1996年5月3日包头西Ms=6.4地震的矩张量解

利用ＣＤＳＮ及ＧＤＳＮ数字化Ｐ波波形资料,用遗传算法反演１９９６年包头西ＭＳ＝６．４地震的地震矩张量解。结果表明该地震矩张量解以双力偶成分为主,是断层面接近南北走向的左旋走滑错动,断裂面走向与大震后５天内余震的分布带走向基本一致。压应力轴与张应力转接近水平,前者近北西西走向,后者近北北东走向。     

用频谱研究小金地震震源参数

本文用ＣＤＳＮ宽频带数字记录，计算了不对称双侧破裂模式的Ｐ波远场位移谱，用频谱方法研究中强地震的震源参数，并将它应用于１９８９年９月２２日四川小金ＭＳ＝６．６级地震的震源参数研究中。研究结果表明，断层长度为８．４ｋｍ；宽度为２．９ｋｍ；动力学参数：地震矩为４．７×１０１７Ｎ·ｍ；平均位错６４．６ｃｍ；应力降１８．９×１０５Ｐａ．并用余震震源深度分布的空间图象证明了：地震断层为走向ＮＷ３３°的走滑断层，断层面倾向为北东，倾角约为２０°。     

1994年9月16日台湾海峡7.3级地震震源过程的研究

采用数字化台网Ｐ波波形资料及台湾台网Ｐ波初动方向资料,研究了１９９４年９月１６日台湾海峡７３级地震及邻近地区（北纬２１～２６°,东经１１５～１２０°）ＭＬ≥５８级共５次地震的矩张量解及震源参数。结果表明,这次７３级地震的矩张量解以双力偶成分为主,是断层面接近ＮＷ走向的正断层。断层面的走向与大震前地震的条带分布走向及余震分布显示的破裂图象较相象,震源机制的张应力轴接近水平,近ＮＥ走向;压应力轴几乎垂直,近ＮＷＷ走向,似乎表明这次地震是受菲律海板块向欧亚板块北西向挤压的力源控制。从Ｐ轴接近竖直而Ｔ轴接近水平来看,发震断层为强烈拉张性正断层,可能还同时存在垂直向上的应力作用。其它４个强震的震源机制解与７３级大震的差别较大。这些地震震源机制解的复杂性,表明台湾海峡地震序列的发展过程比较复杂。     

用遗传算法反演1994年台湾海峡地震的震源过程及其相关研究

将遗传算法应用于地震矩张量解的反演问题．采用数字化台网P波波形资料及台湾台网P波初动方向资料,研究了1994年9月16日台湾海峡7.3级地震及其邻近地区(北纬21～26,东经115～120)ML5.8共5个地震的矩张量解及震源参数．在5个地震中,1994年9月16日台湾海峡7.3级地震是我国东南沿海地区自1918年南澳7.3级地震以来最大的一次地震．结果表明:这次7.3级地震的矩张量解以双力偶成分为主,是断层面接近NW走向的正断层．断层面的走向与大震前地震的条带分布走向及余震分布显示的破裂图象较相像．震源机制的张应力轴接近水平,近NE走向;压应力轴几乎垂直,近NWW走向．似乎表明,这次地震是受菲律宾板块向欧亚板块北西向挤压的力源控制．但从P轴接近竖直而T轴接近水平看,这是一次强烈拉张性的正断层．其它4个强震震源机制解与7.3级大震相互差别较大．这些地震震源机制解的复杂性表明了海峡地震序列发展过程是比较复杂的．      

温州珊溪水库ML3.9震群震源参数特征

采用地震波谱方法测定了温州珊溪水库地震序列的震源参数，分析了震源应力降特征及地震矩与震级的关系。研究结果认为：珊溪震群地震矩和震级统计关系为logMo=1．07ML 10．3；占地震总数60％的小震应力降为0．018～O．049MPa，珊溪震群属于低应力背景下的地震活动；珊溪震区应力降分维数D=0．85，属于低值，反映了震区介质强度和应力分布的非均匀程度较高。     

1991~1996年贝加尔地区地震的震源机制

确定了贝加尔地区１９９１～１９９６年期间８１次能级Ｋ≥１０．０（Ｍ≥３．０）的地震的震源机制。在裂谷带中部的大量震源中发现应力状态有很高的稳定性特征：压应力轴近垂直，张应力轴和中等应力轴近水平。在裂谷西南和东北应力轴有各种各样的走向，但都与震源中的位移类型相对应。新的资料与地壳处于水平张条件下的贝加尔地区内进行的释放过程总趋势是一致的。为了高效地获得信息，把大型计算机求得的震源参数与用手工分析原始     

丹江口水库及邻区地震震源参数研究

在讨论震源参数和Ｍ震级关系以及论述利用地方震尾波估算地震矩方法的基础上，尝试性地系统估算了丹江口水库及邻区内４３次ＭＬ≥２．５级地震的震源参数，并讨论了丹江口水库地震的特征。丹江口水库及邻区地震震源参数的初步分析表明：丹江口及邻区属低应力降地区。水库蓄水的附加引张应力效应可能使得丹江口水库中局部以引张应变为主的地区应变迅速增加，地震应力降高于该区一般地震原有水平、从而诱发地震。此外，丹江口水库地震的破裂长度可能和震源机制的破裂类型有关。     

由峰值速度估算地震应力降

根据Ｂｒｕｎｅ（１９７０）提出的震源位错模式，用发生在滇西地震实验场区鹤庆ＭＳ＝５．３中强地震的地震数字化监测资料，计算了Ｓ波谱，测定了鹤庆地震序列的震源参数．在此基础上研究了地面运动峰值速度参数（ｒ．ｖ）对地震应力降Δσ的依赖性．由地震标定关系给出（ｒ．ｖ）∝Δσ２／３，导出了用峰值速度参数求地震应力降的３个关系：ｌｇ（ｒ．ｖ）＝ｄ１＋（１／３）ｌｇＭ０＋（２／３）ｌｇΔσ；ｌｇ（ｒ．ｖ）＝ｄ２＋（１／３）ＭＬ＋（２／３）ｌｇΔσ；ｌｇΔσ＝－１．０＋１．５ｌｇ（ｒ．ｖ）．假定对大小地震的平均应力降取３．０ＭＰａ，由鹤庆地震序列的观测资料定出常数ｄ１＝－３．８８和ｄ２＝－０．３８．序列震源参数测定结果给出，地震矩为１０１１～１０１５Ｎ·ｍ，破裂半径ａ＝２００～６００ｍ．根据峰值速度测定的应力降Δσ＝０．１～１０ＭＰａ，平均为３．７ＭＰａ．用这些标度关系求出的应力降结果与Ｂｒｕｎｅ模式求应力降的结果比较一致．本文的研究结果还表明，地面运动峰值速度参数对地震应力降的依赖性比对地震矩的依赖性更强．     

帕米尔地区地震活动及震源机制解的分布特征

帕米尔地区存在一个明显的ＮＥ－ＳＷ向中，深源地震带，中，深源地震震源机制分布具有明显的区域特征，兴都库什地区震源断错以倾滑逆断层为主，Ｔ轴仰角几乎垂直，帕米尔弧形构造东侧分布的地震以走滑性质为主，Ｐ轴仰角接近水平，当深度为１００～２００ｋｍ时在弧形构造南侧形成了一个明显的北东向的正断层分布。中，深源地震主压应力方向随深度增加由ＮＷ向逐渐变为ＮＥ向，主压应力Ｐ轴仰角平缓。     

伽师震源区中等强度地震矩张量反演及其应力场特征

使用区域数字地震台站记录的宽频带长周期波形资料,在时间域反演了1997~2004年伽师震源区52次中等强度地震的矩张量.反演结果揭示,在小尺度的伽师震源区内,震源机制解的P轴、T轴和N轴呈现出明显的分区特征.本文进一步把伽师震源区分为东区和西区,分别反演了东区与西区的应力场.应力场反演结果表明,东区的应力场主压应力轴走向为321°,基本水平.最大主张应力走向68°,倾角40°.截至2004年7月,伽师震源区西部的应力场一直较为稳定,最大主压应力方向为12°,最大主张应力方向282°,二者都基本水平,中等主应力轴基本直立.自西向东,伽师震源区最大主压应力轴逆时针旋转了49°,并且西区张应力的水平作用较为显著,东区压应力的水平作用显著.应力场的这种非均匀变化特征与GPS观测得到的地壳运动速率的空间分布以及塔里木盆地边界附近的地形地貌特征有很好的一致性.震源区深部结构的陡变以及位于震源区东部边界规模较大的NW走向的普昌断裂和色力布亚隐伏断裂可能对产生这种横向非均匀的局部应力场起了重要的作用.     

The Banda Sea earthquake of 24 November 1983: evidence for intermediate depth thrust faulting in the Benioff zone

On 24 November 1983, a major earthquake occurred at 180 km depth beneath the Banda Sea. In the focal mechanism solution the pressure axis is almost horizontal, (azimuth 191°, plunge 02°) and the tension axis nearly vertical (plunge 88°). A comparison with the foreshock-aftershock pattern suggests that shear failure took place within the north-north-westerly dipping Benioff zone by thrust faulting along a southerly dipping plane. The focal mechanism solution does not conform to the usual pattern of the tension or compression axis being roughly parallel to the dip of the Benioff zone. Consequently the faulting could not have been caused by down-dip tension or compression within a sinking slab.     

FOCAL MECHANISM AND SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE M5.0 YUEXI EARTHQUAKE ON 1 OCT. 2014, SOUTHWESTERN CHINA

The Oct.1,2014 M5.0 Yuexi earthquake occurred on the Daliang Shan fault zone where only several historical moderate earthquakes were recorded.Based on the waveform data from Sichuan regional seismic network,we calculated the focal mechanism solution and centroid depth of the M5.0 Yuexi earthquake by CAP (Cut and Paste) waveform inversion method,and preliminarily analyzed the seismogenic structure.We also calculated the apparent stress values of the M5.0 earthquake and other 14 M_L≥4.0 events along the Shimian-Qiaojia fault segment of the eastern boundary of the Sichuan-Yunnan block.The result indicates that the parameters of the focal mechanism solution are with a strike of 256°,dip of 62°,and slip of 167° for the nodal plane Ⅰ,and strike of 352°,dip of 79°,and slip of 29° for the nodal plane Ⅱ.The azimuth of the P axis is 121° with dip angle of 11°,the azimuth of T axis is 217° with dip angle of 28°,and the centroid depth is about 11km,and moment magnitude is M_W5.1.According to the focal mechanism solution and the fault geometry near the epicenter,we infer that the seismogenic fault is a branch fault,i.e.,the Puxiong Fault,along the central segment of the Daliang Shan fault zone.Thus,the nodal plane Ⅱ was interpreted as the coseismic rupture plane.The M5.0 Yuexi earthquake is a strike-slip faulting event with an oblique component.The above findings reveal the M5.0 Yuexi earthquake resulted from the left-lateral strike-slip faulting of the NNW Dalang Shan fault zone under the nearly horizontal principal compressive stress regime in an NWW-SEE direction.The apparent stress value of the Yuexi earthquake is 0.99MPa,higher than those of the M_L ≥ 4.0 earthquakes along the eastern boundary of the Sichuan-Yunnan block since 2008 Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake,implying a relatively high stress level on the seismogenic area and greater potential for the moderate and strong earthquake occurrence.It may also reflect the current increasing stress level of the entire area along the eastern boundary,and therefore,posing the risk of strong earthquakes there.     

2022年7—9月中国大陆地区M≥4.0地震震源机制解测定

利用中国地震台网记录的宽频带波形资料,采用近震全波形反演方法得到2022年7月1日—9月30日发生在中国大陆地区的M≥4.0共18次地震的震源机制解以及2022年9月5日四川泸定M6.8地震的矩心位置和矩心偏移时间。结果显示逆断型6次,走滑型7次,正断型4次,未知型1次。      

Present-day seismicity,stress field and crustal deformation of Egypt

In this study we investigate present-day seismicity and crustal deformation of Egypt based on a comprehensive earthquake catalog from 1900 to 2004 by focal mechanism stress inversion and by recent GPS observations. Spatial distribution of earthquake epicenters indicates that Egypt has been suffered from both interplate and intraplate earthquakes. Most earthquake activity (more than 70%) has been concentrated in northern Egypt along the geologically documented borders of Sinai subplate (northern Red Sea and its two branches Suez rift and Aqaba–Dead Sea transform). The majority of inland earthquake focal mechanisms in Egypt are normal with strike-slip component or strike-slip faulting events. Only a small minority, namely four events, exhibits reverse faulting. The inversion method of Gephart and Forsyth (1984) was applied to calculate the orientation of the principle stress axes and the shape of the stress tensor. The best fitting tensor in Egypt shows homogeneity stress field. The tension stress regime is dominant in northern Egypt. The stress directions are well resolved by the 95% confidence limits, the relative stress magnitude has a value of about 0.3. However, along southern Egypt the strike-slip regime is dominant. The shape factor (R-value) is 0.5, which means that the deviatoric components of σ₁ and σ₃ are of the same magnitude, but of opposite signs. The average horizontal velocity of GPS stations in Egypt is 5.15± 1.1 mm/year in mostly NNW direction. The results of deformation analysis indicate that the northern Egypt is deformed more than the southern part. Only the Egyptian-Mediterranean coastal–Nile Delta zone dominates as a compression deformation area. However, an extensional deformation has been observed throughout the rest of country. This means that the relative motion of African plate with respect to both Eurasian and Arabian has highly controlled the deformation processes in Egypt.     

1932年昌马地震破裂带及其形成原因的初步探讨

1932年12月25日,我国甘肃省西部玉门镇以南的昌马地区发生了7.6级地震。震中区产生了规模较大的地面破裂带,其中有张性、压性和剪切等多种型式裂缝。本文根据分析各种自然破坏现象的形成条件,结合极震区地质构造特征,对震源区的应力作用和地震成因提出初步看法。 对地震破裂带的分析结果表明,这次地震起主要作用的是南北向的水平挤压作用,并与自白垩纪以来控制着本区构造断裂的区域应力场是一致的。地震破裂带出现的部位与长期活动的昌马构造断裂带一致。因此,我们认为昌马地震的发生是昌马构造断裂带继承性活动的结果。     

2022年10月—2023年2月中国大陆地区M≥4.0地震震源机制解测定

利用中国地震台网记录的宽频带波形资料,采用近震全波形反演方法得到2022年10月1日—2023年2月28日发生在中国大陆地区的M≥4.0共46次地震的震源机制解以及2023年1月30日新疆沙雅M6.1地震的矩心位置和矩心偏移时间。结果显示逆断型15次,走滑型15次,正断型14次,未知型2次。     

Focal Mechanism Solutions and Stress Field Inversion of Moderately Strong Earthquakes in the Northern Tianshan Area

Using the focal mechanism solutions of 24 moderately strong earthquakes in the northern Tianshan area, we carried out system cluster and stress field inversion analysis. The result indicates that, the focal mechanism solutions of moderately strong earthquakes are mainly dipslip reverse faulting in the northern Tianshan area. The principal rupture planes of earthquakes are NW-oriented. It is basically consistent with the strike of earthquake structure in its adjacent area. The direction of the principal compression stress P axis is nearly NS, and its inclination angle is small; while the inclination angle of the principal extensional stress T axis is large. It shows that the regional stress field is mainly controlled by the near-NS horizontal compressive stress. The direction of the maximum principal stress shows a gradation process of NNE-NS-NW from east to west.     

2012年11月20日宁夏永宁MS4.6 地震震源机制解与发震构造

2012年11月20日在宁夏银川市永宁县与兴庆区交界处发生M_S4.6地震,为了更好地了解此次地震的发震构造,首先采用Hypo2000绝对定位方法得到该地震的震中位置及余震分布;然后采用CAP方法反演了此次地震的震源机制解和震源深度. 反演结果表明,永宁M_S4.6地震是一个带有少量逆冲分量的右旋走滑地震.该地震矩震级为M_W4.3,最佳双力偶解为:节面Ⅰ走向11°,倾角74°,滑动角171°;节面Ⅱ走向103°,倾角81°,滑动角16°.最佳震源深度为8km左右.从该地震震中和震源机制解以及震源深度剖面分布来看,这次地震很可能发生在银川隐伏主断层西侧的次级断层上.      

1927年古浪8级大震区小震重新定位及问题讨论

联合利用甘肃及周边测震台网记录的古浪及周边地区4 592次地震的P波绝对到时和相对到时资料,采用双差地震定位方法对古浪震源区小震进行重新定位后发现,皇城-双塔断裂带东、西两段表现出不同的力学运动性质,西段以逆冲运动为主,地震主要发生在断裂的下盘;而东段地震却主要发生在上盘,断层活动以局部拉张为主。还首次发现在皇城-双塔断裂带的中段与主破裂呈垂直方向存在一条主震发生时新产生的共轭断层,基于小震的断层面参数反演显示该断裂是一高倾角运动性质以右旋为主兼具正断的断裂。     

Inversion of near-field waveform data for earthquake source rupture process (Ⅱ): Inversion of Chi Chiearthquake source, 20 September, 1999, Taiwan

The new inversion algorithm developed based on the recent progress in the nonlinear programming study by us is used to invert the earthquake source process of Chi Chi earthquake Mw7.6, 20 Semptember,1999, Taiwan. A curve fault model is constructed in our inversion to make the fault model close to the real rupturing fault to reduce the influence from the discrepancy between the constructed fault model and the real rupturing fault. The results show that (1) the rupture process of the Chi Chi earthquake source lasted about 32 seconds and the main faulting occurred between 6th to 21st second after the start of the ruptures and the high slip area were mainly located at the northern segment of the fault. (2) The slip was dominated by thrust faulting. The average rake angle was 64.5°, which was very consistent with those inverted by USGS, Harvard and CWB (Central Weather Bureau of Taiwan). The amount of the moment inverted in this paper was 7.76×1020 NM, which was a slightly bigger than those inverted by USGS and Harvard. (3) A clear nucleation step existed in the source faulting process and it lasted about 6 seconds. The moment release rate accelerated obviously at the end of the nucleation step. The faulting started from the southern segment and mainly occurred at the northern segment after 10 seconds. At the end of this paper, we analyzed the reliability of the inversion result via comparing with the GPS observations and discussed its scientific signification.