共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
通过把不确定度作为参数融入到函数模型,建立了不确定性平差模型。依据残差中不确定性传播规律,确定了残差最大不确定度达到最小的平差准则,利用迭代算法得到了不确定性平差模型的解算方法。通过实例分析了最小二乘平差、整体最小二乘平差和不确定性平差准则下最优解的不同特点。 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
主要研究参数带有区间约束的平差算法,通过把平差问题转化成一个带有区间约束的二次规划问题,利用积极集对二次规划问题进行划分与重组,结合无约束共轭梯度优化算法,给出了带有区间约束的平差算法,并同时给出了参数解的精度评估。由于投影梯度法可以迅速改变积极约束集的构成,新的算法比经典的积极集法效率更高,可以降低模型的不适定性,保持参数先验信息中的统计、几何或物理意义,适合于求解大规模的带有区间约束的平差问题。 相似文献
7.
《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》2020,(7)
大地测量中各种异方差多源观测模型进行融合都需要进行混合估计。由于附加信息和样本信息在估计过程中作用是不均等的,需要建立新的加权平差准则,平衡先验约束和观测信息对参数估计的影响。把多源观测数据看成是观测信息和一些随机约束信息,首先利用椭球近似描述有界不确定信息,建立了基于外接椭球特征矩阵迹最小的平差准则,然后提出了一个新的观测信息融合方法,并给出了一种优化权的计算方法,使得加权混合估计方法能有效应用于大地测量数据处理,最后,通过算例验证了算法的有效性,说明了集员估计解与带权混合估计的关系。 相似文献
8.
9.
刘经南 《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》1983,8(1):37-50
本文阐述了卫星网与地面网联合平差中Bursa模型所确定的参考椭球中心位置与Молоденский和Veis两个模型所确定的参考中心几何意义上的差别,导出了三个模型转换参数之间的变换矩阵,进而证明了以上三个模型在确定转换参数的联合平差中的等价性。指出三个模型方程状态上的差异对联合平差及坐标系统转换的最后结果和精度来说,并无丝毫影响。 相似文献
10.
观测数据中常包含统计信息未知的不确定性,可能导致所建立的函数模型产生病态,影响参数估计的准确性和可靠性。文中研究GPS高程拟合模型的不确定性,将系数矩阵进行分块,对含有不确定性的区块加以限制,并将不确定度融入函数模型,利用min-max准则,运用带部分不确定性的平差算法(PULS,Least-Squares with Part of Uncertainty)解算拟合参数。实验中选取均匀分布的模拟点坐标及其高程异常值,分别运用最小二乘(LeastSquares,LS)、总体最小二乘(Total Least-Squares,TLS)以及PULS对拟合参数进行解算,结果表明,PULS得到的拟合参数精度高于LS和TLS,说明PULS在GPS高程拟合中应用的有效性。 相似文献
11.
12.
应用文献 [1 ]推导出的球谐系数与椭球谐系数的转换关系 ,给出了椭球界面下Neumann边值问题的积分解 相似文献
13.
陈月梅 《测绘与空间地理信息》2006,29(5):66-68
提出了在局部区域的椭球面上建立数字高程模型的原理和方法。这种椭球面的DEM是在区域性椭球面上基于新大地坐标系建立的,不同于现有的基于投影平面的DEM。由于未经过从椭球面到平面的投影,从而杜绝了投影变形,也消除了平面位置与水准高程之间作为3维坐标的不兼容性。在具体建模中,直接基于与测区平均高程面最优拟合的区域性椭球面,采用格网DEM的建模方法来建立椭球面DEM。 相似文献
14.
Christopher Kotsakis 《Journal of Geodesy》2008,82(4-5):261-260
Transforming height information that refers to an ellipsoidal Earth reference model, such as the geometric heights determined
from GPS measurements or the geoid undulations obtained by a gravimetric geoid solution, from one geodetic reference frame
(GRF) to another is an important task whose proper implementation is crucial for many geodetic, surveying and mapping applications.
This paper presents the required methodology to deal with the above problem when we are given the Helmert transformation parameters
that link the underlying Cartesian coordinate systems to which an Earth reference ellipsoid is attached. The main emphasis
is on the effect of GRF spatial scale differences in coordinate transformations involving reference ellipsoids, for the particular
case of heights. Since every three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system ‘gauges’ an attached ellipsoid according to its
own accessible scale, there will exist a supplementary contribution from the scale variation between the involved GRFs on
the relative size of their attached reference ellipsoids. Neglecting such a scale-induced indirect effect corrupts the values
for the curvilinear geodetic coordinates obtained from a similarity transformation model, and meter-level apparent offsets
can be introduced in the transformed heights. The paper explains the above issues in detail and presents the necessary mathematical
framework for their treatment.
An erratum to this article can be found at 相似文献
15.
借助以地心参考椭球面为边界面的第二大地边值问题的理论,基于Helmert空间的Neumann边值条件,给定Helmert扰动位的椭球解表达式,并详细推导第二类勒让德函数及其导数的递推关系、Helmert扰动位函数的椭球积分解以及类椭球Hotine积分核函数的实用计算公式,便于后续椭球域第二大地边值问题的实际研究。 相似文献
16.
L. E. Sjöberg 《Journal of Geodesy》2003,77(3-4):139-147
Assuming that the gravity anomaly and disturbing potential are given on a reference ellipsoid, the result of Sjöberg (1988, Bull Geod 62:93–101) is applied to derive the potential coefficients on the bounding sphere of the ellipsoid to order e
2 (i.e. the square of the eccentricity of the ellipsoid). By adding the potential coefficients and continuing the potential downward to the reference ellipsoid, the spherical Stokes formula and its ellipsoidal correction are obtained. The correction is presented in terms of an integral over the unit sphere with the spherical approximation of geoidal height as the argument and only three well-known kernel functions, namely those of Stokes, Vening-Meinesz and the inverse Stokes, lending the correction to practical computations. Finally, the ellipsoidal correction is presented also in terms of spherical harmonic functions. The frequently applied and sometimes questioned approximation of the constant m, a convenient abbreviation in normal gravity field representations, by e
2/2, as introduced by Moritz, is also discussed. It is concluded that this approximation does not significantly affect the ellipsoidal corrections to potential coefficients and Stokes formula. However, whether this standard approach to correct the gravity anomaly agrees with the pure ellipsoidal solution to Stokes formula is still an open question. 相似文献
17.
建立达州市中心城区CGCS2000坐标系时,投影变形值已经大于2.5 cm/km ,需要根据城市中心离中央子午线的距离和城市平均高程面,确定了建立达州市相对独立坐标系的方案,通过边长的高程归化和高斯投影改化,最终解算出地方椭球基于2000国家大地坐标系的椭球参数。 相似文献
18.
The Gauss conformal mappings (GCMs) of an oblate ellipsoid of revolution to a sphere are those that transform the meridians into meridians, and the parallels into parallels of the sphere. The infinitesimal-scale function associated with these mappings depends on the geodetic latitude and contains three parameters, including the radius of the sphere. Gauss derived these constants by imposing local optimum conditions on certain parallel. We deal with the problem of finding the constants to minimize the Chebyshev or maximum norm of the logarithm of the infinitesimal-scale function on a given ellipsoidal segment (the region contained between two parallels). We show how to solve this minimax problem using the intrinsic function fminsearch of Matlab. For a particular ellipsoidal segment, we get the solution and show the alternation property characteristic of best Chebyshev approximations. For a pair of points relatively close in the ellipsoid at different latitudes, the best minimax GCM on the segment defined by these points is used to approximate the geodesic distance between them by the spherical distance between their projections on the corresponding sphere. This approach, combined with the best locally GCM if the points are on the same parallel, is illustrated by applying it to some case studies but specially to a 10° × 10° region contained between portions of two parallels and two meridians. In this case, the maximum absolute error of this spherical approximation is equal to 2.9 mm occurring at a distance about 1,360 km. This error decreases up to 0.94 mm on an 8° × 8° region of this type. So, the spherical approximation to the solution of the inverse geodesic problem by best GCM can be acceptable in many practical geodetic activities. 相似文献