林植被，大量拦截黄河上游清水来源区的清水基流，使得高含沙水流发生频率增大，大规模水土保持措施的实施则使高含沙水流发生频率迅速减小。近50年来黄河干流和一些支流的高含沙水流随时间的变化可以用一个三阶段模式来概括，即20世纪50-60年代，由于人类破坏植被，使高含水流频率增大；20世纪60年代末至80年代中期，大规模水土保持措施的实施使高含沙水流发生的频率减小；20世纪80年代末期以来，人类大量拦截利用清水资源，使高含沙水流的发生频率又复增大。     

黄河孟花段水环境质量评价

针对黄河泥沙对水环境质量评价的突出影响，为了完整地反映多泥沙河流的水环境质量状况以及有效区分由泥沙带来的自然污染与由污染物排放引起的人为污染，该文依据多泥沙河流水环境质量评价应遵循的基本思想方法，对黄河孟花段的水环境质量状况进行了评价。     

黄河下游河道变迁与河道治理

距今3000a以来,黄河改道频繁,通常当河床高出两侧平地2～3m,最高达5m时,便会发生河流改道。3000-150aBP,黄河通常自北向南改道;150aBP至今,通常自南向北改道。现在黄河河床已高出两侧平地3m,有些地方已高出两侧平地10m。按河流演变的自然规律,黄河已达到其河床演变的临界值,很可能会再次改道。如人工改道,最理想的河道是位于汉志河古河道高地与东汉河古河道高地之间的古河间低地内。     

宽变幅水沙两相流的冲淤双临界现象及其地貌学意义

通过黄土高原一些河流资料的分析，发现了宽变幅水沙两相流冲淤过程中的2个临界值，位于非高含水流区域中的临界点，可称之为冲淤下临界；位于高含沙水流区域中的临界点，可称之为冲淤上临界，水沙两相流冲淤的双临界现象，对珩多沙河流河道泥沙的输移有重要意义，随着含沙量的增大，排沙比先减小而后增大，2次与代表排沙比等于1的直线相交，这2个交点即分别对应于挟沙水流冲淤的下临界和上临界，运用所揭示的水沙两相流冲淤过程的双临界现象，可以对冲积河流河型的形成进行新的解释，以我国近百条冲积河流的资料为基础，点绘了年均悬移质输沙率与年均流量的关系，并以不同的符号来区分弯曲河型、游荡河型和高含沙曲流河型。结果表明，上述3种河型可以很好于被代表特征含沙量分别为C=60kg/m^3和C=3.3kg/m^3的2条直线所区分，这2个特征含沙量反映了河道水沙两相流冲淤的上、下临界值。