中亚地区中生代以来的地貌巨变与岩石圈动力学

中亚地区的地貌自中生代以来发生过两次巨变：一次是青藏高原的隆起,另一次是中生代中国东部高原及其西侧共存的中亚准平原的兴衰。青藏高原的隆起引起了全球气候和中亚环境的巨变。对此,自80年代以来开展的国际合作已经在地质学和地球物理学等研究领域取得了丰硕的成果。不过,在解释高原隆升—气候变化—剥蚀作用的相互关系方面仍存歧见。相比之下,中亚地区中生代的地貌巨变尚属新的研究课题。人们认识到,中亚地区在中侏罗世至新近纪曾存在一个准平原,而在中国东部则存在一个中生代高原。这一中生代地貌巨变引发出许多新的思考,如：为什么这一中生代准平原能保存长达150 Ma？中国东部高原是怎样形成的,又是怎样消失的？这两次地貌巨变及其相关的岩石圈动力学将是“TOPO?CENTRAL?ASIA”这一国际岩石圈计划项目的研究主题。     

亚洲地球动力系统的演进与东亚矿产资源效应

本文系统阐述了亚洲中部及邻区地球动力系统的演变进程及其所制约的区域地质和成矿特征,并提出了以下新认识和新观点:①在西伯利亚陆块与中朝—塔里木陆块之间的原"古亚洲洋"区域内是全球地史演化中具有双向侧向陆缘增生与垂向增生同时发展的"双向增生"独特地区。②"古中国陆块群"是位于劳亚古陆和冈瓦纳古陆之间独立存在的古陆。由于它的特殊位置而构成了古亚洲洋与特提斯洋的"分水岭"。③地球动力学的"内动力"归根到底来自地球自身的两个方面:一是地球自转和公转形成的离心力(拉张力)与挤压力,它是地球动力学的基础,二是地球内部永不衰败的"高热能库"。当今地震、火山等等,都是地下过饱和的高热能向地表释放的一瞬间转变为强动能的地质事件。④由地球动力系统演变打造的具有不同特征的断裂系统是控矿储矿的良好空间,因此"断裂系统找矿法"是简便有效的找矿方法之一。据此提出了4个理论指导找矿的试点和验证区。     

Late Paleozoic and Early Mesozoic rare-metal magmatism of Central Asia: Stages, provinces, and formation settings

Late Paleozoic and Early Mesozoic epochs in the formation history of the Central Asian Foldbelt are distinguished by high rare-metal productivity. A number of large REE, Ta, Nb, Zr, Be, Sn, Li, Mo, Re, and other deposits were formed at that time. As a rule, they are of the magmatic origin and related to the intrusions of highly evolved igneous rocks varying in composition from alkaline ultramafic with carbonatites to alkali and Li-F granites. In general, the occurrences of rare-metal magmatism are related to the rift zones of the Central Asian Rift System formed 310?C190 Ma ago and conjugated with a consecutive series of the Barguzin, Hangay, and Hentiy zonal igneous provinces characterized by the large batholiths in their centers and rift zones in the framework. Such a structure indicates that these provinces were formed above isometric mantle sources or plumes with participation of large-scale crustal anatexis. The evident links of rare-metal deposits to occurrences of mantle magmatism within the zonal igneous provinces show that plume sources played an important role in their formation.     

Paleozoic Tectono-Metallogeny in the Tianshan-Altay Region, Central Asia

The research on Paleozoic tectonics and endogenic metallogeny in the Tianshan-Altay region of Central Asia is an important and significant project. The Altay region, as a collision zone of the Early Paleozoic(500–397 Ma), and the Tianshan region, as a collision zone of the early period in the Late Paleozoic(Late Devonian-Early Carboniferous, 385–323 Ma), are all the result of nearly N-S trending shortening and collision(according to recent magnetic orientation). In the Late Devonian-Early Carboniferous period(385–323 Ma), regional NW trending faults displayed features of dextral strike-slip motion in the Altay and Junggar regions. In the Tianshan region, nearly EW-trending regional faults are motions of the thrusts. However, in the Late Carboniferous-Early Permian period(323–260 Ma), influenced by the long-distance effect induced from the Ural collision zone, those areas suffered weaker eastward compression, the existing NW trending faults converted into sinistral strike-slip in the Altay and Junggar regions, and the existing nearly E-W trending faults transferred into dextral strike-slip faults in the Tianshan region. The Rocks of those regions in the Late Carboniferous-Early Permian period(323–260 Ma) were moderately ruptured to a certain tension-shear, and thus formed a number of world famous giant endogenic metal ore deposits in the Tianshan-Altay region. As to the Central Asian continent, the most powerful collision period may not coincide with the most favorable endogenic metallogenic period. It should be treated to "the orogenic metallogeny hypothesis" with caution in that region.     

Paleozoic Tectono-Metallogeny in the Tianshan-Altay Region, Central Asia

The research on Paleozoic tectonics and endogenic metallogeny in the Tianshan-Altay region of Central Asia is an important and significant project. The Altay region, as a collision zone of the Early Paleozoic (500–397 Ma), and the Tianshan region, as a collision zone of the early period in the Late Paleozoic (Late Devonian-Early Carboniferous, 385–323 Ma), are all the result of nearly N-S trending shortening and collision (according to recent magnetic orientation). In the Late Devonian-Early Carboniferous period (385–323 Ma), regional NW trending faults displayed features of dextral strike-slip motion in the Altay and Junggar regions. In the Tianshan region, nearly EW-trending regional faults are motions of the thrusts. However, in the Late Carboniferous-Early Permian period (323–260 Ma), influenced by the long-distance effect induced from the Ural collision zone, those areas suffered weaker eastward compression, the existing NW trending faults converted into sinistral strike-slip in the Altay and Junggar regions, and the existing nearly E-W trending faults transferred into dextral strike-slip faults in the Tianshan region. The Rocks of those regions in the Late Carboniferous-Early Permian period (323–260 Ma) were moderately ruptured to a certain tension-shear, and thus formed a number of world famous giant endogenic metal ore deposits in the Tianshan-Altay region. As to the Central Asian continent, the most powerful collision period may not coincide with the most favorable endogenic metallogenic period. It should be treated to “the orogenic metallogeny hypothesis” with caution in that region.     

巴尔喀什成矿带晚古生代地壳增生与构造演化

巴尔喀什成矿带是中亚成矿域重要的晚古生代斑岩铜钼成矿带。巴尔喀什成矿带晚古生代花岗岩类(石炭-二叠纪)主要为高钾钙碱性系列,晚期出现钾玄岩系列岩石,主要为I型花岗岩类;石炭纪处在同碰撞和火山弧环境,二叠纪为后碰撞环境。分析表明,博尔雷属于经典的岛弧花岗岩区,科翁腊德、阿克斗卡和萨亚克属于埃达克岩(Adakite)区。巴尔喀什成矿带内花岗岩类εNd(t)值为(-5.87～+5.94),εSr(t)值为(-17.16～+51.10)。以巴尔喀什中央断裂为界,成矿带东、西分带,断裂两侧具有不同的地壳生长历史:断裂以东的萨亚克和阿克斗卡地区εNd(t)值较高,具有亏损地幔组分特征,为古生代增生的新生陆壳;以西的科翁腊德和博尔雷εNd(t)值较低,主要是壳幔岩浆混合的结果,反映了古老基底的存在,主要为新元古代增生地壳。成矿带花岗岩类206Pb/204Pb、207Pb/204Pb和208Pb/204Pb比值范围分别为18.3346～20.9929、15.5213～15.7321和38.2874～40.0209,为造山带花岗岩类,具有与天山、阿尔泰和准噶尔花岗岩类的亲缘性。     

Biostratigraphy of Paleozoic Tabulata and Heliolitida of Central Asia

In Soviet Central Asia (Tien Shan and Pamirs) corals are unknown in the Lower Ordovician, rare and unstudied in the Middle Ordovician. The tabulate coral record from the Upper Ordovician, Silurian and Devonian is excellent and numerous common and Key genera and species are enumerated for each stage or substage. Tabulata reached their peak development in the Wenlock, and had markedly decreased in numbers and variety by late Middle Devonian time. Tabulata are rare in Upper Devonian and later rocks but occur through the Carboniferous and into the Upper Permian. -- W. A. Oliver, Jr.     

中亚巴尔喀什成矿带晚古生代最晚期岩浆侵入事件及其热演化历史

哈萨克斯坦巴尔喀什成矿带是中亚成矿域重要的晚古生代斑岩铜钼和云英岩-石英脉型钨钼成矿带,是受走滑断裂边界控制的中亚多核成矿系统的核心之一。本文根据锆石SHRIMP U-Pb定年、40Ar/39Ar热年代学、磷灰石裂变径迹定年和热历史模拟,厘定了巴尔喀什成矿带西部地区晚古生代最晚期深成岩浆侵入事件。研究表明,原来被认为是属于三叠纪的后碰撞花岗岩类侵入岩体,给出锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄为289.7±2.3Ma,为早二叠世。结合前人研究,本文探讨了巴尔喀什成矿带西部从深成岩浆侵入、钨钼成矿作用、区域冷却到剥露作用热历史的全过程。晚古生代最晚期花岗岩类侵入体具有与钨钼矿床相同的晚中生代剥露作用年龄(92.4±5.9Ma)。     

秦岭造山带古生代岩浆作用及地球动力学意义

秦岭造山带记录了华南华北板块聚合的完整过程.古生代岩浆岩记录了造山过程中的壳幔相互作用和造山带演化的动力学过程.古生代的中基性岩浆岩揭示了俯冲隧道内变质脱水交代岩石圈地幔过程,其中富水基性杂岩为富钾基性岩,地球化学特征显示其地幔源区经历了洋壳沉积物的交代;看丰沟岩体为高镁闪长岩,地球化学特征显示其来自经历俯冲流体交代的地幔源区.通过对古生代岩浆岩的研究发现,其具有明显的时空分布规律,它们对应于原特提斯洋俯冲、后撤、前进和回转等过程.所以壳幔相互作用发生在原特提斯洋俯冲过程中.      

东北亚晚古生代—中生代岩浆时空演化:多重板块构造体制范围及叠合的鉴别证据

东北亚大地构造发展经历了古亚洲洋、蒙古—鄂霍茨克洋和古太平洋的俯冲-碰撞作用。如何鉴别和厘定这三种构造体制的时空影响范围和叠合过程一直是一个难题。本文通过巨型岩浆岩带的建库编图,揭示了该地区晚古生代—中生代岩浆岩的时空迁移规律;据此,探讨和厘定了这三大板块构造体制的时空分布范围和构造叠合过程。二叠纪到三叠纪早期间,古亚洲洋体制经历了俯冲到碰撞,主要作用于阿拉善—华北北缘—大兴安岭一带;期间,鄂霍茨克洋主要为陆缘环境,影响范围限于中北部蒙古—外贝加尔一带,并在侏罗纪逐渐向蒙古—鄂霍茨克主缝合带迁移,到白垩纪,其造山带伸展垮塌阶段,影响范围增大,远程效应波及阿拉善—华北北缘—大兴安岭一带,叠加于古亚洲洋体制产物之上。古太平洋构造体制主要发育于三叠纪—侏罗纪时期,其平板俯冲影响范围抵达大兴安岭—太行山,在白垩纪,俯冲板片后撤,影响范围迁移至东亚大陆最东缘。这些作用叠加于古亚洲洋体制产物之上;并与蒙古—鄂霍茨克洋体制同时叠合于大兴安岭一带。     

The Paleozoic evolution of Central Tianshan: Geochemical and geochronological evidence

A suite of Paleozoic granitoids in Central Tianshan was studied for both geochemistry and geochronology in an effort to constrain their origin and tectonic setting. We combined LA-ICP-MS dating of zircon, standard geochemical analyses and Hf-isotopic studies of zircon to develop our tectonic model. Based on our analysis, the granitoids formed in three distinctive stages: ~ 450–400 Ma, ~ 370–350 Ma and ca. 340 Ma. The first stage (450–400 Ma) granitoids exhibit metaluminous, magnesian, high-K to shoshonitic characteristics of I-type granitoids (arc-setting), that are enriched in LREE relative to HREE with high (La/Yb)_CN values, show negative Eu anomaly and are depleted in Nb, Ta and Ti. This phase of granitoid emplacement was most likely related to the southward subduction of the Paleo-Tianshan Ocean beneath the Tarim block and the subsequent Central Tianshan arc. In contrast, the second stage granitoids (370–350 Ma) are distinctly different and are classified as calc-alkaline or shoshonitic plutons with a weak positive Eu anomaly. Within the second stage granitoids, it appears that the earlier (~ 365 Ma) granitoids fit within the A-type field whereas the younger (~ 352 Ma) granitoids plot within the post-collisional potassic field. These granitoids formed during collisions between Central Tianshan and the Tuha terrane that occurred along the northern margin of Central Tianshan. Lastly, the ca. 340 Ma granitoids are typical of volcanic arc granitoids again that probably formed during the northward subduction of the South Tianshan Ocean beneath the Central Tianshan landmass or the subsequent southward subduction of the residual Paleo-Tianshan Ocean.The Hf isotopic data of zircons from all the studied granitoids were pooled and yielded three prominent Hf T_DM^C model age populations: ca. 2400 Ma, ca. 1400 Ma and ca. 1100 Ma. The Hf-data shows a significant input of juvenile crust in addition to crustal recycling. We interpret these three phases of juvenile crustal addition to phases of global growth of continental crust (~ 2400 Ma), the addition of juvenile crust during the breakup of the Columbia supercontinent (~ 1400 Ma) and the assembly of Rodinia (~ 1100 Ma).     

Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt in NE China

The eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) in NE China is a key area for investigating continental growth. However, the complexity of its Paleozoic geological history has meant that the tectonic development of this belt is not fully understood. NE China is composed of the Erguna and Jiamusi blocks in the northern and eastern parts and the Xing’an and Songliao-Xilinhot accretionary terranes in the central and southern parts. The Erguna and Jiamusi blocks have Precambrian basements with Siberia and Gondwana affinities, respectively. In contrast, the Xing ’an and Songliao-Xilinhot accretionary terranes were formed via subduction and collision processes. These blocks and terranes were separated by the Xinlin-Xiguitu, Heilongjiang, Nenjiang, and Solonker oceans from north to south, and these oceans closed during the Cambrian (ca. 500 Ma), Late Silurian (ca. 420 Ma), early Late Carboniferous (ca. 320 Ma), and Late Permian to Middle Triassic (260 –240 Ma), respectively, forming the Xinlin-Xiguitu, Mudanjiang-Yilan, Hegenshan-Heihe, Solonker-Linxi, and Changchun-Yanji suture zones. Two oceanic tectonic cycles took place in the eastern Paleo-Asian Ocean (PAO), namely, the Early Paleozoic cycle involving the Xinlin-Xiguitu and Heilongjiang oceans and the late Paleozoic cycle involving the Nenjiang-Solonker oceans. The Paleozoic tectonic pattern of the eastern CAOB generally shows structural features that trend east-west. The timing of accretion and collision events of the eastern CAOB during the Paleozoic youngs progressively from north to south. The branch ocean basins of the eastern PAO closed from west to east in a scissor-like manner. A bi-directional subduction regime dominated during the narrowing and closure process of the eastern PAO, which led to “soft collision” of tectonic units on each side, forming huge accretionary orogenic belts in central Asia.©2022 China Geology Editorial Office.     

Early Paleozoic tectonics and geodynamics of Central Asia: role of mantle plumes

There were two key stages in the history of Paleozoids that formed in the place of the Paleoasian ocean, one in the Cambrian–Ordovician and the other in the Permian–Triassic. Both time spans were characterized by a combination of similar geodynamic, magmatic, and geomagnetic events: closure and opening of oceanic basins, intense plume magmatism associated with Earth's core cooling, and absence of geomagnetic reversals (superchrons). Three superchrons about 490–460, 260–300, and 124–86 Ma correlate with major events of plume magmatism. Plume reconstructions have to be updated for the period 490–460 Ma, which corresponded to the third superchron and was marked by ocean opening. The previous superplume, about 800–740 Ma, requires further justification but fits the global periodicity with 240 Ma major cycles and smaller ones of 120 (or also 30) Ma.In the Late Cambrian–Ordovician, large-scale accretion and collision events acted, in similar tectonic settings, upon the vast territory that currently extends from the Polar Urals to Lake Baikal (and was times larger in the past). As a result, Gondwanian microcontinents (Kokchetav, Altai–Mongolia, Tuva–Mongolia, etc.) and island arcs joined into the Kazakhstan–Tuva–Mongolia system. The formation of the Late Cambrian–Ordovician orogen in Central Asia was synchronous with opening of the Ural, Ob–Zaisan, Turkestan, and Paleotethys oceans. The plume pulses (520–500 and 490–460 Ma) may have been responsible for opening of new oceans, accelerated amalgamation of terranes, and synchronicity in geodynamic events from the Urals to Transbaikalia.     

中亚费尔干纳盆地构造演化和油气远景浅析

中亚地区油气资源丰富并且出口潜力巨大,加强与中亚国家的能源合作可以增加我国能源安全的系数。本文以中亚费尔干纳盆地为主要研究对象,通过野外构造变形的解析,发现盆缘发育典型的无序型逆冲断层。以此为基础,结合盆地的沉积环境更替,讨论了费尔干纳盆地中生代以来的构造演化。费尔干纳盆地的基底形成于晚古生代,与石炭纪末期南天山洋的关闭有关。三叠纪至侏罗纪,费尔干纳盆地进入了陆内坳陷阶段,沉积了一套河湖相碎屑岩。侏罗纪末期至白垩纪的早期,受中特提斯洋关闭的影响,费尔干纳盆地进入挤压阶段。白垩纪至古近纪,天山造山带以南地区受新特提斯洋扩张的影响,发生了区域性海侵事件,生物繁盛,沉积了优质的烃源岩。古近纪与新近纪之交,随着阿拉伯地块与欧亚大陆的碰撞,新特提斯洋最终关闭,盆地再次进入挤压阶段。新近纪至第四纪时期,盆地内沉积了巨厚的陆相碎屑,不整合地覆盖于古近系之上。受印度与欧亚大陆持续汇聚作用影响,费尔干纳盆地在第四纪进入了前陆盆地演化阶段。通过南天山板块缝合带南、北两侧含油气盆地生储盖组合及构造演化的对比,发现费尔干纳盆地上古生界具有较好的油气资源潜力。我们的研究扩展了费尔干纳盆地的油气前景。     

中扬子区东缘中古生界对冲构造体系形成与演化

中扬子区东缘侏罗纪末期—白垩纪早期,受大洪山推覆区南西方向和江南雪峰逆冲推覆区北西方向的强烈挤压,形成了压扭性狭长的对冲构造体系; 两大推覆区的形成主要受深、浅变质岩结晶基底内幕两套拆离滑脱层系的作用,导致沉积盖层压缩沿基底面、志留系底面、泥盆系底面多层次滑脱推覆,产生了多样的挤压和压扭构造类型及其样式; 由造山带向盆内构造变形具有渐变的特点,为不对称式的仰冲(根带)—楔状掩冲(中带)—滑脱推覆(锋带)—对冲带; 持续压扭作用导致产生系列北东向左行走滑断裂将对冲构造体系分割; 白垩纪晚期—下第三纪,挤压转换为伸展环境,断裂负反转回滑成为中新生代断陷主控断裂,认为大洪山推覆区锋带已处于通海口—杨林尾—汉南一线,主体由于受洪湖走滑断裂和通海口断裂回滑的影响,接受了上白垩统—第四系沉积,仅保留了东、西两端弧形构造带古生界出露的构造面貌。     

中亚盆地群石炭-二叠纪岩相古地理恢复及演化

近十年来,尽管准噶尔盆地上古生界油气勘探不断获得突破,准噶尔周缘盆地也相继有油气显示,但北疆地区含油气盆地的宏观构造背景与中亚含油气盆地群的关系还不清楚,尤其缺少板块尺度的岩相古地理分析。因此深入分析中亚盆地群石炭-二叠系的构造-岩相古地理是十分必要的。本文充分调研中亚盆地群区域地质、油气地质资料,从中亚盆地群古板块、古地理环境分析准噶尔盆地与中亚盆地群的大地构造背景,并结合构造大剖面和岩相发育特征,对中亚盆地群石炭-二叠纪岩相古地理进行研究,研究结果表明：（1）中亚盆地群石炭-二叠系的岩相特征具有明显的东西分带性,西侧的滨里海盆地、图尔盖盆地和楚-萨雷苏盆地以碳酸盐岩发育为主要岩性特征,东侧的斋桑盆地、准噶尔盆地和三塘湖盆地以火山岩和砂泥岩为主要岩性特征;（2）石炭纪时期,中亚西侧盆地群处于低纬度,气温较高,具有较为稳定的台地环境,广泛沉积碳酸盐岩,而中亚东侧盆地群处于中-低纬度,多以岛弧相为主,沉积火山岩和碎屑岩;（3）二叠纪时期,中亚盆地群已由海相沉积转化为陆相沉积,晚二叠世,中亚盆地群整体遭受抬升剥蚀,地层缺失,普遍存在不整合特征;（4）中亚地区石炭-二叠系岩相上的湖相中心和残余洋盆可作为石炭-二叠系油气勘探的重点。