| 不同GPS掩星电离层剖面产品相关性分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周荣,侯威震,曾晨曦,张绍成,柴炳阳. 不同GPS掩星电离层剖面产品相关性分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(11): 31-38,73. DOI: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2019.0347 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周荣 侯威震 曾晨曦 张绍成 柴炳阳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南测绘职业学院,河南 郑州,451464;自然资源部职业技能鉴定指导中心,北京,100830;中国地质大学信息工程学院,湖北 武汉,430074 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（CUGL150839）；国家自然科学青年基金（41504023） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 将在一定时空限定范围内的不同低轨卫星COSMIC、GRACE、CHAMP、FY3C的电离层掩星电子密度剖面定义为一个掩星对来对比分析不同类型掩星电离层产品。结果表明：COSMIC掩星对之间的电子密度剖面整体轮廓符合得很好，电子密度剖面主要在250 km以下和500 km以上存在较大的偏差，250~500 km的电子密度整体偏差较小，统计得到的COSMIC掩星对的电子密度参量NmF2和hmF2的相关系数能分别达到0.99和0.97，具有高度相关性，不同COSMIC卫星之间没有明显的系统误差；COSMIC、GRACE、CHAMP和FY3C不同低轨卫星间的电子密度剖面略有差异，通过统计电子密度参量NmF2和hmF2之间的相关系数，COSMIC和CHAMP的相关系数分别为0.95和0.86，COSMIC和GRACE的相关系数分别为0.98和0.94，COSMIC和FY3C的相关系数分别为0.96和0.92，不同掩星类型之间的电子密度参量之间也具有高度相关性，验证了不同卫星任务GPS掩星电离层剖面的一致性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 电离层 相关性分析 GPS掩星 |
| 收稿时间： | 2019-06-24 |
Correlation analysis of ionospheric profiles for different GPS occultation missions |
| |
| ZHOU Rong,HOU Weizhen,ZENG Chenxi,ZHANG Shaocheng,CHAI Bingyang. Correlation analysis of ionospheric profiles for different GPS occultation missions[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2019, 0(11): 31-38,73. DOI: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2019.0347 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Rong HOU Weizhen ZENG Chenxi ZHANG Shaocheng CHAI Bingyang |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Henan College of Surveying and Mapping, Zhengzhou 451464, China;2. Vocational Skill Appraisal Guidance Center of the Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100830, China;3. China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The occultation ionospheric electron density profile events obtained by low-orbit satellites COSMIC、GRACE、CHAMP and FY3C are defined as an occultation pair in a certain range to analyze the different types of occultation ionospheric products. The results show that:the silhouette of the electron density profile between COSMIC occultation consistent well,there are big deviation under 250 km and 500 km above,the deviation is small between 250~500 km,the correlation coefficient of NmF2 and hmF2 can reach 0.99 and 0.97,there are no obvious bias between different COSMIC satellites. The electron density profile have different differences between LEO satellite. By calculating electron density parameters(NmF2 and hmF2), the correlation coefficient of NmF2 and hmF2 between the COSMIC and CHAMP are 0.95 and 0.86 respectively, the correlation coefficient between COSMIC and GRACE are 0.98 and 0.94,the correlation coefficient between COSMIC and FY3C are 0.96 and 0.92. The electron density parameters of different occultation types also have high correlation which could validate the consistence of the GPS radio occultation profiles from different LEO satellite missions. |
| |
| Keywords: | ionosphere correlation analysis GPS occultation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《测绘通报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《测绘通报》下载全文 |
|
