我国主体功能区划的科学基础

主体功能区划是构筑我国有序区域发展格局的依据,对经济地理学理论和方法创新提出了紧迫的需求。在分析地域功能基本属性的基础上,首次提出了区域发展的空间均衡模型, 认为标识任何区域综合发展状态的人均水平值趋于大体相等。基于该结论,阐释了功能区形成应有利于实现空间均衡正向(差距缩小) 演变过程,空间均衡的前提是资源要素在区域间的合理流动。探讨了地域功能演替对空间均衡过程的影响,提出了区划方案效益最大化是同区域如何划分和对地域功能随时间变化的正确把握程度相关的。进而分析了主体功能区划的 “开发”与“保护”双重功能的复合、指标体系选择、时空属性相关问题的科学基础。探讨了通过立体流和立体空间均衡实现效率与公平并重目标的合理性。并从法律、规划和政策构成的空间管治制度安排层面,对主体功能区划的定位、实施和协调进行了讨论。     

耦合SOFM与SVM的生态功能分区方法——以鄂尔多斯市为例

辨析区域主要生态环境问题及其空间异质性,划定生态功能区,对保障区域生态安全和国土开发优化具有重要指导意义。以往自下而上的分区研究多基于行政区或流域开展,难以体现行政区或流域内部的生态功能分异。以鄂尔多斯市为例,基于生态系统服务与生态敏感性构建区域生态功能分区指标体系,耦合自组织特征映射（SOFM）网络与支持向量机（SVM）划定鄂尔多斯市生态功能分区。结果表明,区域内各生态功能分区指标呈现明显的空间分异特征,通过SOFM网络基于栅格进行指标聚类,构建分类效果指数筛选最佳聚类方案,将区域分为7种不同的生态功能类型。最终,利用SVM识别最优分区界线,将鄂尔多斯市分为11个生态功能区。本文构建分类效果指数实现多分类方案优选,使用机器学习算法解决自下而上的自然分区容易弱化要素空间位置属性的问题,完成了从分类到分区的定量转换,有助于提升分区的空间精度与客观性,为生态功能分区与分区边界划定提供了新的方法途径。     

市域开发空间区划方法与应用——以南京市为例

主体功能区是近年来各级政府和学术界共同关注的热点。论文以主体功能区规划的理念和原则为指导,将主体功能区划的方法延伸到市域空间尺度,提出城市区域开发空间分区方法及应用模式,将市域发展区划分为优化开发、重点开发、限制开发和禁止开发等四大类。在相关理论及已有研究成果的基础上,对城市开发空间区划的理论模型与方法路径进行探讨。通过空间开发约束、空间开发引导和空间开发强度三方面要素的对空间功能区域综合分析,采用两次两维矩阵的判别方法,并将空间开发引导和空间开发约束先构建二维判别矩阵,得出空间开发的适宜性分类,将空间开发的适宜性结果与现状空间开发强度进行组合判别,从而确定空间开发的功能类型。根据不同类型的功能区域,确定空间未来的利用。同时选取南京为实证研究对象,对理论模型与技术方法的实际应用进行验证,对南京市域进行数据分析,提出南京开发空间分区方案,并依此引导城市空间战略的调整,力求对南京空间秩序的开发、空间方向的拓展、产业布局的调整等具有一定的指引作用。     

西藏高原生态功能区划研究

在分析西藏高原生态环境特征,明确生态系统类型的结构与过程及其空间分布特征的基础上,评价不同生态系统类型的生态服务功能及其在区域社会经济发展中的作用和重要性。运用生态系统科学的原理与方法,结合遥感、地理信息系统和综合分析等手段,对西藏高原在生态区、生态亚区和生态功能区3 个级别上进行生态分区,划分为7 个生态区、17 个生态亚区和76 个生态功能区,并用3 级命名法对这些分区进行命名,绘制了西藏高原生态功能分区图,为高原生态保护和区域社会经济发展提供了理论依据。     

我国主体功能区规划的时代背景、科学内涵、目标导向和政策框架(英文)

主体功能区规划是新世纪以来我国在地域空间规划方面的一次重大创新和实践,"十二五"规划上升为国土空间开发和区域协调发展领域的国家战略之一。本文从改革开放以来我国区域发展失衡的三大主要问题:区域发展差距扩大、城镇化盲目、国土开发无序的分析入手,论述了通过地域空间规划确定合理的地域功能格局和国土空间开发结构的客观需求。进而探讨了地域功能的科学内涵和形成机制,揭示了自然生态本底功能和人类活动需求功能复合形成地域功能的过程;并结合主体功能区规划编制中的关键科学问题,如主体功能识别的指标体系选择、功能区的空间组织以及功能开发导向的确定等关键科学问题,探究了解决的具体路径和相关方案,并就支撑主体功能区规划实施的相关政策导向和改革框架进行了阐述。最后,从规划职责体系、空间规划体系和科技支撑体系三个方面对今后的实施、发展和完善主体功能区战略进行了讨论。     

基于“双评价”集成的国土空间地域功能优化分区

“双评价”（资源环境承载能力和国土空间开发适宜性评价）作为构建国土空间的基本战略格局、实施功能分区的科学基础,为主体功能区降尺度传导、国土空间结构优化、国土开发强度管制等提供了一系列重要参数。以地域功能理论为基础,从人地关系演化出发,探索“双评价”的理论内涵,建立“双评价”到地域功能优化分区的科学逻辑,指出“双评价”集成实现综合效益最大化时所形成的主体功能分区方案为地域功能优化分区的最优方案。以福建省、六盘水市为案例,将人类生产生活的合理需求转化为用地需求参数,通过降尺度的参数分解与测算,结合上位规划及政府与专家系统研判,确定总量控制、结构化控制、空间结构或战略格局控制等目标参数,并在“双评价”基础上,通过不断调整指标、参数及阈值,逐步进行格网单元地域功能优化。着重考虑相邻区域功能冲突与协调、差异化的主体功能定位、土地利用现状及规划、区域发展战略格局以及海陆统筹等区域特征,不断校核与优化。从数据的可获取性、数据集满足理论模型及评估方法的适应程度、可使用的分析方法及模型的不确定性以及尺度效应等方面,探讨功能分区方案不确定性及其解决途径,增强优化结果的鲁棒性,以此作为“三区三线”划定等国土空间规划的科学基础。     

中原城市群乡村“三生”功能分区识别及调控路径

本文基于“生产–生活–生态”3个维度，优化了乡村地域功能评价指标体系，综合运用SOFM网络、地理探测器模型和M-K检验方法，实现了中原城市群187个县（区）的最优功能聚类。结果表明：(1)研究区“三生”功能发展水平的数量结构分别呈“橄榄形”“宝塔形”和“金字塔形”特征，冷热点与数量结构特征的空间分布具有相对一致性。(2)基于乡村功能分区模型实现了乡村分区数目的客观判定，并将研究区划分为主导功能区、滞后发展功能区、复合协调功能区3大类和粮食生产主导功能区等7小类。(3)乡村地域功能分区表现为差异化的结构和空间分异特征，该特征是传统农区本底特色和乡村转型多元要素碰撞的直观表现，符合区域发展趋势。(4)结合各类分区的发展现状，提出了针对性的调控路径。以期丰富乡村地域功能理论的内涵，进一步明确传统农区的乡村发展格局，促进乡村地域系统各功能协调发展。     

基于三维魔方的芜湖市域主体功能区划研究

按照一定的分区原则,运用适当分区技术路径,合理选择主体功能区划指标体系,综合运用层次分析法和熵值法确定指标权重,从资源生态保护度、社会经济发展强度、发展潜力3个方面分别进行指标评价,将评价单元划分不同等级.在此基础上,采用三维魔方法,构建魔方单元与主体功能区对应关系,将市域划分为优化开发区域、重点开发区域、适度开发区域、限制开发区域,定性确定禁止开发区域,分区评价及提出相应发展策略.     

广州市商务办公空间区划及其功能分异研究

在依据空间近邻、空间密度与规模特征等原则对广州市商务办公空间进行空间区划的基础上,选取包括甲级办公楼数量、甲级办公楼建筑面积、区内办公楼总项目数、办公楼总建筑面积、入驻企业比例、办公就业人口比例、所在区域城市基准地价、商务办公区形成年份等指标进行分区聚类分析,将广州市商务办公空间划分为三级功能区。其中,天河北商务办公区为一级;东风路、中山路、环市路、珠江新城商务办公区为二级;五羊新村、江南大道中等8个商务办公区为三级。同时,对各级功能区的功能特征进行了系统分析和研究。研究表明,三个级别的功能区之间的功能分异显著,一级功能区是广州现阶段的核心功能区,高端商务办公企业和商务办公就业人口的垄断性非常明显。在行业类型和企业性质上,一级功能区中金融、信息等专业技术服务业比重明显高于较其他功能区,表明广州商务办公功能仍然处于高度集聚阶段,分散化趋势有待培育。     

"三生"视角下的国土空间利用质量评价——以攀西地区为例

近年来,随着城镇化、工业化的推进,国土空间出现了用地相互侵占、生态环境破坏、粮食安全受到威胁等一系列问题,国土空间的利用效率与质量提升变得尤为重要。为实现生产空间的集约高效、生活空间的宜居适度、生态空间的山清水秀。本文基于"三生"功能的理念,以攀西地区为例,采用综合指标法对其国土空间利用质量和协调性进行评价,并针对性的提出国土空间利用质量提升的方法,研究结果显示:(1)攀西地区"三生"空间利用质量指数等级不高,生产空间的指数差异性高于生活空间,生活空间又高于生态空间;(2)攀西地区"三生"空间利用质量的整体协调性不高,多数区县处于不协调水平;(3)就经济发展而言,经济水平越高的区域其"三生"空间利用质量协调性相对较高;(4)在功能分区上,城市化地区的"三生"空间利用质量的协调性高于农产品主产区,农产品主产区又高于重点生态功能区,考虑到重点生态功能区自身发展现状和特殊性,应重点强化其"三生"空间利用能力,以实现区域统筹发展。本研究可以为区域国土空间开发以及优化提供参考。     

20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局

土地利用/土地覆被变化（LUCC）是人类活动与自然环境相互作用最直接的表现形式,本文采用相同空间分辨率的卫星遥感信息源和相同的技术方法,对中国1980 年代末到2010 年土地利用变化数据进行定期更新。在此基础上,提出并发展土地利用动态区划的方法,研究土地利用变化的空间格局与时空特征。我们发现：1990-2010 年的20 年间,中国土地利用变化表现出明显的时空差异。“南减北增,总量基本持衡,新增耕地的重心逐步由东北向西北移动”是耕地变化的基本特征;“扩展提速,东部为重心,向中西部蔓延”是城乡建设用地变化的基本特征;“林地前减后增,荒漠前增后减,草地持续减少”是非人工土地利用类型变化的主要特征。20 世纪末与21 世纪初两个10 年相比,中国土地利用变化空间格局出现了一些新特征,原有的13 个土地利用变化区划单元演变为15 个单元,且部分区划单元边界发生变化。主要变化格局特征为黄淮海地区、东南部沿海地区、长江中游地区和四川盆地城镇工矿用地呈现明显的加速扩张态势;北方地区耕地开垦重心由东北地区和内蒙古东部转向西北绿洲农业区;东北地区旱作耕地持续转变为水田;内蒙古农牧交错带南部、黄土高原和西南山地退耕还林还草效果初显。近20 年间,尽管气候变化对北方地区的耕地变化有一定的影响,但政策调控和经济驱动仍然是导致我国土地利用变化及其时空差异的主要原因。2000 年后的第一个10 年,土地利用格局变化的人为驱动因素已由单向国土开发为主,转变为开发与保护并重。在空间格局变化的分析方法方面,应用“动态区划法”开展世纪之交两个10 年中国LUCC空间格局变化的分析,有效揭示了20 年来中国LUCC“格局的变化过程”,即动态区划边界的推移、区划单元内部特征的变化与单元的消长等;以及“变化过程的格局”,即土地利用变化过程与特征的分阶段区域差异,清晰刻画了LUCC动态区划中区划单元的消长,单元边界的变动,以及前后10 年的变化强度特征,揭示了土地利用“格局”与“过程”之间的交替转化规律,以及不同类型和区域的变化原因,证明了该分析方法的有效性。     

Spatiotemporal characteristics,patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s简

Land-use/land-cover changes （LUCCs） have links to both human and nature inter- actions. China＇s Land-Use/cover Datasets （CLUDs） were updated regularly at 5-year inter- vals from the late 1980s to 2010, with standard procedures based on Landsat TM／ETM＋ im- ages. A land-use dynamic regionalization method was proposed to analyze major land-use conversions. The spatiotemporal characteristics, differences, and causes of land-use changes at a national scale were then examined. The main findings are summarized as fol- lows. Land-use changes （LUCs） across China indicated a significant variation in spatial and temporal characteristics in the last 20 years （1990-2010）. The area of cropland change de- creased in the south and increased in the north, but the total area remained almost un- changed. The reclaimed cropland was shifted from the northeast to the northwest. The built-up lands expanded rapidly, were mainly distributed in the east, and gradually spread out to central and western China. Woodland decreased first, and then increased, but desert area was the opposite. Grassland continued decreasing. Different spatial patterns of LUC in China were found between the late 20th century and the early 21st century. The original 13 LUC zones were replaced by 15 units with changes of boundaries in some zones. The main spatial characteristics of these changes included （1） an accelerated expansion of built-up land in the Huang-Huai-Hai region, the southeastern coastal areas, the midstream area of the Yangtze River, and the Sichuan Basin; （2） shifted land reclamation in the north from northeast China and eastern Inner Mongolia to the oasis agricultural areas in northwest China; （3） continuous transformation from rain-fed farmlands in northeast China to paddy fields; and （4） effective- ness of the ＂Grain for Green＂ project in the southern agricultural-pastoral ecotones of Inner Mongolia, the Loess Plateau, and southwestern mountainous areas. In the last two decades, although climate change in the north affected the change in cropland, policy regulation and economic driving forces were still the primary causes of LUC across China. During the first decade of the 21st century, the anthropogenic factors that drove variations in land-use pat- terns have shifted the emphasis from one-way land development to both development and conservation. The ＂dynamic regionalization method＂ was used to analyze changes in the spatial patterns of zoning boundaries, the internal characteristics of zones, and the growth and decrease of units. The results revealed ＂the pattern of the change process,＂ namely the process of LUC and regional differences in characteristics at different stages. The growth and decrease of zones during this dynamic LUC zoning, variations in unit boundaries, and the characteristics of change intensities between the former and latter decades were examined. The patterns of alternative transformation between the ＂pattern＂ and ＂process＂ of land use and the causes for changes in different types and different regions of land use were explored.     

Spatiotemporal characteristics,patterns, and caus-es of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s

Land-use/land-cover changes (LUCCs) have links to both human and nature interactions. China's Land-Use/cover Datasets (CLUDs) were updated regularly at 5-year intervals from the late 1980s to 2010,with standard procedures based on Landsat TM\ETM+ images. A land-use dynamic regionalization method was proposed to analyze major land-use conversions. The spatiotemporal characteristics,differences,and causes of land-use changes at a national scale were then examined. The main findings are summarized as follows. Land-use changes (LUCs) across China indicated a significant variation in spatial and temporal characteristics in the last 20 years (1990-2010). The area of cropland change decreased in the south and increased in the north,but the total area remained almost unchanged. The reclaimed cropland was shifted from the northeast to the northwest. The built-up lands expanded rapidly,were mainly distributed in the east,and gradually spread out to central and western China. Woodland decreased first,and then increased,but desert area was the opposite. Grassland continued decreasing. Different spatial patterns of LUC in China were found between the late 20th century and the early 21st century. The original 13 LUC zones were replaced by 15 units with changes of boundaries in some zones. The main spatial characteristics of these changes included (1) an accelerated expansion of built-up land in the Huang-Huai-Hai region,the southeastern coastal areas,the midstream area of the Yangtze River,and the Sichuan Basin;(2) shifted land reclamation in the north from northeast China and eastern Inner Mongolia to the oasis agricultural areas in northwest China;(3) continuous transformation from rain-fed farmlands in northeast China to paddy fields;and (4) effectiveness of the "Grain for Green" project in the southern agricultural-pastoral ecotones of Inner Mongolia,the Loess Plateau,and southwestern mountainous areas. In the last two decades,although climate change in the north affected the change in cropland,policy regulation and economic driving forces were still the primary causes of LUC across China. During the first decade of the 21st century,the anthropogenic factors that drove variations in land-use patterns have shifted the emphasis from one-way land development to both development and conservation.The "dynamic regionalization method" was used to analyze changes in the spatial patterns of zoning boundaries,the internal characteristics of zones,and the growth and decrease of units. The results revealed "the pattern of the change process," namely the process of LUC and regional differences in characteristics at different stages. The growth and decrease of zones during this dynamic LUC zoning,variations in unit boundaries,and the characteristics of change intensities between the former and latter decades were examined. The patterns of alternative transformation between the "pattern" and "process" of land use and the causes for changes in different types and different regions of land use were explored.     

Ecological-Living-Productive Land Classification System in China

Rapid economic development, industrialization, and urbanization aggravates the tense relationship between human beings and the land. With multiple demands for food security, ecological protection and economic development, frequent conflicts and competition occur between multiple different functional land types. The current land use classification system focuses on the productive and living functions of land, but gives little consideration to ecological functions. This study builds a national Ecological-Living-Productive Land Classification System based on land functions emphasizing the concept and position of ecological land. So-called ecological land uses are types of land use regulating, maintaining and protecting ecological security. The new land classification is more flexible for overall planning purposes and for making arrangements for ecological, living and productive land spaces. The Ecological-Living-Productive Land Classification System includes three levels. The first level has four major types: ecological land, ecological-productive land, productive-ecological land, and living-productive land. The second level subdivides the major types into 15 functional land categories, including major ecological regulation land, common ecological regulation land, and ecological conservation land for ecological lands; pasture land, timber land and aquaculture land for ecological-productive lands; arable land and orchard for productive-ecological lands; and urban built-up area, rural living land, and industrial land for living-productive lands. The third level is based on land cover types. Based on multiple data sources, and using a strategy of zoning and re-classification, we extracted the spatial distribution of ecological-living-productive lands on a national scale. The areas of ecological land, ecological-productive land, productive land, and living-productive land area are 6,037,000 km², 1,353,800 km², 2,001,900 km² and 207,300 km², respectively; accounting for 62.89%, 14.10%, 20.85% and 2.16% of total area, respectively. For the second-level classification, the area of ecological conservation land is the largest, accounting for 20.17% of the total area. Ecological land is located mainly in central and western China. Ecological-productive land is distributed in various areas throughout the country, and productive-ecological land and living-productive land are concentrated in eastern China.     

综合功能区划的区域实践——以东北地区为例

我国“‘十一五’规划纲要”提出的按照主体功能区的划分对国土的开发和利用进行规划的 空间发展观对我国社会经济发展空间组织的影响将是深远的。本研究基于对东北地区空间发展 的总体情况的概观, 结合利用GIS 数据库分析所获的区域开发综合评价结果, 遵循一定的区划原 则, 获得了东北地区未来振兴的主体功能区划分的初步方案, 对于东北地区振兴规划的编制, 尤 其是空间总体布局的确立提供了重要的科学支撑, 同时本研究所遵循的“全局判断———分区评 价———方案确定”的基本框架对于其他区域主体功能区的划分具有借鉴意义。     

Zoning farmland protection under spatial constraints by integrating remote sensing,GIS and artificial immune systems

Currently, with rapid expanding of urban area, the rate of conversion of agricultural land to nonagricultural uses in China is increasing. Zoning farmland protection is an important measure to protect limited land resource. This article presented an innovative approach based on the integrated use of remote sensing, GIS, and artificial immune systems (AIS) for generating farmland protection areas. Some modifications have been made for conventional AIS so that it can be further extended to the solution of zoning problems. The optimal objective is to generate farmland protection areas that minimize development potential and maximize agricultural suitability and spatial compactness. First, utility function by addressing the criteria of farmland protection is incorporated into AIS algorithm. Second, encoding and mutation of antibodies is modified so that it can be suited to the solution of spatial optimization problems. The AIS-based zoning model was then applied to a case study in Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. The experiments have demonstrated that the proposed method was an efficient and effective spatial optimization technique, which took only about 194 seconds to generate satisfied farmland protection patterns. Furthermore, the AIS-based zoning model can explore various alternatives conveniently, and it can yield better performances than nonprotection scenario in the utility efficiency of land resources and the site condition for farmland.     

过去40年中国城市扩展及其时空差异分析（英文）

The urban expansion process in China from the 1970 s to 2013 was retrieved based on remote sensing and GIS technology. With the latest zoning method used as reference, annual expansion area per city, urban expansion type, and fractal dimension index were employed to analyze the Chinese urban expansion characteristics and its spatial difference from the aspects of urban expansion process, influence of urban expansion on land use, and urban spatial morphological evolutions. Results indicate that 1) under the powerful guidance of policies, urban expansion in China went through six different stages, and cities in the eastern region entered the rapid expansion period the earliest, followed by cities in the central, northeastern and western regions; 2) cultivated lands and rural settlements and industrial traffic lands were the important land sources for urban expansion in China; the influence of urban expansion on land use in the eastern region was the strongest, followed by the central, northeastern and western regions; 3) urban spatial morphology tended to be complex and was directly related to the adopted spatial expansion mode. Infilling expansion became the main urban expansion mode in the western region first, then in the central and northeastern regions, and finally in the eastern region. This study establishes the foundation for an in-depth recognition of urban expansion in China and optimization of future urban planning.     

Urban expansion in China and its spatial-temporal differences over the past four decades

The urban expansion process in China from the 1970s to 2013 was retrieved based on remote sensing and GIS technology. With the latest zoning method used as reference, annual expansion area per city, urban expansion type, and fractal dimension index were employed to analyze the Chinese urban expansion characteristics and its spatial difference from the aspects of urban expansion process, influence of urban expansion on land use, and urban spatial morphological evolutions. Results indicate that 1) under the powerful guidance of policies, urban expansion in China went through six different stages, and cities in the eastern region entered the rapid expansion period the earliest, followed by cities in the central, northeastern and western regions; 2) cultivated lands and rural settlements and industrial traffic lands were the important land sources for urban expansion in China; the influence of urban expansion on land use in the eastern region was the strongest, followed by the central, northeastern and western regions; 3) urban spatial morphology tended to be complex and was directly related to the adopted spatial expansion mode. Infilling expansion became the main urban expansion mode in the western region first, then in the central and northeastern regions, and finally in the eastern region. This study establishes the foundation for an in-depth recognition of urban expansion in China and optimization of future urban planning.     

Evaluating the effects of land‐use development policies on ex‐urban forest cover: An integrated agent‐based GIS approach

We use a GIS‐based agent‐based model (ABM), named dynamic ecological exurban development (DEED), with spatial data in hypothetical scenarios to evaluate the individual and interacting effects of lot‐size zoning and municipal land‐acquisition strategies on possible forest‐cover outcomes in Scio Township, a municipality in Southeastern Michigan. Agent types, characteristics, behavioural methods, and landscape perceptions (i.e. landscape aesthetics) are empirically informed using survey data, spatial analyses, and a USDA methodology for mapping landscape aesthetic quality. Results from our scenario experiments computationally verified literature that show large lot‐size zoning policies lead to greater sprawl, and large lot‐size zoning policies can lead to increased forest cover, although we found this effect to be small relative to municipal land acquisition. The return on land acquisition for forest conservation was strongly affected by the location strategy used to select parcels for conservation. Furthermore, the location strategy for forest conservation land acquisition was more effective at increasing aggregate forest levels than the independent zoning policies, the quantity of area acquired for forest conservation, and any combination of the two. The results using an integrated GIS and ABM framework for evaluating land‐use development policies on forest cover provide additional insight into how these types of policies may act out over time and what aspects of the policies were more influential towards the goal of maximising forest cover.     

基于CiteSpace的国土空间用途分区研究进展

利用CiteSpace文献可视化软件和文献计量分析方法,分析1979—2020年CNKI期刊数据库中国国土空间用途分区研究的662篇相关文献,系统梳理其研究动态和发展脉络。结果发现：1）国土空间用途分区成果不断涌现,发文量总体呈上升趋势。总体可划分为土地用途分区（1992—2006年）、自然生态空间用途分区（2007—2017年）和国土空间用途分区（2018年至今）3个阶段,发文作者之间合作密切,形成具有规模的科研集群,“土地利用”这一关键词具有0.28的高中心性。2）国土空间用途分区研究政策导向性强,内容不断深化。分区理论、分区体系不断优化;研究方法从定性或定量转变为结合现代科学技术的应用;分区管制研究大多集中于现存问题发现、国外经验启示和分区实践研究3个方面。针对已有研究内容较为传统,科学验证研究不深,理论总结升华不够,以及对多学科融合和大数据的运用不足等问题,提出未来研究重点应包括：开展国土空间用途分区相关理论研究,深化生态空间、海洋空间与乡村建设空间用途分区研究,结合国土空间用途管制体系构建需求拓宽国土空间用途分区研究视角,基于多学科交叉融合开展方法与技术的创新应用等4个方面。