Downward continuation of the free-air gravity anomalies to the ellipsoid using the gradient solution and terrain correction—An attempt of global numerical computations

The formulas for the determination of the coefficients of the spherical harmonic expansion of the disturbing potential of the earth are defined for data given on a sphere. In order to determine the spherical harmonic coefficients, the gravity anomalies have to be analytically downward continued from the earth's surface to a sphere—at least to the ellipsoid. The goal of this paper is to continue the gravity anomalies from the earth's surface downward to the ellipsoid using recent elevation models. The basic method for the downward continuation is the gradient solution (theg ₁ term). The terrain correction has also been computed because of the role it can play as a correction term when calculating harmonic coefficients from surface gravity data. Theg ₁ term and the terrain correction were expanded into the spherical harmonics up to180 ^th order. The corrections (theg ₁ term and the terrain correction) have the order of about 2% of theRMS value of degree variance of the disturbing potential per degree. The influences of theg ₁ term and the terrain correction on the geoid take the order of 1 meter (RMS value of corrections of the geoid undulation) and on the deflections of the vertical is of the order 0.1″ (RMS value of correction of the deflections of the vertical).     

Determination of Potential coefficients to degree 52 from 5° Mean Gravity Anomalies

A set of 38406 1°×1° mean free air anomalies were used to derive a set of 1507 5° equal area anomalies that were supplemented by 147 predicted anomalies to form a global coverage of 1654 anomalies. These anomalies were used to derive potential coefficients to degree 52 using the summation formulae. In these computations, a smoothing operator was introduced and found to significantly effect the results at higher degrees. In addition, the effects of the atmosphere, spherical approximation and terrain were studied. It was found that the atmospheric effects and spherical approximation effects were about 0.3% of the actual coefficients. The terrain correction effects amounted to 10 to 25% of the low degree coefficients depending on a specific terrain correction model chosen; however, the correction terms found from the models did not yield solutions that agreed better with current satellite derived potential coefficient determinations. Anomalies were computed from the derived potential coefficients for comparison to the original anomalies. These comparisons showed that the agreement between the two anomalies became significantly better as the degree of expansion increased to the maximum considered. These comparisons shed some doubt on the rule of thumb that a block of size θ^° can be represented by a spherical harmonic expansion to 180^°/θ^°.     

Evolution of the Earth's principal axes and moments of inertia: the canonical form of solution

 Harmonic coefficients of the 2nd degree are separated into the invariant quantitative (the 2nd-degree variance) and the qualitative (the standardized harmonic coefficients) characteristics of the behavior of the potential V ₂(t). On this basis the evolution of the Earth's dynamical figure is described as a solution of the time-dependent eigenvalues–eigenvectors problem in the canonical form. Such a canonical quadratic form is defined only by temporal variations of the harmonic coefficients and always remains finite, even within an infinite time interval. An additional condition for the correction or the determination of temporal variations of the 2nd degree is obtained. Temporal variations of the fully normalized sectorial harmonic coefficients are estimated in addition to ˙Cˉ ₂₀, ˙Cˉ ₂₁, and ˙Sˉ ₂₁ of the EGM96 gravity model. In addition, a non-linear hyperbolic model for Cˉ _2m (t), Sˉ _2m (t) is constructed. The trigonometric form of the hyperbolic model leads to the consideration of the potential V ₂(ψ) instead of V ₂(t) within the closed interval −π/2≤ψ≤+π/2. Thus, it is possible to evaluate the global trend of V ₂(t), the Earth's principal axes and the differences of the moments of inertia within the whole infinite time interval. Received: 25 September 1998 / Accepted: 28 June 2000     

W0: an estimate in the Finnish Height Datum N60, epoch 1993.4, from twenty-five GPS points of the Baltic Sea Level Project

Based upon a data set of 25 points of the Baltic Sea Level Project, second campaign 1993.4, which are close to mareographic stations, described by (1) GPS derived Cartesian coordinates in the World Geodetic Reference System 1984 and (2) orthometric heights in the Finnish Height Datum N60, epoch 1993.4, we have computed the primary geodetic parameter W ₀(1993.4) for the epoch 1993.4 according to the following model. The Cartesian coordinates of the GPS stations have been converted into spheroidal coordinates. The gravity potential as the additive decomposition of the gravitational potential and the centrifugal potential has been computed for any GPS station in spheroidal coordinates, namely for a global spheroidal model of the gravitational potential field. For a global set of spheroidal harmonic coefficients a transformation of spherical harmonic coefficients into spheroidal harmonic coefficients has been implemented and applied to the global spherical model OSU 91A up to degree/order 360/360. The gravity potential with respect to a global spheroidal model of degree/order 360/360 has been finally transformed by means of the orthometric heights of the GPS stations with respect to the Finnish Height Datum N60, epoch 1993.4, in terms of the spheroidal “free-air” potential reduction in order to produce the spheroidal W ₀(1993.4) value. As a mean of those 25 W ₀(1993.4) data as well as a root mean square error estimation we computed W ₀(1993.4)=(6 263 685.58 ± 0.36) kgal × m. Finally a comparison of different W ₀ data with respect to a spherical harmonic global model and spheroidal harmonic global model of Somigliana-Pizetti type (level ellipsoid as a reference, degree/order 2/0) according to The Geodesist's Handbook 1992 has been made. Received: 7 November 1996 / Accepted: 27 March 1997     

A new method for computing the ellipsoidal correction for Stokes's formula

 This paper generalizes the Stokes formula from the spherical boundary surface to the ellipsoidal boundary surface. The resulting solution (ellipsoidal geoidal height), consisting of two parts, i.e. the spherical geoidal height N ₀ evaluated from Stokes's formula and the ellipsoidal correction N ₁, makes the relative geoidal height error decrease from O(e ²) to O(e ⁴), which can be neglected for most practical purposes. The ellipsoidal correction N ₁ is expressed as a sum of an integral about the spherical geoidal height N ₀ and a simple analytical function of N ₀ and the first three geopotential coefficients. The kernel function in the integral has the same degree of singularity at the origin as the original Stokes function. A brief comparison among this and other solutions shows that this solution is more effective than the solutions of Molodensky et al. and Moritz and, when the evaluation of the ellipsoidal correction N ₁ is done in an area where the spherical geoidal height N ₀ has already been evaluated, it is also more effective than the solution of Martinec and Grafarend. Received: 27 January 1999 / Accepted: 4 October 1999     

Comparison of undulation difference accuracies using gravity anomalies and gravity disturbances

Errors are considered in the outer zone contribution to oceanic undulation differences as obtained from a set of potential coefficients complete to degree 180. It is assumed that the gravity data of the inner zone (a spherical cap), consisting of either gravity anomalies or gravity disturbances, has negligible error. This implies that error estimates of the total undulation difference are analyzed. If the potential coefficients are derived from a global field of 1°×1° mean anomalies accurate to ε_Δg=10 mgal, then for a cap radius of 10°, the undulation difference error (for separations between 100 km and 2000 km) ranges from 13 cm to 55 cm in the gravity anomaly case and from 6 cm to 36 cm in the gravity disturbance case. If ε_Δg is reduced to 1 mgal, these errors in both cases are less than 10 cm. In the absence of a spherical cap, both cases yield identical error estimates: about 68 cm if ε_Δg=1 mgal (for most separations) and ranging from 93 cm to 160 cm if ε_Δg=10 mgal. Introducing a perfect 30-degree reference field, the latter errors are reduced to about 110 cm for most separations.     

Influence of the atmospheric masses on the gravitational field of the earth

Seasonal and latitude dependent corrections to the gravity and height anomalies are developed in order to account for the neglect of the atmospheric masses outside the geold, when using Stokes’ equation. It is shown that the atmospheric correction to gravity at sea level is almost constant, equal to0.871 mgals with a variation of2 μ gals whereas the height anomaly correction varies between −0.1 cm and −1.3 cm. Further, when the combined latitudinal/seasonal dependence is neglected in the atmospheric corrections, the maximum error introduced is of the order of40 μ gals for the gravity corrections and0.7 cm for the height anomaly corrections.     

Ellipsoidal corrections to order e 2 of geopotential coefficients and Stokes’ formula

Assuming that the gravity anomaly and disturbing potential are given on a reference ellipsoid, the result of Sjöberg (1988, Bull Geod 62:93–101) is applied to derive the potential coefficients on the bounding sphere of the ellipsoid to order e ² (i.e. the square of the eccentricity of the ellipsoid). By adding the potential coefficients and continuing the potential downward to the reference ellipsoid, the spherical Stokes formula and its ellipsoidal correction are obtained. The correction is presented in terms of an integral over the unit sphere with the spherical approximation of geoidal height as the argument and only three well-known kernel functions, namely those of Stokes, Vening-Meinesz and the inverse Stokes, lending the correction to practical computations. Finally, the ellipsoidal correction is presented also in terms of spherical harmonic functions. The frequently applied and sometimes questioned approximation of the constant m, a convenient abbreviation in normal gravity field representations, by e ²/2, as introduced by Moritz, is also discussed. It is concluded that this approximation does not significantly affect the ellipsoidal corrections to potential coefficients and Stokes formula. However, whether this standard approach to correct the gravity anomaly agrees with the pure ellipsoidal solution to Stokes formula is still an open question.     

On calculating the Earth's C21 and S21 gravity coefficients in the IERS terrestrial reference frame

Modern models of the Earth's gravity field are developed in the IERS (International Earth Rotation Service) terrestrial reference frame. In this frame the mean values for gravity coefficients of the second degree and first order, C ₂₁(IERS) and S ₂₁(IERS), by the current IERS Conventions are recommended to be calculated by using the observed polar motion parameters. Here, it is proved that the formulae presently employed by the IERS Conventions to obtain these coefficients are insufficient to ensure their values as given by the same source. The relevant error of the normalized mean values for C ₂₁(IERS) and S ₂₁(IERS) is 3×10⁻¹², far above the adopted cutoff (10⁻¹³) for variations of these coefficients. Such an error in C ₂₁ and S ₂₁ can produce non-modeled perturbations in motion prediction of certain artificial Earth satellites of a magnitude comparable to the accuracy of current tracking measurements. Received: 14 September 1998 / Accepted: 20 May 1999     

Low-degree earth deformation from reprocessed GPS observations

Surface mass variations of low spherical harmonic degree are derived from residual displacements of continuously tracking global positioning system (GPS) sites. Reprocessed GPS observations of 14 years are adjusted to obtain surface load coefficients up to degree n _max = 6 together with station positions and velocities from a rigorous parameter combination. Amplitude and phase estimates of the degree-1 annual variations are partly in good agreement with previously published results, but also show interannual differences of up to 2 mm and about 30 days, respectively. The results of this paper reveal significant impacts from different GPS observation modeling approaches on estimated degree-1 coefficients. We obtain displacements of the center of figure (CF) relative to the center of mass (CM), Δr _CF–CM, that differ by about 10 mm in maximum when compared to those of the commonly used coordinate residual approach. Neglected higher-order ionospheric terms are found to induce artificial seasonal and long-term variations especially for the z-component of Δr _CF–CM. Daily degree-1 estimates are examined in the frequency domain to assess alias contributions from model deficiencies with regard to satellite orbits. Finally, we directly compare our estimated low-degree surface load coefficients with recent results that involve data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission.