My seismology journey with Donald V. Helmberger

My journey on the wiggles with Don started from February 2008,when I got an opportunity to visit the Caltech Seismolab as a visiting PhD student,which was made ...     

Donald V. Helmberger the Mentor

Don is certainly missed,by me,and by so many others.I particularly miss the constancy I derived by thinking of him down in Pasadena on the third floor of South ...     

In memory of Donald V. Helmberger

When I received the shocking news on August 13,2020 that our beloved Don passed away,I was deeply saddened.The feeling was worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic tha...     

The Lost and the Found: Memories of Donald V. Helmberger

My first exposure to Don Helmberger's work was during a seismology class in my 2nd year in college where several students,including myself,were to present on Gr...     

Data and curiosity: Working with mentor Donald V. Helmberger

I arrived at Caltech in June 1986,with interests in both mineral physics and seismology.I was excited to either study mineral physics with Professor Tom Ahrens,...     

Donald V. Helmberger,the master mentor: Testimonials from former international students

Don trained many Ph.D.students over the～5 decades of his career,at least 45 were advised or co-advised according to a Caltech account.A large number were intern...     

Preface to the special memorial issue for Professor Donald V. Helmberger

Donald Vincent Helmberger,Ph.D.and Smits Family Professor of Geophysics Emeritus at Caltech(Figure 1),one of the primary founders of seismic waveform modeling,w...     

A graduate student experience with Professor Donald V. Helmberger

A year after the passing of Don Helmberger,it is remarkable how memories of interactions with him over my entire professional career continue to spark affection...     

Donald V. Helmberger’s art and science of waveforms

I arrived at the Caltech Seismo Lab early in May 1972.The faculty and graduate students had the run of an old mansion(Donnelly Lab)that was slightly tattered ar...     

Memories of Donald V. Helmberger: Mentor and seismologist extraordinaire

I grew up in one of the most aseismic regions of the planet but decided as a child that I wanted to be a seismologist.Ignoring all the naysayers who claimed tha...     

Mesozoic and Cenozoic tectonics of the Møre Trøndelag Fault Complex,central Norway: constraints from new apatite fission track data

The Møre Trøndelag Fault Complex (MTFC) of central Norway is a long-lived structural zone whose tectonic history included dextral strike slip, sinistral strike slip, and vertical offset. Determination of an offset history for the MTFC is complicated by the lack of well preserved stratigraphic markers. However, low temperature apatite fission track (AFT) thermochronology offers important new clues by allowing the determination of exhumation histories for individual fault blocks presently exposed within the MTFC area. Previously published AFT data from crystalline basement in and near the MTFC suggest the region has a complicated pattern of exhumation. We present new AFT data from a NW–SE transect perpendicular to the principal structural grain of the MTFC. FT analyses of 15 apatite samples yielded apparent ages between 90 and 300 Ma, with mean FT length ranging from 11.8 to 13.5 μm. Thermal models based upon the age and track length data show the MTFC is comprised by multiple structural blocks with individual exhumation histories that are discrete at the 2σ confidence level. Thermal modeling of the AFT data indicates exhumation progressed from west to east, and that the final juxtaposition and exhumation of the innermost blocks took place during Cretaceous or Tertiary (possibly Neogene) time. We suggest that least some of the fracture lineaments of central Norway were re-activated during Mesozoic extension and the opening of the Norwegian sea, and may have remained active into the Cenozoic.     

V. A. Troitskaya: the Founder of the Russian School of Geomagnetic Pulsations

A thorough investigation of short-period oscillations in the Earth’s magnetic field as a fundamental natural process of the magnetospheric plasma began in Russia after V.A. Troitskaya established two oscillatory regimes in the geomagnetic field, namely, the regimes of continuous (Pc) and irregular pulsations (Pi). For studying these pulsations, 19 stations recording the telluric currents were installed during the International Geophysical Year (IGY, 1957–1959) on Troitskaya’s initiative. One of these stations was the Borok station. Subsequently, Borok has become the basic site for investigating geomagnetic pulsations and the main center for studying the short-period pulsations (SPPs) in the Earth’s magnetic field. This is the Borok scientific station where the key fundamental regularities of different types of geomagnetic pulsations were established. Troitskaya led and actively participated these works. Troitskaya organized and conducted the first complex geomagnetic observations in the world at the conjugate points Sogra (Arkhangelsk region, Russia) and Kerguelen (Indian Ocean). These studies were initially tested at the Borok observatory, where it was established that the wave packets of Pc1 geomagnetic pulsations are alternately observed in the northern and southern hemispheres in contrast to the other pulsation types which simultaneously occur in both hemispheres. The studies carried out at Borok promoted the establishment of a new direction in geophysics—diagnostics of the state of the magnetosphere based on the ground observations of geomagnetic pulsations. The analysis of simultaneous observations of the geomagnetic pulsations at polar latitudes of the Arctic and Antarctic was also for the first time conducted at the Borok observatory. This analysis revealed the main characteristics of wave phenomena at the geomagnetic poles and in the vicinity of the projection of the dayside polar cusp. Thus, for the first time in the world, Troitskaya and her Borok colleagues established the key patterns of the oscillatory regimes in the geomagnetic field of the Earth. This laid the basis for the further experimental and theoretical investigations which have shown that SPPs play a leading role in the dynamics of the magnetospheric plasma. In this paper we also list of 60 of Troitskaya’s main publications.     

A reply to the discussion of the [I,S] diagram by V.M. Oversby

Despite Oversby's [1] belief, the [I,S] diagram [2] is as much sensitive as the [α, β] diagram since both of them are based on the same isotopic evolution equations. Also, we do insist again on the greater simplicity of the [I,S] diagram in process in Pb-Pb data for whole rock series to study global isotopic evolution, and most particularly in the case where initial isotopic composition for the series considered cannot be measured.     

2008年1月5日磁层亚暴期间磁尾近地重联事件的THEMIS观测与分析

本文主要应用THEMIS卫星的磁场和等离子体流观测数据,分析了2008年1月5日08∶51~08∶57 UT亚暴膨胀相期间磁尾的一个近地重联事件.在亚暴膨胀相期间,地面的全天空成像仪清楚地记录到了极光的极向扩展,THEMIS的P5卫星在地球同步轨道附近观测到了磁场的偶极化现象.在亚暴膨胀相末期的08∶51~08∶57 UT期间,P3(X_GSM~-9.12R_E) 和P4 (X_GSM ~-9.40R_E) 同时观测到了一对方向相反的高速等离子体流.这对方向相反的高速等离子体流是由磁尾的重联现象所引起.重联的位置被估计位于X_GSM ~-9.12R_E 和X_GSM~-9.40R_E之间较小的空间范围内.并且,在重联位置的两侧,重联的Hall效应被P3和P4两颗卫星观测到.因此,这一磁尾重联事件发生在距离地球非常近的空间范围内.